Hodgkin LymphomaPhase 3SPARKLENCT03242902
To Decrease Fatigue With Light Therapy
A Phase 3 study testing Light therapy intensity 1 and Light therapy intensity 2 in people with Hodgkin Lymphoma and Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma, run by The Netherlands Cancer Institute at 9 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Cancer related fatigue (CRF) is one of the most prevalent and distressing long-term complaints reported by (non-) Hodgkin survivors. The SPARKLE study will test the efficacy of two intensities of light therapy on cancer related fatigue. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hodgkin Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
- What is being tested?
- Light therapy intensity 1 and Light therapy intensity 2
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 166 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- 20 Sep 2017to 11 Aug 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- A history of Hodgkin or DLBCL with a survivorship of ≥ 3 years.
- The presence of moderate to severe fatigue symptoms since diagnosis of or treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma or DLBCL.
Who cannot join
- Fatigue is explained by a somatic factor as defined in the guidelines of chronic fatigue syndrome of the Dutch internists association (NIV). When a somatic cause for fatigue is resolved by stable medication use ≥ 6 months, patients can be included in the current trial.
- Pregnancy (until 3 months postnatal) or women who provide breast feeding
- Extensive surgical operations in the past 3 months.
- Current diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder (e.g. personality disorders, psychosis, bipolar disorder) which would limit participation.
- Diagnosis of and treatment for a secondary malignancy in the past 12 months.
- Presence of photophobia (abnormal intolerance to visual perception of light) or another eye disease that shows symptoms of photophobia (e.g. aniridia, retinitis pigmentosa, glaucoma).
Show all 9Show fewer
- Current or previous use of light therapy for more than 1 week.
- Current employment in shift work.
- Insufficient knowledge of the Dutch language.
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 1 country.
9 sites in 1 country
Netherlands9 sites
Netherlands Cancer Institute
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1066 CX
VUmc
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1081 HV
Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis
Dordrecht, 3300 AK
Admiraal de Ruyter ziekenhuis
Goes, 3318 AT
Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
Leiden, South Holland, 2300 RC
Radboudumc
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6500 HB
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3000 CA
Haga ziekenhuis
The Hague, 2545 CH
Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
Utrecht, 2508 GA
About this study
Official title: Improving Sleep Quality, Psychosocial Functioning, and Cancer Related Fatigue With Light Therapy
Cancer related fatigue (CRF) is one of the most prevalent and distressing long-term complaints reported by (non-) Hodgkin survivors. The SPARKLE study will test the efficacy of two intensities of light therapy on cancer related fatigue. Additionally, it explores possible working mechanisms of light therapy on CRF including improvements in sleep quality, psychosocial variables (depression, anxiety, cognitive complaints, and quality of life), and changes in biological circadian rhythms.
Read the detailed description
Rationale: Cancer related fatigue (CRF) is one of the most prevalent and distressing long-term complaints reported by (non-)Hodgkin survivors. So far, there is no standard treatment. Some non-pharmacological interventions have shown large effects but show limitations as well, e.g. they are labor intensive. A novel and promising treatment for CRF is exposure to bright white light (BWL) therapy. This low-cost intervention is easy to deliver and has a low burden for professionals as well as for patients.
Objective: To examine the efficacy of BWL therapy as an intervention for CRF. As a secondary aim, this study will explore possible working mechanisms including changes in sleep quality, psychological variables, biological circadian rhythms, sleep-wake cycles, inflammation markers and genotype.
Study design: A multicenter randomized controlled trial will invite participants and allocate them to either a light intensity 1 condition (n=80) or a light intensity 2 condition (n=80). The longitudinal design will include four measurement points: baseline, mid-intervention, post-intervention, and at 3 and 9 months follow-up.
Study population: Hodgkin and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) survivors fulfilling the clinical criteria of CRF and a survivorship of ≥ 3 years will be invited. Fatigue should not be attributable to a clear somatic cause or treatment for secondary cancer in the past year. Moreover, 25 Hodgkin survivors without CRF will be recruited to explore the association between circadian rhythms and CRF.
Intervention: The light intervention includes exposure to light for 30 minutes within the first half hour after awakening during 3,5 weeks.
Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study parameter in this study is the change in CRF from baseline to post-intervention and at 3 and 9 months follow-up. This will be assessed with the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Participation in this study includes completion of a light intervention for 3,5 weeks (30 min each day) and 2 visits (1h) to the treating hospital pre- and post-intervention. The visits aim to provide instructions and equipment and to collect two blood samples. Additionally, 5 saliva samples will be collected by the participant at home pre- and post-intervention. Moreover, participants complete questionnaires (30 min, 4 times) and wear an accelerometer (10d, 4 times and during light therapy) to objectively measure sleep quality and activity. Risks of the light intervention are limited, although there are few known reports of agitation, headache and nausea during the first days of light exposure. Benefits are the use of an easy to administer treatment for one of the most distressing symptoms that participants report.
- Conditions
- Hodgkin Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
- Being tested
- Light therapy intensity 1, Light therapy intensity 2
- Keywords
- light therapy, cancer related fatigue, sleep quality, biological rhythms
- Medical subject headings
- Hodgkin Disease, Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Light therapy intensity 1Device
Exposure to white light (10.000 lux) in the morning
Light therapy intensity 2Device
Exposure to white light (10-20 lux) in the morning
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Light intensity 1 | Experimental | The light intervention includes exposure to white light (10.000 lux) at a distance of 45 cm for 30 minutes within the first half hour after awakening during 3 weeks and 4 days. This can be done while engaged in other activities, for example reading the newspaper or eating breakfast. Receives: Device: Light therapy intensity 1 |
| Light intensity 2 | Experimental | The light intervention includes exposure to white light (10-20 lux) at a distance of 45 cm for 30 minutes within the first half hour after awakening during 3 weeks and 4 days. This can be done while engaged in other activities, for example reading the newspaper or eating breakfast. Receives: Device: Light therapy intensity 2 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cancer related fatigue
Fatigue is assessed with the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory
Measured: Change from baseline fatigue at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Cancer related fatigue
Fatigue is assessed with the Multidimensional Fatigue
Measured: Change from baseline fatigue at 3 months after light therapy
Cancer related fatigue
Fatigue is assessed with the Multidimensional Fatigue
Measured: Change from baseline fatigue at 9 months after light therapy
Secondary outcomes (31)
Subjective sleep quality
Subjective sleep quality is assessed with the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index
Measured: Change from baseline subjective sleep quality at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Subjective sleep quality
Subjective sleep quality is assessed with the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index
Measured: Change from baseline subjective sleep quality at 3 months after light therapy
Subjective sleep quality
Subjective sleep quality is assessed with the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index
Measured: Change from baseline subjective sleep quality at 9 months after light therapy
Objective sleep quality
Objective sleep quality data is assessed by wearing an accelerometer for 10 days
Measured: Change from baseline objective sleep quality at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Objective sleep quality
Objective sleep quality data is assessed by wearing an accelerometer for 10 days
Measured: Change from baseline objective sleep quality at 3 months after light therapy
Objective sleep quality
Objective sleep quality data is assessed by wearing an accelerometer for 10 days
Measured: Change from baseline objective sleep quality at 9 months after light therapy
Depression
Depression is assessed with the Center for Epidemiological Studies - depression scale
Measured: Change from baseline depression at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Depression
Depression is assessed with the Center for Epidemiological Studies - depression scale
Measured: Change from baseline depression at 3 months after light therapy
Depression
Depression is assessed with the Center for Epidemiological Studies - depression scale
Measured: Change from baseline depression at 9 months after light therapy
Anxiety
Anxiety is assessed with the State Trait Anxiety Inventory-6 items
Measured: Change from baseline anxiety at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Anxiety
Anxiety is assessed with the State Trait Anxiety Inventory-6 items
Measured: Change from baseline anxiety at 3 months after light therapy
Anxiety
Anxiety is assessed with the State Trait Anxiety Inventory-6 items
Measured: Change from baseline anxiety at 9 months after light therapy
Quality of life
Quality of life is assessed with the Medical Outcome studies short form (SF-36)
Measured: Change from baseline quality of life at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Quality of life
Quality of life is assessed with the Medical Outcome studies short form (SF-36)
Measured: Change from baseline quality of life at 3 months after light therapy
Quality of life
Quality of life is assessed with the Medical Outcome studies short form (SF-36)
Measured: Change from baseline quality of life at 9 months after light therapy
Subjective cognitive complaints
Subjective cognitive complaints assessed with the Medical Outcomes Studies Cognitive functioning.
