Domestic ViolencePhase 3NCT03236948
RCT of the Effectiveness of the WfWI Intervention in Afghanistan
A Phase 3 study testing Women for Women International Intervention in people with Domestic Violence and Depressive Symptoms, run by Medical Research Council, South Africa.
Trial summary
This is an individually randomised control trial to assess the effectiveness of a livelihoods and social empowerment intervention, delivered by Women for Women International, on married women's experiences of intimate partner violence in Afghanistan. It has a 22 month follow up. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Domestic Violence, Depressive Symptoms, Livelihoods
- What is being tested?
- Women for Women International Intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,461 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Oct 2016to Nov 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Women should be in the lowest economic level (earning less than US$1.25/day)
- Unemployed
- No in education/school
- Not involved in a similar programme
- Able to provide informed consent
Who cannot join
- Not mentally incapacitated, so as unable to provide informed consent
- Already been part of the WfWI intervention previously
About this study
Official title: Individually Randomised Control Trial Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Women for Women International (WfWI) Intervention in Afghanistan for Intimate Partner Violence Prevention Among Married Women
This is an individually randomised control trial to assess the effectiveness of a livelihoods and social empowerment intervention, delivered by Women for Women International, on married women's experiences of intimate partner violence in Afghanistan. It has a 22 month follow up.
- Conditions
- Domestic Violence, Depressive Symptoms, Livelihoods
- Being tested
- Women for Women International Intervention
- Medical subject headings
- Depression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Women for Women International InterventionBehavioural
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| WfWI Intervention | Experimental | Women receive the WfWI intervention. This comprises of three main components. First, a social empowerment and health intervention. Second a livelihood strengthening intervention, including numeracy training, and vocational training. Third, a cash transfer conditional on attendance at the intervention to cover costs of attendance and provide start-up capital. The intervention is delivered over 12 months. Receives: Behavioral: Women for Women International Intervention |
| Control | No intervention | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Any past year physical intimate partner violence experienced amongst currently married women
Physical intimate partner violence is assessed using five items based on the WHO VAW scale. A positive response to any item leads to a person being classified as experiencing in the past year.
Measured: 22 months post baseline
Past year severe physical intimate partner violence experience amongst currently married women
Severe physical intimate partner violence experience is assessed using 5 items. Past year severe physical IPV is assessed as positive if a person responds to two (or more) items as once, or one item as few (or more), essentially creating a more than once categorization.
Measured: 22 months post baseline
Depressive symptomology
Past week depressive symptomology is assessed by the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CESD) scale, with the full twenty items. A mean score will be calculated.
Measured: 22 months post baseline
Secondary outcomes (12)
Household food insecurity in past four weeks
Three items ask about household level food insecurity in the past 4 weeks. A mean score is calculated.
Measured: 22 months post baseline
Financial shock resilience
One item assesses ability to mobilise cash in an emergency.
Measured: 22 months post baseline
Monthly earnings
A single item assesses women's past month earnings
Measured: 22 months post baseline
Total savings
A single item assesses women's total savings
Measured: 22 months post baseline
Life satisfaction
Life satisfaction is assessed using four-items derived from the Satisfaction With Life Scale. A mean score is produced.
Measured: 22 months post baseline
Suicidal ideation in past 4 weeks
A single item assesses thoughts about suicide in past week.
Measured: 22 months post baseline
Gender attitudes
11 questions assess women's gender attitudes. A mean score is created.
Measured: 22 months post baseline
Married women's participation in household decision-making
Five items are asked about women's ability to participate in household decisions. A mean score is created.
Measured: 22 months post baseline
Any emotional abuse in the past year amongst currently married women
Seven items assess emotional abuse in the past year. A mean score is calculated.
Measured: 22 months post baseline
Perceptions of husband cruelty amongst currently married women
Five items ask about married women's perceptions of her husband and his attitudes and relationship towards her. A mean score is created
Measured: 22 months post baseline
Mother-in-law or abuse in the past 12 months amongst currently married women
A single item assesses whether mother-in-laws have hit the woman in the past 12 months and another item assesses whether siblings have hit the woman in the past 12 months, an affirmative response to either item would indicate abuse.
Measured: 22 months post baseline
Perceptions of mother-in-law cruelty amongst currently married women
For married women, six items ask about their relationship and the mother-in-laws attitudes towards her
Measured: 22 months post baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Aug 2017
- Study startOct 2016
- Primary completionNov 2018 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Domestic ViolenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Individual level randomised trial, with intervention and control group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,461 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical Research Council, South Africa
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Women for Women International (WfWI)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Rachel Jewkes, Medical Research Council, South Africa
- Investigators
- Rachel Jewkes, PhD, Principal investigator, Director Gender and Health Research Unit
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03236948
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EC034-11-2015
- Status last verified
- Jul 2017
- First submitted
- 28 Jul 2017
- Last updated
- 2 Aug 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Gibbs A, Corboz J, Chirwa E, Mann C, Karim F, Shafiq M, Mecagni A, Maxwell-Jones C, Noble E, Jewkes R. The impacts of combined social and economic empowerment training on intimate partner violence, depression, gender norms and livelihoods among women: an individually randomised controlled trial and qualitative study in Afghanistan. BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Mar 16;5(3):e001946. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001946. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32201622Gibbs A, Said N, Corboz J, Jewkes R. Factors associated with 'honour killing' in Afghanistan and the occupied Palestinian Territories: Two cross-sectional studies. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 8;14(8):e0219125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219125. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31393873Gibbs A, Corboz J, Jewkes R. Factors associated with recent intimate partner violence experience amongst currently married women in Afghanistan and health impacts of IPV: a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2018 May 3;18(1):593. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5507-5.
