Gastric VaricesNCT03277937
Angiography for Evaluation of the Feeder Vessel in EUS-guided Coils and Cyanoacrylate Therapy for Gastric Varices
A study testing angiography in EUS-injection of coils + CYA in people with Gastric Varices, run by Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas at 1 site in Ecuador.
Trial summary
INTRODUCTION: Bleeding from gastric varices (GV) is associated with a high mortality rate. Injection of cyanoacrylate (CYA) using standard gastroscope has demonstrated to achieve higher hemostasis and lower rebleeding rates compared to band ligation or sclerotherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastric Varices
- What is being tested?
- angiography in EUS-injection of coils + CYA
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEcuador
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2015to 1 Jun 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients above 18 years old with gastric varices (GV) on the initial standard diagnostic upper endoscopy will be enrolled. GV will be classified
- Only gastro-esophageal varices type II (GOV II) (fundal varices communicating with esophageal varices) and isolated gastric varices type I (IGV I) (fundal varices within a few centimeters of the gastric cardia) will be included (according to Sarin and Kumar classification).
- Patients with active bleeding and history of previous bleeding due to GV (secondary prophylaxis)
- Patients with high-risk GV suitable for primary prophylaxis according to Baveno VI consensus.
Who cannot join
- Gastro-esophageal varices type I (GOV I) will be excluded as they can be successfully treated by endoscopic band ligation.
- Pregnancy,
- Hepatorenal syndrome
- Multi-organ failure,
- platelet count less than 50,000/ml
- International Normalized Rate (INR) >2,
Show all 10Show fewer
- esophageal stricture,
- Splenic vein thrombosis
- Portal vein thrombosis
- Allergy to iodine.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Ecuador1 site
Ecuadorian Institute of Digestive Diseases, Omnihospital
Guayaquil, Guayas, 090505
About this study
Official title: The Use of Angiography for Determination and Confirmation of the Feeder Vessel as a Modification of the Original EUS-guided Coils and Cyanoacrylate Therapy for Gastric Varices
INTRODUCTION: Bleeding from gastric varices (GV) is associated with a high mortality rate. Injection of cyanoacrylate (CYA) using standard gastroscope has demonstrated to achieve higher hemostasis and lower rebleeding rates compared to band ligation or sclerotherapy. Nevertheless CYA treatment is known to be associated with significant adverse events. Pulmonary embolism due to CYA injection is a serious and sometimes fatal complication of this therapy. These patients usually have respiratory symptom, however this complication can be present in asymptomatic patients, being demonstrated only by a pathological CT scan. On the other hand, it has been described that the risk of glue embolism dependent on the volume of CYA injected, being significantly greater with high volumes. Other complications related to CYA injection are hemorrhage from injection site ulcers, fever, peritonitis, needle impaction, and even death. Also the injection material can cause serious damage to the endoscope.
Currently, endoscopic injection of CYA can be performed by direct visualization using a standard gastroscope or guided by Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) with injection of CYA alone or in combination with coils. The injection of coils in conjunction with CYA may reduce or eliminate the risk of glue embolization as coils can function as a scaffold to retain CYA within the varix and may decrease the amount of glue injection needed to achieve obliteration. It has been previously demonstrated that treatment under EUS guidance may have some benefits. It allows a precise targeting of the varix lumen or afferent feeding veins, being the vessel obstructed with less amount of CYA than used for the "blind" injection by standard endoscopy, reducing the risk of glue embolism. EUS can confirm varix obliteration by Doppler effect and also the visualization of GV is not impaired by blood or food in the stomach, thus it can be used in the setting of active hemorrhage.
Read the detailed description
On the other hand, despite the EUS-injection of coils and CYA have shown very promising results, it is extremely important to have experience performing this technique, as the injection in a wrong vessel could be catastrophic. It has been develop in our unit a modification of Binmoeller´s original technique by performing the injection of coils and CYA by EUS and fluoroscopic guidance. The performance of an angiography guided by EUS and under fluoroscopy evaluation, represents a modification to the original technique that add some benefits: 1) The injection of water-soluble contrast allows identifying the variceal flow and the afferent feeding vessel (left gastric vein) and avoiding splenic vessels embolization. 2) Also, if there is a shunt it can be detected and the injection of CYA can be avoided. 3) In case of active bleeding the angiography allows visualizing which varix is bleeding, and target the correct vessel.
