Coronary Artery DiseaseNCT03248674
Diagnostic Performance of Coronary CT Angiography With CT FFR in Kidney Transplantation Candidates
An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease and Computed Tomography, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) before kidney transplantation require that obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) is excluded, as cardiovascular complications are the leading cause of mortality in kidney transplant patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease, Computed Tomography
- What is being tested?
- CT FFR
- How many people
- 26 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 28 Aug 2017to 24 Jan 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Candidates for kidney transplantation without any residual kidney function and referred to cardiac evaulation.
Who may be able to join
- Candidates for kidney transplantation on dialysis without any residual kidney function AND referred to invasive coronary angiography for cardiac evaluation
- Referral to invasive coronary angiography is based on algorithm used at the Transplant Readiness Assessment Clinic (TRAC) at Stanford:
- A. Diabetic Candidates older than 45 years.
- B. Diabetic Candidates under 45 years old and any one of the following criteria is present:
- a) 25 year History of Diabetes
- b) 5 year Smoking History
- c) Abnormal EKG (ST-T wave changes)
Who cannot join
- Hemodynamically and clinically unstable condition (angina at rest, malignant arrhythmias)
- Known ischemic heart disease (prior, documented myocardial infarction, prior stenting or coronary artery bypass graft surgery)
- BMI>30 kg/m2, or weight >120 kg.
- Atrial fibrillation or other arrhythmia, >6 ectopic beats per minute
- Known or suspected allergy to iodinated contrast medium
- Pregnancy cannot be excluded
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography With Computed Tomography Fractional Flow Reserve in Kidney Transplantation Candidates
Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) before kidney transplantation require that obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) is excluded, as cardiovascular complications are the leading cause of mortality in kidney transplant patients. However, in this patient population, the optimal method for the detection of obstructive CAD has not been identified. Noninvasive stress tests such as Dobutamine stress echocardiography or nuclear perfusion study have low diagnostic accuracy. CT fractional flow reserve measurement (CT FFR) is a novel non-invasive (FDA approved) imaging test to identify obstructive CAD. The goal of this project is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CT FFR in the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with chronic kidney disease before kidney transplantation.
Read the detailed description
Transplantation is the therapy of choice for most patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end stage renal disease (ESRD). Kidney transplantation improves quality of life and overall survival rates. Cardiovascular disease is the most common complication and leading cause of death in the transplant population. In order to assess the risk of cardiac events perioperatively and after kidney transplantation, the majority of kidney transplantation candidates undergo cardiac evaluation, including non-invasive cardiac stress imaging or invasive coronary angiography before transplantation. Invasive coronary angiography is associated with small but definite risk of bleeding or myocardial infarction, making non-invasive cardiac stress imaging such as dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) or nuclear myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) the preferred method. However, non-invasive cardiac stress imaging in patients with stage 5 CKD and ESRD demonstrates only moderate accuracy. DSE and MPS showed only sensitivities ranging from 0.44 to 0.89 and from 0.29 to 0.92, respectively, for identifying one or more severe coronary artery stenosis (defined as coronary diameter stenosis of more than 70%). Due to the moderate accuracy, several transplant centers (including Stanford) still continue to rely on invasive coronary angiography for their populations instead of non-invasive cardiac testing. Thus improved non-invasive cardiac testing with higher sensitivities and specificity are highly desirable in this patient population.
A promising alternative is the use of coronary CT angiography (cCTA) in combination with CT based fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR). Non-invasive cCTA alone has recently been evaluated in kidney transplantation candidates. It demonstrated high sensitivity (0.93) but limited specificity (0.63) in the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease, most likely related to the high prevalence of coronary artery calcifications in patients with CKD and ESRD. The specificity of coronary CTA can be improved by a new image analysis techniques, which allow the calculation of the hemodynamic significance - expressed as the relative pressure drop across a lesion similar - based on computational fluid dynamics derived from the conventional coronary CTA (6). In various study populations, the combination of coronary CT angiography and CT FFR showed excellent correlation with invasive FFR derived from invasive coronary angiography, which is the current gold standard. The implementation of CT- FFR has shown an improvement of the specificity of coronary CTA , even in the presence of coronary artery calcifications. However, no study so far assessed the diagnostic accuracy of coronary angiography with CT-FFR in candidates for kidney transplantation.
