Systemic Lupus ErythematosusPhase 3NCT03312907
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab Administered in Combination With Rituximab to Adult Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) - BLISS-BELIEVE
A Phase 3 study testing Belimumab, Rituximab and Standard therapy (Including Immunosuppressants) in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 79 sites in 11 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess whether co-administration of belimumab and a single cycle of rituximab will optimize treatment with belimumab, which will result in improvements of clinical status with a favorable safety profile, by comparing subjects randomized to belimumab plus rituximab versus belimumab plus… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- What is being tested?
- Belimumab, Rituximab and Standard therapy (Including Immunosuppressants)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 292 participants
- Where
- 79 sitesin 11 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2018to 7 Jul 2021
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects must be >=18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent.
- Subjects who have clinical diagnosis of SLE based on 4 or more of the 11 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria.
- Subjects who have a screening SLEDAI-2K score >=6 (This refers to the total score. Serological activity, i.e., anti-double stranded deoxyribonucleic acid [dsDNA]) positivity and/or hypocomplementemia is not required to be present in SLEDAI-2K assessment, but are scored if present).
- Subjects who have unequivocally positive autoantibody test results defined as an anti-nuclear (ANA) titer >=1:80 and/or a positive anti-dsDNA (>=30 International Units per milliliter [IU/mL]) serum antibody test from 2 independent time points as follows: Positive test results from 2 independent time points within the study screening period. Screening results must be based on the study's central laboratory results. Or, one positive historical test result and 1 positive test result during the screening period.
- Subjects who are on a stable SLE treatment regimen consisting of any of these medications (alone or in combination) for a period of at least 30 days prior to Day 1 (i.e. day of first dose of study treatment) with the exception that switching one agent for another of the same class for tolerability or availability reasons, which will be allowed within 30 days of Day 1: Corticosteroids (prednisone or prednisone equivalent); For those subjects on alternating daily doses of steroids, use the average of 2 daily doses to calculate the average daily steroid dose; Any immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory agents including methotrexate, azathioprine, leflunomide, mycophenolate (including mycophenolate mofetil, mycophenolate mofetil hydrochloride, and mycophenolate sodium), calcineurin inhibitors (example [e.g.] tacrolimus, cyclosporine), sirolimus, oral cyclophosphamide, 6-mercaptopurine, mizoribine, or thalidomide; Anti-malarials (e.g., hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, quinacrine); Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
- Male and/or female. A female subject is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant not breastfeeding, and at least one of the these conditions applies: Not a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) or A WOCBP who agrees to follow the contraceptive guidance during the treatment period and for at least 16 weeks after the last dose of belimumab, or at least 12 months after the last dose of rituximab or rituximab-placebo.
- Capable of giving signed informed consent which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent form (ICF) and in this protocol.
Who cannot join
- Symptomatic herpes zoster within 3 months prior to screening.
- Evidence of active or latent tuberculosis (TB). Documentation may include medical history and examination, chest X-rays (posterior, anterior, and lateral), and TB testing: either a positive tuberculin skin test (TST; defined as a skin induration ≥5 mm at 48 to 72 hours, regardless of Baccillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) or other vaccination history) or a positive (not indeterminate) QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus test.
- Significant allergies to humanized monoclonal antibodies.
- History of hypersensitivity to belimumab and/or rituximab or known to have titers of human anti-mouse antibody or history of hypersensitivity reactions when treated with other diagnostic or therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.
- Lymphoma, leukemia, or any malignancy within the past 5 years (yrs) except for basal cell or squamous epithelial carcinomas of the skin that have been resected with no evidence of metastatic disease for 3 yrs.
- Alanine transferase (ALT) greater than 2 times upper limit of normal (ULN).
Show all 32Show fewer
- Bilirubin greater than 1.5 times ULN (isolated bilirubin greater than 1.5 times ULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin less than 35%).
- Immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency (IgA level less than 10 milligram per deciliter [mg/dL]).
- Immunoglobulin G (IgG) less than 250 mg/dL. For Germany only, IgG less than 400mg/dL.
- Neutrophils less than 1.5 times 10^9.
- Current unstable liver or biliary disease per investigator assessment defined by the presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminemia, esophageal or gastric varices, persistent jaundice, or cirrhosis.
- Severe heart failure (New York Heart Association Class IV) or other severe, uncontrolled cardiac disease.
- QT interval corrected (QTc) greater than 450 millisecond (msec) or QTc greater than 480 msec in subjects with bundle branch block.
- Subjects who have a history of a major organ transplant (e.g., heart, lung, kidney, liver) or hematopoietic stem cell/marrow transplant.
- Subjects who have clinical evidence of significant unstable or uncontrolled acute or chronic diseases not due to SLE (i.e., cardiovascular, pulmonary, hematologic, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, neurological, psychiatric, malignancy, or infectious diseases) which, in the opinion of the principal investigator, could confound the results of the study or put the subject at undue risk.
- Subjects who have an acute or chronic infection requiring management as : Currently on any suppressive therapy for a chronic infection such as pneumocystis, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, herpes zoster, or atypical mycobacteria); Hospitalization for treatment of infection within 60 days of Day 1; subjects who had infection requiring treatment with parenteral (IV or intramuscular [IM]) antibiotics (antibacterials, antivirals, anti-fungals, or anti-parasitic agents) within 60 days of Day 1. Prophylactic anti-infective treatment is allowed.
- Subjects who have severe lupus kidney disease (defined by proteinuria greater than 6 gram (g)/24 hours or equivalent using spot urine protein to creatinine ratio, or serum creatinine greater than 2.5 mg/dL), or have severe active nephritis requiring induction therapy not permitted by protocol (e.g., IV cyclophosphamide), or have required hemodialysis or high dose prednisone or equivalent (greater than 100 mg/day) within 90 days of Day 1.
- Subjects who have severe active central nervous system (CNS) lupus (including seizures, psychosis, organic brain syndrome, cerebrovascular accident [CVA], cerebritis, or CNS vasculitis) requiring therapeutic intervention within 60 days of Day 1.