The aim of this study is to show the results and potential benefits by adding an angiography to the original EUS-guided injection of coils in combination with CYA technique, to determinate and confirm the feeder vessel in GV treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study design: It will be an interventional, descriptive and prospective study, performed in the Ecuadorian Institute of Digestive Disease (IECED), Omni Hospital Academic Tertiary Center Ecuador. Patients have been included from July 2015 and will continue to be included up to October 2017. The study protocol and consent form has been approved by the institutional review board, and will be conducted according to the declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent will be obtained from all subjects.
Population selection, inclusion and exclusion criteria: Patients above 18 years old with gastric varices (GV) on the initial standard diagnostic upper endoscopy will be enrolled. GV will be classified according to Sarin and Kumar classification. Only gastro-esophageal varices type II (GOV II) (fundal varices communicating with esophageal varices) and isolated gastric varices type I (IGV I) (fundal varices within a few centimeters of the gastric cardia) will be included. Gastro-esophageal varices type I (GOV I) will be excluded as they can be successfully treated by endoscopic band ligation. Patients with active bleeding and history of previous bleeding due to GV (secondary prophylaxis) will be included as well as patients with high-risk GV suitable for primary prophylaxis according to Baveno VI consensus. The exclusion criteria will be pregnancy, concurrent hepatorenal syndrome and/or multi-organ failure, platelet count less than 50,000/ml or International Normalized Rate (INR) >2, esophageal stricture, splenic or portal vein thrombosis and allergy to iodine.
Endoscopic Procedure and Technique: All procedures will be performed in a hospital-based interventional endoscopy setting, where radiology is available and by one endoscopist (C.R.M), under general anesthesia, with tracheal intubation, with the patient in supine position and using antibiotic prophylaxis. EUS examination will be performed using a 3.8 mm working channel linear-array therapeutic echoendoscopes (EG 3870UTK; Pentax, Hamburg, Germany), attached to an ultrasound console (Avius Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The echoendoscope will be positioned in the distal esophagus at the level of the cardia (anterograde trans-esophageal, transcrural approach) to visualize the gastric fundus and intramural varices.
Detection of the feeder vessel by EUS: Once positioned, water will be instilled to fill the gastric fundus, in order to improve acoustic coupling and visualization of GV. EUS color Doppler imaging will be used to allow direct visualization of the varices flow. Following the gastric vessel, and by using the fine-flow doppler color of the ultrasound console, the vessel or vessels will be followed from the cardia (distal part of the esophagus) to the proximal part of the esophagus (2 to 3 cm) above the cardia, to detect the feeding vessel. The feeding vessel is characterized by the convergence of all vessels. Once the feeding vessel has been found, a 19 gauge EUS-fine needle aspiration (FNA) (Expect® flexible; Boston Scientific®, Marlborough, USA) will be used to access the vessel, the stylet will be withdrawn and a 20 ml syringe with negative pressure will be used to evaluate blood return, confirming intravascular location. In order to prevent blood clotting of the needle tip, 5 ml of saline solution will be instilled. Moreover, the flush with saline solution allows to confirm the flow of the gastric vessels under B-mode ultrasound visualization.
Using angiography to confirm the target vessel (feeder vessel) and flow traject: In the final diagnostic step, an angiography will be performed using 5 to 10 mL of water-soluble contrast (Ultravist, Bayer, Ecuador) under fluoroscopic evaluation, in order to ensure intravascular location and study varix flow direction (afferent or efferent). Angiography technical success will be measured, determined as the possibility to define the flow trajectory vessel under fluoroscopy.
EUS-guided deployment of Coils and Cyanoacrylate injection: Finally, patients will be treated by EUS-deployment of coils followed by CYA injection. The intravascular embolization coils that will be used (10-16 mm coiled diameter, 12-20 cm straight lengths, 0.035 inches diameter, Nester Embolization Coil; Cook Medical) will be delivered into the vessel through the FNA needle, using the stylet as a pusher. Special attention will be paid not place the needle tip on the counter wall due to the risk of perforation, bleed, coil extrusion and to allow enough space for the coil to curl.