Measured: Change from baseline subjective cognitive complaints at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Subjective cognitive complaints
Subjective cognitive complaints assessed with the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory
Measured: Change from baseline subjective cognitive complaints at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Subjective cognitive complaints
Subjective cognitive complaints assessed with the Medical Outcomes Studies Cognitive functioning
Measured: Change from baseline subjective cognitive complaints at 3 months after light therapy
Subjective cognitive complaints
Subjective cognitive complaints assessed with the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory
Measured: Change from baseline subjective cognitive complaints at 3 months after light therapy
Subjective cognitive complaints
Subjective cognitive complaints assessed with the Medical Outcomes Studies Cognitive functioning
Measured: Change from baseline subjective cognitive complaints at 9 months after light therapy
Subjective cognitive complaints
Subjective cognitive complaints assessed with the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory
Measured: Change from baseline subjective cognitive complaints at 9 months after light therapy
Objective cognitive complaints - alertness and sustained attention
Objective cognitive complaints are assessed with the Psychomotor Vigilance Task.
Measured: Change from baseline objective cognitive complaints at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Objective cognitive complaints - long-term memory
Objective cognitive complaints are assessed with the 15 words test.
Measured: Change from baseline objective cognitive complaints at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Objective cognitive complaints - short-term memory
Objective cognitive complaints are assessed with the digit span task.
Measured: Change from baseline objective cognitive complaints at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Cancer worries
Cancer worries is assessed with the Cancer Worry scale
Measured: Change from baseline cancer worries at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Cancer worries
Cancer worries is assessed with the Cancer Worry scale
Measured: Change from baseline cancer worries at 3 months after light therapy
Cancer worries
Cancer worries is assessed with the Cancer Worry scale
Measured: Change from baseline cancer worries at 9 months after light therapy
Fatigue catastrophizing
Fatigue catastrophizing is assessed with the Fatigue catastrophizing scale
Measured: Baseline
Self-efficacy
Self-efficacy is assessed with the Self-efficacy Scale 28
Measured: Baseline
Circadian rhythms of cortisol and melatonin
Circadian rhythms of cortisol and melatonin will be determined from saliva samples
Measured: Change from baseline circadian rhythms at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Biomarkers of inflammation and genotype
Biomarkers of inflammation (hsIL-6, sTNF-RII, IL-1RA, hsCRP, vitamin D) and genotype will be determined from blood samples
Measured: Change from baseline levels of biomarkers at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Aug 2017
- Study start20 Sep 2017
- Primary completion25 Nov 2019
- Study completion11 Aug 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hodgkin LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 166 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dutch Cancer Society
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Eveline Bleiker, PhD, Principal investigator, The Netherlands Cancer InstituteFlora van Leeuwen, Prof.dr.ir., Principal investigator, The Netherlands Cancer InstituteLaurien Daniels, PhD, MD, Principal investigator, Leiden University Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03242902
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL61017.031.17
- Acronym
- SPARKLE
- Status last verified
- Aug 2020
- First submitted
- 24 Jul 2017
- Last updated
- 1 Sep 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Starreveld DEJ, Daniels LA, Valdimarsdottir HB, Redd WH, de Geus JL, Ancoli-Israel S, Lutgendorf S, Korse CM, Kieffer JM, van Leeuwen FE, Bleiker EMA. Light therapy as a treatment of cancer-related fatigue in (non-)Hodgkin lymphoma survivors (SPARKLE trial): study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2018 Sep 10;18(1):880. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4746-2.
PubMed 30200906
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Sep 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Improving Sleep Quality, Psychosocial Functioning, and Cancer Related Fatigue With Light Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03242902
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SPARKLE / NL61017.031.17
- Conditions
- Hodgkin Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
- Keywords
- light therapy, cancer related fatigue, sleep quality, biological rhythms
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 166 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Netherlands Cancer InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dutch Cancer Society
- Study start
- 20 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 Aug 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cancer related fatigue (CRF) is one of the most prevalent and distressing long-term complaints reported by (non-) Hodgkin survivors. The SPARKLE study will test the efficacy of two intensities of light therapy on cancer related fatigue. Additionally, it explores possible working mechanisms of light therapy on CRF including improvements in sleep quality, psychosocial variables (depression, anxiety, cognitive complaints, and quality of life), and changes in biological circadian rhythms.
