Low Back PainNCT03273114
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
A study testing Cognitive Functional Therapy and Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy in people with Low Back Pain and Back Pain, run by Centro Universitário Augusto Motta at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
There is evidence, of a single randomized controlled trial, that CFT is better than combined manual therapy and motor control exercise for chronic low back pain. However, this study had significant methodological shortcomings regarding the failure to carry out the intention to treat analysis and a considerable loss of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Back Pain, Back Pain, Pain
- What is being tested?
- Cognitive Functional Therapy and Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 148 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 6 Sep 2017to 28 Jun 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged between 18 and 65 years
- Low back pain for more than 3 months
- Disability score of 14% or more on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
- Being able to walk independently with or without support
- Understand Portuguese well enough to be able to fill in the questionnaires
Who cannot join
- Main pain area is not the lumbar spine (from T12 to buttocks)
- Main pain as leg pain (eg: nerve root compression or herniated disc with radicular pain / radiculopathy, lateral and central stenosis)
- Less than 6 months after lumbar spine, lower limb or abdomen surgery
- Invasive procedures for pain relief (ex: epidural injection, rhizotomy) in the last 3 months
- Pregnancy
- Inflammatory/rheumatological diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Scheuermann's disease)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With a Combined Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial
There is evidence, of a single randomized controlled trial, that CFT is better than combined manual therapy and motor control exercise for chronic low back pain. However, this study had significant methodological shortcomings regarding the failure to carry out the intention to treat analysis and a considerable loss of follow-up of patients. As it is, it is important to carry out more studies involving CFT compared to other interventions already used in clinical practice and to correct these methodological shortcomings. Therefore, the aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of Cognitive Functional Therapy in patients with chronic non specific low back pain.
Read the detailed description
Randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessor, blinded participants and intention to treat analysis. Patients will be evaluated at baseline, 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization, to assess the maintenance of any effect of treatment. The patients in the CFT group will be treated by a physical therapists that attended twice the CFT workshops with two of the tutors of the method. She completed 106 hours of training including workshops, patient examinations and a pilot study with the supervision of a physical therapist with more than three years of clinical experience in CFT. Patients in CORE-MT group will be treated by a physical therapist with clinical experience in manual therapy and core training exercises.
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain, Back Pain, Pain, Signs and Symptoms, Neuromuscular Manifestations
- Being tested
- Cognitive Functional Therapy, Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy
- Keywords
- back pain, physiotherapy, exercise therapy, cognitive functional therapy, low back pain, backache, lower back pain, lumbago, multidimensional, biopsychosocial
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain, Back Pain, Pain, Signs and Symptoms, Neuromuscular Manifestations
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cognitive Functional TherapyBehavioural
There will be four main components in the intervention, following the protocol used by O'Keefe et al. (2015):
- The cognitive component will focus on on the multidimensional nature of persistent pain about individual beliefs, and how emotions and behaviors (movement and lifestyle) can reinforce a vicious cycle of pain and disability.
- Specific Functional training is designed to normalize maladaptive or provocative movement and posture.
- Functional integration directed to activities of daily life that are avoided by the patient (rolling in bed, sitting, sitting to standing, walking, bending and lifting)
- Patients will be advised to gradually increase physical activity based on their preference, also focusing on sleep hygiene, stress, and management strategies
Core Training Exercise and Manual TherapyOther
According to the pragmatic clinical decision of the physiotherapist responsible for this intervention arm, participants allocated to the comparison group will be treated with active exercises will involve contractions of abdominal and back muscles in different functional positions, as well as joint mobilization or manipulation techniques applied to the lower back or pélvis, when necessary. Most patients in this group will receive exercises to perform at home, but not related to CFT.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) | Experimental | Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) is a behavioral intervention that addresses multiple aspects of low back pain. This approach focuses on changing the patient's beliefs, confronting their fears, educating them about pain mechanisms, increasing mental strength, and control of their body. This is done with functional tasks performed by individuals training them to reduce excessive muscle activity in the trunk and generate behavioral changes related to pain, from postures and provocative movements. Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive Functional Therapy |
| Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) | Active comparator | The active comparator will be the combination of Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT). Receives: Other: Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain intensity
It will be measured by the Brazilian version of the Numerical Scale of Pain 11 points (END). The END scale goes from 0 to 10, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "the worst pain imaginable." Participants will be asked to answer about their pain levels based on the last seven days
Measured: 8 weeks
Disability associated to low back pain
It will be assessed by the Brazilian version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). It is a tool widely used in research and clinical practice to assess the disability low back pain. This questionnaire has 10 items (0-5 points each) related to activities of daily living that patients with low back pain have more difficulties to do. The sum of the scores of items is multiplied by two and the percentage of disability varies from 0 to 100 %.
