Opioid-use DisorderPhase 4NCT03266445
Effect of Buprenorphine/Naloxone Continuation on Pain Control and Opioid Use
A Phase 4 study testing buprenorphine/naloxone in people with Opioid-use Disorder and Pain, Acute, run by Massachusetts General Hospital.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to determine the effect of continuation of buprenorphine/naloxone in patients with history of Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) scheduled for surgery compared to reduced dose buprenorphine/naloxone prior to surgery on pain scores, opioid consumption, depressive symptoms and severity of substance use… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Opioid-use Disorder, Pain, Acute, Surgery
- What is being tested?
- buprenorphine/naloxone
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 76 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 5 Oct 2018to 26 Feb 2022
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- currently taking buprenorphine or buprenorphine/naloxone daily for treatment of opioid use disorder by DSM-V criteria
- on buprenorphine or buprenorphine/naloxone dose of greater than 8mg for at least 30 days
- ASA health class I-III
Who cannot join
- Unable to consent to the study
- Significant pulmonary or cardiac disease
- Renal insufficiency with a glomerular filtration rate less than 30ml/min
- Liver cirrhosis with a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score of greater than 25
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Randomized Trial of the Effect of Standard of Care Reduced Dose Versus Full Dose Buprenorphine/Naloxone in the Perioperative Period on Pain Control and Post Operative Opioid Use Disorder Symptoms
The aim of this study is to determine the effect of continuation of buprenorphine/naloxone in patients with history of Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) scheduled for surgery compared to reduced dose buprenorphine/naloxone prior to surgery on pain scores, opioid consumption, depressive symptoms and severity of substance use dependence- including record of problematic use of any non-prescribed opioids, alcohol and illicit narcotics.
Read the detailed description
Opioid use disorder (OUD) is characterized by non-remitting cycles of remission and opioid abuse relapse. It is associated with a high rate of psychiatric and physical co-morbidity when left untreated. Buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone are effective opioid maintenance therapy (OMT) for OUD, however, treatment of acute post-surgical pain in patients taking buprenorphine is perceived to be challenging. Although not substantiated in clinical studies, the combination of high receptor binding affinity, long half-life, and partial mu opioid receptor agonism with buprenorphine/naloxone are thought to inhibit the analgesic actions of full mu opioid receptor agonists, potentially making standard postoperative pain control strategies less effective. There is no evidence based standard of care for optimal acute pain management strategies for patients taking buprenorphine and most recommendations are based upon provider opinion- occasionally conflicting along specialty lines. Some providers, mainly consisting of surgeons and anesthesiologists, recommend that buprenorphine should be discontinued at least 72 hours prior to elective surgery and replaced with low dose opioid agonists, in the interim. Other providers, mainly comprising of psychiatrists, contend that these patients should be maintained on buprenorphine throughout the peri-operative period at either a full or reduced dose to prevent an indeterminate risk of substance abuse relapse that can occur as consequence to the abrupt termination buprenorphine in the highly stressful surgical period. This study aims to inform this important unresolved question in the clinical care of this growing population. The investigators seek to determine the effectiveness of managing postoperative pain in patients with OUD where buprenorphine/naloxone is continued perioperatively compared to patients where buprenorphine/naloxone is reduced to a lower dose. Longitudinally, the investigators also intend to determine if there is a difference in substance abuse relapse in patients where buprenorphine/naloxone is continued vs. held by using self assessments and communication with the participant's buprenorphine provider.
- Conditions
- Opioid-use Disorder, Pain, Acute, Surgery
- Being tested
- buprenorphine/naloxone
- Keywords
- relapse, buprenorphine/naloxone, opioids, narcotics, post-surgical pain
- Medical subject headings
- Opioid-Related Disorders, Acute Pain, Recurrence, Pain, Postoperative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
buprenorphine/naloxoneDrug
Also called Reduction vs Continuation
The intervention will be to either continue taking buprenorphine/naloxone or to have the medication reduced perioperatively.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| FULL-BUPRENORPHINE | Active comparator | Participants will be randomly assigned to be maintained on their daily dose of buprenorphine/naloxone Receives: Drug: buprenorphine/naloxone |
| LOW-BUPRENORPHINE (control) | No intervention | Participants will be randomly assigned to have their daily dose of buprenorphine/naloxone reduced to 8mg on the day of surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Post-operative pain scores
Level of pain on a Visual Analog Scale of 0-100 (0=no pain; 100=worst pain imaginable) This scale will be used to quantify the varying degrees of pain or discomfort experienced by the participant.
