AzTrials
AzTrials

Phantom Limb PainNCT03255395

Focused Ultrasound Treatment of Stump Neuromas for the Relief of Chronic Post-Amputation Neuropathic Pain

A study testing Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound in people with Phantom Limb Pain and Residual Limbs, run by Rambam Health Care Campus at 1 site in Israel.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

AIM: To provide initial information on the efficacy (pain reduction) and safety of focused ultrasound surgery for the ablation of stump neuromas in amputees with chronic neuropathic pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Phantom Limb Pain, Residual Limbs, Amputation
What is being tested?
Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteIsrael
Study dates
24 Apr 2017to Apr 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Men and women amputees, aged 18 and older
  • Patients who are able and willing to give consent and able to attend all study visits
  • Patients who are suffering from post-amputation phantom/residual limb pain for at least 3 months
  • Patient with average pain intensity on a 0-10 numerical pain scale (NPS) ≥ 4 during a 3 days period prior to enrollment irrespective of medication use
  • Patient whose targeted (treated) lesion is deeper than 10-mm from the skin
  • Targeted (treated) neuroma is clearly visible by non-contrast MRI, and ExAblate MRgFUS device accessible

Who cannot join

  • Patients with any acute or unstable medical condition (e.g., infection, cardiac condition, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, uncontrolled hypertension) that is expected to hinder them from completing this study
  • Patients with standard contraindications for MR imaging such as non-MRI compatible implanted metallic devices including cardiac pacemakers, size limitations (weight >250 pounds (113kg), etc.
  • Known intolerance or allergies to the MRI contrast agent (e.g. Gadolinium or Magnevist) including advanced kidney disease
  • Individuals who are not able or willing to tolerate the required prolonged stationary position during treatment (approximately 3 hrs.)
  • Are participating or have participated in another clinical trial in the last 30 days
  • Patients with persistent undistinguishable pain (pain source unidentifiable)
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Patients whose neuroma is < 10-mm from the skin, blood vessels or bone
  • Patients with more than three neuromas in the affected limb
  • Targeted (treated) neuroma is NOT visible by non-contrast MRI
  • Targeted neuroma is not accessible to ExAblate due to scar tissue or any other reason

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Israel1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Rambam Health Care Campus

    Haifa

    Elon Eisenberg

    Recruiting

Other trials in Israel

About this study

AIM: To provide initial information on the efficacy (pain reduction) and safety of focused ultrasound surgery for the ablation of stump neuromas in amputees with chronic neuropathic pain.

PARTICIPANTS: The study will include 10 amputees (men/women age >18 years old) with chronic (>3 months) phantom/residual limb pain (NPS ≥ 4).

Read more

DESIGN: Patients potentially qualifying for the study will be offered an Informed Consent to sign prior to further evaluation. Those who accept will sign the informed consent, complete study questionnaires and be evaluated in terms of inclusion/exclusion criteria. Specifically, a complete medical history will be obtained to determine the patient's general health status, current symptoms, frequency and dosage of their current analgesic intake etc. Baseline pain scores will be established. If not performed within six months prior to the evaluation, a contrast MRI of the stump will be performed. Patients not meeting the study criteria will be exited from the study as screen failures and not be included in analyses. All qualifying patients will complete a baseline MRI exam on treatment day. Any patient not meeting study criteria at Imaging will be exited as screen failures.

After completion of the MRI exam, qualifying patients will proceed to the ExAblate treatment. These patients will then be followed for 6-months post-ExAblate treatment; the patients will complete study follow-up questionnaires at 1, 3 days, 1 and 2 weeks, and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatments. Follow-up visits will take place 1 week and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment to assess their pain status, their quality of life and safety. Data regarding dosage and frequency of analgesic intake for the management of post amputation NP will be collected. Relevant cost data will be collected in order to enable an assessment of the total cost of the procedure.

Read the detailed description
  1. BACKGROUND:

In 2005, 1.6 million people were estimated to be living with limb loss (3). Up to 70% of the patients who undergo limb amputation develop chronic phantom/residual limb pain. A state-of-art understanding of the pathophysiologic basis underlying post-amputation pain suggests that neuroma formation by regenerative sprouting, leading to increased ectopic afferent input is the predominant mechanism involved in NP. Post-amputation pain is often persistent, resistant to treatment and leads to considerable disability. Therefore, new "anti-nueromas" treatments are required.

Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is a non-invasive procedure that combines two technologies:

  • Focused ultrasound (FUS) waves which are converted to thermal energy at precise focal point, causes tissue temperature increase, resulting in irreversible thermal ablation of the tissue.
  • MRI: Three-dimensional imaging of the tissue and the ultrasound beam in real time enhances the safety and effectiveness of the procedure by allowing:
  • Anatomical planning of the treatment.
  • Real time thermal imaging enables of the and its surrounding tissues. The safety and effectiveness of MRgFUS has been shown in a prospective, randomized (3:1), two-arm, sham-controlled, multicenter, international clinical study with a sham-crossover option in patients with metastatic bone pain, who were not suitable candidates for radiation therapy. A much higher proportion of MRgFUS patients than controls were responders (65.2% vs 18.9%).

