AzTrials
AzTrials

Adult Spinal DeformityNCT03304405

Influence of Sagittal Imbalance of the Spine on Gait Pattern in Adult Spinal Deformity

An observational study of Adult Spinal Deformity, run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study intends to investigate the changes in gait pattern in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with sagittal imbalance. It will investigate the gait kinematics in patients who have a mismatch of their spinopelvic parameters, and a positive sagittal balance. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Adult Spinal Deformity
What is being tested?
Gait Analysis
How many people
15 participants
Where
1 siteHong Kong
Study dates
1 Jun 2016to 1 Jun 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with diagnosis of ADS will be recruited in this study conducted by the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

Who may be able to join

  • All patients diagnosed with ASD, fulfilling the following radiographic criteria based on whole spine lateral film are eligible for recruitment:
  • SVA bigger than 47mm
  • Pelvic tilt (PT) bigger than 22deg
  • Pelvic incidence (PI) - lumbar lordosis (LL) bigger than 11deg

Who cannot join

  • If the aetiology of the ASD of the patient is neuromuscular origin
  • other pathologies that may affect their gait such as previous trauma or surgeries to the pelvis or the lower limbs and joint replacements
  • inability to walk without aids for short distances

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Hong Kong1 site
  • Duchess of Kent Children's Hospital

    Hong Kong

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

This study intends to investigate the changes in gait pattern in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with sagittal imbalance. It will investigate the gait kinematics in patients who have a mismatch of their spinopelvic parameters, and a positive sagittal balance. The investigators hypothesise that patients with abnormal spinopelvic parameters may demonstrate a pathological gait pattern.

Read the detailed description

With an ageing population, ASD presents as a significant health issue with increasing incidence. Most of the earlier literature concentrated on radiographic measurements of the deformity in the coronal plane, and its surgical correction. However, recent publications have demonstrated that sagittal spinopelvic alignment plays a critical role in pain and disability in patients with ASD, and is a primary determinant of health related quality of life measures. There is substantial evidence that restoration of these parameters after spinal reconstructive surgery is correlated with good clinical outcome.

Maintenance of the ideal sagittal alignment allows an individual to maintain an erect posture with minimal energy expenditure. When there is progressive loss of lumbar lordosis, compensatory mechanisms involving the pelvis, hips and knees occur to extend adjacent segments of the kyphotic spine to allow for compensation of anterior translation of the axis of gravity. However, this compensatory mechanism may potentially result in adverse effect. One of the main disabilities in ASD patients with sagittal imbalance is their decreased walking tolerance. The change in the spinal alignment along with these compensatory mechanisms may result in an inefficient gait worsening their walking tolerance.

Few studies in the literature have investigated the changes in gait pattern in patients with sagittal imbalance. Of those, the patient group was heterogeneous, and the only criterion of sagittal imbalance was a positive sagittal vertical axis (SVA), which the investigators now know is not a complete assessment of the sagittal alignment. The investigators propose to study the change in gait pattern in individuals with abnormal spinopelvic parameters, and how this may affect their quality of lives.

Being tested
Gait Analysis
Keywords
ASD

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Gait AnalysisDiagnostic test

    All patients will undergo gait analysis using reflective surface markers placed at different locations on the head, trunk, upper and lower extremities, and pelvis. All patients will complete an analog pain scale, Oswestry, and SRS-22 questionnaires. These are health-related quality of life questionnaires that provide subjective assessment.

