AzTrials
AzTrials

HIV/AIDSNCT03187964

Xpert Ultra and Xpert HIV-VL in People Living With HIV

A study testing PLHIV Point of Care Xpert Ultra and PLHIV Point of Care Xpert VL in people with HIV/AIDS and TB - Tuberculosis, run by University of Stellenbosch at 1 site in South Africa.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

TB is increasingly diagnosed using the GeneXpert platform, which can be used for a variety of tests (not just TB). HIV viral load monitoring is required at least annually in patients on ART to detect failure of virologic suppression, however, most HIV VL testing is done centrally. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
PLHIV Point of Care Xpert Ultra and PLHIV Point of Care Xpert VL
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,053 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Africa
Study dates
5 Feb 2018to 4 Apr 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Informed consent obtained from patient
  • Patient is more than 18 years old
  • Patient is HIV positive
  • Patient is receiving follow-up ART
  • Patient is willing to provide blood specimens for study
  • Informed consent obtained from patient
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Patient is more than 18 years old
  • Patient is HIV positive
  • Patient is coming into clinic for first ART visit
  • Patient is willing to provide sputum and urine (blood is desirable, but not mandatory) specimens for study

Who cannot join

  • Informed consent not obtained from patient
  • Patient is less than 18 years old
  • Patient is HIV negative or has unknown HIV status
  • Patient is coming into clinic for first time ART
  • Patient is not willing to provide blood specimens for study
  • TB patients
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Informed consent not obtained from patient
  • Patient is less than 18 years old
  • Patient is HIV negative or has unknown HIV status
  • Patient is not coming into clinic for first time ART
  • Patient has been on TB treatment within the last 60 days
  • Patient is not willing to provide sputum and urine specimens for study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Africa1 site
  • Kraaifontein Community Health Centre

    Cape Town, Western Cape, 7570

Other trials in South Africa

About this study

Official title: Feasibility, Accuracy, and Effect of Polyvalent Point-of-care Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra and Xpert HIV-1 Viral Load Testing in HIV-positive Patients Initiating ART: a Randomised Controlled Trial

TB is increasingly diagnosed using the GeneXpert platform, which can be used for a variety of tests (not just TB). HIV viral load monitoring is required at least annually in patients on ART to detect failure of virologic suppression, however, most HIV VL testing is done centrally. A patient with virologic failure is more likely to get TB.

The investigators wish to see if Xpert done at the clinic results in faster patient TB diagnosis and treatment initiation compared to sending specimens away for central testing. In a different patient group (PLHIV returning for HIV treatment monitoring), the investigators wish to see if POC Xpert HIV-1 viral load (Xpert VL) testing results in faster patient viral load quantification compared to centralised testing. Both POC tests will use the same testing hardware. This polyvalent utility of the GeneXpert system is hitherto uninvestigated in this local setting.

Read more

Newly diagnosed pre-ART HIV positive patients will be approached and asked to be a part of this study. Patients will be randomly assigned to Ultra done at the clinic or the normal off-site laboratory TB testing. The time taken for patients to get diagnosed and time-to-treatment will be recorded. We will also do exploratory diagnostic accuracy evaluations including but not limited to, Ultra when done on mouth samples, the new SILVAMP FujiLAM on urine, and host RNA blood signatures for active TB. Additionally, a different group of HIV positive patients (on ART) returning to the clinic for annual follow-up visits will also be asked to join the study. These patients will be randomly selected for either Xpert VL testing done at the clinic or the normal off-site testing. The time taken for patients to receive viral load results will be recorded. Should the patient's viral loads be found to be higher than anticipated and considered by the clinical to indicate a lack of viral suppression, the time taken for patients to have ART regimen adjusted, receive adherence counselling or received HIV drug susceptibility testing will be recorded.

This project will confirm if Ultra TB testing performs well in PLHIV irrespective of symptoms and may produce evidence that supports universal TB testing in this important and vulnerable patient group, including using novel diagnostics on non-traditional specimen types. The investigators will also assess whether POC placement of Ultra and Xpert VL has benefits (e.g., more patients diagnosed for TB or VL monitored during the same day visit).

Read the detailed description

Sensitive and rapid point-of-care diagnostics should improve TB treatment outcomes, however, tests meeting these criteria have, until recently, been unavailable, especially in PLHIV. PLHIV often have early stage TB disease at the time of ART initiation and paucibacillary sputum. The current frontline test for TB is the Xpert MTB/RIF, which uses the GeneXpert platform, and is deployed primarily at centralised reference laboratories (Clouse et al., 2012; Hanrahan et al., 2015). This approach has two major limitations: 1) the instruments' far-patient placement likely undermines its potential clinical impact; 2) Xpert MTB/RIF has suboptimal sensitivity in PLHIV 3) the GeneXpert platform is primarily used only for TB testing and no other assays such as Xpert HIV-1 Viral Load (VL).