II. AIMS:

To provide initial information on the efficacy (pain reduction) and safety of focused ultrasound surgery for the ablation of stump neuromas in amputees with chronic neuropathic pain.

III. PARTICIPANTS:

The study will include 10 amputees with chronic phantom/residual limb pain.

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Men and women amputees, aged 18 and older
  2. Patients who are able and willing to give consent and able to attend all study visits
  3. Patients who are suffering from post-amputation phantom/residual limb pain for at least 3 months
  4. Patient with average pain intensity on a 0-10 numerical pain scale (NPS) ≥ 4 during a 3 days period prior to enrollment irrespective of medication use
  5. Patient whose targeted (treated) lesion is deeper than 10-mm from the skin
  6. Targeted (treated) neuroma is clearly visible by non-contrast MRI, and ExAblate MRgFUS device accessible Exclusion Criteria
  7. Patients with any acute or unstable medical condition that is expected to hinder them from completing this study 2. Patients with standard contraindications for MR imaging. 3. Known intolerance or allergies to the MRI contrast agent (e.g. Gadolinium or Magnevist) including advanced kidney disease 4. Individuals who are not able or willing to tolerate the required prolonged stationary position during treatment 5. Are participating or have participated in another clinical trial in the last 30 days 6. Patients with persistent undistinguishable pain (pain source unidentifiable) 7. Patients whose neuroma is < 10-mm from the skin, blood vessels or bone 8. Patients with more than three neuromas in the affected limb 9. Targeted (treated) neuroma is NOT visible by non-contrast MRI 10. Targeted neuroma is not accessible to ExAblate due to scar tissue or any other reason

IV. STUDY DESIGN Patients potentially qualifying for the study will be offered an Informed Consent to sign prior to further evaluation. Those who accept will sign the informed consent, complete study questionnaires and be evaluated in terms of inclusion/exclusion criteria. Specifically, a complete medical history will be obtained to determine the patient's general health status, current symptoms, frequency and dosage of their current analgesic intake etc. Baseline pain scores will be established. If not performed within six months prior to the evaluation, a contrast MRI of the stump will be performed. Patients not meeting the study criteria will be exited from the study as screen failures and not be included in analyses. All qualifying patients will complete a baseline MRI exam on treatment day. Any patient not meeting study criteria at Imaging will be exited as screen failures.

Qualifying patients will proceed to the ExAblate treatment. These patients will then be followed for 6-months post-ExAblate treatment; patients will complete study follow-up questionnaires at 1, 3 days, 1 and 2 weeks, and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatments. Follow-up visits will take place 1 week and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment to assess their pain status, their quality of life and safety. Data regarding dosage and frequency of analgesic intake for the management of post amputation NP will be collected.

Outcome measures Primary endpoint: Change from baseline in the average daily pain intensity, measured for 3 consecutive days, on the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS), an 11-point numeric rating scale.

Secondary endpoints:

  • Change from baseline in the maximum daily pain intensity, measured for 3 consecutive days, on the NPS.
  • Change from the baseline in the minimum daily pain intensity, measured for 3 consecutive days, on the NPS.
  • Change from the baseline in the consumption of analgesic medications used for the post amputation NP (i.e., increase, unchanged, decreased).
  • Change from baseline in Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) score
  • Change from the baseline in the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI).
  • Change from the baseline in the European Quality of Life Five-Dimensional (EQ-5D) questionnaire.
  • Change from the baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI).
  • Clinician's Global Impression of Change from the baseline.
  • Patient's Global Impression of Change from the baseline.
  • Change from the baseline in MRI findings in the treated neuroma(s).