The CYA that will be used is the 2-Octyl-CYA (Dermabond; Ethicon, Piscataway, NJ). It will be injected always after the coils are deployed and then 1 mL of saline solution will be used to flush the glue completely through the needle. The diameter (10-16 mm), number of coils and the volume of the 2-Octyl-CYA injected will be calculated according to the diameter of the vessel measured on EUS and by the angiography of the vessel. After 30 seconds, once CYA has been solidified and the risk of bleeding on the puncturing site decrease, the needle will be withdrawn. Obliteration of the vessel will be confirmed 3 minutes later using Doppler imaging. Complete obliteration of the treated varix will be defined as absence of Doppler flow on EUS.
A direct visualization of the gastric varices will be performed after the EUS procedure to determine the effect of the obliteration of the feeder vessel by using a standard videoendoscope. After the procedure, patients will be observed for 2 hours in the recovery room before being discharged of the unit. In cases of primary prophylaxis the treatment will be ambulatory.
Finally, a 1, 3, 9 and 12 months follow-up will be performed in order to confirm the results of the EUS-therapeutic by EUS and by upper endoscopy.
Technical success will be considered as target of the vessels and deployment of the proposed EUS-therapeutic. Treatment failure and early rebleeding will be considered when bleeding occurred the first five days and between 5 and 90 days respectively.
Statistical analysis: Demographic characteristics, previous medication and radiological images will be described. Quantitative variables will be described in mean or median, and standard deviation or range, as corresponding. Qualitative variables will be described in percentages. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with a p value <0.05 will be considered to be statistically significant. The IECED institutional biostatistician will review statistical methodology of the study. Statistical calculations will be performed in SPSS software suite v.22.
- Conditions
- Gastric Varices
- Being tested
- angiography in EUS-injection of coils + CYA
- Keywords
- gastric varices, endoscopic ultrasound, coils, cyanoacrylate
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal and Gastric Varices
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
angiography in EUS-injection of coils + CYAProcedure or surgery
Also called Drug: cyanoacrylate, Device: coils
Doppler imaging will be used to allow direct visualization of the varices flow. The gastric vessels will be followed from the cardia to the proximal part of the esophagus, to detect the feeding vessel (FV). Once the FV has been found, a 19-gauge EUS-FNA will be used to access the vessel. An angiography will be performed using 5-10 ml of water-soluble contrast under fluoroscopy, to ensure intravascular location and study varix flow direction. Finally, patients will be treated by EUS-deployment of coils followed by CYA injection. The coils will be delivered into the vessel through the FNA needle, using the stylet as a pusher. The 2-Octyl-CYA will be used. It will be injected always after the coils deployment and then 1 mL of saline solution will be used to flush the glue completely.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with gastric varices | Experimental | Patients above 18 years old with gastric varices (GV) on the initial standard diagnostic upper endoscopy will be enrolled and treated using angiography in EUS-injection of coils + CYA. GV will be classified according to Sarin and Kumar classification. Only gastro-esophageal varices type II (GOV II) (fundal varices communicating with esophageal varices) and isolated gastric varices type I (IGV I) (fundal varices within a few centimeters of the gastric cardia) will be included. Gastro-esophageal varices type I (GOV I) will be excluded. Patients with active bleeding and history of previous bleeding due to GV (secondary prophylaxis) will be included as well as patients with high-risk GV suitable for primary prophylaxis according to Baveno VI consensus. T Receives: Procedure: angiography in EUS-injection of coils + CYA |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
efficacy of adding angiography to the EUS-guided injection of coils + CYA technique, to determinate, confirm and target the feeder vessel in GV treatment.
efficacy will be considered be the complete occlusion and/or disappearance of the GV and will be determinate by follow-up controls using EUS and upper endoscopy. Treatment failure and early rebleeding will be considered when bleeding occurred the first five days.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
safety of adding angiography to the EUS-guided injection of coils + CYA technique, to determinate and confirm the feeder vessel in GV treatment
all adverse events related to the technique during the procedure or the follow-up will be described.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Sep 2017
- Study start1 Jul 2015
- Primary completion1 Apr 2017
- Study completion1 Jun 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (27)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gastric VaricesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Carlos A Robles-Medranda, MD, Principal investigator, Ecuadorian Institute of Digestive Diseases
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03277937
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- JULY 20-2017
- Status last verified
- Nov 2018
- First submitted
- 18 Jul 2017
- Last updated
- 20 Nov 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Hashizume M, Akahoshi T, Tomikawa M. Management of gastric varices. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jan;26 Suppl 1:102-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06572.x.
