AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal PolypNCT03155308

Validation of the NICE Classification Using Pentax Chromoendoscopy

An observational study of Colorectal Polyp, run by Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas at 1 site in Ecuador.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most frequent gastrointestinal tumor and the second cause of cancer related death. Colonoscopy is currently the recommended method for detection of polyps and cancers in the colon. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Colorectal Polyp
What is being tested?
Pentax chromoendoscopy (i-scan and Optical Enhancement)
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
95 participants
Where
1 siteEcuador
Study dates
1 Apr 2017to 1 Jul 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Consecutive adult patients between 18 and 80 years of age, referred for elective outpatient colonoscopy and in whom polypectomy or biopsy is performed will be enrolled.

Inclusion Criteria: Consecutive adult patients between 18 and 80 years of age, referred for elective outpatient colonoscopy and in whom polypectomy or biopsy is performed will be enrolled.

Exclusion Criteria: pregnancy, suspected colonic obstruction or history of previous obstruction, gastrointestinal bleeding, history colorectal surgery, inflammatory bowel disease, hereditary polyposis syndrome, diverticulitis, history of radiation therapy to abdomen or pelvis, history of severe cardiovascular, pulmonary, liver or renal disease, severe coagulation disorders or use of anticoagulants.

Patients with polyps but in whom histopathology has not been evaluated or with a poor bowel preparation (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale ≤6) will be excluded from the analysis but included in the intention to treat.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Ecuador1 site
  • Ecuadorian Institute of Digestive Diseases, Omnihospital

    Guayaquil, Guayas, 090505

Other trials in Ecuador

About this study

Official title: Validation of the NICE Classification Using Pentax Chromoendoscopy (I-scan and Optical Enhancement System

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most frequent gastrointestinal tumor and the second cause of cancer related death. Colonoscopy is currently the recommended method for detection of polyps and cancers in the colon. Removal of all adenomatous polyps during colonoscopy has become worldwide a standard procedure as it has been demonstrated to significantly reduce colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. It is routine practice to remove all the detected polyps for pathological evaluation, due to the low accuracy (59% to 84%) to differentiate non-neoplastic from neoplastic colorectal lesions with white-light endoscopy. The development of electronic or virtual chromoendoscopy (CE) has aimed to reliably predict histology of colorectal lesions based on endoscopic features. This technology differentiates between neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions base on the analysis of the neo-angiogenesis and the mucosal pit pattern. Optical endoscopic diagnosis allows the real-time evaluation of polyp histology during colonoscopy and to determine the appropriate therapeutic strategy. This is important in clinical practice, since adenomas or superficial invasive submucosal carcinoma lesions can be curatively treated by endoscopic removal, unlike deeply invasive carcinomas, which requires surgery. The Narrow-band imaging (NBI) international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) classification is validated classification system proposed as a valid tool for not only differentiating hyperplastic from adenomatous polyps, but also predicting submucosal deep (SM-d) carcinomas. It was developed based on NBI technology, leaving uncertainty on its applicability to other systems. It was previously evaluated the application of the NICE classification to Fujinon spectral Imaging Color Enhancement (FICE) technology founding suboptimal results (accuracy 77%, sensitivity 77% and specificity 75%) and moderate inter-observer agreement (kappa: 0.51).

