AzTrials
AzTrials

SchizophreniaPhase 3NCT03238326

Safety and Tolerability of Open-Label Flexible-dose Brexpiprazole as Maintenance Treatment in Adolescents With Schizophrenia

A Phase 3 study testing Brexpiprazole in people with Schizophrenia, run by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. at 57 sites in 10 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To further characterize the long-term safety and tolerability of brexpiprazole in adolescents with schizophrenia Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 13 to 17 years
Conditions the study is for
Schizophrenia
What is being tested?
Brexpiprazole
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
295 participants
Where
57 sitesin 10 countries
Study dates
23 Aug 2017to 22 Apr 2025
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 13 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Male \& female subjects 13-17 years of age, inclusive.
  • Subjects who turn 18 during trial 331-10-234 are permitted in this trial.
  • Subjects with a current primary diagnosis of schizophrenia, as defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) criteria and confirmed by the K-SADS-PL completed at time of entry into Trial 331-10-234. For de novo subjects who did not participate in Trial 331-10-234, the initial diagnosis of schizophrenia must be made and documented, and the diagnosis confirmed by the K-SADS-PL at screening.
  • Subjects who, in the investigator's judgment, require treatment with antipsychotic medication(s).

Who cannot join

  • Subjects with a DSM-5 diagnosis other than schizophrenia that has been the primary focus of treatment within 3 months of screening
  • Subjects with a clinical presentation or history that is consistent with delirium, dementia, amnesia, or other cognitive disorders; subjects with psychotic symptoms that are better accounted for by another general medical condition(s) or direct effect of a substance (e.g., medication, illicit drug use).
  • History of failure of clozapine treatment or response to clozapine treatment only.
  • History of neuroleptic malignant syndrome

Trial locations and contacts

57 sites in 10 countries.

