Relationship, MaritalNCT03292692
Empirically-Based Couple Interventions on the Web: Serving the Underserved
A study testing OurRelationship in people with Relationship, Marital and Marital Conflict, run by University of Miami.
Trial summary
Although several empirically-supported interventions to prevent and treat relationship distress have been developed, the majority of couples - especially high-risk couples - do not seek these face-to-face interventions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 64 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Relationship, Marital, Marital Conflict
- What is being tested?
- OurRelationship
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 600 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 13 Aug 2013to 18 Oct 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 64 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Currently in a heterosexual relationship
- Currently married, engaged, or cohabiting for at least 6 months
- At least one partner scoring in distressed range of relationship satisfaction (or both partners > 0.5 SD of population mean of distress).
- Living in the United States
- Both partners ages 21-64 (inclusive)
Who cannot join
- Severe Intimate Partner Violence in last 3 months
- Moderate to severe suicidal ideation in last 3 months
- Concrete plans to divorce
- Ongoing affair
- Ongoing couple therapy (or refusal to seek couple therapy for 3 months)
About this study
Although several empirically-supported interventions to prevent and treat relationship distress have been developed, the majority of couples - especially high-risk couples - do not seek these face-to-face interventions. However, our pilot data indicate that large numbers of couples will seek self-administered assistance for their relationship. Additionally, unlike many in-person interventions, couples seeking self-help resources tend to have higher levels of relationship distress. Thus, to improve the reach of couple interventions, this project will translate a leading empirically-supported intervention targeting early signs of relationship distress into a Web-based format. This intervention will consist of individualized feedback and professionally-filmed video clips tailored to a couple's specific needs. By intervening effectively with a large number of couples, the resulting Web-based intervention has the potential to have a population-level impact on relationship distress, divorce, and resulting child difficulties.
In the proposed project, building off our previous pilot studies, effective translation of this in-person intervention into a Web-based format will be ensured by conducting two additional intensive pilot studies. Once final changes have been made to the website and Web-based intervention, 300 couples will be randomly assigned to a wait-list control group or an online intervention. All couples will be assessed for the initial two months; intervention couples will be assessed for one year. This project will: 1) demonstrate that couples randomly assigned to the online intervention will report higher levels of individual, child, and relationship functioning than those in the wait-list control group; 2) document the mechanisms of both active conditions; and 3) show that initial gains in those assigned to the intervention are largely maintained through one-year follow-up.
- Conditions
- Relationship, Marital, Marital Conflict
- Being tested
- OurRelationship
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OurRelationshipBehavioural
Also called OurRelationship.com
Online intervention with coach support
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| OurRelationship | Experimental | Online Intervention Receives: Behavioral: OurRelationship |
| Waitlist Control | No intervention | 2 month waiting period before couples can receive intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Relationship Satisfaction
Relationship satisfaction as measured by the total scale on the four-item version of the Couple Satisfaction Index (Funk \& Rogge, 2007; doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572). Scores on this measure range from 0-21, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
Measured: Pre (0 weeks), Mid (3 weeks), and Post (approximately 6 weeks)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Relationship Confidence
Relationship confidence as measured by 2 items from the Confidence Scale ("I believe we can handle whatever conflicts will arise in the future" and "I feel good about our prospects to make this relationship work"). Scored ranged from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicate more confidence.Cronbach's alpha = .88. These two items have been used in previous studies of couples to assess change (e.g., http://dx.doi .org/10.1177/0192513X08324388).
Measured: Pre (0 weeks), Mid (3 weeks), and Post (approximately 6 weeks)
Depressive Symptoms
Depressive symptoms as measured by the 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) Scale (Cole, Rabin, Smith, \& Kaufman, 2004). The total score was used, with possible scores ranging from 0-30. Higher scores on this measure indicate greater depressive symptoms.
Measured: Pre (0 weeks) and Post (approximately 6 weeks)
Anxiety Symptoms
Anxiety symptoms as measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7; Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams, \& Löwe, 2006). The range of the measure is 0 to 49, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety symptoms. Cronbach's alpha in the present sample was .91.
Measured: Pre (0 weeks) and Post (approximately 6 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Sep 2017
- Study start13 Aug 2013
- Primary completion18 Oct 2014
- Study completion18 Oct 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Relationship, MaritalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Miami
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), University of California, Los Angeles, University of Washington
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Brian Doss, University of Miami
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03292692
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20120378
- Other IDs
- R01HD059802
- Status last verified
- Feb 2018
- First submitted
- 20 Sep 2017
- Last updated
- 12 Feb 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified data available to qualified researchers upon request.
