Balance; DistortedNCT03227666
Improving Balance Through Balance Exercise
A study testing Exercise in people with Balance; Distorted and Fall, run by Region Västerbotten at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
Today most fracture prevention measures targets the bone and osteoporosis. However, only about 20% of individuals with fractures have osteoporosis and at least 90% of all fractures are caused by a fall. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Balance; Distorted, Fall
- What is being tested?
- Exercise
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 52 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2017to 30 Aug 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participation in the HAI study, having postural sway > 400 mm during Eyes Open trial or > 920 mm during Eyes Closed trial
Who cannot join
- Walking aid
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Progressive Balance Exercise on Postural Sway - a 4 Week Randomized Controlled Trial
Today most fracture prevention measures targets the bone and osteoporosis. However, only about 20% of individuals with fractures have osteoporosis and at least 90% of all fractures are caused by a fall. Therefore, the present project builds on previous findings from our group identifying postural sway as an important risk factor for falls and aims to intervene against this risk factor in a randomized controlled trial targeting subjects at the highest risk for falls.
Read the detailed description
Specific aims:
- Examine whether four weeks progressive balance training can improve parameters of body sway in measurements of static standing balance
- Investigate whether participants experience greater security to their own ability and less fear of future falls after 4 weeks of progressive balance training
- Investigate how long a potential effect of progressive balance training may be noticeable on participants' experiences of greater security in their own ability and less fear of future falls
- 3. Examine whether participation in balance training leads to reduced number of falls at follow-up after 6, 12 and 24 months
Falls and fall-related injuries are major health concerns for elderly individuals; they cause functional decline and increased mortality, as well as incurring vast health care costs for society. Occurrences and consequences of falls are expected to increase globally with the growing number of elderly individuals. Hence, the improved detection and prediction of potential fall risk markers are of individual and societal importance.
Falling can be the end result of intrinsic and extrinsic factors negatively affecting an individual's ability to maintain balance, which are often revealed during sequences of body movement. Balance can be both dynamically and statically measured, the latter involves having the individual in a stationary standing position, from which results researchers have proposed impaired postural stability as a risk factor for falling. However, evidence regarding the association of postural instability with prospective falls is limited, and population-based cohort studies in this field are scarce. Other shortcomings of previous studies include the use of retrospective study designs, which increase the risks of recall bias and the identification of risk factors as the result of falls.
Postural instability is preferably investigated using objective measures of posturography, the advantages of which over regular clinical assessments include the reduction of test performance variability and avoidance of subjective scoring systems. Recently, researchers have analyzed the performance of the Wii Balance Board (WBB; Nintendo, Kyoto, Japan) in the measurement of postural instability; WBB-based assessment has shown excellent concurrent validity and the ability to complement existing fall assessments.
As of 2012, all 70-year olds in the Umeå municipality are invited to participate in the Healthy Ageing Initiative (HAI) study, which has currently enrolled more than 3000 participants. Among other measurements, we include assessment of postural stability using a Wii Balance Board (WBB; Nintendo, Kyoto, Japan) device. With each participant in a quiet stance, balance trials consisting of 60-second eyes-open (EO) and eyes-closed (EC) trials are performed. Participants are instructed to maintain an upright position throughout the test, stand relaxed, and avoid any arm or head movement. The WBB measures total COP sway length, representing the sum of postural sway in the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions.
Preliminary results from analyses of data consisting of 1900 70-year-old individuals revealed that participants with postural sway in the 5th quintile had almost twice the risk of falling compared to the reference group, when the 1-year follow-up of prospective falls was performed.
Thus the aim of the present follow-up study is to investigate if the investigators can reduce the increased postural sway of participants who have been identified as having abnormal balance values, based on previous measurements.
The present project is planned to be conducted as a 4-week randomized intervention study with a follow up time of 2 years.
