Triple Negative Breast NeoplasmsPhase 1/2NCT03310957
Safety and Efficacy of SGN-LIV1A Plus Pembrolizumab for Patients With Locally-Advanced or Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
A Phase 1/2 study testing ladiratuzumab vedotin and Pembrolizumab in people with Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms, run by Seagen Inc. at 50 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
This trial studies ladiratuzumab vedotin (LV) with pembrolizumab in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. It will find out what side effects happen when participants get these two drugs. A side effect is anything the drugs do besides treating cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- ladiratuzumab vedotin and Pembrolizumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 185 participants
- Where
- 50 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- 27 Feb 2018to 30 Sep 2024
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Metastatic or locally-advanced, histologically documented TNBC (absence of HER2, ER, and PR expression)
- Part D only: Tumor tissue PD-L1 Combined Positive Score <10 expression.
- Have not previously received cytotoxic therapy for the treatment of unresectable locally-advanced breast cancer or metastatic breast cancer
- At least 6 months since prior treatment with curative intent and recurrence
- At least 1 tumor 10mm in diameter or greater OR lymph node of at least 15 mm in short axis
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
- Able to provide biopsy tissue for biomarker analysis
- Meet baseline laboratory data criteria
Who cannot join
- Prior immune-oncology therapy
- Pre-existing neuropathy of at least Grade 2
- History of carcinomatous meningitis or active central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Patients are eligible if CNS metastases are adequately treated and patients have neurologically returned to baseline (except for residual signs or symptoms related to the CNS treatment) for at least 4 weeks prior to enrollment. Patients must be off corticosteroids.
- Received prior radiotherapy within 2 weeks of start of study treatment or have not adequately recovered from prior radiotherapy
- Active autoimmune disease requiring systemic treatment within the past 2 years
- History of interstitial lung disease
- Current pneumonitis or history of pneumonitis requiring steroids
Trial locations and contacts
50 sites in 4 countries.
50 sites in 4 countries
United States26 sites
New Mexico Cancer Center
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131
Piedmont Cancer Institute
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309
Winship Cancer Institute / Emory University School of Medicine
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers - Aurora
Aurora, Colorado, 80012
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35249
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903
Texas Oncology - DFW
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Summit Medical Group
Florham Park, New Jersey, 07932
Ingalls Cancer Care / Ingalls Memorial Hospital
Harvey, Illinois, 60426
Texas Oncology - Houston Memorial City
Houston, Texas, 77024
Saint Luke's Cancer Institute LLC
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
Cedars Sinai Medical Center / Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center / Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153
Miami Cancer Institute at Baptist Health, Inc.
Miami, Florida, 33176
Allina Health Cancer Institute
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407
Weill Cornell Medicine
New York, New York, 10065
Helen F. Graham Cancer Center / Christiana Care Health Systems
Newark, Delaware, 19713
The Whittingham Cancer Center / Norwalk Hospital
Norwalk, Connecticut, 06856
Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center University of California Irvine
Orange, California, 92868
University of California Irvine - Newport
Orange, California, 92868
AdventHealth Cancer Institute
Orlando, Florida, 32804
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC)/Hillman Cancer Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232
Texas Oncology - San Antonio Medical Center Northeast
San Antonio, Texas, 78212
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center / Seattle Cancer Care Alliance / University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98109-1023
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Spain10 sites
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario La Coruna
A Coruña, Other, 15006
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona, Other, 08003
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, Other, 08035
Complejo Hospitalario de Jaen
Jaén, Other, 23007
L'Institut Catala d'Oncologia
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Other, 08907
MD Anderson Cancer Center - Madrid
Madrid, Other, 28033
Hospital Ruber Internacional
Madrid, Other, 28034
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, Other, 28041
HM Centro Integral Oncologico Clara Campal
Madrid, Other, 28050
Hospital Universitario Quironsalud Madrid
Pozuelo de Alarcón, Other, 28223
Germany8 sites
Gynakologisches Zentrum Bonn Friedensplatz
Bonn, Other, 53111
Marien Hospital Bottrop
Bottrop, Other, 46236
Stadtisches Klinikum Dessau
Dessau, Other, 06847
Universitatsklinikum Erlangen
Erlangen, Other, 91054
Kliniken Essen-Mitte - Evang. Huyssens-Stiftung
Essen, Other, 45136
Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universitaet Muenchen
München, Other, 81675
Klinikum der Universitat Munchen
München, 80337
Rotkreuzklinikum Munich
Munich, Other, 80637
South Korea6 sites
Pusan National University Hospital
Busan, Other, 49201
CHA Bundang Medical Center
Seongnam, Other, 13496
Korea Cancer Center Hospital
Seoul, Other, 01802
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, Other, 03080
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
Seoul, Other, 03722
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, Other, 06351
About this study
Official title: Single Arm, Open Label Phase 1b/2 Study of SGN-LIV1A in Combination With Pembrolizumab for First-Line Treatment of Patients With Unresectable Locally-Advanced or Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
This trial studies ladiratuzumab vedotin (LV) with pembrolizumab in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. It will find out what side effects happen when participants get these two drugs. A side effect is anything the drugs do besides treating cancer. Pembrolizumab is a drug that can be used to treat triple-negative breast cancer. The trial will also find out if these drugs work to treat this type of cancer. Participants in this study have metastatic breast cancer. This means the cancer has spread to other parts of the body.