Publications
Doss BD, Cicila LN, Georgia EJ, Roddy MK, Nowlan KM, Benson LA, Christensen A. A randomized controlled trial of the web-based OurRelationship program: Effects on relationship and individual functioning. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Apr;84(4):285-96. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000063. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
PubMed 26999504Roddy MK, Georgia EJ, Doss BD. Couples with Intimate Partner Violence Seeking Relationship Help: Associations and Implications for Self-Help and Online Interventions. Fam Process. 2018 Jun;57(2):293-307. doi: 10.1111/famp.12291. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
PubMed 28425562Roddy MK, Stamatis CA, Rothman K, Doss BD. Mechanisms of change in a brief, online relationship intervention. J Fam Psychol. 2020 Feb;34(1):57-67. doi: 10.1037/fam0000569. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
PubMed 31380690Doss BD, Roddy MK, Llabre MM, Georgia Salivar E, Jensen-Doss A. Improvements in coparenting conflict and child adjustment following an online program for relationship distress. J Fam Psychol. 2020 Feb;34(1):68-78. doi: 10.1037/fam0000582. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
PubMed 31380688
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Feb 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Empirically-Based Couple Interventions on the Web: Serving the Underserved
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03292692
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 20120378
- Conditions
- Relationship, Marital, Marital Conflict
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MiamiUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), University of California, Los Angeles, University of Washington
- Study start
- 13 Aug 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Oct 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Oct 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 12 Feb 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Although several empirically-supported interventions to prevent and treat relationship distress have been developed, the majority of couples - especially high-risk couples - do not seek these face-to-face interventions. However, our pilot data indicate that large numbers of couples will seek self-administered assistance for their relationship. Additionally, unlike many in-person interventions, couples seeking self-help resources tend to have higher levels of relationship distress. Thus, to improve the reach of couple interventions, this project will translate a leading empirically-supported intervention targeting early signs of relationship distress into a Web-based format. This intervention will consist of individualized feedback and professionally-filmed video clips tailored to a couple's specific needs. By intervening effectively with a large number of couples, the resulting Web-based intervention has the potential to have a population-level impact on relationship distress, divorce, and resulting child difficulties.
In the proposed project, building off our previous pilot studies, effective translation of this in-person intervention into a Web-based format will be ensured by conducting two additional intensive pilot studies. Once final changes have been made to the website and Web-based intervention, 300 couples will be randomly assigned to a wait-list control group or an online intervention. All couples will be assessed for the initial two months; intervention couples will be assessed for one year. This project will: 1) demonstrate that couples randomly assigned to the online intervention will report higher levels of individual, child, and relationship functioning than those in the wait-list control group; 2) document the mechanisms of both active conditions; and 3) show that initial gains in those assigned to the intervention are largely maintained through one-year follow-up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| OurRelationship | Experimental | Behavioral: OurRelationshipOnline Intervention |
| Waitlist Control | No intervention | –2 month waiting period before couples can receive intervention |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 64 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Currently in a heterosexual relationship
- Currently married, engaged, or cohabiting for at least 6 months
- At least one partner scoring in distressed range of relationship satisfaction (or both partners > 0.5 SD of population mean of distress).
- Living in the United States
- Both partners ages 21-64 (inclusive)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Severe Intimate Partner Violence in last 3 months
- Moderate to severe suicidal ideation in last 3 months
- Concrete plans to divorce
- Ongoing affair
- Ongoing couple therapy (or refusal to seek couple therapy for 3 months)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OurRelationshipAlso: OurRelationship.comOnline intervention with coach support | Behavioural | OurRelationship |
Primary outcome
Relationship Satisfaction
Time frame: Pre (0 weeks), Mid (3 weeks), and Post (approximately 6 weeks)
Relationship satisfaction as measured by the total scale on the four-item version of the Couple Satisfaction Index (Funk \& Rogge, 2007; doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572). Scores on this measure range from 0-21, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
3 secondary outcomes
Relationship Confidence
Time frame: Pre (0 weeks), Mid (3 weeks), and Post (approximately 6 weeks)
Depressive Symptoms
Time frame: Pre (0 weeks) and Post (approximately 6 weeks)
Anxiety Symptoms
Time frame: Pre (0 weeks) and Post (approximately 6 weeks)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Feb 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 26999504Doss BD, Cicila LN, Georgia EJ, Roddy MK, Nowlan KM, Benson LA, Christensen A. A randomized controlled trial of the web-based OurRelationship program: Effects on relationship and individual functioning. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Apr;84(4):285-96. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000063. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 28425562Roddy MK, Georgia EJ, Doss BD. Couples with Intimate Partner Violence Seeking Relationship Help: Associations and Implications for Self-Help and Online Interventions. Fam Process. 2018 Jun;57(2):293-307. doi: 10.1111/famp.12291. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31380690Roddy MK, Stamatis CA, Rothman K, Doss BD. Mechanisms of change in a brief, online relationship intervention. J Fam Psychol. 2020 Feb;34(1):57-67. doi: 10.1037/fam0000569. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31380688Doss BD, Roddy MK, Llabre MM, Georgia Salivar E, Jensen-Doss A. Improvements in coparenting conflict and child adjustment following an online program for relationship distress. J Fam Psychol. 2020 Feb;34(1):68-78. doi: 10.1037/fam0000582. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified data available to qualified researchers upon request.
Related trials for Relationship, Marital
Not yet recruiting
Mobile Prenatal Education for Expectant Fathers and Its Effects on Bonding, Stress, Breastfeeding and Marital Satisfaction
Breastfeeding Attitudes, Breast Feeding
Not yet recruiting
Comparative Effects of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, and Treatment-as-Usual on Depression Among People With Marital Crisis
Depression - Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Marital Adjustment Strategies on Emotional Divorce Among Married Women
Marital Relationship
Active, not recruiting
Effects of a Financial Literacy and Gender-Transformative Couples Intervention on Parenting Practices in India
Parenting Practices, Intimate Partner Violence (IPV)
Recruiting
Sexual Health Education During Pregnancy
Sexuality, Depression
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing OurRelationship in people with Relationship, Marital and Marital Conflict, run by University of Miami.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Feb 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Relationship Satisfaction (time frame: Pre (0 weeks), Mid (3 weeks), and Post (approximately 6 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03292692, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Feb 2018.