Recruitment of participants at high risk of falls from the Healthy Ageing Initiative will be performed. The Healthy Ageing Initiative (HAI) is an ongoing population based project aiming to reduce risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCD) by risk factor evaluation and increased physical activity. In short, HAI is inviting all 70 year olds in Umeå municipality to a health examination where traditional and potential novel risk factors for diabetes, CVD and fractures are investigated. These include objective measures of physical activity, blood pressure, blood-glucose, objective measured abdominal fat mass and ectopic fat, bone density and other features of bone quality, cognitive function, balance, walking ability, and different life style factors. At the second visit, all participants are informed about the results of tests performed and gets advice with a focus on physical activity, aiming at decreasing the risk of future diabetes, CVD and fractures. The counseling with focus on physical activity is based on motivational interviewing (MI) which is a directive patient-cantered counseling style to help the participants to explore and resolve their ambivalence about behavior change. They are contacted at 6,12 and 24 months per telephone for follow up and are contacted for an in-clinic follow up after 5 years.
Participants in HAI identified as being in the highest quartile of measures of postural sway, indicating poor balance and high fall risk, are invited to participate by telephone contact, and will upon agreement be randomized into either the intervention group or control group. Participants will after the initial contact also receive written information about the study. The investigators aim to recruit 200 individuals from the existing HAI study cohort
After 4 weeks, the participants are followed up with the same measures that are used in the HAI that contains objective and functional balance tests, tests of muscle strength and a validated questionnaires on fear-of-falling and physical activity. Both groups will be offered the specific program for balance training post measurements, with instructions that it can be performed in the home setting according to the same principles offered to the intervention group. The groups are followed up after 6 and 12 months through 70-years-health checks on prospective falls and levels of physical activity.
Descriptive data will be presented as M+SDs and the Student's t-test will be used to analyze statistical differences between variables. Categorical variables are investigated using chi-squared tests. Potential differences between intervention and control group will be analyzed using paired t-tests and two-way repeated measures ANOVA. All analyses will be performed with SPSS version 24 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) and Stata version 13.1 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA).
This study could potentially lead to increased understanding of how balance exercise can contribute to an improved balance in individuals with impaired balance and ability. The investigators also intend to highlight the participant's confidence in, and experience of, their own balance ability, and if the fear of future falls is reduced. This is important knowledge in order to prevent falls and fall injuries in older individuals, which are expected to increase in number in society. Through improvements in balance, future falls can potentially be preventable, which contributes to less fall-related injuries and accidents, thereby maintaining functional ability in especially older individuals. The prevention of falls and fall injuries reduces the suffering of individuals, but can also reduce health care costs when care for fall injuries such as hip fractures can be reduced.
- Conditions
- Balance; Distorted, Fall
- Being tested
- Exercise
- Keywords
- Postural sway, Progressive balance exercise, RCT, Functional balance
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ExerciseBehavioural
The intervention group will perform three supervised group training sessions a week, consisting of 30 minutes of balance training for 4 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | The intervention group will perform three supervised group training sessions a week, consisting of 30 minutes of balance training for 4 weeks. Receives: Behavioral: Exercise |
| Control group | No intervention | The control group recieves a health consultation that highlights the importance of physical activity and balance exercise according to standard practice within the HAI project. They are asked to return after 4 weeks for follow up. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Postural Sway
Total postural sway length, measured objectively during trials of eyes open and eyes closed, during 60 seconds each
Measured: Change in Baseline Postural Sway at 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (5)
Prospective Falls
Self-recalled during telephone follow-up
Measured: 6,12 and 24 months after intervention
Change in Time-up-and-go (TUG) Performance
Clinical balance test assessing ability to rise from chair, walk back and forth 3 meters and sit back down
Measured: Change in Baseline TUG Performance at 4 weeks
Change in Balance Self-efficacy
Falls Efficacy Scale (FES)
Measured: Change in Baseline Balance Self-efficacy at 4 weeks
Change in Fear of Falling (FOF)
Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I)
Measured: Change in Baseline FOF at 4 weeks
Change in Muscle Strength
Grip strength measured by isokinetic hand dynamometer
Measured: Change in Baseline Muscle Strength at 4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jul 2017
- Study start1 Apr 2017
- Primary completion12 Aug 2017
- Study completion30 Aug 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Balance; DistortedStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Intervention group recieving exercise and control group recieving no exercise
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Region Västerbotten
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Swedish Research Council, Kamprad Family Foundation, Kempe Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Anna Nordström, Region Västerbotten
- Investigators
- Anna Nordström, PhD, Principal investigator, Västerbotten County Council, Umeå University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03227666
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- VCC-LIFE-2
- Status last verified
- Sep 2017
- First submitted
- 13 Jul 2017
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Stel VS, Smit JH, Pluijm SM, Lips P. Consequences of falling in older men and women and risk factors for health service use and functional decline. Age Ageing. 2004 Jan;33(1):58-65. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afh028.