PubMed 21199520Sarin SK, Sachdev G, Nanda R, Misra SP, Broor SL. Endoscopic sclerotherapy in the treatment of gastric varices. Br J Surg. 1988 Aug;75(8):747-50. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800750809.
PubMed 3262398Irani S, Kowdley K, Kozarek R. Gastric varices: an updated review of management. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb;45(2):133-48. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181fbe249.
PubMed 21135706Mahadeva S, Bellamy MC, Kessel D, Davies MH, Millson CE. Cost-effectiveness of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (histoacryl) glue injections versus transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the management of acute gastric variceal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Dec;98(12):2688-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.08769.x.
PubMed 14687818Cheng LF, Wang ZQ, Li CZ, Cai FC, Huang QY, Linghu EQ, Li W, Chai GJ, Sun GH, Mao YP, Wang YM, Li J, Gao P, Fan TY. Treatment of gastric varices by endoscopic sclerotherapy using butyl cyanoacrylate: 10 years' experience of 635 cases. Chin Med J (Engl). 2007 Dec 5;120(23):2081-5.
PubMed 18167180Seewald S, Ang TL, Imazu H, Naga M, Omar S, Groth S, Seitz U, Zhong Y, Thonke F, Soehendra N. A standardized injection technique and regimen ensures success and safety of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate injection for the treatment of gastric fundal varices (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Sep;68(3):447-54. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.050.
PubMed 18760173Romero-Castro R, Ellrichmann M, Ortiz-Moyano C, Subtil-Inigo JC, Junquera-Florez F, Gornals JB, Repiso-Ortega A, Vila-Costas J, Marcos-Sanchez F, Munoz-Navas M, Romero-Gomez M, Brullet-Benedi E, Romero-Vazquez J, Caunedo-Alvarez A, Pellicer-Bautista F, Herrerias-Gutierrez JM, Fritscher-Ravens A. EUS-guided coil versus cyanoacrylate therapy for the treatment of gastric varices: a multicenter study (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Nov;78(5):711-21. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.05.009. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
PubMed 23891417Hwang SS, Kim HH, Park SH, Kim SE, Jung JI, Ahn BY, Kim SH, Chung SK, Park YH, Choi KH. N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate pulmonary embolism after endoscopic injection sclerotherapy for gastric variceal bleeding. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2001 Jan-Feb;25(1):16-22. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200101000-00003.
PubMed 11176287Kok K, Bond RP, Duncan IC, Fourie PA, Ziady C, van den Bogaerde JB, van der Merwe SW. Distal embolization and local vessel wall ulceration after gastric variceal obliteration with N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate: a case report and review of the literature. Endoscopy. 2004 May;36(5):442-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-814323.
PubMed 15100955Sarin SK, Jain AK, Jain M, Gupta R. A randomized controlled trial of cyanoacrylate versus alcohol injection in patients with isolated fundic varices. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Apr;97(4):1010-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05622.x.
PubMed 12003381Noophun P, Kongkam P, Gonlachanvit S, Rerknimitr R. Bleeding gastric varices: results of endoscopic injection with cyanoacrylate at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Dec 21;11(47):7531-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i47.7531.
PubMed 16437729Bhasin DK, Sharma BC, Prasad H, Singh K. Endoscopic removal of sclerotherapy needle from gastric varix after N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate injection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Apr;51(4 Pt 1):497-8. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70459-7. No abstract available.
PubMed 10744834Saracco G, Giordanino C, Roberto N, Ezio D, Luca T, Caronna S, Carucci P, De Bernardi Venon W, Barletti C, Bruno M, De Angelis C, Musso A, Repici A, Suriani R, Rizzetto M. Fatal multiple systemic embolisms after injection of cyanoacrylate in bleeding gastric varices of a patient who was noncirrhotic but with idiopathic portal hypertension. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Feb;65(2):345-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.07.009. Epub 2006 Dec 1. No abstract available.
