AzTrials
AzTrials

Traumatic Brain InjuryNCT03166449

Effects of Immunonutrition on Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury

A study testing Neomune and Fresubin® HP energy in people with Traumatic Brain Injury and Immuno-Deficiency, run by University of Malaya at 1 site in Malaysia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Head injury is one of the top three diagnosis leading to intensive care unit (ICU) admission in Malaysia. There has been growing interest in using immunonutrition as a mode of modulating the inflammatory response to injury or infection with the aim of improving clinical outcome. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 to 78 years
What is being tested?
Neomune and Fresubin® HP energy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 siteMalaysia
Study dates
1 Jul 2014to 31 Jul 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 to 78 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Admission within 48 hours of post traumatic event
  • Moderate to severe head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale 3-12)
  • Requires enteral nutrition.

Who cannot join

  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  • Renal or liver dysfunction
  • Severe sepsis with multi organ failure
  • History of significant abdominal or chest injuries requiring major surgery.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Malaysia1 site
  • Anaesthesia Department, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya

    Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 59100

Other trials in Malaysia

About this study

Official title: Effects of Immunonutrition on Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients in Malaysia: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Head injury is one of the top three diagnosis leading to intensive care unit (ICU) admission in Malaysia. There has been growing interest in using immunonutrition as a mode of modulating the inflammatory response to injury or infection with the aim of improving clinical outcome. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of an immunonutrition on biomarkers (IL-6, glutathione, CRP, total protein and albumin) in traumatic brain injury patients.

Methods: Thirty six patients with head injury admitted to neurosurgical ICU in University Malaya Medical Centre were recruited for this study, over a 6-month period from July 2014 to January 2015. Patients were randomized to receive either an immunonutrition (Group A) or a standard (Group B) enteral feed. Levels of biomarkers were measured at day 1, 5 and 7 of enteral feeding.

Read more

Results: Patients in Group A showed significant reduction of IL-6 at day 5 (p<0.001) with concurrent rise in glutathione levels (p= 0.049). Patients in Group A also demonstrated a significant increase of total protein level at the end of the study (day 7).

Conclusion: These findings indicate the potential of immunonutrition reducing cytokines and increasing antioxidant indices in patients with TBI. However, further studies incorporating patient outcomes are needed to determine its overall clinical benefits.

Read the detailed description

Introduction:

In 2014, injury ranked fifth as the most common cause of hospitalisation in Malaysia, with 86% of major trauma patients sustaining injuries to head and neck. It is known that injuries to the brain is among the most likely to result in death and disability. Therefore, it was unsurprising when the Malaysian Registry of Intensive Care reported head injury as one of the top three diagnosis leading to intensive care unit (ICU) admissions with an in-hospital mortality rate of 22.1%. In addition to causing a significant problem in Malaysia, injury related mortality and morbidity also affects countries worldwide and is expected to be a major cause of death and disability by the year 2030.

This study aims to evaluate the effect of a specific immunonutrition, Neomune, on biomarkers (cytokines, acute phase serum proteins and antioxidants) in traumatic brain injury patients. This immune enhancing enteral feed contains arginine, glutamine and omega-3 fatty acid.

Methods:

This study and its protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee University Malaya Medical Center (MEC ID NO: 20143-15). Written informed consent was obtained from patient's next of kin.

A prospective randomized controlled trial in patients with head injury comparing two high energy protein enteral formula; Neomune (manufactured by Thai Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Thailand) and Fresubin® HP (manufactured by Fresenius Kabi, Bod Hamburg, Germany) was conducted. Fresubin® HP energy is the standard enteral feeding used in neurosurgical ICU patients in University Malaya Medical Centre. Neomune was chosen to study its immune-modulating effects.

Patients receiving Neomune were classified as Group A (n=18), whereas those receiving Fresubin® HP energy as Group B (n=18). Neomune is enriched with arginine, glutamine and omega-3 fatty acid.

Subject recruitment criteria:

Thirty six patients with head injury admitted to neurosurgical ICU, University Malaya Medical Centre were recruited for this study, over a 6-month period from July 2014 to January 2015. Patient's inclusion criteria were a) age between 15-78 years old, b) admission within 48 hours of post traumatic event, c) moderate to severe head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale 3-12) and, d) requiring enteral nutrition. Exclusion criteria were a) history of uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, b) history of renal or liver dysfunction, c) severe sepsis with multi organ failure and d) history of significant abdominal or chest injuries requiring major surgery.

Feeding protocol:

Eligible patients were randomized into receiving either Neomune (Group A) or Fresubin® HP energy (Group B) using a computerized random number generator. Fresubin® HP energy is a premixed formula with an energy of 1.5kcal/ml. Neomune formula comes in powder form and thus was prepared to reach a concentration of 1.5kcal/ml in order to make it comparable for the trial.

