Obesity, ChildhoodNCT03245775
A Trial of Two Family-based Childhood Obesity Treatment Programs
A study testing iChoose and Family Connections in people with Obesity, Childhood, run by University of Virginia at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The primary aim is to determine the relative effectiveness in child BMI z-scores at 3, 6, and 12-months post baseline of iChoose+ versus Family Connections. Secondary aims are to determine (1) ongoing reach, fidelity, and implementation costs, (2) community capacity for implementation and sustainability, (3) relative… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 12 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Obesity, Childhood
- What is being tested?
- iChoose and Family Connections
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 267 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2017to 30 Jun 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 12 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Parent/child dyads will be eligible for participation if they reside in the Dan River Region
- English speaking
- child with a BMI percentile ranking of 85 or higher
- Cohort 3 age eligibility changed from 8-12 to 5-15
Who cannot join
- children with a major cognitive impairment and parents or children with a medical contraindication for moderate physical activity.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908-0717
About this study
Official title: A Randomized-controlled Trial to Compare the Reach, Effectiveness and Maintenance of Two Family-based Childhood Obesity Treatment Programs in a Medically Underserved Region
The primary aim is to determine the relative effectiveness in child BMI z-scores at 3, 6, and 12-months post baseline of iChoose+ versus Family Connections. Secondary aims are to determine (1) ongoing reach, fidelity, and implementation costs, (2) community capacity for implementation and sustainability, (3) relative impact on family eating/physical activity and parental weight, and (4) relative adherence and potential dose response relationships.
Read the detailed description
In partnership with the Community Advisory Board and Parent Advisory Team, with a goal to improve the magnitude of weight reductions and increase the likelihood of iChoose sustainability in the community, the investigators propose to test iChoose+ that will (1) extend iChoose to a 6-month program, followed by 12 bi-weekly maintenance telephone calls, congruent with the 12-month Bright Bodies program duration, (2) formalize a Parent Health Advisory model of previous iChoose families to serve as a 'peer support safety net' for new program participants, and (3) deliver support calls using interactive voice response (IVR) automation to reduce the burden on community stakeholder implementation. When reflecting on and interpreting the outcomes of the previous planning grant, the Community Advisory Board and Parent Advisory Team also identified the need to use a study design that allowed all participants the opportunity to benefit and, with this in mind, to test alternative family-based childhood obesity program options that improve reach within the broad Dan River Region population of minority, low-income, and geographically dispersed families. Thus, the Community Advisory Board and Parent Advisory Team returned to a potential option for delivery that was considered earlier in the planning grant process and was rated highly for scalability- Family Connections, an adaptation of Golan's Home Environmental Change model that focuses exclusively on parents as the agents of change. When compared to iChoose+ (12 bi-weekly sessions \& 24 IVR calls/12 months), Family Connections has fewer sessions and fewer IVR support calls over a shorter period of time (2 in-person sessions spaced one week apart \& 10 IVR calls/6 months), delivers intervention to parents only, and promotes physical activity, but does not include structured exercise sessions. Still, in previous studies Family Connections led to significant reductions in child weight status, though smaller in magnitude than Bright Bodies, that were sustained 6-month post intervention completion. Committed to the goal of allowing all participating families an opportunity to benefit from study participation and the need for a sustainable family-based childhood obesity option, the Community Advisory Board and Parent Advisory Team propose a comparative effectiveness trial where eligible families will be randomly assigned to: (1) iChoose+ (n=87) or to (2) Family Connections (n=87). Given the need to optimize program enrollment, participation, and retention in each program, both iChoose+ and Family Connections will include Parent Health Advisor support63-68 as refined by the Parent Advisory Team. The primary aim is to determine the relative changes in child BMI z-scores at 6 months post baseline of iChoose+ versus Family Connections, though additional assessments will occur at 3 and 12 months post baseline. Secondary aims include (1) determine ongoing reach, fidelity, and costs of implementation, (2) assess community capacity to implement and sustain childhood obesity programs, (3) determine impact on family eating and physical activity and parental weight by intervention, and (4) assess the adherence by intervention and potential dose response relationships. The primary study hypotheses are: (a) children in both conditions will reduce BMI-z scores significantly, when compared to baseline at 3, 6 and 12 months, but iChoose+ reductions will be significantly larger than Family Connections, (b) reach-the sample will be representative of the eligible regional population on demographic and behavioral factors, (c) implementation-the intervention components will be delivered with high fidelity in both conditions, but costs will be lower for Family Connections, (d) maintenance-a sustainability action plan will be completed to include strategies for continued delivery of iChoose+ and/or Family Connections (outcome dependent), (e) parent weight, parent/child behaviors, \& tertiary outcomes that follow the same patterns as BMI z-scores, and (f), community capacity for implementing and sustaining a locally relevant FBCO treatment and maintenance program will remain high over time.