Xpert MTB/RIF has been succeeded by Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra), which promises to increase the speed and sensitivity of TB diagnosis. Although Xpert Ultra will doubtlessly improve the detection of symptomatic patients, its greatest incremental benefit will likely arise in patients with low bacillary load (e.g., unselected HIV-positive patients initiating ART). Thus, Xpert Ultra has the potential to alter how TB is diagnosed in PLHIV by detecting TB before the disease has a chance to progress and before substantial transmission has occurred. The investigators will, in addition to Xpert Ultra on sputum, also perform TB testing using the urinary lateral flow (LF) LAM test, which may detect mycobacteria in asymptomatic PLHIV patients (Lawn et al., 2011). Moreover, investigators will also perform Xpert Ultra and Fujifilm SILVAMP (FujiLAM) on urine in ART initiators. Oral sampling will be done which includes the use of Ultra on tongue swabs and oral washes, inhouse PCR testing MGIT960 liquid culture from PLHIV (ART initiators) as part of preliminary investigation will also be explored, as well the use of blood RNA signatures for TB diagnosis.

These novel test investigations are exploratory, and the results will not yet be used for patient management. This study will address the following research questions: (1) What is the sensitivity and specificity for each approach, overall, and after stratification by viral load/CD4, and (2) What is the proportion of patients that could not expectorate sputum were detected by non-sputum based tests?

The polyvalent utility of the GeneXpert hardware platform is, however, hitherto largely unexplored despite the widespread deployment of machines. HIV VL testing is currently done in South Africa according to the National HIV Treatment guidelines, which advise measuring HIV VL every six months for the first year of treatment and annually thereafter. HIV VL testing involves collection of a blood sample, transporting it to a centralised laboratory for VL quantification, reporting the result back to the clinic, and calling the patient back. If HIV VL is found to be over 1000 genomes per ml, the patient may not be adherent to the prescribed ART or may have drug-resistant HIV and, now that a failure of virologic suppression has been confirmed, the patient may be asked to give a second blood sample for drug susceptibility testing and may have a counselling visit scheduled, in order to improve the patient's adherence. There is, however, a large amount of discretion at local clinics as to what constitutes virologic failure and patients with increased VL may still receive these interventions, even if below the 1000 genomes per ml threshold. The investigators also intend to perform Xpert HIV-1 VL testing and, compared to patients who receive the standard-of-care of centralised VL testing, evaluate the proportion of patients without virologic suppression who are referred to a follow-up intervention (DST and/or adherence counselling).

The investigators propose a study which implements Xpert Ultra (in unselected PLHIV) and Xpert HIV-1 VL (in PLHIV on ART) in Cape Town, South Africa. Furthermore, the GeneXpert platform's polyvalent feasibility, time-to-result and -treatment (Xpert Ultra and LF LAM), and effect on interventions to improve VL (Xpert HIV-1 VL) will be examined.

Being tested
PLHIV Point of Care Xpert Ultra, PLHIV Point of Care Xpert VL
Keywords
People Living with HIV (PLHIV), Xpert HIV-1 Viral Load (Xpert VL), Xpert Ultra, Antiretroviral treatment (ART)
Medical subject headings
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Latent Tuberculosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PLHIV Point of Care Xpert UltraDiagnostic test

    Also called GeneXpert

    Sputum-based TB diagnostic test that takes 80 min to run. Test performed on the same day as the patient visit.

  • PLHIV Point of Care Xpert VLDiagnostic test

    Also called GeneXpert

    Blood-based HIV-1 VL diagnostic and monitoring test that takes 60 min to run. Test performed on the same day as the patient visit.

Study groups in NCT03187964
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PLHIV Centralised Xpert UltraNo interventionPatient sputum specimen collected at Kraaifontein Community Health Centre (KCHC) and sent for centralised Xpert Ultra TB testing at the National Health Laboratory Services (NHLS) facility in Greenpoint, Cape Town, South Africa. Centralised testing uses the established NHLS transportation, testing and report-back to clinic infrastructure according to the national algorithm.
PLHIV Point of Care Xpert UltraActive comparatorPatient sputum specimen collected at KCHC and Xpert Ultra TB testing done on site at point of care (POC).
Receives: Diagnostic Test: PLHIV Point of Care Xpert Ultra
PLHIV Centralised Xpert VLNo interventionPatient blood specimen collected at Kraaifontein Community Health Centre (KCHC) and sent for centralised viral load testing at the NHLS facility in Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. Centralised testing uses the established NHLS transportation, testing and report-back to clinic infrastructure according to the national algorithm.
PLHIV Point of Care Xpert VLActive comparatorPatient blood specimen collected at KCHC and Xpert HIV-1 viral load testing done on site at point of care (POC).
Receives: Diagnostic Test: PLHIV Point of Care Xpert VL

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Treatment time

    Time-specific proportion of patients starting TB treatment (all patients and confirmed cases) in centralised diagnosis and treatment arm compared to POC arm (Xpert Ultra).