- Subjects who have a planned surgical procedure, laboratory abnormality, or condition (e.g., poor venous access) that, in the opinion of the principal investigator, makes the subject unsuitable for the study.
- Subjects who have evidence of serious suicide risk, including any history of suicidal behavior in the last 6 months and/or any suicidal ideation of type 4 or 5 on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) in the last 2 months or who, in the investigator's opinion, pose a significant suicide risk.
- Subjects who have a history of an anaphylaxis reaction to parenteral administration of contrast agents, human or murine proteins, or monoclonal antibodies.
- Subjects who have received live vaccine(s) within 1 month prior to screening, or plans to receive such vaccines during the screening period or during the study.
- Subjects who have received any of the these prior/concomitant therapy within 364 days of Day 1: Belimumab; Rituximab; Abatacept; Any B cell targeted therapy (anti-cluster of differentiation-20 [CD] agents other than rituximab, anti CD22 [epratuzumab], anti-CD52 [alemtuzumab], BLyS-receptor fusion protein [BR3], Trans-membrane activator and calcium-modulator and cytophilin ligand interactor [TACI] Fc, anti B-cell activating factor [BAFF] (LY2127399), anti-Interferon alpha agents or anti-BLyS other than belimumab); A biologic investigational agent other than B cell targeted therapy (e.g., abetimus sodium, anti CD40L antibody [BG9588/ IDEC 1311]). (Investigational agent applies to any drug not approved for sale in the country in which it is being used).
- Subjects who have required 3 or more courses of systemic corticosteroids within 364 days of Day 1. (Topical or inhaled steroids are permitted).
- Subjects who have received any of these within 90 days of Day 1: Anti- Tumor Necrosis Factor (Anti-TNF) therapy (e.g., adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab); Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (anakinra); Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG); High dose prednisone or equivalent (greater than 100 mg/day); Plasmapheresis.
- Subjects who have received any of the these within 60 days of Day 1: A non-biologic investigational agent (Investigational agent applies to any drug not approved for sale in the country in which it is being used); IV cyclophosphamide and, for Germany only, oral cyclophosphamide; Any steroid injection (e.g., intramuscular [IM], intraarticular, or IV).
- Positive immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody test.
- Positive serology for Hepatitis B (HB), defined as HB surface antigen positive (HBsAg+) OR HB core antibody positive (HBcAb+).
- Positive Hepatitis C (HCV) antibody test.
- Subjects who have current drug or alcohol dependence, or a history of drug or alcohol abuse or dependence within 364 days prior to Day 1.
- Sensitivity to any of the study treatments, or components thereof, or drug or other allergy that, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicates participation in the study.
- Unable to administer study treatment (belimumab) by SC injection and has no other reliable resource to administer the injection.
Trial locations and contacts
79 sites in 11 countries.
79 sites in 11 countries
United States28 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-5542
GSK Investigational Site
Austin, Texas, 78731
GSK Investigational Site
Aventura, Florida, 33180
GSK Investigational Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
GSK Investigational Site
Brighton, Michigan, 48116
GSK Investigational Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204
GSK Investigational Site
Denver, Colorado, 80230
GSK Investigational Site
Glendale, Wisconsin, 53217
GSK Investigational Site
La Mesa, California, 92020
GSK Investigational Site
Lansing, Michigan, 48910
GSK Investigational Site
Lansing, Michigan, 48917
GSK Investigational Site
Las Cruces, New Mexico, 88011
GSK Investigational Site
League City, Texas, 77573
GSK Investigational Site
Manhasset, New York, 11030
GSK Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33136
GSK Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10016
GSK Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10032
GSK Investigational Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73102
GSK Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, 32806-6264
GSK Investigational Site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224
GSK Investigational Site
San Leandro, California, 94578
GSK Investigational Site
Spokane, Washington, 99204
GSK Investigational Site
Summerville, South Carolina, 29486
GSK Investigational Site
Tamarac, Florida, 33321
GSK Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, 33613
GSK Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, 33614
GSK Investigational Site
Upland, California, 91786
GSK Investigational Site
Vandalia, Ohio, 45377
Russia12 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Chelyabinsk, 454076
GSK Investigational Site
Kazan', 420097
GSK Investigational Site
Kemerovo, 650066
GSK Investigational Site
Moscow, 119435
GSK Investigational Site
Novosibirsk, 630117
GSK Investigational Site
Omsk, 644111
GSK Investigational Site
Petrozavodsk, 185019
GSK Investigational Site
Ryazan, 390026
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 190068
GSK Investigational Site
Ufa, 450005
GSK Investigational Site
Ulyanovsk, 432063
GSK Investigational Site
Yaroslavl, 150030
South Korea7 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Daegu, 700-721
GSK Investigational Site
Gwangju, 501-757
GSK Investigational Site
Incheon, 400-711
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 03080
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 133-792
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 137-701
GSK Investigational Site
Suwon, 443-380
France6 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Brest, 29609
GSK Investigational Site
Lille, 59037
GSK Investigational Site
Paris, 75013
GSK Investigational Site
Paris, 75571
GSK Investigational Site
Pessac, 33604
GSK Investigational Site
Strasbourg, 67091
Netherlands5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Amersfoort, 3813 TZ
GSK Investigational Site
Groningen, 9713 GZ
GSK Investigational Site
Leiden, 2333 ZA
GSK Investigational Site
The Hague, 2545 AA
GSK Investigational Site
Utrecht, 3584 CX
Spain5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Badalona, 08916
GSK Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08035
GSK Investigational Site
Valencia, 46017
GSK Investigational Site
Valladolid, 47010
GSK Investigational Site
Vigo (Pontevedra), 36214
Brazil4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, 78043-142
GSK Investigational Site
Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, 36010-570
GSK Investigational Site
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, 40.150-150
GSK Investigational Site
São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, 15090-000
Canada4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1
GSK Investigational Site
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7K 0H6
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8
GSK Investigational Site
Trois-Rivières, Quebec, G8Z 1Y2
Argentina3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1046AAQ
GSK Investigational Site
La Plata, Buenos Aires, B1904CFH,
GSK Investigational Site
San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, T4000AXL
Germany3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Frankfurt, 60590
GSK Investigational Site
Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30625
GSK Investigational Site
Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, 24105
Mexico2 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Mérida, Yucatán, 97070
GSK Investigational Site
Zapopan, Jalisco, 45070
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 104-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab Administered in Combination With Rituximab to Adult Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
The purpose of this study is to assess whether co-administration of belimumab and a single cycle of rituximab will optimize treatment with belimumab, which will result in improvements of clinical status with a favorable safety profile, by comparing subjects randomized to belimumab plus rituximab versus belimumab plus rituximab-placebo. Approximately 292 subjects will be randomized in a 1:2:1 ratio to 1 of 3 treatment arms; belimumab plus rituximab-placebo (Arm A, control), belimumab plus rituximab (Arm B, combination), or belimumab plus standard therapy (Arm C, reference). Belimumab will be administered as subcutaneous (SC) and rituximab-placebo or rituximab will be administered by intravenous (IV) infusions. The total duration of the study is for 104 weeks.
