ScarPhase 3NCT03294382
Botulinum Toxin to Improve Results in Epicanthoplasty
A Phase 3 study testing Botulinum toxin type A in people with Scar and Intercanthal Distance Ratio, run by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Medial epicanthal fold is a common skin fold in the inner part of the eye in more than 50% Asia population, giving the illusion of a shorter palpebral fissure length and a wider intercanthal distance. Currently, various epicanthoplasty techniques have been well described to correct epicanthus fold. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 35 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Scar, Intercanthal Distance Ratio
- What is being tested?
- Botulinum toxin type A
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 42 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2017to 1 Apr 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 35 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- patients with moderate to severe congenital epicanthus.
- patients accept Park Z epicanthoplasty.
- Written informed consent given
Who cannot join
- epicanthus caused by trauma, surgical injury.
- patients with both epicanthus and blepharopotosis.
- patients with blepharophimosis-ptosis-epicanthus inversus syndrome, or only inversus epicanthus
- patients underwent Botulinum Toxin Type A periocular injection within 6 months
- patients ever have been allergic to Botulinum Toxin Type A or any components of Botulinum Toxin Type A
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Ru-Lin Huang
Shanghai, 200011
Ru-Lin Huang, Ph.D., M.D., 86-15821950669, hrl222@163.com
Chia-Kang Ho, M.D., 86-13817381588, 610542307@qq.com
About this study
Medial epicanthal fold is a common skin fold in the inner part of the eye in more than 50% Asia population, giving the illusion of a shorter palpebral fissure length and a wider intercanthal distance. Currently, various epicanthoplasty techniques have been well described to correct epicanthus fold. However, hypertrophic scarring after epicanthoplasty remains a clinical challenge, which seems inevitable and may leading to unpleasing supratarsal crease, recurrence of medial epicanthus fold, even obvious scar formation. Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) is widely used for facial rejuvenation and many other medical indications. It is a potent neurotoxin that indirectly blocks neuromuscular transmission and leads to functional denervation of striated muscle for 2 to 6 months after injection. Recently, experimental study and clinical trails have revealed that BTX-A can inhibit the growth of fibroblasts derived from hypertrophic scars and influenced the expression of transforming growth factor-β1. Therefore, we hypothesized that BTX-A can improve hypertrophic scarring after epicanthoplasty through release orbicularis oculi muscle tension, inhibit fibroblast growth, and reduce collagen production. The main aim of this trail is to evaluate the efficiency of BTX-A injection on improving hypertrophic scaring after epicanthoplasty.
- Conditions
- Scar, Intercanthal Distance Ratio
- Being tested
- Botulinum toxin type A, Placebo
- Keywords
- epicanthoplasty, Botulinum Toxins, scar, intercanthal distance, blepharoplasty
- Medical subject headings
- Cicatrix
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
5U botulinum toxin in 0.1 mL normal saline, injected in two points at one side, 2.5U per point, local injection
PlaceboDrug
0.1 mL normal saline, injected in two points at one side, 0.05 mL per point, local injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Botulinum toxin | Experimental | 5U Botulinum toxin in 0.1 mL normal saline, administered in one of the intercanthus Receives: Drug: Botulinum toxin type A |
| Normal Saline | Placebo comparator | 0.1 mL normal saline, administered in the other intercanthus Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Vancouver Scar scale
Vancouver scar scale measures pigmentation, vascularity, pliability and scar height on the postoperative 6 month F/U
Measured: 6 month
intercanthal distance ratio
the ratio of the intercanthal distance to the interpupillary distance
Measured: 6 month
Secondary outcomes (1)
Photographic measurement
The scar width of the patient's picture at 6 month after surgery will be measured using photoshop CS3 extended. One ruler will be placed on the patient's nose before taken the photo. Then the scar width could be measured.
Measured: 6 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Sep 2017
- Study start1 Apr 2017
- Primary completion1 Feb 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Apr 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ScarStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ru-Lin Huang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03294382
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 9hospital
- Status last verified
- Sep 2017
- First submitted
- 22 Sep 2017
- Last updated
- 27 Sep 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Chang CS, Wallace CG, Hsiao YC, Chang CJ, Chen PK. Botulinum toxin to improve results in cleft lip repair: a double-blinded, randomized, vehicle-controlled clinical trial. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 26;9(12):e115690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115690. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25541942Chang CS, Wallace CG, Hsiao YC, Chang CJ, Chen PK. Botulinum toxin to improve results in cleft lip repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Sep;134(3):511-516. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000416.