PubMed 14695865Wolinsky FD, Fitzgerald JF, Stump TE. The effect of hip fracture on mortality, hospitalization, and functional status: a prospective study. Am J Public Health. 1997 Mar;87(3):398-403. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.3.398.
PubMed 9096540Rizzo JA, Friedkin R, Williams CS, Nabors J, Acampora D, Tinetti ME. Health care utilization and costs in a Medicare population by fall status. Med Care. 1998 Aug;36(8):1174-88. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199808000-00006.
PubMed 9708590Masud T, Morris RO. Epidemiology of falls. Age Ageing. 2001 Nov;30 Suppl 4:3-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/30.suppl_4.3. No abstract available.
PubMed 11769786Robinovitch SN, Feldman F, Yang Y, Schonnop R, Leung PM, Sarraf T, Sims-Gould J, Loughin M. Video capture of the circumstances of falls in elderly people residing in long-term care: an observational study. Lancet. 2013 Jan 5;381(9860):47-54. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61263-X. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
PubMed 23083889Tinetti ME, Speechley M, Ginter SF. Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. N Engl J Med. 1988 Dec 29;319(26):1701-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198812293192604.
PubMed 3205267Maki BE, Holliday PJ, Topper AK. A prospective study of postural balance and risk of falling in an ambulatory and independent elderly population. J Gerontol. 1994 Mar;49(2):M72-84. doi: 10.1093/geronj/49.2.m72.
PubMed 8126355Piirtola M, Era P. Force platform measurements as predictors of falls among older people - a review. Gerontology. 2006;52(1):1-16. doi: 10.1159/000089820.
PubMed 16439819Lord SR, Sambrook PN, Gilbert C, Kelly PJ, Nguyen T, Webster IW, Eisman JA. Postural stability, falls and fractures in the elderly: results from the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study. Med J Aust. 1994 Jun 6;160(11):684-5, 688-91.
PubMed 8202002Moe-Nilssen R, Nordin E, Lundin-Olsson L; Work Package 3 of European Community Research Network Prevention of Falls Network Europe. Criteria for evaluation of measurement properties of clinical balance measures for use in fall prevention studies. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Apr;14(2):236-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00839.x.
PubMed 18324932Howcroft J, Kofman J, Lemaire ED. Review of fall risk assessment in geriatric populations using inertial sensors. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013 Aug 8;10(1):91. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-91.
PubMed 23927446Visser JE, Carpenter MG, van der Kooij H, Bloem BR. The clinical utility of posturography. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Nov;119(11):2424-36. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.07.220. Epub 2008 Sep 12.
PubMed 18789756Scaglioni-Solano P, Aragon-Vargas LF. Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board to assess standing balance and sensory integration in highly functional older adults. Int J Rehabil Res. 2014 Jun;37(2):138-43. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000046.