Goal The objective of this project is to evaluate and establish a new non-invasive cardiac test in the detection of coronary artery disease for candidates before kidney transplantation.
Specific Aims We want to confirm the promising results of CT FFR in this specific patient population and want to establish an alternative non-invasive cardiac test.
Study Design This study is designed as a prospective observational cohort study with a study population of 50 -100 patients. All patients who are included in this study will undergo coronary CT angiography with CT-FFR (research part) and a clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography with invasive FFR (standard of care). Coronary angiography and invasive FFR will act as the reference standard.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease, Computed Tomography
- Being tested
- CT FFR
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CT FFRDiagnostic test
CT FFR calculated the fractional flow reserve based on the data derived for a regular coronary CT angiography. Computation is based on development of an anatomic model of the epicardial coronary arteries for each case and calculating the maximum coronary flow during maximal hyperaemia based on a mathematical model incorporating fluid dynamics. These post-processing steps require quantification of the patient-specific myocardial mass as this allows for an estimation of the baseline coronary blood flow.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Diagnostic accuracy of CT FFR.
Diagnostic accuracy of CT FFR (per vessel) in the detection of hemodynamically significant CAD as compared to invasive FFR derived from invasive coronary angiography (reference standard). Presence or absence of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease in concordance between CT FFR and invasive FFR. Hemodynamically significant stenosis is defined as CT FFR value below 0.8.
Measured: CT FFR and Invasive FFR are calculated immediately after coronary CT angiography and invasive coronary angiography
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Aug 2017
- Study start28 Aug 2017
- Primary completion24 Jan 2020
- Study completion24 Jan 2020
Why it stopped: Difficulty with recruitment in this patient population.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Stanford UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 26 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Siemens Medical Solutions
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dominik Fleischmann, MD, Stanford University
- Investigators
- Dominik Fleischmann, M.D., Principal investigator, Stanford Radiology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03248674
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB-41455
- Status last verified
- Dec 2021
- First submitted
- 10 Aug 2017
- Last updated
- 6 Jan 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jan 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography With Computed Tomography Fractional Flow Reserve in Kidney Transplantation Candidates
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03248674
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB-41455
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease, Computed Tomography
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Difficulty with recruitment in this patient population.
- Enrolment
- 26 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Siemens Medical Solutions
- Study start
- 28 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Jan 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) before kidney transplantation require that obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) is excluded, as cardiovascular complications are the leading cause of mortality in kidney transplant patients. However, in this patient population, the optimal method for the detection of obstructive CAD has not been identified. Noninvasive stress tests such as Dobutamine stress echocardiography or nuclear perfusion study have low diagnostic accuracy. CT fractional flow reserve measurement (CT FFR) is a novel non-invasive (FDA approved) imaging test to identify obstructive CAD. The goal of this project is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CT FFR in the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with chronic kidney disease before kidney transplantation.
Detailed description
Transplantation is the therapy of choice for most patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end stage renal disease (ESRD). Kidney transplantation improves quality of life and overall survival rates. Cardiovascular disease is the most common complication and leading cause of death in the transplant population. In order to assess the risk of cardiac events perioperatively and after kidney transplantation, the majority of kidney transplantation candidates undergo cardiac evaluation, including non-invasive cardiac stress imaging or invasive coronary angiography before transplantation. Invasive coronary angiography is associated with small but definite risk of bleeding or myocardial infarction, making non-invasive cardiac stress imaging such as dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) or nuclear myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) the preferred method. However, non-invasive cardiac stress imaging in patients with stage 5 CKD and ESRD demonstrates only moderate accuracy. DSE and MPS showed only sensitivities ranging from 0.44 to 0.89 and from 0.29 to 0.92, respectively, for identifying one or more severe coronary artery stenosis (defined as coronary diameter stenosis of more than 70%). Due to the moderate accuracy, several transplant centers (including Stanford) still continue to rely on invasive coronary angiography for their populations instead of non-invasive cardiac testing. Thus improved non-invasive cardiac testing with higher sensitivities and specificity are highly desirable in this patient population.