Detailed description
Rationale: Cancer related fatigue (CRF) is one of the most prevalent and distressing long-term complaints reported by (non-)Hodgkin survivors. So far, there is no standard treatment. Some non-pharmacological interventions have shown large effects but show limitations as well, e.g. they are labor intensive. A novel and promising treatment for CRF is exposure to bright white light (BWL) therapy. This low-cost intervention is easy to deliver and has a low burden for professionals as well as for patients.
Objective: To examine the efficacy of BWL therapy as an intervention for CRF. As a secondary aim, this study will explore possible working mechanisms including changes in sleep quality, psychological variables, biological circadian rhythms, sleep-wake cycles, inflammation markers and genotype.
Study design: A multicenter randomized controlled trial will invite participants and allocate them to either a light intensity 1 condition (n=80) or a light intensity 2 condition (n=80). The longitudinal design will include four measurement points: baseline, mid-intervention, post-intervention, and at 3 and 9 months follow-up.
Study population: Hodgkin and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) survivors fulfilling the clinical criteria of CRF and a survivorship of ≥ 3 years will be invited. Fatigue should not be attributable to a clear somatic cause or treatment for secondary cancer in the past year. Moreover, 25 Hodgkin survivors without CRF will be recruited to explore the association between circadian rhythms and CRF.
Intervention: The light intervention includes exposure to light for 30 minutes within the first half hour after awakening during 3,5 weeks.
Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study parameter in this study is the change in CRF from baseline to post-intervention and at 3 and 9 months follow-up. This will be assessed with the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Participation in this study includes completion of a light intervention for 3,5 weeks (30 min each day) and 2 visits (1h) to the treating hospital pre- and post-intervention. The visits aim to provide instructions and equipment and to collect two blood samples. Additionally, 5 saliva samples will be collected by the participant at home pre- and post-intervention. Moreover, participants complete questionnaires (30 min, 4 times) and wear an accelerometer (10d, 4 times and during light therapy) to objectively measure sleep quality and activity. Risks of the light intervention are limited, although there are few known reports of agitation, headache and nausea during the first days of light exposure. Benefits are the use of an easy to administer treatment for one of the most distressing symptoms that participants report.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Light intensity 1 | Experimental | Device: Light therapy intensity 1The light intervention includes exposure to white light (10.000 lux) at a distance of 45 cm for 30 minutes within the first half hour after awakening during 3 weeks and 4 days. This can be done while engaged in other activities, for example reading the newspaper or eating breakfast. |
| Light intensity 2 | Experimental | Device: Light therapy intensity 2The light intervention includes exposure to white light (10-20 lux) at a distance of 45 cm for 30 minutes within the first half hour after awakening during 3 weeks and 4 days. This can be done while engaged in other activities, for example reading the newspaper or eating breakfast. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- A history of Hodgkin or DLBCL with a survivorship of ≥ 3 years.
- The presence of moderate to severe fatigue symptoms since diagnosis of or treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma or DLBCL.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Fatigue is explained by a somatic factor as defined in the guidelines of chronic fatigue syndrome of the Dutch internists association (NIV). When a somatic cause for fatigue is resolved by stable medication use ≥ 6 months, patients can be included in the current trial.
- Pregnancy (until 3 months postnatal) or women who provide breast feeding
- Extensive surgical operations in the past 3 months.
- Current diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder (e.g. personality disorders, psychosis, bipolar disorder) which would limit participation.
