AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerEQUIVOKNCT03197805

Assessment of the Impact of RNA Genomic Profile on Treatment Decision-making in HER2 Equivocal Breast Cancer Patients

A study testing PAM 50 test in people with Breast Cancer, run by Centre Jean Perrin at 16 sites in France.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the /College of American Pathologists (CAP) recommend that HER2 status (negative or positive) must be determined in all patients with invasive breast cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer
What is being tested?
PAM 50 test
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
26 participants
Where
16 sitesFrance
Study dates
16 Oct 2017to 28 May 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Performance status ≤ 2 (according to WHO criteria)
  • Patient with early invasive breast cancer histologically confirmed stage I to IIIA)
  • Positive or negative lymph node involvement
  • Positive or negative Hormonal Receptors (Estrogens and/or Progesterone),
  • Equivocal HER2 status (IHC Score 2 and equivocal ISH defined as HER2/Chr17 ratio <2 and 4 ≤ HER2 gene number copy < 6) as assessed on surgical specimen
  • Adequate Hematological, Hepatic, Renal and Cardiac Functions
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Patient potentially eligible for an anti-HER2 therapy
  • Patient eligible to receive an adjuvant therapy
  • Signed Informed Consent
  • Patient with social insurance.

Who cannot join

  • Non-measurable tumor
  • Unknown Hormonal Receptors
  • Unknown node involvement
  • Positive or negative HER2 status (Score 0, 1 or 3 IHC, or Negative or positive ISH)
  • Disease stage ≥IIIB
  • Patient not able to follow the trial.

Trial locations and contacts

16 sites in 1 country.

16 sites in 1 country

France16 sites
  • CHRU Jean Minoz

    Besançon, 25030

  • Institut Bergonie

    Bordeaux, 33076

  • Centre François Baclesse

    Caen, 14000

  • Centre Jean Perrin

    Clermont-Ferrand, 63000

  • Centre Georges François Leclerc

    Dijon, 21079

  • CHU Albert Michalon

    Grenoble, 38043

  • Hopital DUPUYTREN

    Limoges, 87042

  • Centre Léon Bérard

    Lyon, 69373

  • Institut Paoli Calmettes

    Marseille, 13009

  • Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier

    Montpellier, 34298

  • Institut Jean Godinot

    Reims, 51056

  • Institut du Cancer COURLANCY

    Reims, 51100

  • Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest

    Saint-Herblain, 44805

  • Centre Paul Strauss

    Strasbourg, 67065

  • Institut Claudius Regaud

    Toulouse, 31059

  • Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine

    Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54519

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Prospective Study Assessing the Impact of RNA Genomic Profile Defined by a Genomic Test on Treatment Decision-making in Breast Cancer Patients With an ISH Equivocal HER2 Status- EQUIVOK Study

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the /College of American Pathologists (CAP) recommend that HER2 status (negative or positive) must be determined in all patients with invasive breast cancer. The knowledge of HER2 status will help the oncologist in prescribing or not a HER2-targeted therapy to patients. Presently, two main methods are used to assess HER2 status: immunohistochemistry (IHC, protein expression) and in situ hybridization (ISH, gene expression) in order to classify tumor sample as positive, negative or equivocal. When a tumor is classified HER 2+ by IHC method, a second test is performed using ISH methods (FISH, SISH, CISH). In case of HER2 equivocal result with ISH method (4 ≤HER2 gene number copy <6), the patient is eligible to an anti-HER2 therapy after discussed during MD-MM. This decision should be individualized on the basis of patient status (comorbidities and prognosis) and patient preferences after discussing available clinical evidence.

Based on molecular classification, RNA expression could help to discriminate breast cancer subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, HER2-overexpressed and triple negative). Prosigna is a genomic test, developed by NanoString® based on the PAM50 gene signature, which measures the expression of 50 genes to classify tumors into 1 of 4 intrinsic subtypes and could allow determining the HER2 status.

This study was designed in order to define if such a test could help the oncologist to define the better therapeutic decision in a HER2 equivocal population. In addition, concordance tests will be performed. The aim of this study is to assess the modification decision rate between the first and the second multidisciplinary decision-making meeting in HER2 equivocal patients using genomic testing.

Conditions
Breast Cancer
Being tested
PAM 50 test
Keywords
Equivocal Her 2, Genomic test
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PAM 50 testDiagnostic test

    Patients with an equivocal-HER2 breast cancer (IHC Score 2 and equivocal ISH defined as HER2/Chr17 ratio <2 and 4 ≤HER2 gene number copy < 6) will be eligible for RNA genomic test (PAM 50 test). The use of genomic test could help the oncologist to define the better therapeutic decision in a HER2 equivocal population.

Study groups in NCT03197805
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Use of PAM 50 test in Her2 equivocal breast cancer patientExperimentalPatients with an equivocal-HER2 breast cancer (IHC Score 2 and equivocal ISH defined as HER2/Chr17 ratio <2 and 4 ≤HER2 gene number copy < 6) will be eligible for RNA genomic test (PAM 50 test).
Receives: Diagnostic Test: PAM 50 test

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The modification of therapeutical decision between the first and the second multidisciplinary decision-making meeting (MD-MM) using a genomic testing

    Percentage of therapeutical strategy changes between the first and the second multidisciplinary decision-making meetings.

    Measured: The measure will be realised after the second multidisciplinary decision-making meeting that is about one month after patient's inclusion.

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. The HER2 overexpression incidence according to RNA genomic profile among equivocal-HER2 patients

    Percentage of HER2 classified patients using a genomic test among equivocal-HER2 patients

    Measured: The measure will be done when the genomic test is realised, that is about three weeks after patient's inclusion.

  2. The concordance between the second multidisciplinary decision-making meeting decision and the HER2 genomic test result

    Percentage of second multidisciplinary decision-making meeting decision in accordance with genomic test result and reasons justifying discrepancies (check-list and comments)

    Measured: The measure will be done when the genomic test is realised, that is about three weeks after patient's inclusion.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jun 2017
  2. Study start16 Oct 2017
  3. Primary completion28 May 2019
  4. Study completion28 May 2019

Why it stopped: Take care recommendations for Her2 equivok patients has changed.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Cohort longitudinal follow up
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
26 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03197805
Sponsor's protocol ID
2017-A00240-53
Acronym
EQUIVOK
Status last verified
Jul 2019
First submitted
19 Jun 2017
Last updated
25 Jul 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PAM 50 test in people with Breast Cancer, run by Centre Jean Perrin at 16 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 16 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Take care recommendations for Her2 equivok patients has changed.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The modification of therapeutical decision between the first and the second multidisciplinary decision-making meeting (MD-MM) using a genomic testing (time frame: The measure will be realised after the second multidisciplinary decision-making meeting that is about one month after patient's inclusion.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jul 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in