Measured: 24 hours after surgery
Secondary outcomes (3)
Postoperative opioid consumption
Amount of opioids needed for pain control postoperatively
Measured: 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours after surgery
Post-operative pain scores
Level of pain on Visual Analog Scale 0-100 (0= no pain 100= worst pain imaginable) We will compare the results of the 48 and 72 hour time-points with the 24 hour time-point.
Measured: 48 hours, 72 hours after surgery
Presence, severity of substance abuse
Participants will complete questionnaires to identify the presence and severity of substance abuse.These values will be compared with baseline values obtained preoperatively.
Measured: 1 month after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Aug 2017
- Study start5 Oct 2018 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion26 Feb 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Opioid-use DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Massachusetts General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants will be randomly assigned to be maintained on their daily dose of buprenorphine/naloxone or to have their buprenorphine/naloxone reduced to 8mg prior to surgery. Each group will have identical perioperative treatment plans. Primary outcome measured is pain scores following surgery.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 76 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Aurora Naa-Afoley Quaye, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Investigators
- Aurora Quaye, MD, Principal investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03266445
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2017P001425
- Status last verified
- Oct 2018
- First submitted
- 28 Aug 2017
- Last updated
- 9 Oct 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: IPD will only be available to researchers involved in the study. All data will be collected and stored securely using the Redcap system to preserve privacy and confidentiality. Information regarding substance abuse history, including illicit narcotic use, will remain confidential and personal identifiers will be removed during data storage. Only members of the research team will have access to the data that participants have consented to provide. Participants will be informed that they have the right to not answer any question that makes them feel uncomfortable.
Publications
McLellan AT, Lewis DC, O'Brien CP, Kleber HD. Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. JAMA. 2000 Oct 4;284(13):1689-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.13.1689.
PubMed 11015800Scott CK, Dennis ML, Laudet A, Funk RR, Simeone RS. Surviving drug addiction: the effect of treatment and abstinence on mortality. Am J Public Health. 2011 Apr;101(4):737-44. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.197038. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
PubMed 21330586Degenhardt L, Bucello C, Mathers B, Briegleb C, Ali H, Hickman M, McLaren J. Mortality among regular or dependent users of heroin and other opioids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Addiction. 2011 Jan;106(1):32-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03140.x. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
PubMed 21054613Schuckit MA. Treatment of Opioid-Use Disorders. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 28;375(4):357-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1604339. No abstract available.
PubMed 27464203Gordon AJ, Lo-Ciganic WH, Cochran G, Gellad WF, Cathers T, Kelley D, Donohue JM. Patterns and Quality of Buprenorphine Opioid Agonist Treatment in a Large Medicaid Program. J Addict Med. 2015 Nov-Dec;9(6):470-7. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000164.
PubMed 26517324Roberts DM, Meyer-Witting M. High-dose buprenorphine: perioperative precautions and management strategies. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2005 Feb;33(1):17-25. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0503300104.
PubMed 15957687Bryson EO. The perioperative management of patients maintained on medications used to manage opioid addiction. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2014 Jun;27(3):359-64. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000052.
PubMed 24500338McCormick Z, Chu SK, Chang-Chien GC, Joseph P. Acute pain control challenges with buprenorphine/naloxone therapy in a patient with compartment syndrome secondary to McArdle's disease: a case report and review. Pain Med. 2013 Aug;14(8):1187-91. doi: 10.1111/pme.12135. Epub 2013 May 3.
PubMed 23647815Huang A, Katznelson R, de Perrot M, Clarke H. Perioperative management of a patient undergoing Clagett window closure stabilized on Suboxone(R) for chronic pain: a case report. Can J Anaesth. 2014 Sep;61(9):826-31. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0193-y. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
PubMed 24985936Kornfeld H, Manfredi L. Effectiveness of full agonist opioids in patients stabilized on buprenorphine undergoing major surgery: a case series. Am J Ther. 2010 Sep-Oct;17(5):523-8. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181be0804.
PubMed 19918165Macintyre PE, Russell RA, Usher KA, Gaughwin M, Huxtable CA. Pain relief and opioid requirements in the first 24 hours after surgery in patients taking buprenorphine and methadone opioid substitution therapy. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2013 Mar;41(2):222-30. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1304100212.
PubMed 23530789Kelly AM. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emerg Med J. 2001 May;18(3):205-7. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.3.205.