- Conditions
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- Being tested
- Belimumab, Rituximab, Rituximab-placebo, Standard therapy (Including Immunosuppressants), Standard therapy (Excluding Immunosuppressants)
- Keywords
- immunosuppressants, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index, Belimumab, Lupus Low Disease Activity State, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- Medical subject headings
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BelimumabDrug
Belimumab will be administered as SC injection once weekly via autoinjector in thigh or abdomen
RituximabDrug
Rituximab will be administered as IV infusion of 1000mg at Week 4 and Week 6
Rituximab-placeboDrug
Saline will be administered as IV infusions at Week 4 and Week 6
Standard therapy (Including Immunosuppressants)Drug
Standard therapy will contain stable SLE medications including immunosuppressant to be administered from baseline through Week 104.
Standard therapy (Excluding Immunosuppressants)Drug
Standard therapy excluding Immunosuppressant will contain anti-malarials, NSAIDs, and/or corticosteroids with prednisone dose equivalent to <= 5 mg/day will administered through Week 104.
Steroid TaperDrug
Steroid taper will include prednisone doses equivalent to =< 5 mg/day in all Arms through Week 104.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Belimumab + Placebo | Placebo comparator | Eligible subjects will receive Belimumab 200 milligrams (mg) to be administered subcutaneously (SC) on Day 1 and then weekly (i.e., every 7 days) through Week 52. Subjects will also receive rituximab-placebo to be administered by intravenous (IV) infusions at Weeks 4 and 6 in double blind manner. Subjects will receive standard therapy excluding Immunosuppressants and including anti-malarials, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and/or corticosteroids tapered down to prednisone equivalent of less than or equal to (<=) 5 mg/day until Week 104. Subjects will not receive treatment after 52 weeks and will be in observation until Week 104. Receives: Drug: Belimumab; Drug: Rituximab-placebo; Drug: Standard therapy (Excluding Immunosuppressants); Drug: Steroid Taper |
| Belimumab + Rituximab | Experimental | Eligible subjects will receive Belimumab 200 mg to be administered SC on Day 1 and then weekly (i.e., every 7 days) through Week 52. Subjects will also receive rituximab 1000 mg to be administered by IV infusions at Weeks 4 and 6 in double blind manner. Subjects will receive standard therapy excluding Immunosuppressants and including anti-malarials, NSAIDs, and/or corticosteroids tapered down to prednisone equivalent of <= 5 mg/day until Week 104. Subjects will not receive treatment after 52 weeks and will be in observation until Week 104. Receives: Drug: Belimumab; Drug: Rituximab; Drug: Standard therapy (Excluding Immunosuppressants); Drug: Steroid Taper |
| Belimumab + Standard therapy | Other | Eligible subjects will receive open-label Belimumab 200 mg administered SC on Day 1 and then weekly (i.e., every 7 days) until Week 104. Subjects will also receive standard therapy including immunosuppressant, anti-malarials, NSAIDs, and/or corticosteroids tapered down to prednisone equivalent of <= 5 mg/day until Week 104. Receives: Drug: Belimumab; Drug: Standard therapy (Including Immunosuppressants); Drug: Steroid Taper |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With a State of Disease Control at Week 52
Percentage of participants with a state of disease control (Independent blinded assessor [IBA]) was defined as the percentage of participants with a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000(SLEDAI-2K)score less than or equal to(<=)2 achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of <=5 mg/day at Week 52. SLEDAI-2K was a weighted, cumulative index for measuring systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity in previous 10 days,consisting 24 individual items in which signs and symptoms, laboratory tests and physician's assessment for each item within each of 9 organ systems were given a weighted score(1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity)and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. The SLEDAI-2K score was sum of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K, ranges from 0(no symptoms) to 105(presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity.
Measured: Week 52
Secondary outcomes (27)
Percentage of Participants With a State of Clinical Remission at Week 64
Percentage of participants with a state of clinical remission (IBA) was defined as percentage of participants with a clinical SLEDAI-2K score =0 (does not include anti-double stranded deoxyribonucleic [dsDNA] and complement activity scores), achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of 0 mg/day at Week 64. SLEDAI-2K was a weighted, cumulative index for measuring SLE disease activity in previous 10 days, consisting 24 individual items in which signs and symptoms, laboratory tests, and physician's assessment for each item within each of 9 organ systems were given a weighted score (1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity) and summed if present at the time of the visit or in the preceding 10 days. The clinical SLEDAI-2K score was sum of 22 out of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K and ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 101 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity.
Measured: Week 64
Percentage of Participants With a State of Disease Control at Week 104
Percentage of participants with a state of disease control (IBA) was defined as the percentage of participants with a SLEDAI-2K score <=2, achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of <=5 mg/day at Week 104. SLEDAI-2K was a weighted, cumulative index for measuring SLE disease activity in previous 10 days which consisted of 24 individual items in which signs and symptoms, laboratory tests, and physician's assessment for each item within each of 9 organ systems were given a weighted score (1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity) and summed if present at the time of the visit or in the preceding 10 days. The SLEDAI-2K score was the sum of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K which ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity.