Study groups in NCT03304405
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Gait AnalysisAll patients will undergo gait analysis using reflective surface markers placed at different locations on the head, trunk, upper and lower extremities, and pelvis. All patients will complete an analog pain scale, Oswestry, and SRS-22 questionnaires. These are health-related quality of life questionnaires that provide subjective assessment.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Gait Analysis

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Evaluate the effect of sagittal imbalance on the gait cycle using reflective surface markers

    To evaluate the effect of sagittal imbalance on the gait cycle using reflective surface markers

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Investigate the difference in gait kinematics between normal and abnormal sagittal balance using reflective surface markers

    To investigate the difference in gait kinematics between normal and abnormal sagittal balance using reflective surface markers

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Investigate the efficiency in gait differences between normal and abnormal sagittal balance using reflective surface markers

    To investigate the efficiency in gait differences between normal and abnormal sagittal balance using reflective surface markers

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Investigate different muscle recruitment in gait cycles between normal and abnormal sagittal balance using a submaximal graded exercise test

    To investigate different muscle recruitment in gait cycles between normal and abnormal sagittal balance using a submaximal graded exercise test

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Oct 2017
  2. Study start1 Jun 2016
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2017
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
15 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03304405
Sponsor's protocol ID
UW 16-294
Status last verified
May 2020
First submitted
27 Sep 2017
Last updated
6 May 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Cho KJ, Suk SI, Park SR, Kim JH, Kang SB, Kim HS, Oh SJ. Risk factors of sagittal decompensation after long posterior instrumentation and fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Aug 1;35(17):1595-601. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bdad89.

    PubMed 20386505
  • Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, Horton W, Dimar JR. Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Mar 15;30(6):682-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000155425.04536.f7.

    PubMed 15770185
  • Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Sep 15;30(18):2024-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000179086.30449.96.

    PubMed 16166889
  • Smith JS, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Burton DC, Hart RA, Hostin R, Klineberg E; International Spine Study Group. Dynamic changes of the pelvis and spine are key to predicting postoperative sagittal alignment after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a critical analysis of preoperative planning techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 1;37(10):845-53. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823b0892.

    PubMed 22024904
  • Le Huec JC, Faundez A, Dominguez D, Hoffmeyer P, Aunoble S. Evidence showing the relationship between sagittal balance and clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of degenerative spinal diseases: a literature review. Int Orthop. 2015 Jan;39(1):87-95. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2516-6. Epub 2014 Sep 6.

    PubMed 25192690
  • Barrey C, Roussouly P, Le Huec JC, D'Acunzi G, Perrin G. Compensatory mechanisms contributing to keep the sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J. 2013 Nov;22 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S834-41. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3030-z. Epub 2013 Sep 20.

    PubMed 24052406
  • Engsberg JR, Bridwell KH, Reitenbach AK, Uhrich ML, Baldus C, Blanke K, Lenke LG. Preoperative gait comparisons between adults undergoing long spinal deformity fusion surgery (thoracic to L4, L5, or sacrum) and controls. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Sep 15;26(18):2020-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200109150-00016.

    PubMed 11547203
  • Sarwahi V, Boachie-Adjei O, Backus SI, Taira G. Characterization of gait function in patients with postsurgical sagittal (flatback) deformity: a prospective study of 21 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 1;27(21):2328-37. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200211010-00005.

    PubMed 12438980
  • Gottipati P, Fatone S, Koski T, Sugrue PA, Ganju A. Crouch gait in persons with positive sagittal spine alignment resolves with surgery. Gait Posture. 2014;39(1):372-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Aug 18.

    PubMed 24011797
  • Romei M, Galli M, Motta F, Schwartz M, Crivellini M. Use of the normalcy index for the evaluation of gait pathology. Gait Posture. 2004 Feb;19(1):85-90. doi: 10.1016/s0966-6362(03)00017-1.

    PubMed 14741307
  • Syczewska M, Dembowska-Baginska B, Perek-Polnik M, Kalinowska M, Perek D. Gait pathology assessed with Gillette Gait Index in patients after CNS tumour treatment. Gait Posture. 2010 Jul;32(3):358-62. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.06.006. Epub 2010 Jul 13.

    PubMed 20630761

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Adult Spinal Deformity, run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Evaluate the effect of sagittal imbalance on the gait cycle using reflective surface markers (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03304405, which also lists 11 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in