Labor Fetal AnoxiaNCT03268486
Evaluation of a Novel Signal Acquisition Technique for Intrapartum Cardiotocography
An observational study of Labor Fetal Anoxia and Fetal Monitoring, run by University of Lisbon.
Trial summary
Cardiotocography (CTG) is widely used during labour wards in industrialised countries and consists of fetal heart rate and uterine contraction monitoring. The main aim is to identify fetuses that are being poorly oxygenated during labour and require medical intervention to revert the situation or expedite delivery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Labor Fetal Anoxia, Fetal Monitoring
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2017to 31 May 2019
- How long will I take part?
- 6 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All pregnant women in labour at Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon
Who may be able to join
- Singleton term pregnancies, spontaneous or induced/augmented labor, cephalic presentation, > 18 years of age, able to provide written informed consent, no contraindications to internal FHR monitoring and no known contraindication to vaginal delivery. Patients with risk factors for intrapartum hypoxia will also be included.
Who cannot join
- Do not give a written consent.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Cardiotocography (CTG) is widely used during labour wards in industrialised countries and consists of fetal heart rate and uterine contraction monitoring. The main aim is to identify fetuses that are being poorly oxygenated during labour and require medical intervention to revert the situation or expedite delivery.
The need for technical development of CTG is well-recognized, as some of the existing techniques are prone to signal loss and contamination from the maternal heart rate, while others are invasive and have established contra-indications. They also limit maternal mobilisation, contributing to maternal dissatisfaction, and possibly to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.
New techniques for CTG acquisition will shortly be made available by a leading technological company, providing non-invasive monitoring and allowing full maternal mobilisation, and with the potential to change the way labour is conducted in high-resource countries. There is a need for a systematic evaluation of their clinical performance and benefit.
Read the detailed description
First phase of the study will start in October 2017 in labor wards at Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon where performing continuous cardiotocographic fetal monitoring with conventional Doppler technology is the routine procedure. Through a collaboration with Phillips (Boeblingen, Germany) we will have access to a transabdominal ECG/EHG recorder that has high accuracy/reliability and Bluetooth technology providing mobility and and more comfort for mothers. This new device works through five disposable electrodes that are positioned on the maternal abdomen in a standardized manner: one electrode is placed near the umbilicus, a second is placed above the symphysis pubis in a vertical line from the umbilicus, a third and a fourth are placed on opposite sides of the abdomen horizontal to the umbilicus; the ground is placed on the upper right side. Women will be informed of the study by posters and leaflets distributed during the antenatal period and on arrival at labor wards. The inclusion criteria are singleton term pregnancies, spontaneous or induced/augmented labor, cephalic presentation, > 18 years of age, able to provide written informed consent, no contraindications to internal FHR monitoring and no known contraindication to vaginal delivery. Patients with risk factors for intrapartum hypoxia will also be included. After giving written informed consent, women will be simultaneously monitored with scalp electrode, Doppler, trans-abdominal ECG, abdominal EHG and TOCO, as soon as internal monitoring is possible. The maternal abdominal skin will be prepared for low impedance by gentle excoriation of the surface skin cells. Monitoring will be maintained until as close to delivery as possible, and the three FHR signals will be conveyed to a computer acquisition storage system for offline analysis. We aim a sample size of 100 participants. EHG and TOCO will be compared for signal loss, contraction frequency, and contraction area. Transabdominal ECG and Doppler will be compared in terms of signal loss, and with internal ECG regarding signal accuracy. The signal quality will be analysed separately for each monitoring method for the time during which the FHR recorded. As the two FHR modalities do not share a common time clock, synchronisation should be achieved by cross correlating the two heart rate files and locating the peak correlation. The clinical management of labour will be uniquely on the basis of external Doppler ultrasound CTG recordings. Both signals will also be compared for coincidences with MHR determined by maternal ECG with FHR determined by internal ECG. The abdominal fECG monitor calculates the MHR as well as the FHR simultaneously. It uses the height and the width of the QRS complex, both of which are linked to the size of the heart, to differentiate between the fetal and maternal heart signals. Women will be encouraged to perform a sequence of standardized exercises, in the presence of the investigator, and the periods when the mother is lying down, sitting, standing and walking will be recorded.