Measured: Week 104
Percentage of Participants With a State of Disease Control by Visits
Percentage of participants with a state of disease control (IBA) was defined as the percentage of participants with a SLEDAI-2K score <=2, achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of <=5 mg/day. SLEDAI-2K was a weighted, cumulative index for measuring SLE disease activity in previous 10 days which consisted of 24 individual items in which signs and symptoms, laboratory tests, and physician's assessment for each item within each of 9 organ systems were given a weighted score (1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity) and summed if present at the time of the visit or in the preceding 10 days. The SLEDAI-2K score was the sum of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K which ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity.
Measured: Weeks 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 80 and 104
Percentage of Participants With a State of Clinical Remission by Visits
Percentage of participants with a state of clinical remission (IBA) was defined as percentage of participants with a clinical SLEDAI-2K score =0 (does not include anti-dsDNA and complement activity scores), achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of 0 mg/day. SLEDAI-2K was a weighted, cumulative index for measuring SLE disease activity in previous 10 days, consisting 24 individual items in which signs and symptoms, laboratory tests, and physician's assessment for each item within each of 9 organ systems were given a weighted score (1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity) and summed if present at the time of the visit or in the preceding 10 days. The clinical SLEDAI-2K score was sum of 22 out of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K and ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 101 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity
Measured: Weeks 64, 80 and 104
Percentage of Participants With a State of Complete Remission (CR) Sustained for at Least 24 Weeks During Week 52 to Week 104
Percentage of participants with a state of CR (Principal Investigator [PI] assessed) was defined as percentage of participants with a SLEDAI-2K=0 achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at prednisone equivalent dose of 0 mg/day,sustained for at least 24 weeks. Sustained CR was longest period a participant maintains CR without break calculated as last consecutive CR date minus first consecutive CR date plus 1. SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within each 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score (1 to 8, higher score indicates increased activity) and summed if present at time of visit or in preceding 10 days. SLEDAI-2K score was sum of all 24 individual items from SLEDAI-2K, ranges from 0(no symptoms) to 105(presence of all defined symptoms),higher scores indicates increased disease activity. Percentage of participants with a state of CR sustained for at least 24 weeks at any visit during Week 52 to Week 104 were reported.
Measured: Week 52 to Week 104
Percentage of Participants With a State of Clinical Remission (CLR) Sustained for at Least 24 Weeks From Week 80 to Week 104
Percentage of participants with a state of CLR (PI assessed) at Week 104 was defined as percentage of participants with a clinical SLEDAI-2K score=0 (does not include anti-dsDNA and complement activity scores) achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of 0 mg/day, sustained for at least 24 weeks(from Week 80 to Week 104). Sustained CLR is longest period a participant maintains CLR without a break, calculated as last consecutive CLR date minus first consecutive CLR date plus 1. SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within each of 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score(1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity) and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. The clinical SLEDAI-2K score was sum of 22 out of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K and ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 101 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity.
Measured: From Week 80 to Week 104
Percentage of Participants With a State of Complete Remission by Visits
Percentage of participants with a state of complete remission (PI assessed) was defined as the percentage of participants with a SLEDAI-2K score =0, achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of 0 mg/day. SLEDAI-2K was a weighted, cumulative index for measuring systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity in the previous 10 days which consisted of 24 individual items in which signs and symptoms, laboratory tests, and physician's assessment for each item within for each of 9 organ systems were given a weighted score (1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity) and summed if present at the time of the visit or in the preceding 10 days. The SLEDAI-2K score was the sum of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K which ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity.
Measured: Weeks 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104
Time to First Severe Flare
Time to first severe SLE flare was the number of days from treatment start date until the participant met an event. Time to first severe flare was defined as event date minus treatment start date plus 1. Time to first severe flare was measured by Modified SLE flare index which identifies whether a participant had experienced a mild/moderate or severe flare. Analysis of first severe flare was performed on the modified SLE Flare index that excludes severe flares that were triggered only by an increase is SLEDAI-2K score to greater than 12.
Measured: Up to Week 104
Time to First Flare
Time to first SLE flare was the number of days from treatment start date until the participant met an event. Time to first flare was defined as event date minus treatment start date plus 1. Time to first flare was measured by modified SLE flare index which identifies whether a participant had experienced a mild/moderate or severe flare.
Measured: Up to Week 104
Time to Disease Control Sustained for at Least 24 Weeks and Maintained Through Week 104
Disease control sustained for at least 24 weeks and maintained through Week 104 was defined as SLEDAI-2K score <=2, achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of <=5 mg/day. Time to disease control (PI assessed) was defined as the first visit of sustained disease control until Week 104 on or before Week 80 minus treatment start date (Day 1) plus 1. Sustained disease control was longest period a participant maintained disease control without a break. SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within each of 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score (1 to 8, higher score indicates increased activity) and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. SLEDAI-2K score was the sum of all 24 individual items from SLEDAI-2K , ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms),higher scores representing increased disease activity.
Measured: Up to Week 104
Time to Clinical Remission Sustained for at Least 24 Weeks and Maintained Through Week 104
Clinical remission sustained for at least 24 weeks and maintained through Week 104 was defined as clinical SLEDAI-2K score=0 (does not include anti-dsDNA and complement activity scores), achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of 0 mg/day. Time to CLR (PI assessed) was defined as first visit of sustained CLR until Week 104 on or before Week 80 minus treatment start date (Day 1) plus 1. Sustained CLR was longest period a participant maintained clinical remission without a break. SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within each of 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score (1 to 8, higher score indicates increased activity) and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. The clinical SLEDAI-2K score was sum of 22 out of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K and ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 101 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity.
