Melanoma (Skin)Phase 3IL-2NCT03233828
Pre-Treatment of Highly Suspicious Pigmented Skin Lesions With Interleukin-2
A Phase 3 study testing Aldesleukin and Saline in people with Melanoma (Skin) and Melanoma in Situ, run by Carman Giacomantonio at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
This study is meant to assess the use of intralesional IL-2 to modulate the immunological response to suspected melanoma, or melanoma in situ, in an effort to increase lymphocyte infiltration and decrease disease metastasis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Melanoma (Skin), Melanoma in Situ
- What is being tested?
- Aldesleukin and Saline
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 1 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 30 Oct 2019to 27 Nov 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The participant population will include patients characterized by: nodular/polypoid features, bleeding/ulcerated lesions, excluding face and vulvo-genital lesions.
Who cannot join
- Participants who are not: currently immunocompromized, on immuno-therapy for other diagnosis, have known inflammatory or autoimmune diseases or are otherwise incapacitated.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H3G1
About this study
This study is meant to assess the use of intralesional IL-2 to modulate the immunological response to suspected melanoma, or melanoma in situ, in an effort to increase lymphocyte infiltration and decrease disease metastasis.
Patients that are clinically diagnosed with suspected Melanoma or Melanoma in situ will be assigned to either a treatment or control arm. The treatment group will be subjected to two intralesional IL-2 injections, whereas the control group will be subjected to two intralesional injections of saline.
Read more
The proteomic and metabolomic profiles of both groups will be analyzed using urine and blood samples in an effort to assess the systemic immunological response, if any, to the treatment. Also, upon disease confirmation and staging by a qualified pathologist, lesions will be assessed for lymphocyte infiltration using immunohistochemical methods.
This study will determine whether pre-treatment of IL-2 on lesions (clinically diagnosed as melanoma or melanoma in situ) is effective in generating an adaptive immune response, and whether that immune response may play a role in preventing disease metastasis.
Read the detailed description
This study is primarily designed to determine if tumor specific immunity can be generated in patients with highly suspicious pigmented lesions in response to intralesional IL-2, and whether that immunity can confer resistance to melanoma metastasis. Patients will be identified by qualified dermatologists and interviews will be held at the surgery clinic (4th floor Dickson Center) QEII HSC, NSHA.
The standard wait time from consultation to surgical biopsy is up to 4 weeks. Investigators will ensure that patients are seen immediately upon notification from participating dermatologist and all research components of the study are completed within the normally anticipated wait time. Through utilization of this standard wait time, intralesional IL-2 can potentially affect an immune response, that otherwise could not be achieved after the biopsy is completed. Given that the study is conducted within the normal wait time, it doesn't deviate from the normal standard of care. Following the study protocol, patients will receive intralesional injections on Day 1(Week 1 Visit) and Day 8 (Week 2 Visit), and excisional biopsies will be performed on Day 15 (Week 3 Visit), well within the accepted wait time from consultation to biopsy. The intralesional injections and collection of biospecimens beyond the biopsy deviate from but does not delay the normal standard of care. Two additional visits are required in addition to the initial consultation.
This study is a randomized, controlled, double-blind study. Patients with highly suspicious pigmented lesions will be randomly assigned by an algorithm to one of two groups: 1) treatment group patients will be treated intralesionally with IL-2 (Proleukin (Aldesleukin), Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc.) at a dose of 500,000 International Units (IU) in 0.1ml of sterilized saline (0.9%, m/v) for 2 treatment cycles 1 week apart (Day 1 and Day 7); 2) control group patients will be treated intralesionally with sterilized saline (0.9%, m/v) of the same volume (0.1ml). Randomization will be generated by a Random Block algorithm for each patient, and instruction preparation for each patient will be sent to pharmacy. IL-2 (Proleukin) will be obtained from Novartis by the pharmacy, paid for by Dr. Carman Giacomantonio's research services account. The pharmacy will be given instruction to prepare either IL-2 treatment or injectable control (saline). The pharmacy will assign a codified ID which will be provided along with the syringe with the patient name labeled as "Interleukin-2/Placebo" (thus blinding study to clinician and patient). As a pilot study, the principle of the design is to test the feasibility of proceeding to a larger and more expensive trial following the methodology and protocol proposed. As such there will be a minimum of 20 (10 treatment, 10 placebo) participants (up to a maximum of 60). It is estimated that statistical significance will be reached with 20 patients, however if it is not reached after 20 patients, an additional 10 (5 treatment, 5 control) patients will be enrolled. If significance is still not reached after 30 patients, an additional 10 patients will be enrolled and so on up to a maximum of 60 patients. If after 60 patients, significance is not achieved then further recruitment under the current protocol would not be logical and therefore the methodology would need to be revised or study discontinued.