PubMed 11354213Wilkinson KM, Krige A, Brearley SG, Lane S, Scott M, Gordon AC, Carlson GL. Thoracic Epidural analgesia versus Rectus Sheath Catheters for open midline incisions in major abdominal surgery within an enhanced recovery programme (TERSC): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Oct 21;15:400. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-400.
PubMed 25336055
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Oct 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Randomized Trial of the Effect of Standard of Care Reduced Dose Versus Full Dose Buprenorphine/Naloxone in the Perioperative Period on Pain Control and Post Operative Opioid Use Disorder Symptoms
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03266445
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2017P001425
- Conditions
- Opioid-use Disorder, Pain, Acute, Surgery
- Keywords
- relapse, buprenorphine/naloxone, opioids, narcotics, post-surgical pain
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 76 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 Oct 2018 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 26 Feb 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to determine the effect of continuation of buprenorphine/naloxone in patients with history of Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) scheduled for surgery compared to reduced dose buprenorphine/naloxone prior to surgery on pain scores, opioid consumption, depressive symptoms and severity of substance use dependence- including record of problematic use of any non-prescribed opioids, alcohol and illicit narcotics.
Detailed description
Opioid use disorder (OUD) is characterized by non-remitting cycles of remission and opioid abuse relapse. It is associated with a high rate of psychiatric and physical co-morbidity when left untreated. Buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone are effective opioid maintenance therapy (OMT) for OUD, however, treatment of acute post-surgical pain in patients taking buprenorphine is perceived to be challenging. Although not substantiated in clinical studies, the combination of high receptor binding affinity, long half-life, and partial mu opioid receptor agonism with buprenorphine/naloxone are thought to inhibit the analgesic actions of full mu opioid receptor agonists, potentially making standard postoperative pain control strategies less effective. There is no evidence based standard of care for optimal acute pain management strategies for patients taking buprenorphine and most recommendations are based upon provider opinion- occasionally conflicting along specialty lines. Some providers, mainly consisting of surgeons and anesthesiologists, recommend that buprenorphine should be discontinued at least 72 hours prior to elective surgery and replaced with low dose opioid agonists, in the interim. Other providers, mainly comprising of psychiatrists, contend that these patients should be maintained on buprenorphine throughout the peri-operative period at either a full or reduced dose to prevent an indeterminate risk of substance abuse relapse that can occur as consequence to the abrupt termination buprenorphine in the highly stressful surgical period. This study aims to inform this important unresolved question in the clinical care of this growing population. The investigators seek to determine the effectiveness of managing postoperative pain in patients with OUD where buprenorphine/naloxone is continued perioperatively compared to patients where buprenorphine/naloxone is reduced to a lower dose. Longitudinally, the investigators also intend to determine if there is a difference in substance abuse relapse in patients where buprenorphine/naloxone is continued vs. held by using self assessments and communication with the participant's buprenorphine provider.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants will be randomly assigned to be maintained on their daily dose of buprenorphine/naloxone or to have their buprenorphine/naloxone reduced to 8mg prior to surgery. Each group will have identical perioperative treatment plans. Primary outcome measured is pain scores following surgery.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| FULL-BUPRENORPHINE | Active comparator | Drug: buprenorphine/naloxoneParticipants will be randomly assigned to be maintained on their daily dose of buprenorphine/naloxone |
| LOW-BUPRENORPHINE (control) | No intervention | –Participants will be randomly assigned to have their daily dose of buprenorphine/naloxone reduced to 8mg on the day of surgery |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- currently taking buprenorphine or buprenorphine/naloxone daily for treatment of opioid use disorder by DSM-V criteria
- on buprenorphine or buprenorphine/naloxone dose of greater than 8mg for at least 30 days
- ASA health class I-III
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Unable to consent to the study
- Significant pulmonary or cardiac disease
- Renal insufficiency with a glomerular filtration rate less than 30ml/min
- Liver cirrhosis with a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score of greater than 25
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| buprenorphine/naloxoneAlso: Reduction vs ContinuationThe intervention will be to either continue taking buprenorphine/naloxone or to have the medication reduced perioperatively. | Drug | FULL-BUPRENORPHINE |
Primary outcome
Post-operative pain scores
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Level of pain on a Visual Analog Scale of 0-100 (0=no pain; 100=worst pain imaginable) This scale will be used to quantify the varying degrees of pain or discomfort experienced by the participant.