Read the detailed description
The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the combination of LV, which targets LIV-1- expressing tumor cells, with the checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab for patients with unresectable locally-advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. These two drugs act through distinct and possibly complementary modes of action.
This is a single-arm, open-label, multicenter trial. Patients given LV and pembrolizumab during dose escalation will be monitored for frequency of dose-limiting toxicities to determine a recommended doses for expansion cohorts. In addition to safety measures, objective response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and other efficacy outcomes will be assessed.
- Conditions
- Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms
- Being tested
- ladiratuzumab vedotin, Pembrolizumab
- Keywords
- Breast cancer, Breast carcinoma, Triple negative breast cancer, Locally-advanced breast cancer, Metastatic breast cancer, Tumors, breast, Breast tumors, pembrolizumab, LIV-1 protein, human, Ladiratuzumab vedotin, hLIV22-vcMMAE, Seattle Genetics
- Medical subject headings
- Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms, Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ladiratuzumab vedotinDrug
Also called LV, SGN-LIV1A
Given into the vein (IV; intravenously)
PembrolizumabDrug
Also called KEYTRUDA®
IV infusion every 3 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| LV + pembrolizumab | Experimental | LV + pembrolizumab Receives: Drug: ladiratuzumab vedotin; Drug: Pembrolizumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study treatment. SAEs was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, meets one or more of the criteria: death, life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly or birth defect and other medically significant events. TEAEs were defined as newly occurring (not present at baseline) or worsened after first dose of investigational product within 30 days after last dose date or within 90 days for SAE. AEs included SAEs and all non-SAEs.
Measured: From start of study treatment up to 30 days and up to 90 days post last dose for AEs and SAEs respectively (maximum exposure to any study treatment = 27 months; follow-up: AEs = maximum up to 28 months; SAEs = maximum up to 30 months)
Number of Participants With Treatment Related TEAEs and SAEs
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study treatment. SAEs was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, meets one or more of the criteria: death, life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly or birth defect and other medically significant events. AEs included SAEs and all non-SAEs. A treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to the study drug in a participant who received study drug. AEs were defined as treatment emergent if they were newly occurring or worsened following study treatment. Relatedness to study drug was assessed by the investigator.
Measured: From start of study treatment up to 30 days and up to 90 days post last dose for AEs and SAEs respectively (maximum exposure to any study treatment = 27 months; follow-up: AEs = maximum up to 28 months; SAEs = maximum up to 30 months)
Number of Participants With AEs of Grade <3 and Grade >=3 Per National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 4.03
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study treatment. AEs severities were graded using the NCI CTCAE v4.03; where Grade 1= mild AE, Grade 2= moderate AE, Grade 3= severe AE, and Grade 4= life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated, Grade 5= indicated death related to AE.
Measured: From start of study treatment up to 30 days for AEs (maximum exposure to any study treatment = 27 months; follow-up: AEs = maximum up to 28 months)
Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity Grade (0 to 4) in Any Hematology Parameter
In this outcome measure, number of participants with maximum post-baseline laboratory toxicity grade in any hematology parameter are reported. As per NCI-CTCAE v4.03: Grade 1= mild, Grade 2= moderate, Grade 3= severe, and Grade 4= life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 0 = within normal limits. Baseline was defined as most recent non-missing lab result before first dose. Hematology parameters evaluated: hemoglobin, leukocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils and platelets.
