AzTrials
AzTrials

Leber Hereditary Optic NeuropathyPhase 3REFLECTNCT03293524

Efficacy & Safety Study of Bilateral IVT Injection of GS010 in LHON Subjects Due to the ND4 Mutation for up to 1 Year

A Phase 3 study testing GS010 in people with Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy, run by GenSight Biologics at 13 sites in 7 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of GS010 gene therapy - (lenadogene nolparvovec) in subjects with LHON due to the G11778A ND4 mitochondrial mutation with a vision loss up to one year. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy
What is being tested?
GS010
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
98 participants
Where
13 sitesin 7 countries
Study dates
12 Mar 2018to 23 Jul 2024
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Main Selection Criteria:

  • Age 15 years or older on the date of signed informed consent.
  • Clinically manifested vision loss due to ND4 LHON, to any extent, in at least one eye.
  • Vision loss duration of ≤ 365 days (i.e. ≤ 1 year) in each affected eye at Inclusion Visit (Visit 2).

Main Non-Selection Criteria:

  • Contraindication to intravitreal injection in any eye.
  • Subjects refusing to discontinue idebenone.
  • Previous vitrectomy in either eye.
  • Narrow angle in any eye contra-indicating pupillary dilation.
  • Presence of known/documented mutations, other than the G11778A ND4 LHON-causing mutation, which are known to cause pathology of the optic nerve, retina or afferent visual system.
  • History of recurrent uveitis (idiopathic or immune-related) or active ocular inflammation.

Main Inclusion Criteria:

  • Vision loss duration of ≤ 365 days (i.e. ≤ 1 year) in each affected eye at Inclusion Visit (Visit 2).
  • Each eye of the subject must maintain at least Hand Motion (HM) visual acuity, as defined by the study's SOP for visual acuity testing.
  • Documented results of genotyping showing the presence of the G11778A mutation in the ND4 gene and the absence of the other primary LHON-associated mutations (ND1 or ND6) in the subject's mitochondrial DNA.

Main Exclusion Criteria:

  • Light Perception (LP) or No Light Perception (NLP) visual acuity in any eye, as defined by the study's standard operating procedure (SOP) for visual acuity testing.
  • Presence of active infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis or endophthalmitis in either eye.
  • Presence of alcoholism, alcohol dependence, or alcohol or drug abuse (excluding nicotine).

Trial locations and contacts

13 sites in 7 countries.

13 sites in 7 countries

United States7 sites
  • Emory Healthcare - The Emory Clinic

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • University of Colorado Health Eye Center

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Vanderbilt Eye Institute

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232

  • Department of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

    New York, New York, 10029

  • Doheny Eye Center UCLA Pasadena

    Pasadena, California, 91105

  • Departments of Neurology and Ophthalmology, Wills Eye Hospital and Thomas Jefferson University

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107

Other trials in United States

Belgium1 site
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent

    Ghent, 9000

Other trials in Belgium

France1 site
  • CHNO Les Quinze Vingts

    Paris, Paris, 75012

Other trials in France

Italy1 site
  • IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (ISNB) Clinica Neurologica

    Bologna, 40139

Other trials in Italy

Spain1 site
  • Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal

    Madrid, 28034

Other trials in Spain

Taiwan1 site
  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital

    Taipei, 11217

Other trials in Taiwan

United Kingdom1 site
  • Moorfields Eye Hospital

    London, Greater London, EC1V 2PD

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Efficacy and Safety of Bilateral Intravitreal Injection of GS010: A Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Subjects Affected With G11778A ND4 Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy for Up to One Year

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of GS010 gene therapy - (lenadogene nolparvovec) in subjects with LHON due to the G11778A ND4 mitochondrial mutation with a vision loss up to one year.

Read the detailed description

The REFLECT study is a Phase 3, international, multi-center, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of intravitreal (IVT) of GS010 compared to IVT of placebo in second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes at 1.5 years post-treatment, by analyzing the change from baseline of the visual acuity in ND4 LHON subjects with vision loss up to one year.

Being tested
GS010, Placebo
Keywords
Leber Hereditary Optic Atrophy, Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy, LHON, Eye Diseases, Hereditary Eye Diseases, Inherited retinal dystrophies or degeneration, Gene Therapy, Intravitreal Injections, Mitochondrial Disease, AAV2 Vectors, Hereditary Optic Atrophy
Medical subject headings
Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber, Eye Diseases, Eye Diseases, Hereditary, Mitochondrial Diseases, Optic Atrophies, Hereditary

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GS010Genetic

    Also called Lenadogene nolparvovec

    GS010 is a recombinant adeno-associated viral vector serotype 2 (rAAV2/2) containing the wild-type ND4 gene (rAAV2/2-ND4). GS010 was administrated via intravitreal injection containing 1.2/1.3E11 vg in 90 μL balanced sterile saline solution (BSSS).

  • PlaceboDrug

    The placebo is a balanced sterile saline solution (BSSS) used for IVT. The placebo was administered via intravitreal injection in a volume of 90 μL.