57 sites in 10 countries

United States17 sites
  • Clinical Research Site #128

    Anaheim, California, 92805

  • Clinical Research Site #136

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30331

  • Clinical Research Site #133

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219

  • Clinical Research Site #105

    Culver City, California, 90230

  • Clinical Research Site #101

    Dothan, Alabama, 36303

  • Clinical Research Site #108

    Everett, Washington, 98201

  • Clinical Research Site #140

    Frisco, Texas, 75034

  • Clinical Research Site #113

    Garfield Heights, Ohio, 44125

  • Clinical Research Site #148

    Kansas City, Kansas, 66160

  • Clinical Research Site #121

    Kinston, North Carolina, 28501

  • Clinical Research Site #138

    Lake Charles, Louisiana, 70629

  • Clinical Research Site #124

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89109

  • Clinical Research Site #103

    Long Beach, California, 90807

  • Clinical Research Site #130

    New York, New York, 10036

  • Clinical Research Site #102

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73116

  • Clinical Research Site #100

    Rochester, New York, 14618

  • Clinical Research Site #135

    Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136

Other trials in United States

Mexico8 sites
  • Clinical Research Site #161

    Culiacán, Sinaloa, 80230

  • Clinical Research Site #168

    Durango, 34000

  • Clinical Research Site #165

    Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44100

  • Clinical Research Site #163

    León, Guanajuato, 37000

  • Clinical Research Site #166

    Mérida, Yucatán, 97070

  • Clinical Research Site #171

    Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64310

  • Clinical Research Site #160

    Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64710

  • Clinical Research Site #170

    San Luis Potosí City, San Luis Potosí, 78213

Other trials in Mexico

Poland7 sites
  • Clinical Research Site #266

    Bialystok, Podlaskie Voivodeship, 15-879

  • Clinical Research Site #269

    Gdansk, Polorskie, 80-542

  • Clinical Research Site #260

    Poznan, 60-744

  • Clinical Research Site #272

    Poznan, 61-485

  • Clinical Research Site #263

    Tyniec Mały, Dolnyslask, 55-040

  • Clinical Research Site #270

    Wałbrzych, 58-309

  • Clinical Research Site #267

    Wroclaw, 54-617

Other trials in Poland

Ukraine7 sites
  • Clinical Research Site #527

    Dnipro, 49027

  • Clinical Research Site #523

    Kharkiv, 61068

  • Clinical Research Site #521

    Kharkiv, 61153

  • Clinical Research Site #522

    Kherson, 73488

  • Clinical Research Site #520

    Lviv, 79021

  • Clinical Research Site #526

    Poltava, Poltava Oblast, 36013

  • Clinical Research Site #525

    Ternopil, 46027

Other trials in Ukraine

Russia6 sites
  • Clinical Research Site #542

    Arkhangelsk, Primorsky District, 163530

  • Clinical Research Site #545

    Moscow, 127083

  • Clinical Research Site #541

    Saint Petersburg, 192019

  • Clinical Research Site #540

    Saint Petersburg, 197341

  • Clinical Research Site #543

    Stavropol, Stavropolskiy Kray, 355038

  • Clinical Research Site #544

    Yaroslavl, 150003

Other trials in Russia

Serbia5 sites
  • Clinical Research Site #500

    Belgrade, 11000

  • Clinical Research Site #504

    Belgrade, 11000

  • Clinical Research Site #503

    Kragujevac, 34000

  • Clinical Research Site #502

    Niš, 18000

  • Clinical Research Site #501

    Novi Sad, 21000

Other trials in Serbia

Romania4 sites
  • Clinical Research Site #244

    Bucharest, 041914

  • Clinical Research Site #241

    Cluj-Napoca, 400660

  • Clinical Research Site #243

    Iași, IS700282

  • Clinical Research Site #242

    Timișoara, 300329

Other trials in Romania

France1 site
  • Clinical Research Site #321

    Nice, 06200

Other trials in France

Italy1 site
  • Clinical Research Site #283

    Naples, 80131

Other trials in Italy

Spain1 site
  • Clinical Research Site #224

    Torremolinos, Malaga, 29620

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: A Long-term, Multicenter, Open-label Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Flexible-Dose Brexpiprazole as Maintenance Treatment in Adolescents (13-17 Years Old) With Schizophrenia

To further characterize the long-term safety and tolerability of brexpiprazole in adolescents with schizophrenia

Read the detailed description

This is a long-term, multicenter, open-label trial designed to examine the long-term safety and tolerability of brexpiprazole in adolescent participants (ages 13-17) with a DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophrenia.

Conditions
Schizophrenia
Being tested
Brexpiprazole
Keywords
Brexpiprazole, Schizophrenia
Medical subject headings
Schizophrenia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BrexpiprazoleDrug

    Also called OPC-34712

    Once daily, oral tablets

Study groups in NCT03238326
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
De Novo (Conversion Period)Experimental1-3 milligrams/day (mg/day) brexpiprazole for 1 to 4 weeks
Receives: Drug: Brexpiprazole
Prior and Current Brexpiprazole (Open-label Treatment Period)Experimental1-4 mg/day brexpiprazole; Start at 0.5 mg/day, titrate and maintain between 1mg/day to max of 4 mg/day
Receives: Drug: Brexpiprazole
Prior Aripiprazole and Current Brexpiprazole (Open-label Treatment Period)Experimental1-4 mg/day brexpiprazole; Start at 0.5 mg/day, titrate and maintain between 1mg/day to max of 4 mg/day
Receives: Drug: Brexpiprazole
Prior Placebo and Current Brexpiprazole (Open-label Treatment Period)Experimental1-4 mg/day brexpiprazole; Start at 0.5 mg/day, titrate and maintain between 1mg/day to max of 4 mg/day
Receives: Drug: Brexpiprazole
De Novo (Open-label Treatment Period)Experimental1-4 mg/day brexpiprazole; Start at 0.5 mg/day, titrate and maintain between 1mg/day to max of 4 mg/day
Receives: Drug: Brexpiprazole

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant administered a medicinal product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study treatment.

    Measured: From the first dose of study drug (including the conversion period and the open-label treatment period in the current study) up to 21 days after the last dose of study drug (up to approximately 25.6 months).

  2. Number of Participants With Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant administered a medicinal product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any AE occurring at any dose that results in death, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, in-patient hospitalization or prolongs hospitalization or congenital anomaly/birth defect. A serious TEAE is defined as an AE that occurred or worsened after the first dose of study treatment up until 30 days after the last dose.

    Measured: From the first dose of study drug (including the conversion period and the open-label treatment period in the current study) up to 21 days after the last dose of study drug (up to approximately 25.6 months).

  3. Number of Participants Who Discontinued the Trial Due to AEs

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant administered a medicinal product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study treatment. Participants who discontinued the trial due to AEs were recorded.

    Measured: From the first dose of study drug (including the conversion period and the open-label treatment period in the current study) up to 21 days after the last dose of study drug (up to approximately 25.6 months).

Secondary outcomes (33)
  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Tests (Parameters Assessed in Units Per Liter)

    Clinical laboratory assessments included clinical chemistry (alanine aminotransferase [ALT], alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase [AST], creatinine phosphokinase (CPK), gamma glutamyl transferase, lactate dehydrogenase.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  2. Mean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Tests (Parameters Assessed in Milligrams Per Deciliter)

    Clinical laboratory assessments included clinical chemistry (bilirubin, urea nitrogen, calcium, glucose, cholesterol including low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C), creatinine, Triglycerides [TG]).