PubMed 24445863Kwok BC, Clark RA, Pua YH. Novel use of the Wii Balance Board to prospectively predict falls in community-dwelling older adults. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2015 Jun;30(5):481-4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
PubMed 25796535Johansson J, Nordstrom A, Nordstrom P. Objectively measured physical activity is associated with parameters of bone in 70-year-old men and women. Bone. 2015 Dec;81:72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 4.
PubMed 26151120
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Progressive Balance Exercise on Postural Sway - a 4 Week Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03227666
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VCC-LIFE-2
- Conditions
- Balance; Distorted, Fall
- Keywords
- Postural sway, Progressive balance exercise, RCT, Functional balance
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Region VästerbottenOther government
- Collaborators
- Swedish Research Council, Kamprad Family Foundation, Kempe Foundation
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Aug 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Today most fracture prevention measures targets the bone and osteoporosis. However, only about 20% of individuals with fractures have osteoporosis and at least 90% of all fractures are caused by a fall. Therefore, the present project builds on previous findings from our group identifying postural sway as an important risk factor for falls and aims to intervene against this risk factor in a randomized controlled trial targeting subjects at the highest risk for falls.
Detailed description
Specific aims:
- Examine whether four weeks progressive balance training can improve parameters of body sway in measurements of static standing balance
- Investigate whether participants experience greater security to their own ability and less fear of future falls after 4 weeks of progressive balance training
- Investigate how long a potential effect of progressive balance training may be noticeable on participants' experiences of greater security in their own ability and less fear of future falls
- 3. Examine whether participation in balance training leads to reduced number of falls at follow-up after 6, 12 and 24 months
Falls and fall-related injuries are major health concerns for elderly individuals; they cause functional decline and increased mortality, as well as incurring vast health care costs for society. Occurrences and consequences of falls are expected to increase globally with the growing number of elderly individuals. Hence, the improved detection and prediction of potential fall risk markers are of individual and societal importance.
Falling can be the end result of intrinsic and extrinsic factors negatively affecting an individual's ability to maintain balance, which are often revealed during sequences of body movement. Balance can be both dynamically and statically measured, the latter involves having the individual in a stationary standing position, from which results researchers have proposed impaired postural stability as a risk factor for falling. However, evidence regarding the association of postural instability with prospective falls is limited, and population-based cohort studies in this field are scarce. Other shortcomings of previous studies include the use of retrospective study designs, which increase the risks of recall bias and the identification of risk factors as the result of falls.
Postural instability is preferably investigated using objective measures of posturography, the advantages of which over regular clinical assessments include the reduction of test performance variability and avoidance of subjective scoring systems. Recently, researchers have analyzed the performance of the Wii Balance Board (WBB; Nintendo, Kyoto, Japan) in the measurement of postural instability; WBB-based assessment has shown excellent concurrent validity and the ability to complement existing fall assessments.
As of 2012, all 70-year olds in the Umeå municipality are invited to participate in the Healthy Ageing Initiative (HAI) study, which has currently enrolled more than 3000 participants. Among other measurements, we include assessment of postural stability using a Wii Balance Board (WBB; Nintendo, Kyoto, Japan) device. With each participant in a quiet stance, balance trials consisting of 60-second eyes-open (EO) and eyes-closed (EC) trials are performed. Participants are instructed to maintain an upright position throughout the test, stand relaxed, and avoid any arm or head movement. The WBB measures total COP sway length, representing the sum of postural sway in the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions.
Preliminary results from analyses of data consisting of 1900 70-year-old individuals revealed that participants with postural sway in the 5th quintile had almost twice the risk of falling compared to the reference group, when the 1-year follow-up of prospective falls was performed.
Thus the aim of the present follow-up study is to investigate if the investigators can reduce the increased postural sway of participants who have been identified as having abnormal balance values, based on previous measurements.
The present project is planned to be conducted as a 4-week randomized intervention study with a follow up time of 2 years.