    Measured: Up to 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. TB diagnosis time

    Time-specific proportion of patients diagnosed in centralised diagnosis and treatment arm compared to POC arm (Xpert Ultra for TB and XpertVL for VL)

    Measured: Up to 8 weeks

  2. Urine LF-LAM, urine FujiLAM and urine Xpert Ultra in people investigated for TB

    Diagnostic accuracy and concordance compared to a sputum culture reference standard

    Measured: Up to one week

  3. Tongue swab and oral wash Xpert Ultra, tongue swab in-house PCR, and tongue swab culture in people investigated for TB

    Diagnostic accuracy and concordance compared to a sputum culture reference standard and vs. the tongue swab culture

    Measured: Up to one week

  4. Candidate host RNA blood signatures for active TB specified in Turner LRM et al., 2020 in people investigated for TB

    Diagnostic accuracy and concordance compared to a sputum culture reference standardUU

    Measured: Up to one week

  5. HIV DST or adherence counselling

    Time-specific proportion of patients without virologic suppression identified to require adherence counselling and/or HIV drug susceptibility testing

    Measured: Up to one week

  6. Time to referral for HIV regimen adjustment or adherence counselling in patients without virologic suppression

    Time-specific proportion of patients without virologic suppression referred for adherence counselling and/or switching to a second-line ART regimen

    Measured: Up to 8 weeks

  7. Initial lost to follow-up

    Time-specific proportion of patients with a known TB diagnosis or increase in HIV VL that do not successfully start treatment (TB) or HIV adherence counselling, DST or regimen change (VL)

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jun 2017
  2. Study start5 Feb 2018
  3. Primary completion16 Jan 2022
  4. Study completion4 Apr 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
1,053 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03187964
Sponsor's protocol ID
N14/10/136
Status last verified
Apr 2022
First submitted
12 Jun 2017
Last updated
5 Apr 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Collaborators will have access to de-identified IPD data. Other researchers wishing to access the data will be required to sign a data sharing agreement as per institutional policies.

Publications

  • Hanrahan CF, Clouse K, Bassett J, Mutunga L, Selibas K, Stevens W, Scott L, Sanne I, Van Rie A. The patient impact of point-of-care vs. laboratory placement of Xpert((R)) MTB/RIF. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015 Jul;19(7):811-6. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.15.0013.

    PubMed 26056107
  • Lawn SD, Brooks SV, Kranzer K, Nicol MP, Whitelaw A, Vogt M, Bekker LG, Wood R. Screening for HIV-associated tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance before antiretroviral therapy using the Xpert MTB/RIF assay: a prospective study. PLoS Med. 2011 Jul;8(7):e1001067. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001067. Epub 2011 Jul 26.

    PubMed 21818180
  • Clouse K, Page-Shipp L, Dansey H, Moatlhodi B, Scott L, Bassett J, Stevens W, Sanne I, Van Rie A. Implementation of Xpert MTB/RIF for routine point-of-care diagnosis of tuberculosis at the primary care level. S Afr Med J. 2012 Sep 7;102(10):805-7. doi: 10.7196/samj.5851.

    PubMed 23034211
  • Luabeya AK, Wood RC, Shenje J, Filander E, Ontong C, Mabwe S, Africa H, Nguyen FK, Olson A, Weigel KM, Jones-Engel L, Hatherill M, Cangelosi GA. Noninvasive Detection of Tuberculosis by Oral Swab Analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Feb 27;57(3):e01847-18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01847-18. Print 2019 Mar.

    PubMed 30541931
  • Broger T, Sossen B, du Toit E, Kerkhoff AD, Schutz C, Ivanova Reipold E, Ward A, Barr DA, Mace A, Trollip A, Burton R, Ongarello S, Pinter A, Lowary TL, Boehme C, Nicol MP, Meintjes G, Denkinger CM. Novel lipoarabinomannan point-of-care tuberculosis test for people with HIV: a diagnostic accuracy study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Aug;19(8):852-861. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30001-5. Epub 2019 May 30.

    PubMed 31155318
  • Turner CT, Gupta RK, Tsaliki E, Roe JK, Mondal P, Nyawo GR, Palmer Z, Miller RF, Reeve BW, Theron G, Noursadeghi M. Blood transcriptional biomarkers for active pulmonary tuberculosis in a high-burden setting: a prospective, observational, diagnostic accuracy study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Apr;8(4):407-419. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30469-2. Epub 2020 Mar 13.

    PubMed 32178775
  • Zifodya JS, Kreniske JS, Schiller I, Kohli M, Dendukuri N, Schumacher SG, Ochodo EA, Haraka F, Zwerling AA, Pai M, Steingart KR, Horne DJ. Xpert Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 22;2(2):CD009593. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009593.pub5.

    PubMed 33616229

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PLHIV Point of Care Xpert Ultra and PLHIV Point of Care Xpert VL in people with HIV/AIDS and TB - Tuberculosis, run by University of Stellenbosch at 1 site in South Africa.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Treatment time (time frame: Up to 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03187964, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Apr 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in