On Day 1 (first treatment) and 15 (excisional biopsy), all patients will have blood (4 vials) and urine (25-50 ml) samples taken. Local reactions to injections will be monitored for non- specific signs such as bleeding, arythema, infection, or irritation. Investigators do not anticipate specific changes in the pigmented lesion related to the injection in this short time period, however all changes will be noted.
On Day 15, following the second intralesional injection an excisional biopsy will be performed following standard surgical techniques, as follows: ellipse of skin encompassing the pigmented lesion extending into the subcutaneous fat will be performed to achieve a grossly clear but narrow margin of excision. This small defect will be closed primarily with interrupted sutures. The biopsied specimen will be subsequently evaluated using standard histological techniques to confirm diagnoses, assess margin status (clear or involved) and depth of lesion invasion. The depth of lesion invasion will dictate the extent of subsequent surgical excisions and margin selection according to standard National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Pre-biopsy intralesional injections of 0.1ml into the lesion will not alter dimensions or architecture of the lesion or impact the extent the subsequent biopsy required. Lesions that are felt to be too large for closure without tissue manipulation or creation of flaps, will be biopsied using a punch biopsy sampling technique whereby 4mm diameter discs of tissue from representative areas of the lesion will be taken to confirm the diagnosis and the depth of invasion. The depth of invasion will dictate the extent and complexity of subsequent surgery required to remove the lesion and achieve clear margins according to NCCN guidelines. The biopsied specimen will be processed as follows: using a 22G needle a fine needle aspiration biopsy will be performed (the needle will be passed through the center of the lesion two times) for RNA analysis. The remainder of the tissue will be sent to pathology for standard histological assessment. The pathologist will also report the extent of observed tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) associated with treatment compared to control injections. Blood and urine will be assessed using metabalomic and proteomic methods to assess systemic immune response to treatment.
All blood, urine, and lesion biopsy samples will be labeled with a codified number (will not contain any patient identifying information) and will be immediately transported to Dr. Carman Giacomantonio laboratory at Dalhousie University for storage. Fine needle aspiration of excised samples will be assessed for tumor genetic and epigeneitic profile. Blood and urine will be assessed for proteomic and metabolomic profiles, respectively.
All study participants will receive assessments every 4 months for 2 years and biannual assessments for years 3 to 5 after the initial intervention to assess disease progression, or the development of new melanoma, to compare between both treatment and control groups. There is no standardize test or measurable biomarker to assess established or lasting immunity. This aspect of the study is identical to the patient assessment conducted as per standard of care for melanoma patients. Again, any publications of study results will be completed devoid of any information that could be used to identify patients included in the study.
- Conditions
- Melanoma (Skin), Melanoma in Situ
- Being tested
- Aldesleukin, Saline
- Keywords
- Intralesional Injection, Immunotherapy, Immune Response, Interleukin-2 (Aldesleukin), Tumor Infiltration, Metastasis Prevention
- Medical subject headings
- Melanoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AldesleukinBiological
500,000 IU in 0.1mL
SalineOther
0.1 mL of sterile saline solution (0.9% m/v)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intralesional IL-2 Injection | Experimental | Two subcutaneous intralesional injections of Aldesleukin, prepared by the pharmacy such that the contents will be masked, will be administered by the care provider in a clinic seven days apart. Receives: Biological: Aldesleukin |
| Saline Injection | Placebo comparator | Two subcutaneous intralesional injections of Saline, prepared by the pharmacy such that the contents will be masked, will be administered by the care provider in a clinic seven days apart. Receives: Other: Saline |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Assessment of Number of Patients Needed to Obtain Significance
Data will be analyzed in order to achieve a statistically significant differentiation between treatment and control outcomes in study measures including tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and circulating immunomodulators.
Measured: 1 year
Assessment of Metastasis
All patients will receive assessments every 4 months for 2 years and then biannual assessments for years 3-5 after the initial intervention to assess disease metastasis in treatment and control groups. Both number of new metastases (integer value) and thickness (mm) will be measured as a part of this assessment.
Measured: Assessments every 4 months for 2 years. Biannual assessments for years 3-5.
Secondary outcomes (3)
Assessment of RNA Genetic Profile
RNA analysis of excised tissue will be compared to unaffected patient tissue obtained from the clear margins of the excisional biopsy to assess genetic changes resulting from the melanoma and treatment/placebo injections.