- Conditions
- Obesity, Childhood
- Being tested
- iChoose, Family Connections
- Keywords
- health disparities, community-based participatory research
- Medical subject headings
- Pediatric Obesity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
iChooseBehavioural
12 bi-weekly sessions \& 24 IVR calls/12 months, 24 physical activity sessions over 6 months; delivers intervention to parents and children only
Family ConnectionsBehavioural
2 in-person sessions spaced one week apart \& 10 IVR calls/6 months, promotes physical activity but does not include structured exercise sessions; delivers intervention to parents only
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| iChoose | Experimental | 12 bi-weekly sessions \& 24 IVR calls/12 months, 24 physical activity sessions over 6 months; delivers intervention to parents and children only Receives: Behavioral: iChoose |
| Family Connections | Experimental | 2 in-person sessions spaced one week apart \& 10 IVR calls/6 months, promotes physical activity but does not include structured exercise sessions; delivers intervention to parents only Receives: Behavioral: Family Connections |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Child Body Mass Index (BMI) Z-score at 6 Months
child BMI is converted to a BMI Z score which uses a standardized distribution. A BMI z score of 0 indicates an average BMI for the childs height, weight, age, and gender. Positive z-scores indicate the number of standard deviations above the norm, while negative numbers indicate the number of standard deviations below the norm. Higher z scores indicate a greater BMI status for the child. The primary outcome is a change score, or the difference between the 6 month BMI z-score and the Baseline BMI z-score. A negative score will indicate BMI z score status reductions and is a positive finding.
Measured: Baseline and 6-months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Change From Baseline of Parent Body Mass Index (BMI) at 6 Months
BMI is the persons weight divided by the square of their height. BMI categories help to classify individuals as underweight (less than 18.5), normal (18.5-24.9), overweight (25-29.9), and obese (30 or higher). Parent BMI change scores are the difference between the 6 month calculated BMI and the Baseline BMI. Negative scores indicate improvement in BMI status over this 6 month period.
Measured: Baseline and 6-months
Change From Baseline in the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory for Children Score at 6 Months
The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory is a 23-item instruments that assesses four domains of health (physical, emotional, social, and school functioning). Scoring is reported as a percent (0-100), higher scores indicate better health related quality of life. The change score is calculated as the difference between the 6 month and baseline scores. A positive difference is considered an improvement in quality of life.
Measured: Baseline and 6-months
Change From Baseline in the Healthy Days Core Module for Parents at 6 Months
The Healthy Days Core Module is a measure of quality of life through self reports of the total number of physical and mental health "sick days" (e.g., unable to do daily activities) in the past month. Higher scores indicate more unhealthy days, or lower quality of life. Change scores are calculated as the difference between 6 month and baseline scores. A negative change score indicates a decrease in unhealthy days and thereby and increase in quality of life.
Measured: Baseline and 6-months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Aug 2017
- Study start1 Jun 2017
- Primary completion30 Nov 2019
- Study completion30 Jun 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Obesity, ChildhoodStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of VirginiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 267 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Virginia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Nebraska, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jamie Zoellner, PhD RD, University of Virginia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03245775
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 19748
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 7 Aug 2017
- Last updated
- 28 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Zoellner JM, You W, Hill JL, Brock DP, Yuhas M, Alexander RC, Price B, Estabrooks PA. A comparative effectiveness trial of two family-based childhood obesity treatment programs in a medically underserved region: Rationale, design & methods. Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Sep;84:105801. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
PubMed 31260792
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized-controlled Trial to Compare the Reach, Effectiveness and Maintenance of Two Family-based Childhood Obesity Treatment Programs in a Medically Underserved Region
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03245775
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 19748
- Conditions
- Obesity, Childhood
- Keywords
- health disparities, community-based participatory research
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 267 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of VirginiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Nebraska, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 28 Jun 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary aim is to determine the relative effectiveness in child BMI z-scores at 3, 6, and 12-months post baseline of iChoose+ versus Family Connections. Secondary aims are to determine (1) ongoing reach, fidelity, and implementation costs, (2) community capacity for implementation and sustainability, (3) relative impact on family eating/physical activity and parental weight, and (4) relative adherence and potential dose response relationships.