Read the detailed description

NBI technology uses a physical filter in order to exploit the capacity of hemoglobin to selectively absorb blue light. It is considered to be less useful in areas with a large lumen, such as the stomach and colon, as a result of insufficient light for wide-range observation of the full extent of the tissue surface, and because the images are dark. I-scan is a virtual chromoendoscopy, based on the principle of digital post-processing and consists of three different image algorithms. Mode 1 is for detection of lesions. This algorithm is used for surface enhancement (SE) and enhances light-dark contrast by obtaining luminance intensity data for each pixel and apply an algorithm that allows detailed observation of the mucosal surface structure and lesion borders without altering the brightness of the endoscopic picture. Mode 2 is for characterization of lesions. This algorithm combines SE and tone enhancement (TE). TE dissects and analyses the individual red-green-blue components of a normal endoscopic image in real time and then alters the color frequencies of each component and recombines the components to a single, new color image without visible delay for the examiner. It is used to enhance minute mucosal changes and vessel structures. Mode 3 adds contrast enhancement (CE) to the endoscopic image (in addition to SE and TE) and is for demarcation of lesions. It digitally adds blue color to dark areas within the endoscopic image. Recently an image-enhanced endoscopic technology using a pre-processor band-limited light called Optical Enhancement system (OE system™), was developed by HOYA Co. (Tokyo, Japan) and is now equipped with the latest endoscopy system (Pentax Video Processor EPK-i7010; HOYA Co.). This new technology combines digital signal processing with optical filters that overcomes the limit of the spectral characteristics of the illumination light. Previous i-scan technology uses white light alone as an illumination light and digital post-processing of the reflection afterwards creates images yielding the virtual chromoendoscopic image. Although accumulating evidence has shown the usefulness of i-scan in the clinical setting, emission of white light alone causes a potential limitation for the current i-scan technology to obtain higher contrast images of microvascular pattern on the mucosal surface as shown by Narrow Band Imaging (NBI). The basic concept of OE is to overcome the darkness of NBI, which results in less usefulness for detectability in wide-range observation in the full-extended gastrointestinal lumen. The new innovated optical filters achieve higher illumination intensity and overall transmittance by connecting the peaks of the hemoglobin absorption spectrum (415 nm, 540 nm and 570 nm) creating a continuous wavelength spectrum. There are two modes with different OE filters. Mode 1 is designed mainly to improve visualization of microvessels with a sufficient amount of light, and Mode 2 is designed to improve contrast of white-light observation by bringing the color tone of the overall image closer to that of natural color (white color tone). Due to the underlying differences between the NBI and Pentax technologies (i-scan and OE system), it remains uncertain whether the NICE classification may be translated to this technology. The aim of this study is to validate the NICE classification by applying i-scan and OE system with high-definition without optical magnification, to evaluate colorectal lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design: It will be a non-interventional, prospective, non-randomized, non-controlled and simple blind study, performed in the Ecuadorian Institute of Digestive Disease (IECED), OmniHospital Academic Tertiary Center Ecuador, with patients included from April 2017 to October 2017. The study protocol and consent form has been approved by the institutional review board and will be conducted according to the declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent will be obtained from all subjects before the examination.

Study Population: Consecutive adult patients between 18 and 80 years of age, referred for elective outpatient colonoscopy and in whom polypectomy or biopsy is performed will be enrolled. Exclusion criteria will be pregnancy, suspected colonic obstruction or history of previous obstruction, gastrointestinal bleeding, history colorectal surgery, inflammatory bowel disease, hereditary polyposis syndrome, diverticulitis, history of radiation therapy to abdomen or pelvis, history of severe cardiovascular, pulmonary, liver or renal disease, severe coagulation disorders or use of anticoagulants. Patients with polyps but in whom histopathology has not been evaluated or with a poor bowel preparation (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale ≤6) will be excluded from the analysis but included in the intention to treat.