Measured: Post-baseline up to 30 days after last dose (maximum exposure to any study intervention was 27 months; follow-up = maximum up to 28 months)
Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity Grade (0 to 4) in Any Serum Chemistry Parameter
In this outcome measure, number of participants with maximum post-baseline laboratory toxicity grade in any serum chemistry parameters are reported. As per NCI-CTCAE v4.03: Grade 1= mild, Grade 2= moderate, Grade 3= severe, and Grade 4= life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 0 = within normal limits. Baseline was defined as most recent non-missing lab result before first dose. Serum chemistry parameters evaluated: alanine aminotransferase, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, amylase, aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin, calcium corrected for albumin, calcium- ionized, creatinine, gamma glutamyl transferase, glucose, lipase, phosphate, potassium, sodium and urate. In this outcome measure, only those grades as rows are reported which had at least one participant for at least 1 reporting group.
Measured: Post-baseline up to 30 days after last dose (maximum exposure to any study intervention was 27 months; follow-up = maximum up to 28 months)
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT): Part A and Part C
DLT : hematologic and/or non-hematologic AE specified in protocol that is considered related to SGN-LIV or the combination and cannot be attributed to pembrolizumab alone including: any clinically significant, non-hematologic AE>= Grade 3 according to NCI CTCAE v4.03, Grade 3 febrile neutropenia, Grade 4 thrombocytopenia or Grade 3 thrombocytopenia associated with clinically significant bleeding that required medical intervention, Grade 4 anemia unrelated to underlying disease, discontinuation during Cycle 1 due to treatment-related toxicity/ inability to receive all 3 doses of SGN-LIV (Days 1, 8, and 15) as participant not met dosing criteria (Part C only)prolonged delay (>2 weeks) in initiating Cycle 2 due to treatment-related toxicity and Grade 5 event (death).
Measured: Cycle 1 (up to 21 days)
ORR as Determined by the Investigator According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version (v)1.1
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR: >=30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Kaplan Meier method was used for analysis.
Measured: From start of study treatment up to date of confirmed CR or PR (maximum up to 30 months)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Duration of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1
DOR = time from first documentation of objective response (subsequently confirmed) per investigator to first documentation of disease progression, or death due to any cause, whichever came first. CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (reduction in short axis to <10 mm). PR: >=30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking reference baseline sum diameters. Progression: at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, reference smallest sum on study (includes baseline sum if that is smallest on study). In addition to relative increase of 20%, sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 0.5 cm. Appearance of one or more new lesions. Kaplan-Meier method used for DOR evaluation. DOR was only calculated for subgroup of participants who achieved a confirmed CR or PR.
Measured: From the date of first CR or PR until the date of the first documentation of progression or death, or censoring date, whichever came first (maximum up to 30 months)
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
DCR was defined as percentage of participants with CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) per RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR: >=30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progression, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. Progression: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study (this includes baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 0.5 cm. Appearance of one or more new lesions. Clopper-Pearson method was used for 95% confidence interval.
Measured: From start of study treatment up to date of CR or PR or SD (maximum up to 30 months)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from start of study treatment to first documentation of disease progression based upon the disease assessment per RECISTv1.1 or clinical progression, or to death due to any cause, whichever came first. Progression: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 0.5 cm. The appearance of one or more new lesions. Kaplan-Meier method was used for PFS evaluation.
Measured: From start of study treatment until the date of the first documentation of progression or death, or censoring date, whichever came first (maximum up to 30 months)
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, OS was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive. Kaplan-Meier method was used for OS evaluation.
Measured: From start of study treatment until the date of death, or censoring date, whichever came first (maximum up to 30 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Oct 2017
- Study start27 Feb 2018
- Primary completion30 Sep 2024
- Study completion30 Sep 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Triple Negative Breast NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 185 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Seagen Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Zejing Wang, MD, PhD, Study director, Seagen Inc.Kristel Apolinario, PharmD, Study director, Seagen Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03310957
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SGNLVA-002
- Other IDs
- KEYNOTE 721, 2017-002289-35, MK-3475-721, 2017
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 11 Oct 2017
- Last updated
- 12 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Single Arm, Open Label Phase 1b/2 Study of SGN-LIV1A in Combination With Pembrolizumab for First-Line Treatment of Patients With Unresectable Locally-Advanced or Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03310957
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SGNLVA-002
- Conditions
- Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Breast cancer, Breast carcinoma, Triple negative breast cancer, Locally-advanced breast cancer, Metastatic breast cancer, Tumors, breast, Breast tumors, pembrolizumab
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 185 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Seagen Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Study start
- 27 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 12 Dec 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This trial studies ladiratuzumab vedotin (LV) with pembrolizumab in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. It will find out what side effects happen when participants get these two drugs. A side effect is anything the drugs do besides treating cancer. Pembrolizumab is a drug that can be used to treat triple-negative breast cancer. The trial will also find out if these drugs work to treat this type of cancer. Participants in this study have metastatic breast cancer. This means the cancer has spread to other parts of the body.