Measured: 8 weeks
Secondary outcomes (9)
Global impression of recovery
It will be evaluated based on the Global Perceived Effect Scale (GPES) which is an 11-point scale ranging from -5 ('vastly worse'), through 0 (no change) to +5 (completely recovered).
Measured: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization
Pain intensity
It will be measured by the Brazilian version of the Numerical Scale of Pain 11 points (END) 13. The END scale goes from 0 to 10, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "the worst pain imaginable." Participants will be asked to answer about their pain levels based on the last seven days.
Measured: 6 and 12 months after randomization
Disability associated to low back pain
It will be assessed by the Brazilian version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). It is a tool widely used in research and clinical practice to assess the disability low back pain. This questionnaire has 10 items (0-5 points each) related to activities of daily living that patients with low back pain have more difficulties to do. The sum of the scores of items is multiplied by two and the percentage of disability varies from 0 to 100 %.
Measured: 6 and 12 months after randomization
Patient Satisfaction (mediator of outcome)
This is a simple questionnaire from 1 to 5 asking the patients how satisfied they were with their treatment: 1 = satisfied, 2 = just a little satisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = just a little dissatisfied, 5 = dissatisfied
Measured: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization
Catastrophization (mediator of outcome)
It will be evaluated by the question "When I feel pain, it's terrible and I feel it's never going to get any better."with the response options ranging from "Never do that" = 0 to "Always do that" = 10.
Measured: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization
Depression (mediator of outcome)
It will be evaluated by the question "During the past month have you often been bothered by feeling down, depressed or hopeless?" with the response options ranging from "Never" = 0 to "All the time" = 10.
Measured: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months months after randomization
Fear of movement (mediator of outcome)
It will be assessed by the question "Physical activity might harm my back" and the response options will range from 0 ("completely disagree") to 10 ("completely agree).
Measured: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months months after randomization
Stress (mediator of outcome)
It will be evaluated by the question "Do you feel stressed? and the response options will range from 0 ("completely disagree") to 10 ("completely agree)
Measured: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months months after randomization
Sleep (mediator of outcome)
It will be evaluated by the question "Did you have sleep problems last month?" based on Subjective Health Complaints Inventory19. The response options will be "Not at all"=0, "A little"=1, "Some"=2, and "Serious"=3
Measured: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months months after randomization
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Sep 2017
- Study start6 Sep 2017
- Primary completion28 Jun 2020
- Study completion28 Jun 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessor, blinded participants and intention to treat analysis. Patients will be evaluated at baseline, 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization, to assess the maintenance of any effect of treatment. The patients in the CFT group will be treated by a physical therapists that attended twice the CFT workshops with two of the tutors of the method. She completed 106 hours of training including workshops, patient examinations and a pilot study with the supervision of a physical therapist with more than three years of clinical experience in CFT. Patients in CORE group will be treated by a physical therapist with clinical experience in manual therapy and core training exercises.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 148 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centro Universitário Augusto Motta
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ney Armando Meziat Filho, Centro Universitário Augusto Motta
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03273114
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- neymeziat
- Status last verified
- Sep 2020
- First submitted
- 1 Sep 2017
- Last updated
- 9 Sep 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Meziat Filho N. Changing beliefs for changing movement and pain: Classification-based cognitive functional therapy (CB-CFT) for chronic non-specific low back pain. Man Ther. 2016 Feb;21:303-6. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.04.013. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
PubMed 25920336Meziat Filho N, Mendonca R, Nogueira LA. Lack of confidence in the lower limb: Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) for a unilateral loading impairment in chronic non-specific low back pain. Case report. Man Ther. 2016 Sep;25:104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Mar 12.