Measured: Up to Week 104
Duration of Disease Control
Duration of disease control was defined as SLEDAI-2K score <=2, achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of <=5 mg/day. The duration of disease control (PI assessed) was the longest period between 2 visits that the participant was a disease control responder at all visits and calculated as the first visit of disease control minus last visit of disease control plus 1. SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within each of 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score (1 to 8, higher score indicates increased activity) and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. SLEDAI-2K score was the sum of all 24 individual items from SLEDAI-2K, ranges from 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms),higher scores representing increased disease activity
Measured: Up to Week 104
Duration of Clinical Remission
Clinical remission was defined as clinical SLEDAI-2K score =0 (does not include anti-dsDNA and complement activity scores), achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of 0 mg/day. The duration of clinical remission (PI assessed) was the longest period between 2 visits that the participant was a clinical remission responder at all visits and was calculated as the first visit of clinical remission minus last visit of clinical remission plus 1. SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within each of 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score (1 to 8, higher score indicates increased activity) and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. The clinical SLEDAI-2K score was sum of 22 out of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K and ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 101 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity.
Measured: Up to Week 104
Change From Baseline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) Score by Visit (PI Assessed)
The SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score (1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity) and summed if present at the time of visit or in the preceding 10 days. Weighted scores for central nervous system (CNS) (7 items) was 8; for vascular (1 item) was 8; for Musculoskeletal (2 items) was 4; for Renal (4 items) was 4; for Mucocutaneous (3 items) was 2; for Cardiovascular and Respiratory (2 items) was 2; for Immunologic (2 items) was 2;for Constitutional (1 item) was 1 and for Hematologic (2 items) was 1. SLEDAI-2K score was the sum of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K which ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. Baseline value was latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Percentage of Participants With SLEDAI-2K Organ Improvement Compared to Baseline by Visits (PI Assessed)
SLEDAI-2K assessments consisted of 24 individual items with 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score(1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity)and summed if present at the time of analysis. SLEDAI-2K score was sum of all 24 individual items from SLEDAI-2K ranges from 0(no symptoms) to 105(presence of all defined symptoms). Higher scores indicates increased disease activity. An improvement was defined as a decrease(compared to Baseline) in SLEDAI-2K score within same organ system at a post-Baseline visit. Baseline value was latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Data for following organ systems was reported: CNS total, Vascular total, Musculoskeletal total, Renal total, Mucocutaneous total, Cardiovascular (Cardio) and Respiratory (Resp) total, Immunologic total and Hematologic total. Constitutional organ system was removed from analysis and its one item (fever)moved to hematologic organ system.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Percentage of Participants With SLEDAI-2K Organ Worsening Compared to Baseline by Visits (PI Assessed)
SLEDAI-2K assessments consisted of 24 individual items with 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score(1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity)and summed if present at time of analysis. SLEDAI-2K score was sum of all 24 individual items from SLEDAI-2K, ranges from 0(no symptoms) to 105(presence of all defined symptoms). Higher scores indicates increased disease activity. A worsening was defined as an increase(compared to Baseline) in SLEDAI-2K score within same organ system at a post-Baseline visit. Baseline value was latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Percentage of participants with SLEDAI-2K organ worsening for following organ systems were reported;CNS total,Vascular total,Musculoskeletal total,Renal total,Mucocutaneous total,Cardio and Resp total,Immunologic total and Hematologic total. Constitutional organ system was removed from analysis and its one item (fever)moved to hematologic organ system.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) by Visits
The Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) was a physician-reported visual analogue scale that provides an overall measure of the participant's current disease activity. Physician's Global Assessment was collected on a 10 centimeter (cm) visual analogue scale (VAS) by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (maximum disease activity). The PGA score was then rescaled for reporting by multiplying the collected score by 3 divided by 10. Hence, the PGA score ranges from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as the post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Percentage of Participants With Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) -American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Damage Index Worsening Compared With Baseline at Week 52 and Week 104
The SLICC-ACR Damage Index measures irreversible (not related to active inflammation) changes occurring since the diagnosis of SLE ascertained by clinical assessment and present for at least 6 months. The questionnaire contains 39 items covering 12 different organ systems which were scored on a numerical scale between 0 (no damage) to 7 (increasing disease damage). Individual ranges for organ systems were; ocular: 0-2, neuropsychiatric: 0-6, renal: 0-3, pulmonary: 0-5, cardiovascular:0-6, peripheral vascular: 0-5, gastrointestinal:0-5, musculoskeletal: 0-6, skin: 0-3, endocrine (diabetes): 0-1, gonadal:0-1 and malignancies: 0-2. The SLICC-ACR score was calculated by taking sum of the individual scores for 12 organ systems which ranges from 0 (no damage) to 45 (increasing disease damage) where higher score indicates increasing disease damage severity. Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 52 and Week 104
Percentage of Participants That Met the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Response Criteria by Visits (PI Assessed)
Lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) was defined as a state which, if sustained, was associated with a low likelihood of adverse outcome, considering disease activity and medication safety. The LLDAS response criteria were: (1) SLEDAI-2K <=4, with no activity in major organ systems (renal, CNS, cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, fever) and no hemolytic anemia or gastrointestinal activity; (2) no new features of lupus disease activity compared with the previous assessment; (3) PGA (scale 0-3), <=1; (4) current prednisolone (or equivalent) dose <=7.5 mg daily; and (5) well tolerated standard maintenance doses of immunosuppressive drugs and approved biological agents, excluding investigational drugs. Percentage of participants that met the LLDAS response criteria were reported.
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104
Percentage of Participants With a State of Disease Control Using the PI Assessment of SLEDAI-2K by Visit
Percentage of participants with a state of disease control was defined as the percentage of participants with a SLEDAI-2K score <=2, achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of <=5 mg/day, using the PI assessment of SLEDAI-2K. SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within each of 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score (1 to 8, higher score indicates increased activity) and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. SLEDAI-2K score was the sum of all 24 individual items from SLEDAI-2K, ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms), higher scores representing increased disease activity. Percentage of participants with a state of disease control using the PI assessment of SLEDAI-2K were summarized.
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Percentage of Participants With a State of Clinical Remission Using the PI Assessment of SLEDAI-2K by Visit
Percentage of participants with a state of clinical remission was defined as the percentage of participants with a clinical SLEDAI-2K score =0 (does not include anti-dsDNA and complement activity scores), achieved without immunosuppressants (which was allowed in Belimumab+ Standard therapy arm only) and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of 0 mg/day using the PI assessment of SLEDAI-2K. SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within each of 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score (1 to 8, higher score indicates increased activity) and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. The clinical SLEDAI-2K score was sum of 22 out of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K and ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 101 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. Percentage of participants with a state of clinical remission using the PI assessment of SLEDAI-2K were summarized.
