Cancer of RectumPhase 1/2NCT03204994
Fluorescence Targeted Pelvic Lymph Node Mapping
A Phase 1/2 study testing Indocyanine Green in people with Cancer of Rectum and Lymph Node Disease, run by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
This study aims to assess the lymphatic drainage of rectal tumours by using ICG as a fluorescent non-specific marker. As a feasibility study, it will also assess its technique and timing along with its ability to assist in removing lymph nodes when it is clinically indicated. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer of Rectum, Lymph Node Disease
- What is being tested?
- Indocyanine Green
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2017to 1 Aug 2018
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
- Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
- Participant is undergoing elective curative surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma
- Participant is willing and able to comply with study requirements
Who cannot join
- Participant has history of or known allergy to indocyanine green
- Participant has history of or known allergy to iodides
- Participant suffers from hyperthyroidism or has a benign thyroid tumour
- Participant has renal failure
- Female participant currently pregnant, planning pregnancy or breast feeding
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 7LE
About this study
Official title: Investigating the Feasibility of Fluorescence Targeted Pelvic Lymph Node Mapping During Rectal Cancer Surgery
This study aims to assess the lymphatic drainage of rectal tumours by using ICG as a fluorescent non-specific marker. As a feasibility study, it will also assess its technique and timing along with its ability to assist in removing lymph nodes when it is clinically indicated.
Read the detailed description
Current surgical treatment for rectal cancer includes total mesorectal excision (TME) which involves excision of the rectum in its encompassing fat including the lymph nodes. Rectal cancer can spread to lymph nodes locally inside the TME 'package' and the lateral pelvic lymph nodes. The TME must be fully excised to ensure that the circumferential resection margin (CRM) is disease free or negative. Despite advancing surgical techniques, a positive margin can occur in around 9% of patients with accurate pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), increasing the risk of local recurrence.
Incidence of lateral pelvic lymph node involvement has been reported between 10-25%. It is thought that lower rectal tumours are more likely to spread to the lateral pelvic nodes. In the far East, LPLN dissection is often added to the TME procedure. Formal LPLND is not utilised in Europe due to operative risks including damage to pelvic nerves, greater blood loss and prolonged operating time. Instead, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is utilised to 'sterilise' the lymph nodes. Although a retrospective analysis suggested that LPLN dissection is equivalent to preoperative CRT for preventing local recurrence, there has been evidence to suggest that positive LPLNs after CRT decrease cancer specific survival and relapse free survival. This would suggest that there may be a cohort of patients that would benefit from some form of LPLN dissection, although it is not certain what characteristics of tumours are more likely to metastasise to the LPLNs.
In prostatectomies, where pelvic lymph node dissection is a standard part of the procedure, there has been investigation into fluorescence guided lymph node mapping. Yuen et al utilised ICG guided node mapping in open prostatectomy. In their study, all lymph nodes identified by fluorescence were found to have metastases on pathology whereas non-fluorescent nodes were free from disease. A smaller, retrospective study comparing fluorescence guided lymph node dissection with standard lymph node dissection showed higher sensitivity and specificity in the fluorescence guided technique. Similar results were seen in an early, robotic prostatectomy study.
ICG has been used to map pelvic lymph nodes in colorectal cancer, with the first reported cases being published in 2010. ICG was injected to the tumour base in 25 open rectal resections. A wide field camera is useful for fluorescence in open surgery, however, as most rectal cancer cases are performed using a minimally invasive approach a laparoscopic method is needed. Ishizuka et al used a similar method in low rectal cancers to identify drainage in three different sets of lymph nodes. In 2015, a study of 5 patients using ICG node mapping with the same laparoscopic equipment to be used in this study demonstrated fluorescence in all 5 patients. Both studies 'berry picked' the fluorescing lymph nodes. In the 2010 study, 23 out of 25 patients had fluorescing lymph nodes. In the 2 non-fluorescing nodes LPLD was performed and no diseased nodes were identified. In these studies, they did not observe what types of tumours drain to the LPLDs.