PubMed 27052627Vibe Fersum K, O'Sullivan P, Skouen JS, Smith A, Kvale A. Efficacy of classification-based cognitive functional therapy in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pain. 2013 Jul;17(6):916-28. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00252.x. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
PubMed 23208945O'Keeffe M, Purtill H, Kennedy N, O'Sullivan P, Dankaerts W, Tighe A, Allworthy L, Dolan L, Bargary N, O'Sullivan K. Individualised cognitive functional therapy compared with a combined exercise and pain education class for patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 1;5(6):e007156. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007156.
PubMed 26033941Caneiro JP, Smith A, Rabey M, Moseley GL, O'Sullivan P. Process of Change in Pain-Related Fear: Clinical Insights From a Single Case Report of Persistent Back Pain Managed With Cognitive Functional Therapy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Sep;47(9):637-651. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7371. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
PubMed 28704623Bunzli S, McEvoy S, Dankaerts W, O'Sullivan P, O'Sullivan K. Patient Perspectives on Participation in Cognitive Functional Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain. Phys Ther. 2016 Sep;96(9):1397-407. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20140570. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
PubMed 27013577Maher C, Underwood M, Buchbinder R. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2017 Feb 18;389(10070):736-747. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30970-9. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
PubMed 27745712O'Sullivan P. It's time for change with the management of non-specific chronic low back pain. Br J Sports Med. 2012 Mar;46(4):224-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.081638. Epub 2011 Aug 4. No abstract available.
PubMed 21821612Goyal M, Haythornthwaite JA. Is It Time to Make Mind-Body Approaches Available for Chronic Low Back Pain? JAMA. 2016 Mar 22-29;315(12):1236-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2437. No abstract available.
PubMed 27002443Menke JM. Do manual therapies help low back pain? A comparative effectiveness meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 1;39(7):E463-72. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000230.
PubMed 24480940Kent P, Mirkhil S, Keating J, Buchbinder R, Manniche C, Albert HB. The concurrent validity of brief screening questions for anxiety, depression, social isolation, catastrophization, and fear of movement in people with low back pain. Clin J Pain. 2014 Jun;30(6):479-89. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000010.
PubMed 24281277Paungmali A, Joseph LH, Sitilertpisan P, Pirunsan U, Uthaikhup S. Lumbopelvic Core Stabilization Exercise and Pain Modulation Among Individuals with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain. Pain Pract. 2017 Nov;17(8):1008-1014. doi: 10.1111/papr.12552. Epub 2017 Feb 25.
PubMed 28042685Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Malmivaara A, Koes BW. Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD000335. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000335.pub2.
PubMed 16034851Castro J, Correia L, Donato BS, Arruda B, Agulhari F, Pellegrini MJ, Belache FTC, de Souza CP, Fernandez J, Nogueira LAC, Reis FJJ, Ferreira AS, Meziat-Filho N. Cognitive functional therapy compared with core exercise and manual therapy in patients with chronic low back pain: randomised controlled trial. Pain. 2022 Dec 1;163(12):2430-2437. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002644. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
PubMed 35384931
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Sep 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With a Combined Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03273114
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- neymeziat
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain, Back Pain, Pain, Signs and Symptoms, Neuromuscular Manifestations
- Keywords
- back pain, physiotherapy, exercise therapy, cognitive functional therapy, low back pain, backache, lower back pain, lumbago
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 148 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centro Universitário Augusto MottaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Jun 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There is evidence, of a single randomized controlled trial, that CFT is better than combined manual therapy and motor control exercise for chronic low back pain. However, this study had significant methodological shortcomings regarding the failure to carry out the intention to treat analysis and a considerable loss of follow-up of patients. As it is, it is important to carry out more studies involving CFT compared to other interventions already used in clinical practice and to correct these methodological shortcomings. Therefore, the aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of Cognitive Functional Therapy in patients with chronic non specific low back pain.