Measured: Weeks 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Non-serious AE (Non-SAE)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situations as per medical or scientific judgment. Data for number of participants with SAE and non-SAE (>=5 %) has been summarized.
Measured: Up to Week 111 (including 8 weeks of safety follow-up)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. AESIs were Malignant Neoplasms, Post-Injection Systemic Reactions (PISR), All Infections of Special Interest (Opportunistic Infections (OI), Herpes Zoster (HZ), Tuberculosis (TB), and Sepsis), Depression (including mood disorders and anxiety)/suicide/self-injury and Deaths. Data for number of participants with AESIs has been summarized.
Measured: Up to Week 104
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) by Visits
The Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity is a single-item, participant reported scale developed for the assessment of the participant's overall rating of their disease activity due to SLE. The scale measures disease activity ranging from 0 (Very Well) to 10 (Very Poor) and the higher score indicates severe disease activity. Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as the post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 8, 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 72 and 104
Change From Baseline in Lupus Quality of Life (LupusQoL) Domain Scores by Visit
LupusQoL is a SLE-specific health related qualify of life (HRQOL) instrument with 34 questions across 8 domains:Physical health(8 items),Pain(3 items),Planning(3 items),Intimate relationship(2 items),Burden to others(3 items),Emotional health(6 items),Body image(5 items),Fatigue(4 items). Questions were related to participants experience in prior 4 weeks.A 5-point Likert response format was used, ranging from 0(all of the time) to 4(never) for each question. Individual domain scores were reported which were calculated by taking sum of responses to all items within each domain. Individual domain scores range:Physical health(0-32),Pain(0-12),Planning(0-12),Intimate relationship(0-8),Burden to others(0-12),Emotional health(0-24),Body image(0-20),Fatigue(0-16). Higher score indicates better HRQOL. Baseline value was latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 8, 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 72 and 104
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Score by Visit
The FACIT-Fatigue scale was a 13-item questionnaire completed by the participant, which provides a measure of fatigue/quality of life, with a 7-day recall period. The participant scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The higher score for the questions, the greater the fatigue. The total score was the sum of the responses from all questions (inverted for reversed items) multiplied by 13, then divided by the number of questions answered, ranging from 0 (worse fatigue) to 52 (no fatigue) where a higher score indicates an improvement in the participant's health status and decrease in the score indicates worse fatigue/quality of life. Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as the post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 8, 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 72 and 104
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in FACIT-Fatigue Score Exceeding the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID, Greater Than or Equal to [>=]4)
The FACIT-Fatigue scale was a 13-item questionnaire completed by the participant, which provides a measure of fatigue/quality of life, with a 7-day recall period. The participant scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions, the greater the fatigue. The total score was the sum of the responses (inverted for reversed items) multiplied by 13, then divided by the number of questions answered, ranging from 0 (worse fatigue) to 52 (no fatigue) where a higher score indicates an improvement in the participant's health status and decrease in the score indicates worse fatigue/quality of life. A participant was considered to had an improvement exceeding the minimal clinically important difference if they had >=4 points improvement in their FACIT-Fatigue Scale score from Baseline. Percentage of participants with improvement in FACIT-Fatigue scale score exceeding the MCID (>=4 points) were summarized.
Measured: Weeks 8, 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 72 and 104
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Oct 2017
- Study start1 Mar 2018
- Primary completion29 May 2020
- Study completion7 Jul 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Systemic Lupus ErythematosusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 292 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03312907
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 205646
- Other IDs
- 2016-003050-32, 2016
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 13 Oct 2017
- Last updated
- 18 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: GSK will assess requests from qualified researchers for anonymized individual patient-level data (IPD) and related study documents. Data sharing is subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. For further information, refer to https://www.gsk-studyregister.com/About\_GSK\_Patient\_Level\_Data\_Sharing\_Final\_13July2023.pdf
- Expanded access
- Available
Publications
Aranow C, Allaart CF, Amoura Z, Bruce IN, Cagnoli PC, Chatham WW, Clark KL, Furie R, Groark J, Urowitz MB, van Vollenhoven R, Daniels M, Fox NL, Gregan YI, Henderson RB, van Maurik A, Ocran-Appiah JC, Oldham M, Roth DA, Shanahan D, Tak PP, Teng YO. Efficacy and safety of sequential therapy with subcutaneous belimumab and one cycle of rituximab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: the phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled BLISS-BELIEVE study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Oct 21;83(11):1502-1512. doi: 10.1136/ard-2024-225686.
PubMed 39159997Arends EJ, Zlei M, Tipton CM, Cotic J, Osmani Z, de Bie FJ, Kamerling SWA, van Maurik A, Dimelow R, Gregan YI, Fox NL, Rabelink TJ, Roth DA, Sanz I, van Dongen JJM, van Kooten C, Teng YKO. Disruption of memory B-cell trafficking by belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 Sep 1;63(9):2387-2398. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae286.
PubMed 38775637Hannon CW, McCourt C, Lima HC, Chen S, Bennett C. Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;3(3):CD007478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007478.pub2.
PubMed 33687069Teng YKO, Bruce IN, Diamond B, Furie RA, van Vollenhoven RF, Gordon D, Groark J, Henderson RB, Oldham M, Tak PP. Phase III, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 104-week study of subcutaneous belimumab administered in combination with rituximab in adults with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): BLISS-BELIEVE study protocol. BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 20;9(3):e025687. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025687.
PubMed 30898822Parodis I, Lopez Benavides AH, Zickert A, Pettersson S, Moller S, Welin Henriksson E, Voss A, Gunnarsson I. The Impact of Belimumab and Rituximab on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Jun;71(6):811-821. doi: 10.1002/acr.23718.
