AzTrials
AzTrials

Intestinal Infectious DiseasesNCT03161951

Differential Diagnostics of Etiology of Acute Infections

An observational study of Intestinal Infectious Diseases and Neuroinfections, run by The Republican Research and Practical Center for Epidemiology and Microbiology.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Method for diagnostics of the origin of infections (bacterial vs viral) based on the identification of activation markers of blood neutrophils and monocytes will be developed. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
How many people
169 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
3 Jan 2017to 29 Dec 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients admitted to the infectious departments of city hospitals.

Who may be able to join

  • neuroinfections or acute intestinal infections;
  • the possibility of blood sampling within a period of up to 24 hours from the moment of admission to hospital;
  • less than 72 hours passed after the onset of the disease and until blood was collected;

Who cannot join

  • refuse of patient to participate in the trial;
  • more than 24 hours passed after the patient entered the hospital;
  • the disease began more than 72 hours ago;
  • concomitant severe acute and chronic diseases;
  • malignant neoplasms, treatment at a time of less than 1 year, autoimmune diseases in the phase of exacerbation;
  • pregnancy/lactation;
Show all 9Show fewer
  • HIV, Hepatites B/C;
  • active tuberculosis;
  • alcohol use disorder/drug addiction.

About this study

Official title: Differential Diagnostics of Etiology of Acute Infections Based on the Analysis of Expression of Activation Markers on the Surface of Peripheral Blood Monocytes and Neutrophils.

Method for diagnostics of the origin of infections (bacterial vs viral) based on the identification of activation markers of blood neutrophils and monocytes will be developed.

Read the detailed description

During the study, method for diagnostics of the origin of infections (bacterial vs viral) based on the identification of activation markers of blood neutrophils and monocytes will be developed.This method will allow to make a diagnosis within an hour after blood sampling.

The expression of the following markers of activation will be studied using flow cytometry: CD11b, CD11c, CD13, CD16, CD32, CD35, CD38, CD62L, CD64, CD66b, CD88, CD284, HLA-ABC and HLA-DR.

Keywords
acute Infections, flow cytometry, cell activation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT03161951
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NeuroinfectionsPatients with acute neuroinfections of bacterial and viral ethology.
Intestinal Infectious DiseasesPatients with acute intestinal infectious diseases of bacterial and viral ethology.
Control groupControl group of healthy persons

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sensitivity of the diagnosis of bacterial vs viral acute infection

    Sensitivity of the diagnosis of bacterial vs viral acute infection using proposed method

    Measured: 1 month

  2. Specificity of the diagnosis of bacterial vs viral acute infection

    Specificity of the diagnosis of bacterial vs viral acute infection using proposed method

    Measured: 1 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 May 2017
  2. Study start3 Jan 2017
  3. Primary completion10 Dec 2018
  4. Study completion29 Dec 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
169 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03161951
Sponsor's protocol ID
RRPCEM_NMAT
Status last verified
Jan 2019
First submitted
17 May 2017
Last updated
9 Jan 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Intestinal Infectious Diseases and Neuroinfections, run by The Republican Research and Practical Center for Epidemiology and Microbiology.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sensitivity of the diagnosis of bacterial vs viral acute infection (time frame: 1 month). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in