- Diagnosis of and treatment for a secondary malignancy in the past 12 months.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Light therapy intensity 1Exposure to white light (10.000 lux) in the morning | Device | Light intensity 1 |
| Light therapy intensity 2Exposure to white light (10-20 lux) in the morning | Device | Light intensity 2 |
Primary outcome
Cancer related fatigue
Time frame: Change from baseline fatigue at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Fatigue is assessed with the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory
Cancer related fatigue
Time frame: Change from baseline fatigue at 3 months after light therapy
Fatigue is assessed with the Multidimensional Fatigue
Cancer related fatigue
Time frame: Change from baseline fatigue at 9 months after light therapy
Fatigue is assessed with the Multidimensional Fatigue
31 secondary outcomes
Subjective sleep quality
Time frame: Change from baseline subjective sleep quality at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Subjective sleep quality
Time frame: Change from baseline subjective sleep quality at 3 months after light therapy
Subjective sleep quality
Time frame: Change from baseline subjective sleep quality at 9 months after light therapy
Objective sleep quality
Time frame: Change from baseline objective sleep quality at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Objective sleep quality
Time frame: Change from baseline objective sleep quality at 3 months after light therapy
Objective sleep quality
Time frame: Change from baseline objective sleep quality at 9 months after light therapy
Depression
Time frame: Change from baseline depression at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Depression
Time frame: Change from baseline depression at 3 months after light therapy
Depression
Time frame: Change from baseline depression at 9 months after light therapy
Anxiety
Time frame: Change from baseline anxiety at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Anxiety
Time frame: Change from baseline anxiety at 3 months after light therapy
Anxiety
Time frame: Change from baseline anxiety at 9 months after light therapy
Quality of life
Time frame: Change from baseline quality of life at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Quality of life
Time frame: Change from baseline quality of life at 3 months after light therapy
Quality of life
Time frame: Change from baseline quality of life at 9 months after light therapy
Subjective cognitive complaints
Time frame: Change from baseline subjective cognitive complaints at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Subjective cognitive complaints
Time frame: Change from baseline subjective cognitive complaints at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Subjective cognitive complaints
Time frame: Change from baseline subjective cognitive complaints at 3 months after light therapy
Subjective cognitive complaints
Time frame: Change from baseline subjective cognitive complaints at 3 months after light therapy
Subjective cognitive complaints
Time frame: Change from baseline subjective cognitive complaints at 9 months after light therapy
Subjective cognitive complaints
Time frame: Change from baseline subjective cognitive complaints at 9 months after light therapy
Objective cognitive complaints - alertness and sustained attention
Time frame: Change from baseline objective cognitive complaints at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Objective cognitive complaints - long-term memory
Time frame: Change from baseline objective cognitive complaints at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Objective cognitive complaints - short-term memory
Time frame: Change from baseline objective cognitive complaints at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Cancer worries
Time frame: Change from baseline cancer worries at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Cancer worries
Time frame: Change from baseline cancer worries at 3 months after light therapy
Cancer worries
Time frame: Change from baseline cancer worries at 9 months after light therapy
Fatigue catastrophizing
Time frame: Baseline
Self-efficacy
Time frame: Baseline
Circadian rhythms of cortisol and melatonin
Time frame: Change from baseline circadian rhythms at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Biomarkers of inflammation and genotype
Time frame: Change from baseline levels of biomarkers at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Sep 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30200906Starreveld DEJ, Daniels LA, Valdimarsdottir HB, Redd WH, de Geus JL, Ancoli-Israel S, Lutgendorf S, Korse CM, Kieffer JM, van Leeuwen FE, Bleiker EMA. Light therapy as a treatment of cancer-related fatigue in (non-)Hodgkin lymphoma survivors (SPARKLE trial): study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2018 Sep 10;18(1):880. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4746-2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Hodgkin Lymphoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) in Children With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia and B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
Testing the Combination of Anti-cancer Drugs Mosunetuzumab, Polatuzumab Vedotin, and Lenalidomide for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise Specified, High Grade B-Cell Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Combination of Venetoclax and Rituximab, in Comparison to the Usual Treatment (Ibrutinib Plus Rituximab or Zanubrutinib Alone) for Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia/Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma
Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma, Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
BV-CHP Real-life and Biological Evidences in Patients With sALCL
Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 3
International Study for Treatment of Childhood Relapsed Precursor B-Cell ALL 2020 (IntReALL BCP 2020)
B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eveline Bleiker, PhD principal investigator
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Flora van Leeuwen, Prof.dr.ir. principal investigator
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Laurien Daniels, PhD, MD principal investigator
Leiden University Medical Center
9 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Light therapy intensity 1 and Light therapy intensity 2 in people with Hodgkin Lymphoma and Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma, run by The Netherlands Cancer Institute at 9 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cancer related fatigue (time frame: Change from baseline fatigue at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03242902, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Sep 2020.