Recruitment of participants at high risk of falls from the Healthy Ageing Initiative will be performed. The Healthy Ageing Initiative (HAI) is an ongoing population based project aiming to reduce risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCD) by risk factor evaluation and increased physical activity. In short, HAI is inviting all 70 year olds in Umeå municipality to a health examination where traditional and potential novel risk factors for diabetes, CVD and fractures are investigated. These include objective measures of physical activity, blood pressure, blood-glucose, objective measured abdominal fat mass and ectopic fat, bone density and other features of bone quality, cognitive function, balance, walking ability, and different life style factors. At the second visit, all participants are informed about the results of tests performed and gets advice with a focus on physical activity, aiming at decreasing the risk of future diabetes, CVD and fractures. The counseling with focus on physical activity is based on motivational interviewing (MI) which is a directive patient-cantered counseling style to help the participants to explore and resolve their ambivalence about behavior change. They are contacted at 6,12 and 24 months per telephone for follow up and are contacted for an in-clinic follow up after 5 years.
Participants in HAI identified as being in the highest quartile of measures of postural sway, indicating poor balance and high fall risk, are invited to participate by telephone contact, and will upon agreement be randomized into either the intervention group or control group. Participants will after the initial contact also receive written information about the study. The investigators aim to recruit 200 individuals from the existing HAI study cohort
After 4 weeks, the participants are followed up with the same measures that are used in the HAI that contains objective and functional balance tests, tests of muscle strength and a validated questionnaires on fear-of-falling and physical activity. Both groups will be offered the specific program for balance training post measurements, with instructions that it can be performed in the home setting according to the same principles offered to the intervention group. The groups are followed up after 6 and 12 months through 70-years-health checks on prospective falls and levels of physical activity.
Descriptive data will be presented as M+SDs and the Student's t-test will be used to analyze statistical differences between variables. Categorical variables are investigated using chi-squared tests. Potential differences between intervention and control group will be analyzed using paired t-tests and two-way repeated measures ANOVA. All analyses will be performed with SPSS version 24 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) and Stata version 13.1 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA).
This study could potentially lead to increased understanding of how balance exercise can contribute to an improved balance in individuals with impaired balance and ability. The investigators also intend to highlight the participant's confidence in, and experience of, their own balance ability, and if the fear of future falls is reduced. This is important knowledge in order to prevent falls and fall injuries in older individuals, which are expected to increase in number in society. Through improvements in balance, future falls can potentially be preventable, which contributes to less fall-related injuries and accidents, thereby maintaining functional ability in especially older individuals. The prevention of falls and fall injuries reduces the suffering of individuals, but can also reduce health care costs when care for fall injuries such as hip fractures can be reduced.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Intervention group recieving exercise and control group recieving no exercise
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Behavioral: ExerciseThe intervention group will perform three supervised group training sessions a week, consisting of 30 minutes of balance training for 4 weeks. |
| Control group | No intervention | –The control group recieves a health consultation that highlights the importance of physical activity and balance exercise according to standard practice within the HAI project. They are asked to return after 4 weeks for follow up. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Participation in the HAI study, having postural sway > 400 mm during Eyes Open trial or > 920 mm during Eyes Closed trial
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Walking aid
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ExerciseThe intervention group will perform three supervised group training sessions a week, consisting of 30 minutes of balance training for 4 weeks. | Behavioural | Intervention Group |
Primary outcome
Change in Postural Sway
Time frame: Change in Baseline Postural Sway at 4 weeks
Total postural sway length, measured objectively during trials of eyes open and eyes closed, during 60 seconds each
5 secondary outcomes
Prospective Falls
Time frame: 6,12 and 24 months after intervention
Change in Time-up-and-go (TUG) Performance
Time frame: Change in Baseline TUG Performance at 4 weeks
Change in Balance Self-efficacy
Time frame: Change in Baseline Balance Self-efficacy at 4 weeks
Change in Fear of Falling (FOF)
Time frame: Change in Baseline FOF at 4 weeks
Change in Muscle Strength
Time frame: Change in Baseline Muscle Strength at 4 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2017.