Enteral feeding was delivered within 24 to 48 h after admission or surgery according to Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) Guidelines [6]. All feeding were introduced via nasogastric tube and carried out using infusion pump. Enteral feeding was commenced at an initial rate of 20 ml/h, and increased by 20 ml/h every 6 hours until target calorie was reached, provided that there was no significant gastric residual volume (<300 mL). The target calorie for each patient was determined by the clinician working alongside the dietitian using Harris Benedict equation which measures Resting Energy Expenditure (REE). This was further corrected 140% of REE based on studies done on traumatic brain injured patients and nutrition guidelines published by the BTF, the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, and the Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care. Patients going for scheduled surgery are kept nil by mouth 6 hours prior surgery. Feeding interruption are also kept to a minimal if patients are undergoing procedures, extubation or imaging.

Data collection:

Venous blood was withdrawn from patients at day 1, 5 and 7 of enteral nutrition to measure the levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), glutathione, C-reactive protein (CRP), total protein and albumin. The concentration of IL-6 and glutathione were determined by ELISA (R\&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA) according to manufacturer's protocol. Prealbumin was not included as a nutritional biomarker in this study because this test is not available in our standard laboratory test. Furthermore, we were also limited by resource constraint. All measured outcomes were compared between Group A and Group B.

Sample size analysis:

The sample size for this study was calculated based on a similar study done previously on immune enhancing nutrition in traumatic brain injury by Painter et al.

Statistical analysis The data were analysed using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) software version 20.0. Paired t-test was used to compare the concentration of cytokines, acute phase serum proteins and antioxidants between day 1, 5 and 7 after the administration of enteral feeding. Independent sample t-test was used to compare continuous data which include cytokines, acute phase serum proteins and antioxidant levels between Group A and Group B. Statistical significance was predetermined at p < 0.05.

Being tested
Neomune, Fresubin® HP energy
Keywords
Traumatic Brain injury, Immunonutrition
Medical subject headings
Brain Injuries, Traumatic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NeomuneDietary supplement

    Enteral feeding with Neomune was delivered within 24 to 48 h after admission or surgery according to Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) Guidelines

  • Fresubin® HP energyDietary supplement

    Enteral feeding with Neomune was delivered within 24 to 48 h after admission or surgery according to Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) Guidelines

Study groups in NCT03166449
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NeomuneExperimental18 patients with traumatic brain injury were given Neomune as enteral nutrition.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Neomune
Fresubin® HP energyActive comparator18 patients with traumatic brain injury were given Fresubin® HP energy as enteral nutrition.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Fresubin® HP energy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Levels of biomarkers

    Venous blood was withdrawn from patients to check levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), glutathione, C-reactive protein (CRP)

    Measured: Day 1 of enteral nutrition

  2. Levels of biomarkers

    Venous blood was withdrawn from patients to check levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), glutathione, C-reactive protein (CRP)

    Measured: Day 5 of enteral nutirtion

  3. Levels of biomarkers

    Venous blood was withdrawn from patients to check levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), glutathione, C-reactive protein (CRP)

    Measured: Day 7 of enteral nutirtion

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Levels of total protein and albumin

    Venous blood was withdrawn from patients to check levels of total protein and albumin

    Measured: Day 1, 5 and 7 of enteral nutrition

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 May 2017
  2. Study start1 Jul 2014
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2015
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03166449
Sponsor's protocol ID
14-1430-23171.
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
22 May 2017
Last updated
30 May 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • 1. MOH: National trauma database January 2009 to December 2009 fourth report. 2011. 2. Health Facts 2015 [http://vlib.moh. gov.my/cms/ documentstorage/ com.tms.cms. document.Document_ef876440-a0188549-82a26f00 e6a36876/ KKM_ HEALTH _ FACTS _ 2015.pdf] 3. Hyder AA, Wunderlich CA, Puvanachandra P, Gururaj G, Kobusingye OC: The impact of traumatic brain injuries: a global perspective. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007; 22(5):341-353. 4. MOH: Malaysian registry of intensive care report for 2013. Malaysian Registry of Intensive Care, Clinical Research Centre, Ministry of Health Malaysia; 2013. 5. Mathers CD, Loncar D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS medicine. 2006;3(11):e442. 6. Bullock MR, Povlishock JT: Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. Editor's Commentary. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24 Suppl 1:2 p preceding S1. 7. Harris JA, Benedict FG. A biometric study of human basal metabolism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1918;4(12):370-373. 8. Roza AM, Shizgal HM. The Harris Benedict equation reevaluated: resting energy requirements and the body cell mass. Am J Clin Nutr. 1984;40(1):168-182. 9. Painter TJ, Rickerds J, Alban RF. Immune enhancing nutrition in traumatic brain injury-A preliminary study Int J Surg. 2015 Sep 30;21:70-4.

  • Rai VRH, Phang LF, Sia SF, Amir A, Veerakumaran JS, Kassim MKA, Othman R, Tah PC, Loh PS, Jailani MIO, Ong G. Effects of immunonutrition on biomarkers in traumatic brain injury patients in Malaysia: a prospective randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Jun 15;17(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0369-4.

    PubMed 28619005

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Neomune and Fresubin® HP energy in people with Traumatic Brain Injury and Immuno-Deficiency, run by University of Malaya at 1 site in Malaysia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Malaysia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Levels of biomarkers (time frame: Day 1 of enteral nutrition). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03166449, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 May 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in