PubMed 30055091
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 104-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab Administered in Combination With Rituximab to Adult Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03312907
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 205646
- Conditions
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- Keywords
- immunosuppressants, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index, Belimumab, Lupus Low Disease Activity State, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 292 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 May 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Jul 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 25 Apr 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess whether co-administration of belimumab and a single cycle of rituximab will optimize treatment with belimumab, which will result in improvements of clinical status with a favorable safety profile, by comparing subjects randomized to belimumab plus rituximab versus belimumab plus rituximab-placebo. Approximately 292 subjects will be randomized in a 1:2:1 ratio to 1 of 3 treatment arms; belimumab plus rituximab-placebo (Arm A, control), belimumab plus rituximab (Arm B, combination), or belimumab plus standard therapy (Arm C, reference). Belimumab will be administered as subcutaneous (SC) and rituximab-placebo or rituximab will be administered by intravenous (IV) infusions. The total duration of the study is for 104 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Belimumab + Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Belimumab, Drug: Rituximab-placebo, Drug: Standard therapy (Excluding Immunosuppressants), Drug: Steroid TaperEligible subjects will receive Belimumab 200 milligrams (mg) to be administered subcutaneously (SC) on Day 1 and then weekly (i.e., every 7 days) through Week 52. Subjects will also receive rituximab-placebo to be administered by intravenous (IV) infusions at Weeks 4 and 6 in double blind manner. Subjects will receive standard therapy excluding Immunosuppressants and including anti-malarials, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and/or corticosteroids tapered down to prednisone equivalent of less than or equal to (<=) 5 mg/day until Week 104. Subjects will not receive treatment after 52 weeks and will be in observation until Week 104. |
| Belimumab + Rituximab | Experimental | Drug: Belimumab, Drug: Rituximab, Drug: Standard therapy (Excluding Immunosuppressants), Drug: Steroid TaperEligible subjects will receive Belimumab 200 mg to be administered SC on Day 1 and then weekly (i.e., every 7 days) through Week 52. Subjects will also receive rituximab 1000 mg to be administered by IV infusions at Weeks 4 and 6 in double blind manner. Subjects will receive standard therapy excluding Immunosuppressants and including anti-malarials, NSAIDs, and/or corticosteroids tapered down to prednisone equivalent of <= 5 mg/day until Week 104. Subjects will not receive treatment after 52 weeks and will be in observation until Week 104. |
| Belimumab + Standard therapy | Other | Drug: Belimumab, Drug: Standard therapy (Including Immunosuppressants), Drug: Steroid TaperEligible subjects will receive open-label Belimumab 200 mg administered SC on Day 1 and then weekly (i.e., every 7 days) until Week 104. Subjects will also receive standard therapy including immunosuppressant, anti-malarials, NSAIDs, and/or corticosteroids tapered down to prednisone equivalent of <= 5 mg/day until Week 104. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Subjects must be >=18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent.
- Subjects who have clinical diagnosis of SLE based on 4 or more of the 11 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria.
- Subjects who have a screening SLEDAI-2K score >=6 (This refers to the total score. Serological activity, i.e., anti-double stranded deoxyribonucleic acid [dsDNA]) positivity and/or hypocomplementemia is not required to be present in SLEDAI-2K assessment, but are scored if present).
- Subjects who have unequivocally positive autoantibody test results defined as an anti-nuclear (ANA) titer >=1:80 and/or a positive anti-dsDNA (>=30 International Units per milliliter [IU/mL]) serum antibody test from 2 independent time points as follows: Positive test results from 2 independent time points within the study screening period. Screening results must be based on the study's central laboratory results. Or, one positive historical test result and 1 positive test result during the screening period.
- Subjects who are on a stable SLE treatment regimen consisting of any of these medications (alone or in combination) for a period of at least 30 days prior to Day 1 (i.e. day of first dose of study treatment) with the exception that switching one agent for another of the same class for tolerability or availability reasons, which will be allowed within 30 days of Day 1: Corticosteroids (prednisone or prednisone equivalent); For those subjects on alternating daily doses of steroids, use the average of 2 daily doses to calculate the average daily steroid dose; Any immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory agents including methotrexate, azathioprine, leflunomide, mycophenolate (including mycophenolate mofetil, mycophenolate mofetil hydrochloride, and mycophenolate sodium), calcineurin inhibitors (example [e.g.] tacrolimus, cyclosporine), sirolimus, oral cyclophosphamide, 6-mercaptopurine, mizoribine, or thalidomide; Anti-malarials (e.g., hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, quinacrine); Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
Key exclusion criteria (32 listed)
- Symptomatic herpes zoster within 3 months prior to screening.
- Evidence of active or latent tuberculosis (TB). Documentation may include medical history and examination, chest X-rays (posterior, anterior, and lateral), and TB testing: either a positive tuberculin skin test (TST; defined as a skin induration ≥5 mm at 48 to 72 hours, regardless of Baccillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) or other vaccination history) or a positive (not indeterminate) QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus test.
- Significant allergies to humanized monoclonal antibodies.
- History of hypersensitivity to belimumab and/or rituximab or known to have titers of human anti-mouse antibody or history of hypersensitivity reactions when treated with other diagnostic or therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.
- Lymphoma, leukemia, or any malignancy within the past 5 years (yrs) except for basal cell or squamous epithelial carcinomas of the skin that have been resected with no evidence of metastatic disease for 3 yrs.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BelimumabBelimumab will be administered as SC injection once weekly via autoinjector in thigh or abdomen | Drug | Belimumab + Placebo, Belimumab + Rituximab, Belimumab + Standard therapy |
| RituximabRituximab will be administered as IV infusion of 1000mg at Week 4 and Week 6 | Drug | Belimumab + Rituximab |
| Rituximab-placeboSaline will be administered as IV infusions at Week 4 and Week 6 | Drug | Belimumab + Placebo |
| Standard therapy (Including Immunosuppressants)Standard therapy will contain stable SLE medications including immunosuppressant to be administered from baseline through Week 104. | Drug | Belimumab + Standard therapy |
| Standard therapy (Excluding Immunosuppressants)Standard therapy excluding Immunosuppressant will contain anti-malarials, NSAIDs, and/or corticosteroids with prednisone dose equivalent to <= 5 mg/day will administered through Week 104. | Drug | Belimumab + Placebo, Belimumab + Rituximab |
| Steroid TaperSteroid taper will include prednisone doses equivalent to =< 5 mg/day in all Arms through Week 104. | Drug | Belimumab + Placebo, Belimumab + Rituximab, Belimumab + Standard therapy |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With a State of Disease Control at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of participants with a state of disease control (Independent blinded assessor [IBA]) was defined as the percentage of participants with a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000(SLEDAI-2K)score less than or equal to(<=)2 achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of <=5 mg/day at Week 52. SLEDAI-2K was a weighted, cumulative index for measuring systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity in previous 10 days,consisting 24 individual items in which signs and symptoms, laboratory tests and physician's assessment for each item within each of 9 organ systems were given a weighted score(1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity)and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. The SLEDAI-2K score was sum of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K, ranges from 0(no symptoms) to 105(presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity.