PubMed 25158709Al-Qattan MM, Al-Shanawani BN, Alshomer F. Botulinum toxin type A: implications in wound healing, facial cutaneous scarring, and cleft lip repair. Ann Saudi Med. 2013 Sep-Oct;33(5):482-8. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2013.482.
PubMed 24188943Zelken J, Yang SY, Chang CS, Chang CJ, Yang JY, Chuang SS, Chen HC, Hsiao YC. Donor Site Aesthetic Enhancement With Preoperative Botulinum Toxin in Forehead Flap Nasal Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Nov;77(5):535-538. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000625.
PubMed 26418784Kim YS, Lee HJ, Cho SH, Lee JD, Kim HS. Early postoperative treatment of thyroidectomy scars using botulinum toxin: a split-scar, double-blind randomized controlled trial. Wound Repair Regen. 2014 Sep-Oct;22(5):605-12. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12204. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
PubMed 24898579Kwon B, Nguyen AH. Reconsideration of the Epicanthus: Evolution of the Eyelid and the Devolutional Concept of Asian Blepharoplasty. Semin Plast Surg. 2015 Aug;29(3):171-83. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1556849.
PubMed 26306084Elhefnawy AM. Assessment of intralesional injection of botulinum toxin type A injection for hypertrophic scars. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2016 May-Jun;82(3):279-83. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.173586.
PubMed 27088929Shaarawy E, Hegazy RA, Abdel Hay RM. Intralesional botulinum toxin type A equally effective and better tolerated than intralesional steroid in the treatment of keloids: a randomized controlled trial. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2015 Jun;14(2):161-6. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12134. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
PubMed 25810045Robinson AJ, Khadim MF, Khan K. Keloid scars and treatment with Botulinum Toxin Type A: the Belfast experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Mar;66(3):439-40. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.08.042. Epub 2012 Oct 23. No abstract available.
PubMed 23092904Zhang DZ, Liu XY, Xiao WL, Xu YX. Botulinum Toxin Type A and the Prevention of Hypertrophic Scars on the Maxillofacial Area and Neck: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 17;11(3):e0151627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151627. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 26985661Huang RL, Ho CK, Tremp M, Xie Y, Li Q, Zan T. Early Postoperative Application of Botulinum Toxin Type A Prevents Hypertrophic Scarring after Epicanthoplasty: A Split-Face, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Oct;144(4):835-844. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006069.
PubMed 31568286
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Sep 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Botulinum Toxin to Improve Results in Epicanthoplasty
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03294382
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 9hospital
- Conditions
- Scar, Intercanthal Distance Ratio
- Keywords
- epicanthoplasty, Botulinum Toxins, scar, intercanthal distance, blepharoplasty
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Feb 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Medial epicanthal fold is a common skin fold in the inner part of the eye in more than 50% Asia population, giving the illusion of a shorter palpebral fissure length and a wider intercanthal distance. Currently, various epicanthoplasty techniques have been well described to correct epicanthus fold. However, hypertrophic scarring after epicanthoplasty remains a clinical challenge, which seems inevitable and may leading to unpleasing supratarsal crease, recurrence of medial epicanthus fold, even obvious scar formation. Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) is widely used for facial rejuvenation and many other medical indications. It is a potent neurotoxin that indirectly blocks neuromuscular transmission and leads to functional denervation of striated muscle for 2 to 6 months after injection. Recently, experimental study and clinical trails have revealed that BTX-A can inhibit the growth of fibroblasts derived from hypertrophic scars and influenced the expression of transforming growth factor-β1. Therefore, we hypothesized that BTX-A can improve hypertrophic scarring after epicanthoplasty through release orbicularis oculi muscle tension, inhibit fibroblast growth, and reduce collagen production. The main aim of this trail is to evaluate the efficiency of BTX-A injection on improving hypertrophic scaring after epicanthoplasty.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Botulinum toxin | Experimental | Drug: Botulinum toxin type A5U Botulinum toxin in 0.1 mL normal saline, administered in one of the intercanthus |
| Normal Saline | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo0.1 mL normal saline, administered in the other intercanthus |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 35 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- patients with moderate to severe congenital epicanthus.
- patients accept Park Z epicanthoplasty.
- Written informed consent given
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- epicanthus caused by trauma, surgical injury.
- patients with both epicanthus and blepharopotosis.