A subgroup analysis will be performed in the different stages of labour, particularly during maternal pushing, as well as in women with different skin colour and body mass index categories and in the different positions they adopt. Both umbilical cord arterial and venous blood sampling will be performed for the diagnosis of newborn metabolic acidosis, as soon as possible after birth. Data on basic demographic characteristics, pregnancy complications, course of labor, and neonatal outcome will be obtained.
In the second phase of the study, we want to know if the different traces acquired from the same fetus through transabdominal ECG and Doppler CTG may have different interpretations and may lead to different obstetric attitudes. In order to do that we will retrospectively analyze all the independent traces through a computer analysis (Omniview-SisPorto program). This system emits visual and sound alerts when features associated with poor fetal oxygenation are detected and has been shown to provide analysis that is in good agreement with a consensus of experts. The main outcome will be the agreement of alerts displayed by each signal acquisition technique regarding the same fetus.
- Conditions
- Labor Fetal Anoxia, Fetal Monitoring
- Keywords
- Fetal monitoring, cardiotocography
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Triple monitoring | Pregnant women with singleton term pregnancies, spontaneous or induced/augmented labor, cephalic presentation, > 18 years of age, able to provide written informed consent, no contraindications to internal FHR monitoring and no known contraindication to vaginal delivery. After giving written informed consent, women will be simultaneously monitored with scalp electrode, Doppler, trans-abdominal ECG, abdominal EHG and TOCO, as soon as internal monitoring is possible. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Signal quality
Transabdominal ECG and Doppler will be compared in terms of signal loss, and with internal ECG regarding signal accuracy. The signal quality will be analysed separately for each monitoring method for the time during which the FHR recorded.
Measured: The analysis will be made at the end of the recruiting phase (that will have 3 months of duration)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Aug 2017
- Study start1 Oct 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 May 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion31 May 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Labor Fetal AnoxiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 6 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Lisbon
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ana Catarina Reis de Carvalho, University of Lisbon
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03268486
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ULisbon TAECG
- Status last verified
- Aug 2017
- First submitted
- 29 Aug 2017
- Last updated
- 31 Aug 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Aug 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of a Novel Signal Acquisition Technique for Intrapartum Cardiotocography
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03268486
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ULisbon TAECG
- Conditions
- Labor Fetal Anoxia, Fetal Monitoring
- Keywords
- Fetal monitoring, cardiotocography
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of LisbonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 May 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cardiotocography (CTG) is widely used during labour wards in industrialised countries and consists of fetal heart rate and uterine contraction monitoring. The main aim is to identify fetuses that are being poorly oxygenated during labour and require medical intervention to revert the situation or expedite delivery.
The need for technical development of CTG is well-recognized, as some of the existing techniques are prone to signal loss and contamination from the maternal heart rate, while others are invasive and have established contra-indications. They also limit maternal mobilisation, contributing to maternal dissatisfaction, and possibly to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.
New techniques for CTG acquisition will shortly be made available by a leading technological company, providing non-invasive monitoring and allowing full maternal mobilisation, and with the potential to change the way labour is conducted in high-resource countries. There is a need for a systematic evaluation of their clinical performance and benefit.