A promising alternative is the use of coronary CT angiography (cCTA) in combination with CT based fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR). Non-invasive cCTA alone has recently been evaluated in kidney transplantation candidates. It demonstrated high sensitivity (0.93) but limited specificity (0.63) in the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease, most likely related to the high prevalence of coronary artery calcifications in patients with CKD and ESRD. The specificity of coronary CTA can be improved by a new image analysis techniques, which allow the calculation of the hemodynamic significance - expressed as the relative pressure drop across a lesion similar - based on computational fluid dynamics derived from the conventional coronary CTA (6). In various study populations, the combination of coronary CT angiography and CT FFR showed excellent correlation with invasive FFR derived from invasive coronary angiography, which is the current gold standard. The implementation of CT- FFR has shown an improvement of the specificity of coronary CTA , even in the presence of coronary artery calcifications. However, no study so far assessed the diagnostic accuracy of coronary angiography with CT-FFR in candidates for kidney transplantation.
Goal The objective of this project is to evaluate and establish a new non-invasive cardiac test in the detection of coronary artery disease for candidates before kidney transplantation.
Specific Aims We want to confirm the promising results of CT FFR in this specific patient population and want to establish an alternative non-invasive cardiac test.
Study Design This study is designed as a prospective observational cohort study with a study population of 50 -100 patients. All patients who are included in this study will undergo coronary CT angiography with CT-FFR (research part) and a clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography with invasive FFR (standard of care). Coronary angiography and invasive FFR will act as the reference standard.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Candidates for kidney transplantation without any residual kidney function and referred to cardiac evaulation.
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Candidates for kidney transplantation on dialysis without any residual kidney function AND referred to invasive coronary angiography for cardiac evaluation
- Referral to invasive coronary angiography is based on algorithm used at the Transplant Readiness Assessment Clinic (TRAC) at Stanford:
- A. Diabetic Candidates older than 45 years.
- B. Diabetic Candidates under 45 years old and any one of the following criteria is present:
- a) 25 year History of Diabetes
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Hemodynamically and clinically unstable condition (angina at rest, malignant arrhythmias)
- Known ischemic heart disease (prior, documented myocardial infarction, prior stenting or coronary artery bypass graft surgery)
- BMI>30 kg/m2, or weight >120 kg.
- Atrial fibrillation or other arrhythmia, >6 ectopic beats per minute
- Known or suspected allergy to iodinated contrast medium
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CT FFRCT FFR calculated the fractional flow reserve based on the data derived for a regular coronary CT angiography. Computation is based on development of an anatomic model of the epicardial coronary arteries for each case and calculating the maximum coronary flow during maximal hyperaemia based on a mathematical model incorporating fluid dynamics. These post-processing steps require quantification of the patient-specific myocardial mass as this allows for an estimation of the baseline coronary blood flow. | Diagnostic test | – |
Primary outcome
Diagnostic accuracy of CT FFR.
Time frame: CT FFR and Invasive FFR are calculated immediately after coronary CT angiography and invasive coronary angiography
Diagnostic accuracy of CT FFR (per vessel) in the detection of hemodynamically significant CAD as compared to invasive FFR derived from invasive coronary angiography (reference standard). Presence or absence of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease in concordance between CT FFR and invasive FFR. Hemodynamically significant stenosis is defined as CT FFR value below 0.8.
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Difficulty with recruitment in this patient population.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jan 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dominik Fleischmann, M.D. principal investigator
Stanford Radiology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease and Computed Tomography, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Difficulty with recruitment in this patient population.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Diagnostic accuracy of CT FFR. (time frame: CT FFR and Invasive FFR are calculated immediately after coronary CT angiography and invasive coronary angiography). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jan 2022.