ICG, when injected intravenously, rapidly binds to plasma proteins and is exclusively excreted into bile by the liver. It is known to be well tolerated but there have been reported cases of urticaria and anaphylaxis. Risk of anaphylaxis is 1 in 10,000 and if occurs can be treated using a standard protocol. ICG contains sodium iodide and therefore should be avoided in patients with known allergy to iodides.
This study aims to assess the lymphatic drainage of rectal tumours by using ICG as a fluorescent non-specific marker. As a feasibility study, it will also assess its technique and timing along with its ability to assist in removing lymph nodes when it is clinically indicated.
- Conditions
- Cancer of Rectum, Lymph Node Disease
- Being tested
- Indocyanine Green
- Keywords
- Colorectal surgery, Fluorescence guided surgery
- Medical subject headings
- Rectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Indocyanine GreenDrug
Also called ICG
Fluorescence guided lymphatic mapping using indocyanine green.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tumour injection of ICG | Experimental | Indocyanine green injection into tumour before or during surgery. Receives: Drug: Indocyanine Green |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number & location of lymph nodes identified with and without fluorescent probe during rectal cancer surgery
Measured: 1 day
Secondary outcomes (2)
Noise to background signal of lymph nodes compared with positivity of lymph nodes.
Positivity defined as whether they contain metastatic disease or not.
Measured: 1 day
Number of lymph nodes lying outside the CRM identified by fluorescence
Fluorescence identification of CRM nodes
Measured: 1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jul 2017
- Study start1 Aug 2017
- Primary completion1 Jul 2018
- Study completion1 Aug 2018
Why it stopped: Not able to recruit
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cancer of RectumStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Thomas Barnes, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
- Investigators
- Chris Cunningham, MD, Principal investigator, Chief InvestigatorThomas Barnes, MBChB, Principal investigator, Clinical Research Fellow
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03204994
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 12451
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 28 Jun 2017
- Last updated
- 13 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Investigating the Feasibility of Fluorescence Targeted Pelvic Lymph Node Mapping During Rectal Cancer Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03204994
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 12451
- Conditions
- Cancer of Rectum, Lymph Node Disease
- Keywords
- Colorectal surgery, Fluorescence guided surgery
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Not able to recruit
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to assess the lymphatic drainage of rectal tumours by using ICG as a fluorescent non-specific marker. As a feasibility study, it will also assess its technique and timing along with its ability to assist in removing lymph nodes when it is clinically indicated.
Detailed description
Current surgical treatment for rectal cancer includes total mesorectal excision (TME) which involves excision of the rectum in its encompassing fat including the lymph nodes. Rectal cancer can spread to lymph nodes locally inside the TME 'package' and the lateral pelvic lymph nodes. The TME must be fully excised to ensure that the circumferential resection margin (CRM) is disease free or negative. Despite advancing surgical techniques, a positive margin can occur in around 9% of patients with accurate pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), increasing the risk of local recurrence.
Incidence of lateral pelvic lymph node involvement has been reported between 10-25%. It is thought that lower rectal tumours are more likely to spread to the lateral pelvic nodes. In the far East, LPLN dissection is often added to the TME procedure. Formal LPLND is not utilised in Europe due to operative risks including damage to pelvic nerves, greater blood loss and prolonged operating time. Instead, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is utilised to 'sterilise' the lymph nodes. Although a retrospective analysis suggested that LPLN dissection is equivalent to preoperative CRT for preventing local recurrence, there has been evidence to suggest that positive LPLNs after CRT decrease cancer specific survival and relapse free survival. This would suggest that there may be a cohort of patients that would benefit from some form of LPLN dissection, although it is not certain what characteristics of tumours are more likely to metastasise to the LPLNs.
In prostatectomies, where pelvic lymph node dissection is a standard part of the procedure, there has been investigation into fluorescence guided lymph node mapping. Yuen et al utilised ICG guided node mapping in open prostatectomy. In their study, all lymph nodes identified by fluorescence were found to have metastases on pathology whereas non-fluorescent nodes were free from disease. A smaller, retrospective study comparing fluorescence guided lymph node dissection with standard lymph node dissection showed higher sensitivity and specificity in the fluorescence guided technique. Similar results were seen in an early, robotic prostatectomy study.