PubMed 29724222Gibbs A, Corboz J, Shafiq M, Marofi F, Mecagni A, Mann C, Karim F, Chirwa E, Maxwell-Jones C, Jewkes R. An individually randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of the Women for Women International Programme in reducing intimate partner violence and strengthening livelihoods amongst women in Afghanistan: trial design, methods and baseline findings. BMC Public Health. 2018 Jan 22;18(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5029-1.
PubMed 29357843
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Aug 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Individually Randomised Control Trial Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Women for Women International (WfWI) Intervention in Afghanistan for Intimate Partner Violence Prevention Among Married Women
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03236948
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EC034-11-2015
- Conditions
- Domestic Violence, Depressive Symptoms, Livelihoods
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 1,461 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical Research Council, South AfricaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Women for Women International (WfWI)
- Study start
- Oct 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is an individually randomised control trial to assess the effectiveness of a livelihoods and social empowerment intervention, delivered by Women for Women International, on married women's experiences of intimate partner violence in Afghanistan. It has a 22 month follow up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Individual level randomised trial, with intervention and control group
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| WfWI Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Women for Women International InterventionWomen receive the WfWI intervention. This comprises of three main components. First, a social empowerment and health intervention. Second a livelihood strengthening intervention, including numeracy training, and vocational training. Third, a cash transfer conditional on attendance at the intervention to cover costs of attendance and provide start-up capital. The intervention is delivered over 12 months. |
| Control | No intervention | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Women should be in the lowest economic level (earning less than US$1.25/day)
- Unemployed
- No in education/school
- Not involved in a similar programme
- Able to provide informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Not mentally incapacitated, so as unable to provide informed consent
- Already been part of the WfWI intervention previously
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Women for Women International Intervention | Behavioural | WfWI Intervention |
Primary outcome
Any past year physical intimate partner violence experienced amongst currently married women
Time frame: 22 months post baseline
Physical intimate partner violence is assessed using five items based on the WHO VAW scale. A positive response to any item leads to a person being classified as experiencing in the past year.
Past year severe physical intimate partner violence experience amongst currently married women
Time frame: 22 months post baseline
Severe physical intimate partner violence experience is assessed using 5 items. Past year severe physical IPV is assessed as positive if a person responds to two (or more) items as once, or one item as few (or more), essentially creating a more than once categorization.
Depressive symptomology
Time frame: 22 months post baseline
Past week depressive symptomology is assessed by the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CESD) scale, with the full twenty items. A mean score will be calculated.
12 secondary outcomes
Household food insecurity in past four weeks
Time frame: 22 months post baseline
Financial shock resilience
Time frame: 22 months post baseline
Monthly earnings
Time frame: 22 months post baseline
Total savings
Time frame: 22 months post baseline
Life satisfaction
Time frame: 22 months post baseline
Suicidal ideation in past 4 weeks
Time frame: 22 months post baseline
Gender attitudes
Time frame: 22 months post baseline
Married women's participation in household decision-making
Time frame: 22 months post baseline
Any emotional abuse in the past year amongst currently married women
Time frame: 22 months post baseline
Perceptions of husband cruelty amongst currently married women
Time frame: 22 months post baseline
Mother-in-law or abuse in the past 12 months amongst currently married women
Time frame: 22 months post baseline
Perceptions of mother-in-law cruelty amongst currently married women
Time frame: 22 months post baseline
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Aug 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32201622Gibbs A, Corboz J, Chirwa E, Mann C, Karim F, Shafiq M, Mecagni A, Maxwell-Jones C, Noble E, Jewkes R. The impacts of combined social and economic empowerment training on intimate partner violence, depression, gender norms and livelihoods among women: an individually randomised controlled trial and qualitative study in Afghanistan. BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Mar 16;5(3):e001946. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001946. eCollection 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31393873Gibbs A, Said N, Corboz J, Jewkes R. Factors associated with 'honour killing' in Afghanistan and the occupied Palestinian Territories: Two cross-sectional studies. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 8;14(8):e0219125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219125. eCollection 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29724222Gibbs A, Corboz J, Jewkes R. Factors associated with recent intimate partner violence experience amongst currently married women in Afghanistan and health impacts of IPV: a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2018 May 3;18(1):593. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5507-5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29357843Gibbs A, Corboz J, Shafiq M, Marofi F, Mecagni A, Mann C, Karim F, Chirwa E, Maxwell-Jones C, Jewkes R. An individually randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of the Women for Women International Programme in reducing intimate partner violence and strengthening livelihoods amongst women in Afghanistan: trial design, methods and baseline findings. BMC Public Health. 2018 Jan 22;18(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5029-1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Domestic Violence
RecruitingObservational study
Self-Dehumanization and Hesitation to Report Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence
Active, not recruiting
Community Resiliency Collective Efficacy Intervention
Violence, Physical, Violence, Non-accidental
Enrolling by invitation
Evaluation of a Trauma-Informed Partner Violence Intervention Program
Domestic Violence, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Metacognitive Interpersonal Therapy for Male Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators With Personality Disorders
Intimate Partner Violence, Personality Disorders
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of the Impact on Mental and Physical Health of Caring for Women Who Are Victims of Sexual and Gender-based Violence, Using a Coordinated Multidisciplinary Approach in Women's Centres or Traditional Health Centres.
Domestic and/or Sexual Violence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rachel Jewkes, PhD principal investigator
Director Gender and Health Research Unit
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Women for Women International Intervention in people with Domestic Violence and Depressive Symptoms, run by Medical Research Council, South Africa.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Any past year physical intimate partner violence experienced amongst currently married women (time frame: 22 months post baseline). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03236948, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Aug 2017.