Detailed description
First phase of the study will start in October 2017 in labor wards at Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon where performing continuous cardiotocographic fetal monitoring with conventional Doppler technology is the routine procedure. Through a collaboration with Phillips (Boeblingen, Germany) we will have access to a transabdominal ECG/EHG recorder that has high accuracy/reliability and Bluetooth technology providing mobility and and more comfort for mothers. This new device works through five disposable electrodes that are positioned on the maternal abdomen in a standardized manner: one electrode is placed near the umbilicus, a second is placed above the symphysis pubis in a vertical line from the umbilicus, a third and a fourth are placed on opposite sides of the abdomen horizontal to the umbilicus; the ground is placed on the upper right side. Women will be informed of the study by posters and leaflets distributed during the antenatal period and on arrival at labor wards. The inclusion criteria are singleton term pregnancies, spontaneous or induced/augmented labor, cephalic presentation, > 18 years of age, able to provide written informed consent, no contraindications to internal FHR monitoring and no known contraindication to vaginal delivery. Patients with risk factors for intrapartum hypoxia will also be included. After giving written informed consent, women will be simultaneously monitored with scalp electrode, Doppler, trans-abdominal ECG, abdominal EHG and TOCO, as soon as internal monitoring is possible. The maternal abdominal skin will be prepared for low impedance by gentle excoriation of the surface skin cells. Monitoring will be maintained until as close to delivery as possible, and the three FHR signals will be conveyed to a computer acquisition storage system for offline analysis. We aim a sample size of 100 participants. EHG and TOCO will be compared for signal loss, contraction frequency, and contraction area. Transabdominal ECG and Doppler will be compared in terms of signal loss, and with internal ECG regarding signal accuracy. The signal quality will be analysed separately for each monitoring method for the time during which the FHR recorded. As the two FHR modalities do not share a common time clock, synchronisation should be achieved by cross correlating the two heart rate files and locating the peak correlation. The clinical management of labour will be uniquely on the basis of external Doppler ultrasound CTG recordings. Both signals will also be compared for coincidences with MHR determined by maternal ECG with FHR determined by internal ECG. The abdominal fECG monitor calculates the MHR as well as the FHR simultaneously. It uses the height and the width of the QRS complex, both of which are linked to the size of the heart, to differentiate between the fetal and maternal heart signals. Women will be encouraged to perform a sequence of standardized exercises, in the presence of the investigator, and the periods when the mother is lying down, sitting, standing and walking will be recorded.
A subgroup analysis will be performed in the different stages of labour, particularly during maternal pushing, as well as in women with different skin colour and body mass index categories and in the different positions they adopt. Both umbilical cord arterial and venous blood sampling will be performed for the diagnosis of newborn metabolic acidosis, as soon as possible after birth. Data on basic demographic characteristics, pregnancy complications, course of labor, and neonatal outcome will be obtained.
In the second phase of the study, we want to know if the different traces acquired from the same fetus through transabdominal ECG and Doppler CTG may have different interpretations and may lead to different obstetric attitudes. In order to do that we will retrospectively analyze all the independent traces through a computer analysis (Omniview-SisPorto program). This system emits visual and sound alerts when features associated with poor fetal oxygenation are detected and has been shown to provide analysis that is in good agreement with a consensus of experts. The main outcome will be the agreement of alerts displayed by each signal acquisition technique regarding the same fetus.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 6 Months
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Triple monitoring | – | –Pregnant women with singleton term pregnancies, spontaneous or induced/augmented labor, cephalic presentation, > 18 years of age, able to provide written informed consent, no contraindications to internal FHR monitoring and no known contraindication to vaginal delivery. After giving written informed consent, women will be simultaneously monitored with scalp electrode, Doppler, trans-abdominal ECG, abdominal EHG and TOCO, as soon as internal monitoring is possible. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All pregnant women in labour at Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Singleton term pregnancies, spontaneous or induced/augmented labor, cephalic presentation, > 18 years of age, able to provide written informed consent, no contraindications to internal FHR monitoring and no known contraindication to vaginal delivery. Patients with risk factors for intrapartum hypoxia will also be included.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Do not give a written consent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Signal quality
Time frame: The analysis will be made at the end of the recruiting phase (that will have 3 months of duration)
Transabdominal ECG and Doppler will be compared in terms of signal loss, and with internal ECG regarding signal accuracy. The signal quality will be analysed separately for each monitoring method for the time during which the FHR recorded.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Aug 2017.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Labor Fetal Anoxia and Fetal Monitoring, run by University of Lisbon.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Catarina Carvalho, Resident (+351919297913, catarinareiscarvalho@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Signal quality (time frame: The analysis will be made at the end of the recruiting phase (that will have 3 months of duration)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Aug 2017.