AzTrials
AzTrials

Hematologic DiseasesMULTISIMNCT03250845

Comparison of Multigam IV (5% vs. 10%) in Patients With an Immunodeficiency Secondary to a Hematological Disorder

An observational study of Hematologic Diseases and Secondary Immune Deficiency, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this observational study is to compare the administration of standard of care Multigam IV 5% and standard of care Multigam IV 10% in order to observe changes in infusion time and infusion related reactions. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
30 Jun 2017to 13 Dec 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: 30 patients with an immunodeficiency secondary to a hematologic disorder

Who may be able to join

  • Age => 18 years
  • Immunodeficiency secondary to a hematologic disorder
  • Patient has received at least 2 Multigam IV 5% administrations
  • Patient may not have had any adverse events (grade 2 or higher according to CTCAE v4.03) during the last 2 Multigam IV 5% administrations
  • Patient needs at least 2 more immunoglobulin administrations
  • Signed informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Patient has received less than 2 Multigam IV 5% administrations
  • Patient has had an adverse event (grade 2 or higher according to CTCAE v4.03) during the last 2 Multigam IV 5% administrations
  • Refusal to sign informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • UZ Leuven Gasthuisberg

    Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Multigam IV (5% vs. 10%) as Substitution Therapy in Patients With an Immunodeficiency Secondary to a Hematological Disorder to Evaluate Infusion Time, Tolerance and Satisfaction. A Monocentric Observational Belgian Study

The purpose of this observational study is to compare the administration of standard of care Multigam IV 5% and standard of care Multigam IV 10% in order to observe changes in infusion time and infusion related reactions. Patient satisfaction, number of actions taken by the nursing staff during infusion and satisfaction of the nursing staff will also be evaluated.

Read the detailed description

Given the growing number of patient contacts at our day-care center, there is a continuous search to further improve the flow and to shorten the time spent per patient at the day-care center, without loss of quality in care.

In order to achieve this goal, this study wants to compare the administration of Multigam IV 5% and Multigam IV 10%. Multigam 5% and Multigam 10% are immunoglobulin solutions that are administered to strengthen the body's natural defense system (immune system). In case of recurrent infections, patients with an immunodeficiency secondary to a hematologic disorder can be treated with immunoglobulin substitution therapy. Patients can receive Multigam IV 5% and Multigam IV 10% in daily clinical practice and will receive both formulations in the same manner and intensity, meaning their use is not limited to this study.

For this observational study, patients with an immunodeficiency secondary to a hematologic disorder will be evaluated for inclusion. Patient characteristics, infusion time, time spent at the day-care center, adverse events and number of actions taken by the nursing staff will be evaluated for Multigam 5% administration. After 3-4 weeks, patients will return for Multigam 10% administration and an identical evaluation will take place along with a questionnaire for the patient and nursing staff to assess their satisfaction. The results will be processed to compare and evaluate the administration of both immunoglobulin solutions.

Keywords
Multigam, Immunoglobulin, Secondary immunodeficiency
Medical subject headings
Hematologic Diseases

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Infusion Time of Multigam IV 5% and Multigam IV 10%

    Comparison of infusion time between Multigam (MG) IV 5% and Multigam IV 10%. Results will be assessed by Student's-t-test and 95% confidence interval.

    Measured: Up to 1 month after Multigam 5% infusion

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Hospitalisation Time of Multigam IV 5% and Multigam IV 10%

    Comparison of hospitalisation time (time spent at day clinic) between Multigam IV 5% and Multigam IV 10%. Results will be assessed by Student's-t-test and 95% confidence interval.

    Measured: Up to 1 month after Multigam 5% infusion

  2. IVIg-related Adverse Events Per Patient During Multigam IV 5% and Multigam IV 10% Administration

    Evaluation of the occurence of adverse events (AEs) for both administrations via CTCAE v4.03 criteria.

    Results are reported as the mean number of IVIg-related AEs per patient. Adverse events were actively monitored during infusion and patients could report adverse events up to 72h after infusion.

    Measured: Up to 72 after each infusion

  3. Nursing Actions Per Patient During Multigam IV 5% and Multigam IV 10% Administration

    Evaluate the number of actions taken by the nursing staff during Multigam administration. Nursing actions were defined as the sum of actions required to increase the infusion rate (if needed) and any other action that had to be taken due to adverse effects during administration (e.g. lowering of infusion rate or supportive medication). Standard procedures like taking parameters were not accounted for this evaluation.

    Measured: During each infusion (up to 1 day)

  4. Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire.

    Assess patient satisfaction via questionnaires. Questionnaires were taken at the end of MG 10% infusion and were validated by the principal investigator (PI) and head nurse.

    Patients could score following questions from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) [Full scale: 1: strongly disagree; 2:disagree; 3: neutral; 4: agree; 5; strongly agree]:

    Question 1: I experienced less side effects during Multigam 10% infusion. Question 2: I experienced time gain with Multigam 10%. Question 3: I had a more productive day with Multigam 10%. Question 4: I am in favor of of the use of Multigam 10%.

    Measured: End of study (after Multigam 10% infusion)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Aug 2017
  2. Study start30 Jun 2017
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2017
  4. Study completion13 Dec 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03250845
Sponsor's protocol ID
HEM-2017-001
Acronym
MULTISIM
Status last verified
Oct 2019
First submitted
7 Aug 2017
Last updated
15 Nov 2019
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Hematologic Diseases and Secondary Immune Deficiency, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Nov 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Infusion Time of Multigam IV 5% and Multigam IV 10% (time frame: Up to 1 month after Multigam 5% infusion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Nov 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in