PubMed 17141231Rickman OB, Utz JP, Aughenbaugh GL, Gostout CJ. Pulmonary embolization of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate after endoscopic injection therapy for gastric variceal bleeding. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004 Nov;79(11):1455-8. doi: 10.4065/79.11.1455.
PubMed 15544027Bhat YM, Weilert F, Fredrick RT, Kane SD, Shah JN, Hamerski CM, Binmoeller KF. EUS-guided treatment of gastric fundal varices with combined injection of coils and cyanoacrylate glue: a large U.S. experience over 6 years (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jun;83(6):1164-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.09.040. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
PubMed 26452992
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Nov 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Use of Angiography for Determination and Confirmation of the Feeder Vessel as a Modification of the Original EUS-guided Coils and Cyanoacrylate Therapy for Gastric Varices
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03277937
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- JULY 20-2017
- Conditions
- Gastric Varices
- Keywords
- gastric varices, endoscopic ultrasound, coils, cyanoacrylate
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades DigestivasUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
INTRODUCTION: Bleeding from gastric varices (GV) is associated with a high mortality rate. Injection of cyanoacrylate (CYA) using standard gastroscope has demonstrated to achieve higher hemostasis and lower rebleeding rates compared to band ligation or sclerotherapy. Nevertheless CYA treatment is known to be associated with significant adverse events. Pulmonary embolism due to CYA injection is a serious and sometimes fatal complication of this therapy. These patients usually have respiratory symptom, however this complication can be present in asymptomatic patients, being demonstrated only by a pathological CT scan. On the other hand, it has been described that the risk of glue embolism dependent on the volume of CYA injected, being significantly greater with high volumes. Other complications related to CYA injection are hemorrhage from injection site ulcers, fever, peritonitis, needle impaction, and even death. Also the injection material can cause serious damage to the endoscope.
Currently, endoscopic injection of CYA can be performed by direct visualization using a standard gastroscope or guided by Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) with injection of CYA alone or in combination with coils. The injection of coils in conjunction with CYA may reduce or eliminate the risk of glue embolization as coils can function as a scaffold to retain CYA within the varix and may decrease the amount of glue injection needed to achieve obliteration. It has been previously demonstrated that treatment under EUS guidance may have some benefits. It allows a precise targeting of the varix lumen or afferent feeding veins, being the vessel obstructed with less amount of CYA than used for the "blind" injection by standard endoscopy, reducing the risk of glue embolism. EUS can confirm varix obliteration by Doppler effect and also the visualization of GV is not impaired by blood or food in the stomach, thus it can be used in the setting of active hemorrhage.
Detailed description
On the other hand, despite the EUS-injection of coils and CYA have shown very promising results, it is extremely important to have experience performing this technique, as the injection in a wrong vessel could be catastrophic. It has been develop in our unit a modification of Binmoeller´s original technique by performing the injection of coils and CYA by EUS and fluoroscopic guidance. The performance of an angiography guided by EUS and under fluoroscopy evaluation, represents a modification to the original technique that add some benefits: 1) The injection of water-soluble contrast allows identifying the variceal flow and the afferent feeding vessel (left gastric vein) and avoiding splenic vessels embolization. 2) Also, if there is a shunt it can be detected and the injection of CYA can be avoided. 3) In case of active bleeding the angiography allows visualizing which varix is bleeding, and target the correct vessel.
The aim of this study is to show the results and potential benefits by adding an angiography to the original EUS-guided injection of coils in combination with CYA technique, to determinate and confirm the feeder vessel in GV treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study design: It will be an interventional, descriptive and prospective study, performed in the Ecuadorian Institute of Digestive Disease (IECED), Omni Hospital Academic Tertiary Center Ecuador. Patients have been included from July 2015 and will continue to be included up to October 2017. The study protocol and consent form has been approved by the institutional review board, and will be conducted according to the declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent will be obtained from all subjects.