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  3. Mean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Tests (Parameters Assessed in Percentage)

    Clinical laboratory assessments of HbA1c are reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  4. Mean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Tests (Parameters Assessed in Million Cells Per Microliter)

    Clinical laboratory assessments included hematology including the red blood cell count (RBC Count).

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  5. Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Parameters Assessed in Thousand Cells Per Microliter)

    Clinical laboratory assessments included hematology (basophils, eosinophils, neutrophils, leukocytes, lymphocytes, white blood cell (WBC) count, platelets).

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  6. Mean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Tests (Parameters That Were Unitless)

    Clinical laboratory assessments of pH are reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  7. Mean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Tests (Parameters Assessed in Nanograms Per Milliliter)

    Clinical laboratory assessments included prolactin for both males and females.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  8. Mean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Tests (Parameters Assessed in Milliequivalents Per Liter)

    Clinical laboratory assessments including chloride and potassium are reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  9. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Tests

    Laboratory assessments included hematology, chemistry, and urinalysis. Abnormality criteria included: In mg/dL [high bilirubin≥2.0, low calcium≤8.2, high cholesterol fasting≥240, HDL-C, Fasting<40 male(M)/ < 50 female(F); LDL-C, fasting≥160, high glucose, fasting≥100, non-fasting≥200 high TG, fasting≥150, high urate≥8.5 F/≥10.5 M, high protein urine≥2 units increase]; high creatine kinase(units per liter [U/L])>3xupper limit of normal (ULN)]; high eosinophils/leukocytes ≥10%;ALT>3×ULN; in mEq/L [Cl≤ 90; potassium≤ 2.5; sodium low≤ 126, high ≥156]; platelets≤75000/mm3; hemoglobin≤11g/dL M/≤ 9.5 F; glucose, urine≥2 units inc.; casts≥2 units inc.; hematocrit≤37% and decrease of≥3% points, M/≤ 32% and ≥3% points dec.,F. Number of participants with clinically significant laboratory test abnormalities were reported as per criteria defined in protocol. The categories with at least 1 participant with clinically significant abnormalities are reported.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  10. Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Parameters Assessed in Beats Per Minute)

    Vital sign measurements included pulse rate assessed in beats per minute in standing and supine position.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  11. Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Parameters Assessed in Millimeters of Mercury)

    Vital sign measurements included systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Blood pressure measurements were made in the supine and standing positions after the participant has been in each position at least 3 minutes.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  12. Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Parameters Assessed in Centimeters)

    Vital sign measurements included height assessed in centimeters.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  13. Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Parameters Assessed in Kilograms)

    Vital sign measurements included weight assessed in kilograms.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  14. Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Parameters Assessed in Celsius)

    Vital sign measurements included temperature assessed in celsius.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  15. Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Parameters Assessed in Z-Score)

    Vital sign measurements- Z-score for body weight (BW), height, and BMI. To adjust for normal growth, z-scores were derived, which normalize for the natural growth of pediatric patients and adolescents. Z-score was calculated as the deviation of the participant's each parameter from the mean for the respective parameter of the reference population divided by the standard deviation (SD) for the reference population. Z-score-0 represents the population mean for the respective parameter. Positive Z-scores-values above the mean, negative Z-scores indicate values below the mean. BW and BMI: Higher Z-scores-Potential overweight/obesity (worse outcome if excessive). Lower Z-scores -Underweight (worse outcome if extreme). Height: Higher Z-scores-Taller than average (neutral unless clinically relevant). Lower Z-scores → Short stature (may indicate growth issues). Z ≥ +2-Above normal range (e.g., overweight or obesity for BMI). Z ≤ -2-Below normal range (e.g., underweight or short stature).

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  16. Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Parameters Assessed in Kilograms Per Meter Square)

    Vital sign measurements included body mass index (BMI).