ICG has been used to map pelvic lymph nodes in colorectal cancer, with the first reported cases being published in 2010. ICG was injected to the tumour base in 25 open rectal resections. A wide field camera is useful for fluorescence in open surgery, however, as most rectal cancer cases are performed using a minimally invasive approach a laparoscopic method is needed. Ishizuka et al used a similar method in low rectal cancers to identify drainage in three different sets of lymph nodes. In 2015, a study of 5 patients using ICG node mapping with the same laparoscopic equipment to be used in this study demonstrated fluorescence in all 5 patients. Both studies 'berry picked' the fluorescing lymph nodes. In the 2010 study, 23 out of 25 patients had fluorescing lymph nodes. In the 2 non-fluorescing nodes LPLD was performed and no diseased nodes were identified. In these studies, they did not observe what types of tumours drain to the LPLDs.
ICG, when injected intravenously, rapidly binds to plasma proteins and is exclusively excreted into bile by the liver. It is known to be well tolerated but there have been reported cases of urticaria and anaphylaxis. Risk of anaphylaxis is 1 in 10,000 and if occurs can be treated using a standard protocol. ICG contains sodium iodide and therefore should be avoided in patients with known allergy to iodides.
This study aims to assess the lymphatic drainage of rectal tumours by using ICG as a fluorescent non-specific marker. As a feasibility study, it will also assess its technique and timing along with its ability to assist in removing lymph nodes when it is clinically indicated.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tumour injection of ICG | Experimental | Drug: Indocyanine GreenIndocyanine green injection into tumour before or during surgery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
- Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
- Participant is undergoing elective curative surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma
- Participant is willing and able to comply with study requirements
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Participant has history of or known allergy to indocyanine green
- Participant has history of or known allergy to iodides
- Participant suffers from hyperthyroidism or has a benign thyroid tumour
- Participant has renal failure
- Female participant currently pregnant, planning pregnancy or breast feeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Indocyanine GreenAlso: ICGFluorescence guided lymphatic mapping using indocyanine green. | Drug | Tumour injection of ICG |
Primary outcome
Number & location of lymph nodes identified with and without fluorescent probe during rectal cancer surgery
Time frame: 1 day
2 secondary outcomes
Noise to background signal of lymph nodes compared with positivity of lymph nodes.
Time frame: 1 day
Number of lymph nodes lying outside the CRM identified by fluorescence
Time frame: 1 day
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Not able to recruit). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Aug 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cancer of Rectum
RecruitingObservational study
Biopsy-Resection Agreement of Peritoneal Histopathological Growth Patterns in Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study
Peritoneal (Metastatic) Cancer, Colorectal Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Testing the Addition of Atezolizumab to Combination Chemotherapy or Atezolizumab Alone for Metastatic Colon or Rectal Cancer, the COMMIT Study
Metastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma, Stage IV Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Targeted Therapy Directed by Genetic Testing in Treating Patients With Advanced Refractory Solid Tumors, Lymphomas, or Multiple Myeloma (The MATCH Screening Trial)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Not yet recruiting
Efficacy of a Novel High Intensive Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation on Faecal Incontinence in Patients With Low Anterior Resection Cancer Syndrome After Rectal Cancer Surgery
Faecal Incontinence With Faecal Urgency, Rectal Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Neoadjuvant FOLFOXIRI and Chemoradiotherapy Versus Neoadjuvant CAPOX/FOLFOX and Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery or a Watch-and-Wait Approach in High Risk Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Chris Cunningham, MD principal investigator
Chief Investigator
Thomas Barnes, MBChB principal investigator
Clinical Research Fellow
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Indocyanine Green in people with Cancer of Rectum and Lymph Node Disease, run by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Not able to recruit). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number & location of lymph nodes identified with and without fluorescent probe during rectal cancer surgery (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2019.