Population selection, inclusion and exclusion criteria: Patients above 18 years old with gastric varices (GV) on the initial standard diagnostic upper endoscopy will be enrolled. GV will be classified according to Sarin and Kumar classification. Only gastro-esophageal varices type II (GOV II) (fundal varices communicating with esophageal varices) and isolated gastric varices type I (IGV I) (fundal varices within a few centimeters of the gastric cardia) will be included. Gastro-esophageal varices type I (GOV I) will be excluded as they can be successfully treated by endoscopic band ligation. Patients with active bleeding and history of previous bleeding due to GV (secondary prophylaxis) will be included as well as patients with high-risk GV suitable for primary prophylaxis according to Baveno VI consensus. The exclusion criteria will be pregnancy, concurrent hepatorenal syndrome and/or multi-organ failure, platelet count less than 50,000/ml or International Normalized Rate (INR) >2, esophageal stricture, splenic or portal vein thrombosis and allergy to iodine.
Endoscopic Procedure and Technique: All procedures will be performed in a hospital-based interventional endoscopy setting, where radiology is available and by one endoscopist (C.R.M), under general anesthesia, with tracheal intubation, with the patient in supine position and using antibiotic prophylaxis. EUS examination will be performed using a 3.8 mm working channel linear-array therapeutic echoendoscopes (EG 3870UTK; Pentax, Hamburg, Germany), attached to an ultrasound console (Avius Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The echoendoscope will be positioned in the distal esophagus at the level of the cardia (anterograde trans-esophageal, transcrural approach) to visualize the gastric fundus and intramural varices.
Detection of the feeder vessel by EUS: Once positioned, water will be instilled to fill the gastric fundus, in order to improve acoustic coupling and visualization of GV. EUS color Doppler imaging will be used to allow direct visualization of the varices flow. Following the gastric vessel, and by using the fine-flow doppler color of the ultrasound console, the vessel or vessels will be followed from the cardia (distal part of the esophagus) to the proximal part of the esophagus (2 to 3 cm) above the cardia, to detect the feeding vessel. The feeding vessel is characterized by the convergence of all vessels. Once the feeding vessel has been found, a 19 gauge EUS-fine needle aspiration (FNA) (Expect® flexible; Boston Scientific®, Marlborough, USA) will be used to access the vessel, the stylet will be withdrawn and a 20 ml syringe with negative pressure will be used to evaluate blood return, confirming intravascular location. In order to prevent blood clotting of the needle tip, 5 ml of saline solution will be instilled. Moreover, the flush with saline solution allows to confirm the flow of the gastric vessels under B-mode ultrasound visualization.
Using angiography to confirm the target vessel (feeder vessel) and flow traject: In the final diagnostic step, an angiography will be performed using 5 to 10 mL of water-soluble contrast (Ultravist, Bayer, Ecuador) under fluoroscopic evaluation, in order to ensure intravascular location and study varix flow direction (afferent or efferent). Angiography technical success will be measured, determined as the possibility to define the flow trajectory vessel under fluoroscopy.
EUS-guided deployment of Coils and Cyanoacrylate injection: Finally, patients will be treated by EUS-deployment of coils followed by CYA injection. The intravascular embolization coils that will be used (10-16 mm coiled diameter, 12-20 cm straight lengths, 0.035 inches diameter, Nester Embolization Coil; Cook Medical) will be delivered into the vessel through the FNA needle, using the stylet as a pusher. Special attention will be paid not place the needle tip on the counter wall due to the risk of perforation, bleed, coil extrusion and to allow enough space for the coil to curl.
The CYA that will be used is the 2-Octyl-CYA (Dermabond; Ethicon, Piscataway, NJ). It will be injected always after the coils are deployed and then 1 mL of saline solution will be used to flush the glue completely through the needle. The diameter (10-16 mm), number of coils and the volume of the 2-Octyl-CYA injected will be calculated according to the diameter of the vessel measured on EUS and by the angiography of the vessel. After 30 seconds, once CYA has been solidified and the risk of bleeding on the puncturing site decrease, the needle will be withdrawn. Obliteration of the vessel will be confirmed 3 minutes later using Doppler imaging. Complete obliteration of the treated varix will be defined as absence of Doppler flow on EUS.
A direct visualization of the gastric varices will be performed after the EUS procedure to determine the effect of the obliteration of the feeder vessel by using a standard videoendoscope. After the procedure, patients will be observed for 2 hours in the recovery room before being discharged of the unit. In cases of primary prophylaxis the treatment will be ambulatory.
