AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Bifurcation LesionsNCT03172845

Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Findings and Coronary Bifurcation Lesions

A study testing percutaneous coronary intervention in people with Coronary Bifurcation Lesions, run by Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To determine the clinical prevalence of vulnerable plaque using OCT in patients with coronary bifurcation lesion. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Bifurcation Lesions
What is being tested?
percutaneous coronary intervention
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
304 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
27 Jun 2017to 30 Jul 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients ≥ 18 years old
  • Patients with ischemic heart disease who are considered for coronary revascularization with PCI
  • True coronary bifurcation lesion Medina 1.1.1, 0.1.1, 1.0.1 (stenosis> 50% by visual estimation) treated by drug-eluting stent
  • Reference vessel diameter of main vessel >= 2.5mm and side branch >=2.0 mm by visual estimation

Who cannot join

  • Saphenous vein grafts
  • In-stent restenotic lesions
  • Thombus-containing lesions
  • Patient who had Myocardial infarction with in less than one month
  • Patent who had bifurcation lesion dilation with balloon
  • Contraindication or hypersensitivity to anti-platelet agents or contrast media
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Creatinine level ≥ 2.0 mg/dL
  • Severe hepatic dysfunction (3 times normal reference values)
  • Hemodynamic unstable patients
  • Inability of OCT devise to cross the lesion into distal vessel
  • Pregnant women or women with potential childbearing
  • Inability to understand or read the informed content

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Nanjing First Hospital

    Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210006

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Prevalence of Vulnerable Plaque Its Location and Clinical Significance in Bifurcation Lesions Detected by Optical Coherence Tomography.

To determine the clinical prevalence of vulnerable plaque using OCT in patients with coronary bifurcation lesion.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective registry study in which patient with bifurcation lesion undergoing baseline coronary angiography, baseline OCT and percutaneous coronary intervention will be studied. OCT is used to assess the prevalence of vulnerable plaque, its location at bifurcation lesions and compare vulnerable plaque related major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during one-year follow-up in bifurcation lesions between patients with vulnerable plaque and those without. Relationship between endothelial shear stress and vulnerable plaque. Relationship between bifurcation angle and vulnerable plaque.

Group A: presence of vulnerable plaque at the bifurcation Group B: absence of vulnerable plaque at the bifurcation Documentation of immediate post stent OCT and 12 months follow up angiography with OCT will be performed. Immediate post stent OCT to assess successful stent implantation and after 12 months follow up to document year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) included myocardial infraction, cardiac death and clinically driven target lesion revascularization, stent thrombosis.

Being tested
percutaneous coronary intervention
Keywords
coronary bifurcation lesion, optical coherence tomography, vulnerable plaque

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • percutaneous coronary interventionProcedure or surgery

    Also called PCI

    percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation.

Study groups in NCT03172845
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Vulnerable plaqueExperimentalThin-cap fibro atheroma (TCFA) was defined as a lipid-rich plaque with the thinnest fibrous cap thickness<65um. Plaque rupture was identified by the presence of fibrous cap discontinuity with a clear cavity formation inside the plaque. Plaque erosion is characterized by luminal thrombus and absence of the endothelium or without evidence of fibrous cap disruption. Fibro calcific plaque contains OCT evidence of fibrous tissue along with calcium that appears as a signal-poor or heterogeneous region with a sharply delineated border which is applied to larger calcifications. Calcified nodule is characterized as a signal or multiple regions of calcium protruding into the lumen, superficial calcification accompanied by substantive calcium proximal and or distal to the lesion. Thrombus is defined as a mass attached to luminal surface or floating within the lumen. It is seen as a protrusion inside the lumen of the artery with signal attenuation.
Receives: Procedure: percutaneous coronary intervention
Without any vulnerable plaqueStable plaqueActive comparatorpatient with bifurcation lesion undergoing baseline coronary angiography and baseline OCT.
Receives: Procedure: percutaneous coronary intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The prevalence of coronary vulnerable plaques in bifurcation lesions using coherence tomography (OCT)

    Vulnerable plaque was considered when presence of Thin-cap fibro atheroma (TCFA), Lipid-rich plaque (vulnerable), Plaque rupture, Plaque erosion, thrombus and calcified nodule.

    Measured: Documentation of baseline OCT

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)

    MACE was included myocardial infarction, cardiac death, and target lesion revascularization.

    Measured: 0 to 12 months

  2. Stent Thrombosis

    Stent thrombosis was defined according to the Academic Research Consortium definition.

    Measured: 0 to 12 months

  3. Thin-cap fibroatheroma

    Thin-cap fibroatheroma was defined as a lipid-rich plaque with the thinnest fibrous cap thickness < 65 µm.

    Measured: 0 to 12 months

  4. Calcified nodule

    Calcified nodule is characterized as a signal or multiple regions of calcium protruding into the lumen, superficial calcification accompanied by substantive calcium proximal and or distal to the lesion.

    Measured: 0 to 12 months

  5. Plaque erosion

    Plaque erosion is characterized by luminal thrombus and absence of the endothelium, without evidence of fibrous cap disruption.

    Measured: 0 to 12 months

  6. Plaque rupture

    Rupture was identified by the presence of fibrous cap discontinuity with a clear cavity formation inside the plaque.

    Measured: 0 to 12 months

  7. Thrombus

    Thrombus is defined as a mass attached to luminal surface or floating within the lumen. It is seen as a protrusion inside the lumen of the artery with signal attenuation.

    Measured: 0 to 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Jun 2017
  2. Study start27 Jun 2017
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2018
  4. Study completion30 Jul 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
304 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03172845
Sponsor's protocol ID
NFH20170423
Status last verified
Jul 2019
First submitted
11 May 2017
Last updated
30 Jul 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing percutaneous coronary intervention in people with Coronary Bifurcation Lesions, run by Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The prevalence of coronary vulnerable plaques in bifurcation lesions using coherence tomography (OCT) (time frame: Documentation of baseline OCT). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in