Detailed description
Randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessor, blinded participants and intention to treat analysis. Patients will be evaluated at baseline, 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization, to assess the maintenance of any effect of treatment. The patients in the CFT group will be treated by a physical therapists that attended twice the CFT workshops with two of the tutors of the method. She completed 106 hours of training including workshops, patient examinations and a pilot study with the supervision of a physical therapist with more than three years of clinical experience in CFT. Patients in CORE-MT group will be treated by a physical therapist with clinical experience in manual therapy and core training exercises.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessor, blinded participants and intention to treat analysis. Patients will be evaluated at baseline, 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization, to assess the maintenance of any effect of treatment. The patients in the CFT group will be treated by a physical therapists that attended twice the CFT workshops with two of the tutors of the method. She completed 106 hours of training including workshops, patient examinations and a pilot study with the supervision of a physical therapist with more than three years of clinical experience in CFT. Patients in CORE group will be treated by a physical therapist with clinical experience in manual therapy and core training exercises.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) | Experimental | Behavioral: Cognitive Functional TherapyCognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) is a behavioral intervention that addresses multiple aspects of low back pain. This approach focuses on changing the patient's beliefs, confronting their fears, educating them about pain mechanisms, increasing mental strength, and control of their body. This is done with functional tasks performed by individuals training them to reduce excessive muscle activity in the trunk and generate behavioral changes related to pain, from postures and provocative movements. |
| Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) | Active comparator | Other: Core Training Exercise and Manual TherapyThe active comparator will be the combination of Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Aged between 18 and 65 years
- Low back pain for more than 3 months
- Disability score of 14% or more on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
- Being able to walk independently with or without support
- Understand Portuguese well enough to be able to fill in the questionnaires
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Main pain area is not the lumbar spine (from T12 to buttocks)
- Main pain as leg pain (eg: nerve root compression or herniated disc with radicular pain / radiculopathy, lateral and central stenosis)
- Less than 6 months after lumbar spine, lower limb or abdomen surgery
- Invasive procedures for pain relief (ex: epidural injection, rhizotomy) in the last 3 months
- Pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Functional TherapyThere will be four main components in the intervention, following the protocol used by O'Keefe et al. (2015): 1. The cognitive component will focus on on the multidimensional nature of persistent pain about individual beliefs, and how emotions and behaviors (movement and lifestyle) can reinforce a vicious cycle of pain and disability. 2. Specific Functional training is designed to normalize maladaptive or provocative movement and posture. 3. Functional integration directed to activities of daily life that are avoided by the patient (rolling in bed, sitting, sitting to standing, walking, bending and lifting) 4. Patients will be advised to gradually increase physical activity based on their preference, also focusing on sleep hygiene, stress, and management strategies | Behavioural | Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) |
| Core Training Exercise and Manual TherapyAccording to the pragmatic clinical decision of the physiotherapist responsible for this intervention arm, participants allocated to the comparison group will be treated with active exercises will involve contractions of abdominal and back muscles in different functional positions, as well as joint mobilization or manipulation techniques applied to the lower back or pélvis, when necessary. Most patients in this group will receive exercises to perform at home, but not related to CFT. | Other | Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) |
Primary outcome
Pain intensity
Time frame: 8 weeks
It will be measured by the Brazilian version of the Numerical Scale of Pain 11 points (END). The END scale goes from 0 to 10, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "the worst pain imaginable." Participants will be asked to answer about their pain levels based on the last seven days
Disability associated to low back pain
Time frame: 8 weeks
It will be assessed by the Brazilian version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). It is a tool widely used in research and clinical practice to assess the disability low back pain. This questionnaire has 10 items (0-5 points each) related to activities of daily living that patients with low back pain have more difficulties to do. The sum of the scores of items is multiplied by two and the percentage of disability varies from 0 to 100 %.