Finally, a 1, 3, 9 and 12 months follow-up will be performed in order to confirm the results of the EUS-therapeutic by EUS and by upper endoscopy.
Technical success will be considered as target of the vessels and deployment of the proposed EUS-therapeutic. Treatment failure and early rebleeding will be considered when bleeding occurred the first five days and between 5 and 90 days respectively.
Statistical analysis: Demographic characteristics, previous medication and radiological images will be described. Quantitative variables will be described in mean or median, and standard deviation or range, as corresponding. Qualitative variables will be described in percentages. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with a p value <0.05 will be considered to be statistically significant. The IECED institutional biostatistician will review statistical methodology of the study. Statistical calculations will be performed in SPSS software suite v.22.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with gastric varices | Experimental | Procedure: angiography in EUS-injection of coils + CYAPatients above 18 years old with gastric varices (GV) on the initial standard diagnostic upper endoscopy will be enrolled and treated using angiography in EUS-injection of coils + CYA. GV will be classified according to Sarin and Kumar classification. Only gastro-esophageal varices type II (GOV II) (fundal varices communicating with esophageal varices) and isolated gastric varices type I (IGV I) (fundal varices within a few centimeters of the gastric cardia) will be included. Gastro-esophageal varices type I (GOV I) will be excluded. Patients with active bleeding and history of previous bleeding due to GV (secondary prophylaxis) will be included as well as patients with high-risk GV suitable for primary prophylaxis according to Baveno VI consensus. T |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients above 18 years old with gastric varices (GV) on the initial standard diagnostic upper endoscopy will be enrolled. GV will be classified
- Only gastro-esophageal varices type II (GOV II) (fundal varices communicating with esophageal varices) and isolated gastric varices type I (IGV I) (fundal varices within a few centimeters of the gastric cardia) will be included (according to Sarin and Kumar classification).
- Patients with active bleeding and history of previous bleeding due to GV (secondary prophylaxis)
- Patients with high-risk GV suitable for primary prophylaxis according to Baveno VI consensus.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Gastro-esophageal varices type I (GOV I) will be excluded as they can be successfully treated by endoscopic band ligation.
- Pregnancy,
- Hepatorenal syndrome
- Multi-organ failure,
- platelet count less than 50,000/ml
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| angiography in EUS-injection of coils + CYAAlso: Drug: cyanoacrylate, Device: coilsDoppler imaging will be used to allow direct visualization of the varices flow. The gastric vessels will be followed from the cardia to the proximal part of the esophagus, to detect the feeding vessel (FV). Once the FV has been found, a 19-gauge EUS-FNA will be used to access the vessel. An angiography will be performed using 5-10 ml of water-soluble contrast under fluoroscopy, to ensure intravascular location and study varix flow direction. Finally, patients will be treated by EUS-deployment of coils followed by CYA injection. The coils will be delivered into the vessel through the FNA needle, using the stylet as a pusher. The 2-Octyl-CYA will be used. It will be injected always after the coils deployment and then 1 mL of saline solution will be used to flush the glue completely. | Procedure or surgery | Patients with gastric varices |
Primary outcome
efficacy of adding angiography to the EUS-guided injection of coils + CYA technique, to determinate, confirm and target the feeder vessel in GV treatment.
Time frame: 12 months
efficacy will be considered be the complete occlusion and/or disappearance of the GV and will be determinate by follow-up controls using EUS and upper endoscopy. Treatment failure and early rebleeding will be considered when bleeding occurred the first five days.
1 secondary outcome
safety of adding angiography to the EUS-guided injection of coils + CYA technique, to determinate and confirm the feeder vessel in GV treatment
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Nov 2018.
- Results publication: PubMed 21199520Hashizume M, Akahoshi T, Tomikawa M. Management of gastric varices. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jan;26 Suppl 1:102-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06572.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 3262398Sarin SK, Sachdev G, Nanda R, Misra SP, Broor SL. Endoscopic sclerotherapy in the treatment of gastric varices. Br J Surg. 1988 Aug;75(8):747-50. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800750809.
- Results publication: PubMed 21135706Irani S, Kowdley K, Kozarek R. Gastric varices: an updated review of management. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb;45(2):133-48. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181fbe249.