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  17. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs

    Vital sign measurements included SBP, and DBP, pulse rate, body temperature, body weight, BMI, and height. Vital sign measurements included pulse rate in supine and standing positions (low: <50 beats per minute [bpm] and decrease ≥15 bpm; High: >120 bpm and increase ≥15 bpm), SBP in supine and standing positions (low: <110 mmHg and decrease ≥20 mmHg; High: >120 mmHg and increase ≥20 mmHg), DBP in supine and standing positions (low: <60 mmHg and decrease ≥15 mmHg; High: >80 mmHg and increase ≥15 mmHg), weight in kg (low: ≥7% decrease; High: ≥7% increase), orthostatic hypotension, (≥20mmHg decrease in SBP or ≥10 mmHg in DBP in heart rate from supine to standing). Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in vital signs were reported as per criteria defined in protocol. The categories with at least one participant with clinically significant abnormalities in vital signs are reported.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  18. Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) (Parameters Assessed in Milliseconds)

    12-lead ECG recordings were obtained for parameters including PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, QTcB [QT interval as corrected for heart rate by Bazett's formula] interval, QTcF [QT interval as corrected for heart rate by Fridericia's formula] interval, QTcN [QT interval corrected for heart rate by the FDA Neuropharm] interval, and RR interval.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  19. Mean Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (Parameters Assessed in Beats Per Minute)

    Twelve-lead ECG recordings were obtained for parameters including mean heart rate.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  20. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in ECG Parameters

    12-lead ECG recordings were obtained for certain parameters and the 12-lead ECG abnormality criteria included bradycardia ≤ 50 bpm and decrease ≥15 bpm; sinus bradycardia ≤ 50 bpm and decrease of ≥ 15 bpm, supraventricular premature beat (SVPB)-not present at baseline and present post baseline, ventricular premature beat (VPB)- not present at baseline and present post baseline; and primary (1°) atrioventricular (AV) block (PR ≥200 milliseconds [msec] and increase of ≥50 msec, right bundle-branch block (RBBB) and symmetrical T-wave inversion (Sym T Wave Inv) - both not present at baseline and present post baseline; Increase in QTc-QTcF ≥ 450 msec for males, ≥ 470 msec for females. Number of participants with clinically significant ECG abnormalities was reported as per the criteria defined in the protocol. The categories with at least 1 participant with clinically significant ECG abnormalities are reported.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  21. Mean Change From Baseline on the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score

    The AIMS assessment consists of 12 items rating the involuntary movements: Facial and oral movements (4 items), extremity movements (2 items), and trunk movements (1 item) were observed unobtrusively while the participant is at rest and the investigator also made global judgments on the participant's dyskinesias (2 items), and dental status (2 items). Severity of each item was rated on a 5-point scale, with a score of 0 (absence of symptoms) to 4 (severe condition). Total Score is the sum of the scores of all 12 items, ranging from 0 to 48, higher scores indicate severe condition. A negative change reflects an improvement or reduction in the severity of abnormal movements.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  22. Mean Change From Baseline on the Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score

    The SAS consists of a list of 10 symptoms of Parkinsonism (gait, arm dropping, shoulder shaking, elbow rigidity, wrist rigidity, head rotation, glabella tap, tremor, salivation, and akathisia). Each item is rated on a 5-point scale, with a score of zero representing absence of symptoms, and a score of 4 representing a severe condition. The SAS Total Score is the sum of the scores for all 10 items, ranging from 0-40. A negative change reflects an improvement or reduction in Parkinsonism severity.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  23. Mean Change From Baseline in the Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) Total Score

    The BARS score is based only on the item of "Global Clinical Assessment of Akathisia". The BARS consists of 4 items related to akathisia as follows. Item 1: objective observation of akathisia by the investigator; Item 2: subjective feelings of restlessness by the participant; Item 3: subjective distress due to akathisia; and Item 4: global clinical assessment of akathisia. The first 3 items will be rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 3, with 0 representing absence of symptoms and 3 representing a severe condition. The BARS global clinical assessment score refers to the ratings from the 4th item Global Clinical Assessment of Akathisia, which is a 6-point Likert scale from 0 to 5, with 0 representing absence of symptoms and 5 representing severe akathisia. Total score is the sum of the scores of all 4 items, ranging from 0 to 14. Higher score indicates severe akathisia. A negative change from baseline reflects improvement or reduction in the severity of akathisia symptoms.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  24. Number of Participants With At Least One Occurrence of Suicidal Behavior or Suicidal Ideation as Recorded on Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

    C-SSRS is a scale used to report at least one occurrence of any suicidal behavior or suicidal ideation. Suicidal behavior was defined as reporting any of the following items: actual attempt, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, and preparatory acts or behavior. The suicidal ideation total score is the sum of intensity scores of 5 items (frequency, duration, controllability, deterrents, and reasons for ideation). The score of each intensity item ranges from 0 (none) to 5 (worst) and the total score ranges from 0 to 25. Lower scores indicate improvement.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  25. Number of Participants With Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale

    The UKU rating scale is a semi-structured interview used to assess the side effects of participants being treated with antipsychotic drugs. Each item (i.e., each symptom) of the UKU side effects is defined by the means of a 4-point-scale (0-1-2-3) if it is assessed in psychic, autonomic (auto), neurologic, other categories. In general, Degree 0 means "doubtfully or not present (NP)", and Degrees 1, 2, and 3 indicate that the symptom is present to a mild, moderate or severe degree, respectively.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  26. Number of Participants With at Least One Occurrence of Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)

    The NY-AACENT is used to detect changes in cognitive function for neurological or psychiatric problems, specifically created to be used in pediatric population (ages 12 -17), but could be used with other age groups, as appropriate. Each of the 7 items is derived from the 7 domains as follows: Working Memory, Attention/Vigilance, Verbal Learning/Memory, Visual Learning/Memory, Reasoning and Problem Solving, Speed of Processing, and Social Cognition. Each score is derived as follows: 0=not present in the past week; 1=present (during past week) and mild; 2=present (during past week) and moderate; 3=present (during past week) and severe; and 4=present (during past week) and extreme; and the item score is set to missing/unknown. The NY-AACENT total score is calculated by summing up 7 individual item scores at participant-visit level. The Total range is 0-28. Higher scores reflects greater severity and frequency of cognitive problems and lower scores shows absence or mild cognitive issues.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  27. Number of Participants With Stages of Tanner Scale Score at Baseline and Month 24

    The Tanner scale is a classification system used to assess physical development during puberty, detailing five distinct stages of growth. The Tanner Staging Scale assessment consists of 2 domains for girls and 3 domains for boys. Participants with change in Tanner Staging Scale (Stage 1-5) Score are reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 24

  28. Change From Baseline in the PANSS Total Score

    The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) to 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS total score was the sum of the rating scores for 7 positive scale items, 7 negative scale items, and 16 general psychopathology scale items from the PANSS panel. The PANSS total score ranges from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome). Higher scores indicate worsening of symptoms. A negative change from baseline reflects improvement or reduction in symptom severity.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  29. Change From Baseline in the PANSS Positive Subscale Scores

    The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) to 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS total score was the sum of the rating scores for 7 positive (+ve) scale items, 7 negative (-ve) scale items, and 16 general psychopathology scale items from the PANSS panel. The PANSS total score ranges from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome). Higher scores indicate worsening of symptoms. A negative change from baseline reflects improvement or reduction in symptom severity.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  30. Change From Baseline in the PANSS Negative Subscale Scores

    The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) to 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS total score was the sum of the rating scores for 7 positive scale items, 7 negative scale items, and 16 general psychopathology scale items from the PANSS panel. The PANSS total score ranges from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome). Higher scores indicate worsening of symptoms. A negative (-ve) change from baseline reflects improvement or reduction in symptom severity.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  31. Change From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) Total Score

    The CGAS is a 100-point rating scale measuring psychological, social and school functioning for children aged 6-17. The scale is separated into 10-point sections with the score ranging from 0-100, 1 to 10 indicates the need for constant supervision and 91 to 100 indicates superior functioning in all areas. A positive change from baseline reflects improvement in functioning.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  32. Mean Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score

    The CGI-S scale is an investigator-rated evaluation that assesses the severity of a participant's illness on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 to 7. The investigator answered the following question: "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the patient at this time?" Response choices include: 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill patients. Higher scores indicate worse condition.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

  33. Mean Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score

    The efficacy of brexpiprazole in the treatment was rated for each participant using the CGI-I. The investigator rated the participant's total improvement whether or not it was entirely due to drug treatment on a 7-point scale, ranging from 0 to 7. Response choices were: 0 = not assessed, 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. Higher scores indicate worse condition.

    Measured: From the first dose of the study drug up to the last dose in the open-label treatment period (Up to Month 24)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Aug 2017
  2. Study start23 Aug 2017
  3. Primary completion22 Apr 2025
  4. Study completion22 Apr 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
295 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03238326
Sponsor's protocol ID
331-10-236
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
1 Aug 2017
Last updated
4 Feb 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Atkinson SD, Shah A, Burgess MV, Hefting N, Chen D, Ward C. Safety and Tolerability of Brexpiprazole in Adolescents With Schizophrenia: A Long-Term, Open-Label Study. JAACAP Open. 2024 May 27;3(2):313-322. doi: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.04.005. eCollection 2025 Jun.

    PubMed 40520975

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Brexpiprazole in people with Schizophrenia, run by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. at 57 sites in 10 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 57 sites in United States, Mexico, Poland, Ukraine, Russia and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Feb 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) (time frame: From the first dose of study drug (including the conversion period and the open-label treatment period in the current study) up to 21 days after the last dose of study drug (up to approximately 25.6 months).). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03238326, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in