Measured: RNA analysis of excised tissue up to 5 years.
Assessment of Systemic Immune Response: Proteomic Analysis
Proteomic analysis will be conducted on blood samples to assess systemic immune response to both treatment and control groups. Serum collected from patient blood samples will be used for proteomic analysis to assess protein expression, including circulating immunomodulators (cytokines and chemokines) before, and after, treatment. This study may serve to help develop diagnostic protocols and methods of assessing response to treatments.
Measured: Proteomic analysis of serum samples up to 5 years
Assessment of Systemic Immune Response: Metabolomic Analysis
Metabolomic analysis will be conducted on urine samples to assess systemic immune response to both treatment and control groups. All tumor and tissue produce by products in waste that are excreted by the kidneys. Urine samples can be evaluated using techniques, such as Mass Spectrometric, to determine if biological compounds can be identified in association with the presence of a malignant process that would not be produced by normal tissue.This study may serve to help develop diagnostic protocols and methods of assessing response to treatments.
Measured: Metabolomic analysis of urine samples up to 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Jul 2017
- Study start30 Oct 2019
- Primary completion27 Nov 2019
- Study completion27 Nov 2019
Why it stopped: Low enrollment numbers.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Melanoma (Skin)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Patients will be given either intralesional IL-2 or intralesional saline as a control
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Carman Giacomantonio
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Nova Scotia Health Authority
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Carman Giacomantonio, Nova Scotia Health Authority
- Investigators
- Carman A Giacomantonio, MD, FRCSC, Principal investigator, Surgical Oncologist / General Surgeon / Professor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03233828
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 4387
- Acronym
- IL-2
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 26 Jul 2017
- Last updated
- 24 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ranieri JM, Wagner JD, Wenck S, Johnson CS, Coleman JJ 3rd. The prognostic importance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in thin melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Jul;13(7):927-32. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2006.04.023. Epub 2006 May 22.
PubMed 16788753Sandru A, Voinea S, Panaitescu E, Blidaru A. Survival rates of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. J Med Life. 2014 Oct-Dec;7(4):572-6.
PubMed 25713625Tsao H, Atkins MB, Sober AJ. Management of cutaneous melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 2;351(10):998-1012. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra041245. No abstract available.
PubMed 15342808Hersey P, Gallagher S. Intralesional immunotherapy for melanoma. J Surg Oncol. 2014 Mar;109(4):320-6. doi: 10.1002/jso.23494. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
PubMed 24301265Sloot S, Rashid OM, Sarnaik AA, Zager JS. Developments in Intralesional Therapy for Metastatic Melanoma. Cancer Control. 2016 Jan;23(1):12-20. doi: 10.1177/107327481602300104.
PubMed 27009452Boyd KU, Wehrli BM, Temple CL. Intra-lesional interleukin-2 for the treatment of in-transit melanoma. J Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;104(7):711-7. doi: 10.1002/jso.21968. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
PubMed 21744347
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pre-Treatment of Highly Suspicious Pigmented Skin Lesions With Interleukin-2
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03233828
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IL-2 / 4387
- Conditions
- Melanoma (Skin), Melanoma in Situ
- Keywords
- Intralesional Injection, Immunotherapy, Immune Response, Interleukin-2 (Aldesleukin), Tumor Infiltration, Metastasis Prevention
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Low enrollment numbers.
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Carman GiacomantonioUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Nova Scotia Health Authority
- Study start
- 30 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Nov 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 24 Jul 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is meant to assess the use of intralesional IL-2 to modulate the immunological response to suspected melanoma, or melanoma in situ, in an effort to increase lymphocyte infiltration and decrease disease metastasis.
Patients that are clinically diagnosed with suspected Melanoma or Melanoma in situ will be assigned to either a treatment or control arm. The treatment group will be subjected to two intralesional IL-2 injections, whereas the control group will be subjected to two intralesional injections of saline.
The proteomic and metabolomic profiles of both groups will be analyzed using urine and blood samples in an effort to assess the systemic immunological response, if any, to the treatment. Also, upon disease confirmation and staging by a qualified pathologist, lesions will be assessed for lymphocyte infiltration using immunohistochemical methods.
This study will determine whether pre-treatment of IL-2 on lesions (clinically diagnosed as melanoma or melanoma in situ) is effective in generating an adaptive immune response, and whether that immune response may play a role in preventing disease metastasis.
Detailed description
This study is primarily designed to determine if tumor specific immunity can be generated in patients with highly suspicious pigmented lesions in response to intralesional IL-2, and whether that immunity can confer resistance to melanoma metastasis. Patients will be identified by qualified dermatologists and interviews will be held at the surgery clinic (4th floor Dickson Center) QEII HSC, NSHA.