- Results publication: PubMed 14687818Mahadeva S, Bellamy MC, Kessel D, Davies MH, Millson CE. Cost-effectiveness of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (histoacryl) glue injections versus transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the management of acute gastric variceal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Dec;98(12):2688-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.08769.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 18167180Cheng LF, Wang ZQ, Li CZ, Cai FC, Huang QY, Linghu EQ, Li W, Chai GJ, Sun GH, Mao YP, Wang YM, Li J, Gao P, Fan TY. Treatment of gastric varices by endoscopic sclerotherapy using butyl cyanoacrylate: 10 years' experience of 635 cases. Chin Med J (Engl). 2007 Dec 5;120(23):2081-5.
- Results publication: PubMed 18760173Seewald S, Ang TL, Imazu H, Naga M, Omar S, Groth S, Seitz U, Zhong Y, Thonke F, Soehendra N. A standardized injection technique and regimen ensures success and safety of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate injection for the treatment of gastric fundal varices (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Sep;68(3):447-54. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.050.
- Results publication: PubMed 23891417Romero-Castro R, Ellrichmann M, Ortiz-Moyano C, Subtil-Inigo JC, Junquera-Florez F, Gornals JB, Repiso-Ortega A, Vila-Costas J, Marcos-Sanchez F, Munoz-Navas M, Romero-Gomez M, Brullet-Benedi E, Romero-Vazquez J, Caunedo-Alvarez A, Pellicer-Bautista F, Herrerias-Gutierrez JM, Fritscher-Ravens A. EUS-guided coil versus cyanoacrylate therapy for the treatment of gastric varices: a multicenter study (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Nov;78(5):711-21. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.05.009. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 11176287Hwang SS, Kim HH, Park SH, Kim SE, Jung JI, Ahn BY, Kim SH, Chung SK, Park YH, Choi KH. N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate pulmonary embolism after endoscopic injection sclerotherapy for gastric variceal bleeding. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2001 Jan-Feb;25(1):16-22. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200101000-00003.
- Results publication: PubMed 15100955Kok K, Bond RP, Duncan IC, Fourie PA, Ziady C, van den Bogaerde JB, van der Merwe SW. Distal embolization and local vessel wall ulceration after gastric variceal obliteration with N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate: a case report and review of the literature. Endoscopy. 2004 May;36(5):442-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-814323.
- Results publication: PubMed 12003381Sarin SK, Jain AK, Jain M, Gupta R. A randomized controlled trial of cyanoacrylate versus alcohol injection in patients with isolated fundic varices. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Apr;97(4):1010-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05622.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 16437729Noophun P, Kongkam P, Gonlachanvit S, Rerknimitr R. Bleeding gastric varices: results of endoscopic injection with cyanoacrylate at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Dec 21;11(47):7531-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i47.7531.
- Results publication: PubMed 10744834Bhasin DK, Sharma BC, Prasad H, Singh K. Endoscopic removal of sclerotherapy needle from gastric varix after N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate injection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Apr;51(4 Pt 1):497-8. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70459-7. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Gastric Varices
RecruitingObservational study
The Value of Spleen Thickness and Spleen Diameter for Gastroesophageal Varices Diagnosis in Compensated Cirrhosis
Liver Cirrhosis, Gastroesophageal Varices
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Case-Specific Health Care Professional Clinical Survey for Concerto Versa™ Detachable Coils
Arteriovenous Malformation, Gastrointestinal Bleed
Recruiting
EUS-Guided Coil and Glue vs Glue Injection for Bleeding Gastric Varices in Cirrhosis
Gastric Varices Bleeding, Cirrhosis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Baveno VIII Criteria for Portal Hypertension in Egyptian Patients
Compensated Liver Disease, Esophageal Varices
Recruiting
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating the Impact of Fasting Duration on Postoperative Rebleeding Following Esophageal Variceal Ligation.
Esophageal Varices
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Carlos A Robles-Medranda, MD principal investigator
Ecuadorian Institute of Digestive Diseases
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing angiography in EUS-injection of coils + CYA in people with Gastric Varices, run by Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas at 1 site in Ecuador.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Ecuador. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
efficacy of adding angiography to the EUS-guided injection of coils + CYA technique, to determinate, confirm and target the feeder vessel in GV treatment. (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03277937, which also lists 27 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2018.