- Background: PubMed 14695865Stel VS, Smit JH, Pluijm SM, Lips P. Consequences of falling in older men and women and risk factors for health service use and functional decline. Age Ageing. 2004 Jan;33(1):58-65. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afh028.
- Background: PubMed 9096540Wolinsky FD, Fitzgerald JF, Stump TE. The effect of hip fracture on mortality, hospitalization, and functional status: a prospective study. Am J Public Health. 1997 Mar;87(3):398-403. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.3.398.
- Background: PubMed 9708590Rizzo JA, Friedkin R, Williams CS, Nabors J, Acampora D, Tinetti ME. Health care utilization and costs in a Medicare population by fall status. Med Care. 1998 Aug;36(8):1174-88. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199808000-00006.
- Background: PubMed 11769786Masud T, Morris RO. Epidemiology of falls. Age Ageing. 2001 Nov;30 Suppl 4:3-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/30.suppl_4.3. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 23083889Robinovitch SN, Feldman F, Yang Y, Schonnop R, Leung PM, Sarraf T, Sims-Gould J, Loughin M. Video capture of the circumstances of falls in elderly people residing in long-term care: an observational study. Lancet. 2013 Jan 5;381(9860):47-54. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61263-X. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
- Background: PubMed 3205267Tinetti ME, Speechley M, Ginter SF. Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. N Engl J Med. 1988 Dec 29;319(26):1701-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198812293192604.
- Background: PubMed 8126355Maki BE, Holliday PJ, Topper AK. A prospective study of postural balance and risk of falling in an ambulatory and independent elderly population. J Gerontol. 1994 Mar;49(2):M72-84. doi: 10.1093/geronj/49.2.m72.
- Background: PubMed 16439819Piirtola M, Era P. Force platform measurements as predictors of falls among older people - a review. Gerontology. 2006;52(1):1-16. doi: 10.1159/000089820.
- Background: PubMed 8202002Lord SR, Sambrook PN, Gilbert C, Kelly PJ, Nguyen T, Webster IW, Eisman JA. Postural stability, falls and fractures in the elderly: results from the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study. Med J Aust. 1994 Jun 6;160(11):684-5, 688-91.
- Background: PubMed 18324932Moe-Nilssen R, Nordin E, Lundin-Olsson L; Work Package 3 of European Community Research Network Prevention of Falls Network Europe. Criteria for evaluation of measurement properties of clinical balance measures for use in fall prevention studies. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Apr;14(2):236-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00839.x.
- Background: PubMed 23927446Howcroft J, Kofman J, Lemaire ED. Review of fall risk assessment in geriatric populations using inertial sensors. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013 Aug 8;10(1):91. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-91.
- Background: PubMed 18789756Visser JE, Carpenter MG, van der Kooij H, Bloem BR. The clinical utility of posturography. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Nov;119(11):2424-36. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.07.220. Epub 2008 Sep 12.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Balance; Distorted
Recruiting
Balance Rehabilitation With Modified Visual Input in Patients With Neuropathy
Neuropathy, Ataxia
Recruiting
Innovative Approaches to Enhance Balance and Neuroplasticity in Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Mobility Limitation
Recruiting
Effect of Functional Core Stability Training or Cognitive Training on Balance and Postural Control in Chronic Ankle Instability
Cognitive Training, Functional Core Stability Training
Recruiting
Effects of Otago and Gaze Stabilization Exercises on Balance, Gait and QOL in Elderly Stroke Patients
Balance; Distorted, Gait, Hemiplegic
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Neuropathic Pain and Postural Stability in Patients With Lumbar Radiculopathy
Postural Stability, Balance; Distorted
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anna Nordström, PhD principal investigator
Västerbotten County Council, Umeå University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Exercise in people with Balance; Distorted and Fall, run by Region Västerbotten at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Postural Sway (time frame: Change in Baseline Postural Sway at 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03227666, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2017.