The standard wait time from consultation to surgical biopsy is up to 4 weeks. Investigators will ensure that patients are seen immediately upon notification from participating dermatologist and all research components of the study are completed within the normally anticipated wait time. Through utilization of this standard wait time, intralesional IL-2 can potentially affect an immune response, that otherwise could not be achieved after the biopsy is completed. Given that the study is conducted within the normal wait time, it doesn't deviate from the normal standard of care. Following the study protocol, patients will receive intralesional injections on Day 1(Week 1 Visit) and Day 8 (Week 2 Visit), and excisional biopsies will be performed on Day 15 (Week 3 Visit), well within the accepted wait time from consultation to biopsy. The intralesional injections and collection of biospecimens beyond the biopsy deviate from but does not delay the normal standard of care. Two additional visits are required in addition to the initial consultation.
This study is a randomized, controlled, double-blind study. Patients with highly suspicious pigmented lesions will be randomly assigned by an algorithm to one of two groups: 1) treatment group patients will be treated intralesionally with IL-2 (Proleukin (Aldesleukin), Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc.) at a dose of 500,000 International Units (IU) in 0.1ml of sterilized saline (0.9%, m/v) for 2 treatment cycles 1 week apart (Day 1 and Day 7); 2) control group patients will be treated intralesionally with sterilized saline (0.9%, m/v) of the same volume (0.1ml). Randomization will be generated by a Random Block algorithm for each patient, and instruction preparation for each patient will be sent to pharmacy. IL-2 (Proleukin) will be obtained from Novartis by the pharmacy, paid for by Dr. Carman Giacomantonio's research services account. The pharmacy will be given instruction to prepare either IL-2 treatment or injectable control (saline). The pharmacy will assign a codified ID which will be provided along with the syringe with the patient name labeled as "Interleukin-2/Placebo" (thus blinding study to clinician and patient). As a pilot study, the principle of the design is to test the feasibility of proceeding to a larger and more expensive trial following the methodology and protocol proposed. As such there will be a minimum of 20 (10 treatment, 10 placebo) participants (up to a maximum of 60). It is estimated that statistical significance will be reached with 20 patients, however if it is not reached after 20 patients, an additional 10 (5 treatment, 5 control) patients will be enrolled. If significance is still not reached after 30 patients, an additional 10 patients will be enrolled and so on up to a maximum of 60 patients. If after 60 patients, significance is not achieved then further recruitment under the current protocol would not be logical and therefore the methodology would need to be revised or study discontinued.
On Day 1 (first treatment) and 15 (excisional biopsy), all patients will have blood (4 vials) and urine (25-50 ml) samples taken. Local reactions to injections will be monitored for non- specific signs such as bleeding, arythema, infection, or irritation. Investigators do not anticipate specific changes in the pigmented lesion related to the injection in this short time period, however all changes will be noted.
On Day 15, following the second intralesional injection an excisional biopsy will be performed following standard surgical techniques, as follows: ellipse of skin encompassing the pigmented lesion extending into the subcutaneous fat will be performed to achieve a grossly clear but narrow margin of excision. This small defect will be closed primarily with interrupted sutures. The biopsied specimen will be subsequently evaluated using standard histological techniques to confirm diagnoses, assess margin status (clear or involved) and depth of lesion invasion. The depth of lesion invasion will dictate the extent of subsequent surgical excisions and margin selection according to standard National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Pre-biopsy intralesional injections of 0.1ml into the lesion will not alter dimensions or architecture of the lesion or impact the extent the subsequent biopsy required. Lesions that are felt to be too large for closure without tissue manipulation or creation of flaps, will be biopsied using a punch biopsy sampling technique whereby 4mm diameter discs of tissue from representative areas of the lesion will be taken to confirm the diagnosis and the depth of invasion. The depth of invasion will dictate the extent and complexity of subsequent surgery required to remove the lesion and achieve clear margins according to NCCN guidelines. The biopsied specimen will be processed as follows: using a 22G needle a fine needle aspiration biopsy will be performed (the needle will be passed through the center of the lesion two times) for RNA analysis. The remainder of the tissue will be sent to pathology for standard histological assessment. The pathologist will also report the extent of observed tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) associated with treatment compared to control injections. Blood and urine will be assessed using metabalomic and proteomic methods to assess systemic immune response to treatment.