- patients with blepharophimosis-ptosis-epicanthus inversus syndrome, or only inversus epicanthus
- patients underwent Botulinum Toxin Type A periocular injection within 6 months
- patients ever have been allergic to Botulinum Toxin Type A or any components of Botulinum Toxin Type A
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Botulinum toxin type A5U botulinum toxin in 0.1 mL normal saline, injected in two points at one side, 2.5U per point, local injection | Drug | Botulinum toxin |
| Placebo0.1 mL normal saline, injected in two points at one side, 0.05 mL per point, local injection | Drug | Normal Saline |
Primary outcome
Vancouver Scar scale
Time frame: 6 month
Vancouver scar scale measures pigmentation, vascularity, pliability and scar height on the postoperative 6 month F/U
intercanthal distance ratio
Time frame: 6 month
the ratio of the intercanthal distance to the interpupillary distance
1 secondary outcome
Photographic measurement
Time frame: 6 month
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Sep 2017.
- Background: PubMed 25541942Chang CS, Wallace CG, Hsiao YC, Chang CJ, Chen PK. Botulinum toxin to improve results in cleft lip repair: a double-blinded, randomized, vehicle-controlled clinical trial. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 26;9(12):e115690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115690. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 25158709Chang CS, Wallace CG, Hsiao YC, Chang CJ, Chen PK. Botulinum toxin to improve results in cleft lip repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Sep;134(3):511-516. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000416.
- Background: PubMed 24188943Al-Qattan MM, Al-Shanawani BN, Alshomer F. Botulinum toxin type A: implications in wound healing, facial cutaneous scarring, and cleft lip repair. Ann Saudi Med. 2013 Sep-Oct;33(5):482-8. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2013.482.
- Background: PubMed 26418784Zelken J, Yang SY, Chang CS, Chang CJ, Yang JY, Chuang SS, Chen HC, Hsiao YC. Donor Site Aesthetic Enhancement With Preoperative Botulinum Toxin in Forehead Flap Nasal Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Nov;77(5):535-538. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000625.
- Background: PubMed 24898579Kim YS, Lee HJ, Cho SH, Lee JD, Kim HS. Early postoperative treatment of thyroidectomy scars using botulinum toxin: a split-scar, double-blind randomized controlled trial. Wound Repair Regen. 2014 Sep-Oct;22(5):605-12. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12204. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
- Results publication: PubMed 26306084Kwon B, Nguyen AH. Reconsideration of the Epicanthus: Evolution of the Eyelid and the Devolutional Concept of Asian Blepharoplasty. Semin Plast Surg. 2015 Aug;29(3):171-83. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1556849.
- Results publication: PubMed 27088929Elhefnawy AM. Assessment of intralesional injection of botulinum toxin type A injection for hypertrophic scars. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2016 May-Jun;82(3):279-83. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.173586.
- Results publication: PubMed 25810045Shaarawy E, Hegazy RA, Abdel Hay RM. Intralesional botulinum toxin type A equally effective and better tolerated than intralesional steroid in the treatment of keloids: a randomized controlled trial. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2015 Jun;14(2):161-6. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12134. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
- Results publication: PubMed 23092904Robinson AJ, Khadim MF, Khan K. Keloid scars and treatment with Botulinum Toxin Type A: the Belfast experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Mar;66(3):439-40. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.08.042. Epub 2012 Oct 23. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 26985661Zhang DZ, Liu XY, Xiao WL, Xu YX. Botulinum Toxin Type A and the Prevention of Hypertrophic Scars on the Maxillofacial Area and Neck: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 17;11(3):e0151627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151627. eCollection 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31568286Huang RL, Ho CK, Tremp M, Xie Y, Li Q, Zan T. Early Postoperative Application of Botulinum Toxin Type A Prevents Hypertrophic Scarring after Epicanthoplasty: A Split-Face, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Oct;144(4):835-844. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006069.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Scar
Recruiting
A Study Assessing Arrhythmia Mapping With a Multi-Electrode Mapping Catheter
Scar-related Atrial Tachycardia, Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study to Evaluate ALN-CIDEB in Adult Participants With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease or With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis (MASLD/MASH)
Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease, Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis
Recruiting
Clinical Impact of Uterine Repair During Cesarean Section With Barbed Suture on the Incidence of Isthmocele
Isthmocele, Cesarean Scar Defect
RecruitingPhase 2
Tirzepatide for Treatment of CCCA
Central Centrifugal Cicatricial Alopecia (CCCA)
Recruiting
Surgical Outcomes of Simple Interrupted Versus Running Epidermal Sutures in Full-thickness Skin Graft Placement
Skin Graft Scar
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Botulinum toxin type A in people with Scar and Intercanthal Distance Ratio, run by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Vancouver Scar scale (time frame: 6 month). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03294382, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Sep 2017.