27 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With a State of Clinical Remission at Week 64
Time frame: Week 64
Percentage of Participants With a State of Disease Control at Week 104
Time frame: Week 104
Percentage of Participants With a State of Disease Control by Visits
Time frame: Weeks 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 80 and 104
Percentage of Participants With a State of Clinical Remission by Visits
Time frame: Weeks 64, 80 and 104
Percentage of Participants With a State of Complete Remission (CR) Sustained for at Least 24 Weeks During Week 52 to Week 104
Time frame: Week 52 to Week 104
Percentage of Participants With a State of Clinical Remission (CLR) Sustained for at Least 24 Weeks From Week 80 to Week 104
Time frame: From Week 80 to Week 104
Percentage of Participants With a State of Complete Remission by Visits
Time frame: Weeks 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104
Time to First Severe Flare
Time frame: Up to Week 104
Time to First Flare
Time frame: Up to Week 104
Time to Disease Control Sustained for at Least 24 Weeks and Maintained Through Week 104
Time frame: Up to Week 104
Time to Clinical Remission Sustained for at Least 24 Weeks and Maintained Through Week 104
Time frame: Up to Week 104
Duration of Disease Control
Time frame: Up to Week 104
Duration of Clinical Remission
Time frame: Up to Week 104
Change From Baseline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) Score by Visit (PI Assessed)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Percentage of Participants With SLEDAI-2K Organ Improvement Compared to Baseline by Visits (PI Assessed)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Percentage of Participants With SLEDAI-2K Organ Worsening Compared to Baseline by Visits (PI Assessed)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) by Visits
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Percentage of Participants With Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) -American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Damage Index Worsening Compared With Baseline at Week 52 and Week 104
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 52 and Week 104
Percentage of Participants That Met the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Response Criteria by Visits (PI Assessed)
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104
Percentage of Participants With a State of Disease Control Using the PI Assessment of SLEDAI-2K by Visit
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Percentage of Participants With a State of Clinical Remission Using the PI Assessment of SLEDAI-2K by Visit
Time frame: Weeks 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Non-serious AE (Non-SAE)
Time frame: Up to Week 111 (including 8 weeks of safety follow-up)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
Time frame: Up to Week 104
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) by Visits
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 8, 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 72 and 104
Change From Baseline in Lupus Quality of Life (LupusQoL) Domain Scores by Visit
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 8, 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 72 and 104
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Score by Visit
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 8, 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 72 and 104
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in FACIT-Fatigue Score Exceeding the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID, Greater Than or Equal to [>=]4)
Time frame: Weeks 8, 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 72 and 104
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Feb 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 39159997Aranow C, Allaart CF, Amoura Z, Bruce IN, Cagnoli PC, Chatham WW, Clark KL, Furie R, Groark J, Urowitz MB, van Vollenhoven R, Daniels M, Fox NL, Gregan YI, Henderson RB, van Maurik A, Ocran-Appiah JC, Oldham M, Roth DA, Shanahan D, Tak PP, Teng YO. Efficacy and safety of sequential therapy with subcutaneous belimumab and one cycle of rituximab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: the phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled BLISS-BELIEVE study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Oct 21;83(11):1502-1512. doi: 10.1136/ard-2024-225686.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38775637Arends EJ, Zlei M, Tipton CM, Cotic J, Osmani Z, de Bie FJ, Kamerling SWA, van Maurik A, Dimelow R, Gregan YI, Fox NL, Rabelink TJ, Roth DA, Sanz I, van Dongen JJM, van Kooten C, Teng YKO. Disruption of memory B-cell trafficking by belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 Sep 1;63(9):2387-2398. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae286.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33687069Hannon CW, McCourt C, Lima HC, Chen S, Bennett C. Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;3(3):CD007478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007478.pub2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30898822Teng YKO, Bruce IN, Diamond B, Furie RA, van Vollenhoven RF, Gordon D, Groark J, Henderson RB, Oldham M, Tak PP. Phase III, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 104-week study of subcutaneous belimumab administered in combination with rituximab in adults with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): BLISS-BELIEVE study protocol. BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 20;9(3):e025687. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025687.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30055091Parodis I, Lopez Benavides AH, Zickert A, Pettersson S, Moller S, Welin Henriksson E, Voss A, Gunnarsson I. The Impact of Belimumab and Rituximab on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Jun;71(6):811-821. doi: 10.1002/acr.23718.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. GSK will assess requests from qualified researchers for anonymized individual patient-level data (IPD) and related study documents. Data sharing is subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. For further information, refer to https://www.gsk-studyregister.com/About_GSK_Patient_Level_Data_Sharing_Final_13July2023.pdf
Related trials for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingPhase 4
Dapagliflozin in Active Lupus Nephritis
Lupus Nephritis (LN)
RecruitingObservational study
Electroencephalogram Recording in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingObservational study
Deciphering the Genetic Architecture of Autoimmune Diseases
Autoimmune Diseases
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
79 sites in 11 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Belimumab, Rituximab and Standard therapy (Including Immunosuppressants) in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 79 sites in 11 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 32 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 79 sites in United States, Russia, South Korea, France, Netherlands and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Apr 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With a State of Disease Control at Week 52 (time frame: Week 52). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03312907, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Feb 2025.