Detailed description
The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the combination of LV, which targets LIV-1- expressing tumor cells, with the checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab for patients with unresectable locally-advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. These two drugs act through distinct and possibly complementary modes of action.
This is a single-arm, open-label, multicenter trial. Patients given LV and pembrolizumab during dose escalation will be monitored for frequency of dose-limiting toxicities to determine a recommended doses for expansion cohorts. In addition to safety measures, objective response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and other efficacy outcomes will be assessed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| LV + pembrolizumab | Experimental | Drug: ladiratuzumab vedotin, Drug: PembrolizumabLV + pembrolizumab |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Metastatic or locally-advanced, histologically documented TNBC (absence of HER2, ER, and PR expression)
- Have not previously received cytotoxic therapy for the treatment of unresectable locally-advanced breast cancer or metastatic breast cancer
- At least 6 months since prior treatment with curative intent and recurrence
- At least 1 tumor 10mm in diameter or greater OR lymph node of at least 15 mm in short axis
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Prior immune-oncology therapy
- Pre-existing neuropathy of at least Grade 2
- History of carcinomatous meningitis or active central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Patients are eligible if CNS metastases are adequately treated and patients have neurologically returned to baseline (except for residual signs or symptoms related to the CNS treatment) for at least 4 weeks prior to enrollment. Patients must be off corticosteroids.
- Received prior radiotherapy within 2 weeks of start of study treatment or have not adequately recovered from prior radiotherapy
- Active autoimmune disease requiring systemic treatment within the past 2 years
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ladiratuzumab vedotinAlso: LV, SGN-LIV1AGiven into the vein (IV; intravenously) | Drug | LV + pembrolizumab |
| PembrolizumabAlso: KEYTRUDA®IV infusion every 3 weeks | Drug | LV + pembrolizumab |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: From start of study treatment up to 30 days and up to 90 days post last dose for AEs and SAEs respectively (maximum exposure to any study treatment = 27 months; follow-up: AEs = maximum up to 28 months; SAEs = maximum up to 30 months)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study treatment. SAEs was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, meets one or more of the criteria: death, life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly or birth defect and other medically significant events. TEAEs were defined as newly occurring (not present at baseline) or worsened after first dose of investigational product within 30 days after last dose date or within 90 days for SAE. AEs included SAEs and all non-SAEs.
Number of Participants With Treatment Related TEAEs and SAEs
Time frame: From start of study treatment up to 30 days and up to 90 days post last dose for AEs and SAEs respectively (maximum exposure to any study treatment = 27 months; follow-up: AEs = maximum up to 28 months; SAEs = maximum up to 30 months)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study treatment. SAEs was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, meets one or more of the criteria: death, life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly or birth defect and other medically significant events. AEs included SAEs and all non-SAEs. A treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to the study drug in a participant who received study drug. AEs were defined as treatment emergent if they were newly occurring or worsened following study treatment. Relatedness to study drug was assessed by the investigator.
Number of Participants With AEs of Grade <3 and Grade >=3 Per National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 4.03
Time frame: From start of study treatment up to 30 days for AEs (maximum exposure to any study treatment = 27 months; follow-up: AEs = maximum up to 28 months)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study treatment. AEs severities were graded using the NCI CTCAE v4.03; where Grade 1= mild AE, Grade 2= moderate AE, Grade 3= severe AE, and Grade 4= life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated, Grade 5= indicated death related to AE.
Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity Grade (0 to 4) in Any Hematology Parameter
Time frame: Post-baseline up to 30 days after last dose (maximum exposure to any study intervention was 27 months; follow-up = maximum up to 28 months)
In this outcome measure, number of participants with maximum post-baseline laboratory toxicity grade in any hematology parameter are reported. As per NCI-CTCAE v4.03: Grade 1= mild, Grade 2= moderate, Grade 3= severe, and Grade 4= life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 0 = within normal limits. Baseline was defined as most recent non-missing lab result before first dose. Hematology parameters evaluated: hemoglobin, leukocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils and platelets.
Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity Grade (0 to 4) in Any Serum Chemistry Parameter
Time frame: Post-baseline up to 30 days after last dose (maximum exposure to any study intervention was 27 months; follow-up = maximum up to 28 months)
In this outcome measure, number of participants with maximum post-baseline laboratory toxicity grade in any serum chemistry parameters are reported. As per NCI-CTCAE v4.03: Grade 1= mild, Grade 2= moderate, Grade 3= severe, and Grade 4= life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 0 = within normal limits. Baseline was defined as most recent non-missing lab result before first dose. Serum chemistry parameters evaluated: alanine aminotransferase, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, amylase, aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin, calcium corrected for albumin, calcium- ionized, creatinine, gamma glutamyl transferase, glucose, lipase, phosphate, potassium, sodium and urate. In this outcome measure, only those grades as rows are reported which had at least one participant for at least 1 reporting group.
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT): Part A and Part C
Time frame: Cycle 1 (up to 21 days)
DLT : hematologic and/or non-hematologic AE specified in protocol that is considered related to SGN-LIV or the combination and cannot be attributed to pembrolizumab alone including: any clinically significant, non-hematologic AE>= Grade 3 according to NCI CTCAE v4.03, Grade 3 febrile neutropenia, Grade 4 thrombocytopenia or Grade 3 thrombocytopenia associated with clinically significant bleeding that required medical intervention, Grade 4 anemia unrelated to underlying disease, discontinuation during Cycle 1 due to treatment-related toxicity/ inability to receive all 3 doses of SGN-LIV (Days 1, 8, and 15) as participant not met dosing criteria (Part C only)prolonged delay (>2 weeks) in initiating Cycle 2 due to treatment-related toxicity and Grade 5 event (death).
ORR as Determined by the Investigator According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version (v)1.1
Time frame: From start of study treatment up to date of confirmed CR or PR (maximum up to 30 months)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR: >=30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Kaplan Meier method was used for analysis.
4 secondary outcomes
Duration of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1
Time frame: From the date of first CR or PR until the date of the first documentation of progression or death, or censoring date, whichever came first (maximum up to 30 months)
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time frame: From start of study treatment up to date of CR or PR or SD (maximum up to 30 months)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: From start of study treatment until the date of the first documentation of progression or death, or censoring date, whichever came first (maximum up to 30 months)
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: From start of study treatment until the date of death, or censoring date, whichever came first (maximum up to 30 months)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Dec 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
BrAin Metastasis in tripLe Negateive Breast Cancer: IvoneScimab and Trop2 ADC
Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), Brain Metastases
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Phase I/II Study of the Anti-Programmed Death Ligand-1 Durvalumab Antibody (MEDI4736) in Combination With Olaparib and/or Cediranib for Advanced Solid Tumors and Advanced or Recurrent Ovarian, Triple Negative Breast, Lung, Prostate and Colorectal Can...
Colorectal Neoplasms, Breast Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of Patritumab Deruxtecan Plus Pembrolizumab With Other Anticancer Agents in Participants With High-Risk Early-Stage Triple-Negative or Hormone Receptor-Low Positive/HER-2 Negative Breast Cancer (MK-1022-010, HERTHENA-Breast-03)
Breast Neoplasms, Breast Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Collection of CSF Samples From Participants With Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) and HER2+ Breast Cancer With no Prior History Nor Active Radiographically Detectable Brain Metastases
Breast Cancer, Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Zejing Wang, MD, PhD study director
Seagen Inc.
Kristel Apolinario, PharmD study director
Seagen Inc.
50 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing ladiratuzumab vedotin and Pembrolizumab in people with Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms, run by Seagen Inc. at 50 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 50 sites in United States, Spain, Germany, South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Dec 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (time frame: From start of study treatment up to 30 days and up to 90 days post last dose for AEs and SAEs respectively (maximum exposure to any study treatment = 27 months; follow-up: AEs = maximum up to 28 months; SAEs = maximum up to 30 months)). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Dec 2025.