All blood, urine, and lesion biopsy samples will be labeled with a codified number (will not contain any patient identifying information) and will be immediately transported to Dr. Carman Giacomantonio laboratory at Dalhousie University for storage. Fine needle aspiration of excised samples will be assessed for tumor genetic and epigeneitic profile. Blood and urine will be assessed for proteomic and metabolomic profiles, respectively.
All study participants will receive assessments every 4 months for 2 years and biannual assessments for years 3 to 5 after the initial intervention to assess disease progression, or the development of new melanoma, to compare between both treatment and control groups. There is no standardize test or measurable biomarker to assess established or lasting immunity. This aspect of the study is identical to the patient assessment conducted as per standard of care for melanoma patients. Again, any publications of study results will be completed devoid of any information that could be used to identify patients included in the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Patients will be given either intralesional IL-2 or intralesional saline as a control
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intralesional IL-2 Injection | Experimental | Biological: AldesleukinTwo subcutaneous intralesional injections of Aldesleukin, prepared by the pharmacy such that the contents will be masked, will be administered by the care provider in a clinic seven days apart. |
| Saline Injection | Placebo comparator | Other: SalineTwo subcutaneous intralesional injections of Saline, prepared by the pharmacy such that the contents will be masked, will be administered by the care provider in a clinic seven days apart. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- The participant population will include patients characterized by: nodular/polypoid features, bleeding/ulcerated lesions, excluding face and vulvo-genital lesions.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Participants who are not: currently immunocompromized, on immuno-therapy for other diagnosis, have known inflammatory or autoimmune diseases or are otherwise incapacitated.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Aldesleukin500,000 IU in 0.1mL | Biological | Intralesional IL-2 Injection |
| Saline0.1 mL of sterile saline solution (0.9% m/v) | Other | Saline Injection |
Primary outcome
Assessment of Number of Patients Needed to Obtain Significance
Time frame: 1 year
Data will be analyzed in order to achieve a statistically significant differentiation between treatment and control outcomes in study measures including tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and circulating immunomodulators.
Assessment of Metastasis
Time frame: Assessments every 4 months for 2 years. Biannual assessments for years 3-5.
All patients will receive assessments every 4 months for 2 years and then biannual assessments for years 3-5 after the initial intervention to assess disease metastasis in treatment and control groups. Both number of new metastases (integer value) and thickness (mm) will be measured as a part of this assessment.
3 secondary outcomes
Assessment of RNA Genetic Profile
Time frame: RNA analysis of excised tissue up to 5 years.
Assessment of Systemic Immune Response: Proteomic Analysis
Time frame: Proteomic analysis of serum samples up to 5 years
Assessment of Systemic Immune Response: Metabolomic Analysis
Time frame: Metabolomic analysis of urine samples up to 5 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jul 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 16788753Ranieri JM, Wagner JD, Wenck S, Johnson CS, Coleman JJ 3rd. The prognostic importance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in thin melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Jul;13(7):927-32. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2006.04.023. Epub 2006 May 22.
- Background: PubMed 25713625Sandru A, Voinea S, Panaitescu E, Blidaru A. Survival rates of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. J Med Life. 2014 Oct-Dec;7(4):572-6.
- Background: PubMed 15342808Tsao H, Atkins MB, Sober AJ. Management of cutaneous melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 2;351(10):998-1012. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra041245. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24301265Hersey P, Gallagher S. Intralesional immunotherapy for melanoma. J Surg Oncol. 2014 Mar;109(4):320-6. doi: 10.1002/jso.23494. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
- Background: PubMed 27009452Sloot S, Rashid OM, Sarnaik AA, Zager JS. Developments in Intralesional Therapy for Metastatic Melanoma. Cancer Control. 2016 Jan;23(1):12-20. doi: 10.1177/107327481602300104.
- Background: PubMed 21744347Boyd KU, Wehrli BM, Temple CL. Intra-lesional interleukin-2 for the treatment of in-transit melanoma. J Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;104(7):711-7. doi: 10.1002/jso.21968. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
- New treatments for metastatic melanomaLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Melanoma (Skin)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-17 Blockade to Decrease irAEs (REPLAY)
Metastatic Melanoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Feasibility Study Utilizing Immune Recall to Increase Response to Checkpoint Therapy
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Dapansutrile Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With PD-1 Refractory Advanced Melanoma
Melanoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Carman A Giacomantonio, MD, FRCSC principal investigator
Surgical Oncologist / General Surgeon / Professor
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Aldesleukin and Saline in people with Melanoma (Skin) and Melanoma in Situ, run by Carman Giacomantonio at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Jul 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Assessment of Number of Patients Needed to Obtain Significance (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03233828, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jul 2024.