Study groups in NCT03293524
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
GS010-GS010ExperimentalPatients received single IVT injection of GS010 in both their first-affected eye and their second-affected/not-yet-affected eye at a droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) dose of 1.2/1.3E11 vg in 90 μL for each eye. Treatment could be performed either on a single day (1 IVT injection in each eye on Day 0) or on 2 consecutive days (1st IVT injection on Day -1 and 2nd IVT injection on Day 0).
Receives: Genetic: GS010
GS010-PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPatients received single IVT injection of GS010 in their first-affected eye and placebo IVT injection in their second-affected/not-yet-affected eye. Patients received IVT lenadogene nolparvovec in their first-affected eye (ddPCR dose of 1.2/1.3E11 vg in a volume of 90 μL) and placebo IVT injection (volume of 90 μL) in their second-affected/not-yet-affected eye. Treatment could be performed either on a single day (1 IVT injection in each eye on Day 0) or on 2 consecutive days (1st IVT injection on Day -1 and 2nd IVT injection on Day 0).
Receives: Genetic: GS010; Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline of the Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Reported With Log of the Minimal Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) at 1.5 Years Post-treatment, in the Second Affected/Not-yet Affected Eyes

    The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline of BCVA reported with LogMAR at 1.5-year post-treatment, in the second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes of ND4 LHON patients with vision loss up to one year. LogMAR BCVA was used to represent BCVA.

    Measured: at 1.5 years post-treatment, in the second-affected/not-yet affected eyes

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Change From Baseline of the BCVA Reported With LogMAR at 5 Years Post-treatment, in the Second Affected/Not-yet Affected Eyes

    Change from baseline of BCVA reported with LogMAR at 5 years post-treatment, in the second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes of ND4 LHON patients with vision loss up to one year. LogMAR BCVA was used to represent BCVA.

    Measured: at 5 years post-treatment, in the second-affected/not-yet affected eyes

  2. Proportion of Patients Who Switched From Off-chart Eyes to On-chart Eyes at 5 Years Post-treatment

    Proportion of patients with both eyes off-chart, defined as those patients unable to read letter on the ETDRS chart, who had at least one eye on-chart, defined as those patients able to read letters on the ETDRS chart (at either 4 meters or 1 meter) at 5 years

    Measured: From baseline to 5 years post-treatment

  3. Responder Analyses - Improvements From Nadir (Gainer Eyes) at 5 Years

    Proportion of patients with an improvement of at least -0.3 LogMAR (≥ +15 ETDRS letters) from nadir to year 5 in at least one eye. Nadir was defined for each eye of each subject as the worst value observed from baseline to year 5

    Measured: From nadir to 5 years post-treatment

  4. Responder Analyses - Clinically Relevant Recovery From Nadir at 5 Years

    Proportion of patients with clinically relevant recovery (CRR) from nadir that was defined as patient with a CRR in at least one eye - Patient with at least one eye which was on chart at nadir, and which had an improvement of at least -0.2 LogMAR from nadir, or which was off-chart at nadir but became on-chart

    Measured: From nadir to 5 years post-treatment

  5. Responder Analyses- Clinically Relevant Benefit at 5 Years

    Proportion of patients who had clinically relevant stabilization (CRS), defined as eyes with LogMAR BCVA < 1 at baseline and at 5 years post-treatment or had a clinically relevant recovery (CRR) from nadir. The best response observed in either eye was considered.

    Measured: From baseline nadir to 5 years post-treatment

  6. Quality of Life Questionnaire: VFQ-25 - Composite Score

    Change from baseline to 5 years follow up in the Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) composite score. The VFQ-25 is a patient-reported outcome instrument assessing vision-related quality of life and consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs plus an additional single-item general health rating question. Each item was converted to a 0-100 scale for scoring, where 100 represents the best possible score on the measure and 0 represents the worst. Items within each subscale were averaged to create 12 subscale scores (11 subscales related to vision + 1 subscale related to general health). The vision-related subscale scores (excluding the general health rating question) were then averaged to calculate the composite score.

    Measured: From baseline to 5 years post-treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Sep 2017
  2. Study start12 Mar 2018
  3. Primary completion23 Jul 2024
  4. Study completion23 Jul 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Each participant had an eye designated as first-affected eye, and a fellow eye designated as either second-affected eye or not-yet-affected eye at the Screening Visit based on non-equal vision loss duration. In participants reporting simultaneous onset of vision loss in both eyes, the second-affected eye was randomly selected between both eyes. All participants received GS010 in their first-affected eye and were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either GS010 (GS010- GS010 treatment arm) or placebo (GS010-Placebo treatment arm) in the second-affected/not-yet-affected eye.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
98 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03293524
Sponsor's protocol ID
GS-LHON-CLIN-05
Other IDs
2017-002187-40, 2017
Acronym
REFLECT
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
19 Sep 2017
Last updated
16 Apr 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Expanded access
Available

Publications

  • Carelli V, Newman NJ, Yu-Wai-Man P, Biousse V, Moster ML, Subramanian PS, Vignal-Clermont C, Wang AG, Donahue SP, Leroy BP, Sergott RC, Klopstock T, Sadun AA, Rebolleda Fernandez G, Chwalisz BK, Banik R, Girmens JF, La Morgia C, DeBusk AA, Jurkute N, Priglinger C, Karanjia R, Josse C, Salzmann J, Montestruc F, Roux M, Taiel M, Sahel JA; the LHON Study Group. Indirect Comparison of Lenadogene Nolparvovec Gene Therapy Versus Natural History in Patients with Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy Carrying the m.11778G>A MT-ND4 Mutation. Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Feb;12(1):401-429. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00611-x. Epub 2022 Nov 30.

    PubMed 36449262

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing GS010 in people with Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy, run by GenSight Biologics at 13 sites in 7 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 13 sites in United States, Belgium, France, Italy, Spain and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Apr 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline of the Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Reported With Log of the Minimal Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) at 1.5 Years Post-treatment, in the Second Affected/Not-yet Affected Eyes (time frame: at 1.5 years post-treatment, in the second-affected/not-yet affected eyes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03293524, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in