9 secondary outcomes
Global impression of recovery
Time frame: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization
Pain intensity
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after randomization
Disability associated to low back pain
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after randomization
Patient Satisfaction (mediator of outcome)
Time frame: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization
Catastrophization (mediator of outcome)
Time frame: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization
Depression (mediator of outcome)
Time frame: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months months after randomization
Fear of movement (mediator of outcome)
Time frame: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months months after randomization
Stress (mediator of outcome)
Time frame: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months months after randomization
Sleep (mediator of outcome)
Time frame: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months months after randomization
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Sep 2020.
- Background: PubMed 25920336Meziat Filho N. Changing beliefs for changing movement and pain: Classification-based cognitive functional therapy (CB-CFT) for chronic non-specific low back pain. Man Ther. 2016 Feb;21:303-6. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.04.013. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
- Background: PubMed 27052627Meziat Filho N, Mendonca R, Nogueira LA. Lack of confidence in the lower limb: Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) for a unilateral loading impairment in chronic non-specific low back pain. Case report. Man Ther. 2016 Sep;25:104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Mar 12.
- Background: PubMed 23208945Vibe Fersum K, O'Sullivan P, Skouen JS, Smith A, Kvale A. Efficacy of classification-based cognitive functional therapy in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pain. 2013 Jul;17(6):916-28. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00252.x. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
- Background: PubMed 26033941O'Keeffe M, Purtill H, Kennedy N, O'Sullivan P, Dankaerts W, Tighe A, Allworthy L, Dolan L, Bargary N, O'Sullivan K. Individualised cognitive functional therapy compared with a combined exercise and pain education class for patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 1;5(6):e007156. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007156.
- Background: PubMed 28704623Caneiro JP, Smith A, Rabey M, Moseley GL, O'Sullivan P. Process of Change in Pain-Related Fear: Clinical Insights From a Single Case Report of Persistent Back Pain Managed With Cognitive Functional Therapy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Sep;47(9):637-651. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7371. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
- Background: PubMed 27013577Bunzli S, McEvoy S, Dankaerts W, O'Sullivan P, O'Sullivan K. Patient Perspectives on Participation in Cognitive Functional Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain. Phys Ther. 2016 Sep;96(9):1397-407. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20140570. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
- Background: PubMed 27745712Maher C, Underwood M, Buchbinder R. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2017 Feb 18;389(10070):736-747. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30970-9. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
- Background: PubMed 21821612O'Sullivan P. It's time for change with the management of non-specific chronic low back pain. Br J Sports Med. 2012 Mar;46(4):224-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.081638. Epub 2011 Aug 4. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 27002443Goyal M, Haythornthwaite JA. Is It Time to Make Mind-Body Approaches Available for Chronic Low Back Pain? JAMA. 2016 Mar 22-29;315(12):1236-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2437. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24480940Menke JM. Do manual therapies help low back pain? A comparative effectiveness meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 1;39(7):E463-72. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000230.
- Background: PubMed 24281277Kent P, Mirkhil S, Keating J, Buchbinder R, Manniche C, Albert HB. The concurrent validity of brief screening questions for anxiety, depression, social isolation, catastrophization, and fear of movement in people with low back pain. Clin J Pain. 2014 Jun;30(6):479-89. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000010.
- Background: PubMed 28042685Paungmali A, Joseph LH, Sitilertpisan P, Pirunsan U, Uthaikhup S. Lumbopelvic Core Stabilization Exercise and Pain Modulation Among Individuals with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain. Pain Pract. 2017 Nov;17(8):1008-1014. doi: 10.1111/papr.12552. Epub 2017 Feb 25.
Related trials for Low Back Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Veterans' Intervention Blending NeuRomodulation and YogA for Chronic Low BackPaiN Treatment: VIBRANT
Chronic Low Back Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Psilocybin-Assisted Physical Therapy in Chronic Low Back Pain
Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP), Physical Therapy
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
PRP Versus NP Injections for Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain
Discogenic Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Dual-Task Core Stabilization Training in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Gamified Home-Based Core Neuromuscular Training for Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Core Muscles
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cognitive Functional Therapy and Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy in people with Low Back Pain and Back Pain, run by Centro Universitário Augusto Motta at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain intensity (time frame: 8 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03273114, which also lists 14 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Sep 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.