Detailed description
In partnership with the Community Advisory Board and Parent Advisory Team, with a goal to improve the magnitude of weight reductions and increase the likelihood of iChoose sustainability in the community, the investigators propose to test iChoose+ that will (1) extend iChoose to a 6-month program, followed by 12 bi-weekly maintenance telephone calls, congruent with the 12-month Bright Bodies program duration, (2) formalize a Parent Health Advisory model of previous iChoose families to serve as a 'peer support safety net' for new program participants, and (3) deliver support calls using interactive voice response (IVR) automation to reduce the burden on community stakeholder implementation. When reflecting on and interpreting the outcomes of the previous planning grant, the Community Advisory Board and Parent Advisory Team also identified the need to use a study design that allowed all participants the opportunity to benefit and, with this in mind, to test alternative family-based childhood obesity program options that improve reach within the broad Dan River Region population of minority, low-income, and geographically dispersed families. Thus, the Community Advisory Board and Parent Advisory Team returned to a potential option for delivery that was considered earlier in the planning grant process and was rated highly for scalability- Family Connections, an adaptation of Golan's Home Environmental Change model that focuses exclusively on parents as the agents of change. When compared to iChoose+ (12 bi-weekly sessions \& 24 IVR calls/12 months), Family Connections has fewer sessions and fewer IVR support calls over a shorter period of time (2 in-person sessions spaced one week apart \& 10 IVR calls/6 months), delivers intervention to parents only, and promotes physical activity, but does not include structured exercise sessions. Still, in previous studies Family Connections led to significant reductions in child weight status, though smaller in magnitude than Bright Bodies, that were sustained 6-month post intervention completion. Committed to the goal of allowing all participating families an opportunity to benefit from study participation and the need for a sustainable family-based childhood obesity option, the Community Advisory Board and Parent Advisory Team propose a comparative effectiveness trial where eligible families will be randomly assigned to: (1) iChoose+ (n=87) or to (2) Family Connections (n=87). Given the need to optimize program enrollment, participation, and retention in each program, both iChoose+ and Family Connections will include Parent Health Advisor support63-68 as refined by the Parent Advisory Team. The primary aim is to determine the relative changes in child BMI z-scores at 6 months post baseline of iChoose+ versus Family Connections, though additional assessments will occur at 3 and 12 months post baseline. Secondary aims include (1) determine ongoing reach, fidelity, and costs of implementation, (2) assess community capacity to implement and sustain childhood obesity programs, (3) determine impact on family eating and physical activity and parental weight by intervention, and (4) assess the adherence by intervention and potential dose response relationships. The primary study hypotheses are: (a) children in both conditions will reduce BMI-z scores significantly, when compared to baseline at 3, 6 and 12 months, but iChoose+ reductions will be significantly larger than Family Connections, (b) reach-the sample will be representative of the eligible regional population on demographic and behavioral factors, (c) implementation-the intervention components will be delivered with high fidelity in both conditions, but costs will be lower for Family Connections, (d) maintenance-a sustainability action plan will be completed to include strategies for continued delivery of iChoose+ and/or Family Connections (outcome dependent), (e) parent weight, parent/child behaviors, \& tertiary outcomes that follow the same patterns as BMI z-scores, and (f), community capacity for implementing and sustaining a locally relevant FBCO treatment and maintenance program will remain high over time.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| iChoose | Experimental | Behavioral: iChoose12 bi-weekly sessions \& 24 IVR calls/12 months, 24 physical activity sessions over 6 months; delivers intervention to parents and children only |
| Family Connections | Experimental | Behavioral: Family Connections2 in-person sessions spaced one week apart \& 10 IVR calls/6 months, promotes physical activity but does not include structured exercise sessions; delivers intervention to parents only |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 12 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Parent/child dyads will be eligible for participation if they reside in the Dan River Region
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- children with a major cognitive impairment and parents or children with a medical contraindication for moderate physical activity.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| iChoose12 bi-weekly sessions \& 24 IVR calls/12 months, 24 physical activity sessions over 6 months; delivers intervention to parents and children only | Behavioural | iChoose |
| Family Connections2 in-person sessions spaced one week apart \& 10 IVR calls/6 months, promotes physical activity but does not include structured exercise sessions; delivers intervention to parents only | Behavioural | Family Connections |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Child Body Mass Index (BMI) Z-score at 6 Months
Time frame: Baseline and 6-months
child BMI is converted to a BMI Z score which uses a standardized distribution. A BMI z score of 0 indicates an average BMI for the childs height, weight, age, and gender. Positive z-scores indicate the number of standard deviations above the norm, while negative numbers indicate the number of standard deviations below the norm. Higher z scores indicate a greater BMI status for the child. The primary outcome is a change score, or the difference between the 6 month BMI z-score and the Baseline BMI z-score. A negative score will indicate BMI z score status reductions and is a positive finding.
3 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline of Parent Body Mass Index (BMI) at 6 Months
Time frame: Baseline and 6-months
Change From Baseline in the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory for Children Score at 6 Months
Time frame: Baseline and 6-months
Change From Baseline in the Healthy Days Core Module for Parents at 6 Months
Time frame: Baseline and 6-months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jun 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31260792Zoellner JM, You W, Hill JL, Brock DP, Yuhas M, Alexander RC, Price B, Estabrooks PA. A comparative effectiveness trial of two family-based childhood obesity treatment programs in a medically underserved region: Rationale, design & methods. Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Sep;84:105801. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Obesity, Childhood
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of a 10-week Multicomponent Intervention Combined With Parent Education on Binge Eating Behavior in Children and Adolescents
Binge Eating Disorder, Binge Eating
Recruiting
National Childhood Obesity Prevention Programme BE FIT 24
Childhood Obesity
RecruitingPhase 2
Oxytocin for Weight Loss in Adolescents
Obesity, Adolescent, Oxytocin
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Brain and Obesity Longitudinal Development: Neurobiological Mechanisms of Semaglutide Treatment of Adolescent Obesity
Pediatric Obesity, Obesity
RecruitingObservational study
Early Tracking of Childhood Health Determinants (ETCHED) Study
Diabetes Mellitus, Obesity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing iChoose and Family Connections in people with Obesity, Childhood, run by University of Virginia at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Jun 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Child Body Mass Index (BMI) Z-score at 6 Months (time frame: Baseline and 6-months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03245775, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jun 2024.