3 secondary outcomes
Postoperative opioid consumption
Time frame: 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours after surgery
Post-operative pain scores
Time frame: 48 hours, 72 hours after surgery
Presence, severity of substance abuse
Time frame: 1 month after surgery
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Oct 2018.
- Background: PubMed 11015800McLellan AT, Lewis DC, O'Brien CP, Kleber HD. Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. JAMA. 2000 Oct 4;284(13):1689-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.13.1689.
- Background: PubMed 21330586Scott CK, Dennis ML, Laudet A, Funk RR, Simeone RS. Surviving drug addiction: the effect of treatment and abstinence on mortality. Am J Public Health. 2011 Apr;101(4):737-44. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.197038. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
- Background: PubMed 21054613Degenhardt L, Bucello C, Mathers B, Briegleb C, Ali H, Hickman M, McLaren J. Mortality among regular or dependent users of heroin and other opioids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Addiction. 2011 Jan;106(1):32-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03140.x. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
- Background: PubMed 27464203Schuckit MA. Treatment of Opioid-Use Disorders. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 28;375(4):357-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1604339. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 26517324Gordon AJ, Lo-Ciganic WH, Cochran G, Gellad WF, Cathers T, Kelley D, Donohue JM. Patterns and Quality of Buprenorphine Opioid Agonist Treatment in a Large Medicaid Program. J Addict Med. 2015 Nov-Dec;9(6):470-7. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000164.
- Background: PubMed 15957687Roberts DM, Meyer-Witting M. High-dose buprenorphine: perioperative precautions and management strategies. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2005 Feb;33(1):17-25. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0503300104.
- Background: PubMed 24500338Bryson EO. The perioperative management of patients maintained on medications used to manage opioid addiction. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2014 Jun;27(3):359-64. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000052.
- Background: PubMed 23647815McCormick Z, Chu SK, Chang-Chien GC, Joseph P. Acute pain control challenges with buprenorphine/naloxone therapy in a patient with compartment syndrome secondary to McArdle's disease: a case report and review. Pain Med. 2013 Aug;14(8):1187-91. doi: 10.1111/pme.12135. Epub 2013 May 3.
- Background: PubMed 24985936Huang A, Katznelson R, de Perrot M, Clarke H. Perioperative management of a patient undergoing Clagett window closure stabilized on Suboxone(R) for chronic pain: a case report. Can J Anaesth. 2014 Sep;61(9):826-31. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0193-y. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
- Background: PubMed 19918165Kornfeld H, Manfredi L. Effectiveness of full agonist opioids in patients stabilized on buprenorphine undergoing major surgery: a case series. Am J Ther. 2010 Sep-Oct;17(5):523-8. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181be0804.
- Background: PubMed 23530789Macintyre PE, Russell RA, Usher KA, Gaughwin M, Huxtable CA. Pain relief and opioid requirements in the first 24 hours after surgery in patients taking buprenorphine and methadone opioid substitution therapy. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2013 Mar;41(2):222-30. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1304100212.
- Background: PubMed 11354213Kelly AM. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emerg Med J. 2001 May;18(3):205-7. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.3.205.
- Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. Behavioral health trends in the United States: Results from the 2014 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. 2015. HHS Publication No. SMA 15-4927, NSDUH Series H-50.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. IPD will only be available to researchers involved in the study. All data will be collected and stored securely using the Redcap system to preserve privacy and confidentiality. Information regarding substance abuse history, including illicit narcotic use, will remain confidential and personal identifiers will be removed during data storage. Only members of the research team will have access to the data that participants have consented to provide. Participants will be informed that they have the right to not answer any question that makes them feel uncomfortable.
Related trials for Opioid-use Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Development of an Interview-Informed Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) for Opioid Use in the Era of Fentanyl
Substance Use Disorders (SUDs)
Not yet recruiting
Comprehensive Opioid Management and Breathing During Sleep
Sleep-Disordered Breathing, Chronic Opioid Use
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Wellcome Leap Psilocybin for OUD
Opioid Use Disorder
Recruiting
Opioid and Pain Treatment in Indigenous Communities (OPTIC) Trial
Opioid Use Disorder, Opioid Misuse
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Aurora Quaye, MD principal investigator
Massachusetts General Hospital
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing buprenorphine/naloxone in people with Opioid-use Disorder and Pain, Acute, run by Massachusetts General Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Aurora Quaye, MD (617-726-2000, aquaye@partners.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Post-operative pain scores (time frame: 24 hours after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03266445, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Oct 2018.