Treatment Procedure

  • Baseline MRI examinations (without contrast) will be performed to identify the neuroma size, location and extent and device accessibility as well as to evaluate the patient's ability to cooperate during the ExAblate procedure. If at this point it is determined that the patient does not meet all Inclusion and Exclusion criteria and cannot be treated, the patient will be exited from the study. These patients will be considered screening failures, and will not be included in any of the safety or efficacy endpoint analyses.
  • If the patient meets all study criteria, the patient will have the ExAblate treatment during this same MRI examination session.
  • An IV line will be positioned for the delivery of medications and will be maintained throughout the procedure. Monitoring of heart rate and pO2 will be maintained throughout the procedure using standard MR-compatible monitoring devices. The patients' skin will be closely examined for hair in the treatment path. If necessary, the hair will be removed around the treatment area and the skin will be cleaned, for example with alcohol, from any oil based skin product. Degassed water and possibly an acoustic gel pad will be placed atop of the transducers' window to generate acoustic coupling.
  • Patients will be positioned on the ExAblate therapy bed in a selected position according to the planned treatment area. The patient's area of treatment may be placed in a special-purpose imaging coil and positioned in the magnet in the treatment position.
  • An MRI scan will be performed with T2 and T1 weighted sequences in all three orientations to localize and measure the target neuroma(s) to be treated.
  • Any prior scar will be identified on the image and the ultrasound treatment plan will be planned to avoid sonicating through the scar whenever possible.
  • If the neuroma(s) to be treated is identifiable on the MR images, accessible by the device for treatment, and the patient meets all inclusion and exclusion criteria, treatment planning will begin.
  • The physician will trace the neuroma(s) in the targeted area.
  • The physician will draw the treatment volume using MR images from one or more scan orientations using the following guidelines:
  • Up to three well defined neuromas can be treated.
  • A central point on the neuroma (depending on patient anatomy) will be sonicated with a low thermal dose, to verify targeting accuracy in the patient. Target placement and transducer positioning will be adjusted as necessary.
  • If at this point it is determined that the patient cannot be treated, he or she will be withdrawn from the magnet and the IV line and pulse oximeter will be removed. The patient will be taken to the recovery area for observation and release. Follow-up will consist of a phone call at 1-week post treatment. These patients will be considered screen failures and will not be included in the efficacy analysis.
  • Prior to the delivery of any treatment sonications the patient will receive analgesia and sedation or other measures to reduce pain and limit patient motion, and help alleviate anxiety and claustrophobia. Monitoring of heart rate and pO2 saturation will be maintained throughout the procedure.
  • Treatment will begin. Sonications will be performed on successive points [sonication duration between 15 - 60 sec]. The effect of each sonication will be measured by MR using phase map imaging, reflecting the temperature-dependent change in the proton resonance frequency. Acoustic power will be adjusted throughout the treatment, to achieve temperature between 65 and 85 degrees from MR thermal images at the targeted neuroma.
  • Sonications will continue until the prescribed targeted area has been treated. The goal is that the total time from 1st to last sonication will be limited to 180-minutes, or to patient tolerance.
  • If no more than 3 planned sonications can be performed using therapeutic energies, then these patients will be considered as screen failures, and will not be included in the intent-to-treat analysis. However, they will be added to the Safety analyses. Criteria to terminate treatment include patient intolerance to the treatment, targeting difficulties due to patient motion or a decision of the treating physician.
  • Immediately post-treatment, a series of MR scans will be performed. The scanning will include T2 weighted sequences and T1 weighted contrast enhanced sequences to evaluate general anatomy and to assess treatment effect.
  • The patient will be taken off the therapeutic table and escorted to a recovery area for observation period pending release from hospital.
  • All MR exams taken during the study will be archived for later analyses.
  • If during the treatment session, the physician did not complete the planned treatment, and determines that it would be to the benefit of the patient to continue treatment at a second session, a second treatment session may be completed within two (2) weeks of the first treatment. However, up to three painful neuromas can be treated under this protocol and the purpose of the second treatment is to complete the original treatment plan. This protocol does not allow for a second treatment due to continued pain at the treated site or the treatment of additional painful lesions. The preparation procedures for the second treatment will be the same as the first. No more than two treatments should be performed within a two (2) week period.

Follow-up Telephone follow-up visits will be completed at 1 and 3 days, and 2 weeks post treatment. Clinic visits will be completed at 1 week and 1, 3 and 6 months post-ExAblate treatment. Patients will be evaluated for general health, efficacy measurements as well as for device/procedure related AEs that may have occurred during the follow-up period. Additional data regarding dosage and frequency of analgesic intake for the management of NP will also be collected. For phone visits, study personnel will contact the patient, inquire about AEs and question the patient according to the pain questionnaire, pain medication intake. The study personnel will then sign and date the completed forms. A follow-up MRI to assess the effects on the treated neuroma(s) will be performed four months after treatment.

Being tested
Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound
Keywords
MRI, Ultrasound, Phantom Limb Pain, Residual Limb Pain, Neuroma
Medical subject headings
Phantom Limb, Neuroma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasoundDevice

    Ten amputees wil recieve a magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound treatment aimed at ablating neuromas, which are believe to contribute to their phantom / residual limb pain

Study groups in NCT03255395
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS)ExperimentalTen amputees will recieve magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) treatment aimed to ablate neromas, which are beleived to cuase phantom / residual limb pain
Receives: Device: Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline in the average daily pain

    Change from baseline in the average daily pain intensity, measured for 3 consecutive days, on the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS), an 11-point numeric rating scale.

    Measured: Up to 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Aug 2017
  2. Study start24 Apr 2017
  3. Primary completionApr 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
A single group feasibility study
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
10 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03255395
Sponsor's protocol ID
180-16
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
17 Aug 2017
Last updated
2 Apr 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound in people with Phantom Limb Pain and Residual Limbs, run by Rambam Health Care Campus at 1 site in Israel.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Elon Eisenberg, Prof (972-4-7771931, e_eisenberg@rambam.health.gov.il), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline in the average daily pain (time frame: Up to 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in