Intervention: endoscopic technique The procedures will be performed under propofol intravenous sedation, in left later or supine position. For bowel preparation, the participants will have to ingest 4 liters of polyethylene glycol solution in the evening the day before the procedure. The effectiveness of the bowel cleansing will be evaluated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Three colonoscopists (C.R.M., M.V., M.S.A.), with extensive experience in colonoscopy with i-scan and OE (>1000 cases) and familiar with the NICE classification, will perform the procedures using Pentax high definition colonoscopes without optical magnification (EC-3890Zi, PENTAX Medical, HOYA Co.) and EPK-i7010 processor with the ability to display i-scan and OE system™ images. The endoscopy images will be analyzed on a 27-inch, flat panel, high definition LCD monitors (Radiance™ ultra SC-WU27-G1520 model). All lesions initially detected by white light endoscopy will be intensively washed using a water ejection pump before recording the procedure and then the endoscopic features on the surface will be evaluated using the 3 i-scan modes and the 2 OE modes without magnification. The lesion size data (1-5/6-9/>10 mm), location (cecum/ right/ transverse/ left/ sigmoid colon/ rectum) and macroscopic shape of the lesions based on the Paris classification will be recorded. The size will be estimated with biopsy forceps (2.2 mm closed; Radial Jaw 4, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA) or polypectomy snare (13mm open; Captivator, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA). Finally all lesions will be classified in real-time into 3 types based on NICE classification (NICE 1, hyperplastic polyps; NICE 2, adenoma and superficial submucosal carcinoma; NICE 3, SM-d invasive carcinoma). A level of confidence (high or low) will be assign in each stage. A high confidence prediction will be considered when the endoscopist is 90% certain of the diagnosis and this condition will be consider when polyps have ≥1 features associated with one NICE type and no features associated to the others NICE type. If there are uncertainty regarding the features or if there are features from different NICE types the prediction will have low confidence. Polyp's images will be photographically and videotape recorded. Each high-definition video will consist of 30 to 60 seconds of white-light endoscopy followed by i-scan 1,2,3 and OE mode 1 and 2. For the purpose of this study, magnification was not allowed during recording. All polyps will be resected or biopsied for histopathological examination used as the criterion standard for the analysis. Two experienced pathologists, blind to the endoscopic diagnosis, will assess the histology according to the revised Vienna classification. Lesions identified histopathologically as serrated adenomas/ polyps or traditional serrated adenoma will be excluded from the analysis but included in the intention to treat, due to the lack of fully established evidence of NICE classification utility for the diagnosis of these lesions.

In a second phase, endoscopists with less experience (<1000 procedures) using i-scan and OE will be selected. After a formal instruction on the NICE classification based on theoretical background and a series of i-scan/OE-polyp images, each of them will have to reviewed all the videos and applied the NICE classification in order to predict the histology. Each of the three criteria of the NICE system (colour/vessel/surface pattern) will be individually scored as well as the overall level of confidence (high/low).

Statistical analysis

Base line characteristics will be expressed as percentage or mean +/- standard deviation. It will be calculated the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values with the 95% of Confidence Interval (95% CI), for each component of the classification and for the overall prediction by using the classification. Using multilevel logistic regression, the sensitivity and specificity of the different criteria, will be compared. Diagnostic values of the criteria used in combination (combination of "at least 1 criterion being positive" versus "all combined criteria being positive") will be assessed and compared. The criterion standard for validation of predictions will be the lesions histology. Presence of adenomatous feature at each criterion will be defined as a positive result. The sample size was calculated assuming that 80% of predictions will be made with high confidence, and that the real accuracy will be 90%. A data set containing 30 random-selected videos will be presented after 2 months to the three main investigators (C.R.M, M.V, M.S.A.) in order to assess intra and inter-observer reproducibility. The endoscopists will have classified again the polyps according to the three types on the NICE classification. To examine inter and intra observer agreement, kappa values will be calculated. Kappa coefficients below 0.4 indicate "poor agreement," values between 0.4 and 0.8 represent "moderate to good agreement," and values greater than 0.8 indicate "excellent agreement." A P value of less than 0.05 will be considered to be statistically significant. All the statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS software suite v.22.

Being tested
Pentax chromoendoscopy (i-scan and Optical Enhancement)

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pentax chromoendoscopy (i-scan and Optical Enhancement)Device

    All lesions will be evaluated using the 3 i-scan modes and the 2 OE modes without magnification. The lesion size data, location and macroscopic shape of the lesions based on the Paris classification will be recorded. Finally all lesions will be classified in real-time into 3 types based on NICE classification (NICE 1, hyperplastic polyps; NICE 2, adenoma and superficial submucosal carcinoma; NICE 3, SM-d invasive carcinoma). A level of confidence (high or low) will be assign in each stage. Polyp's images will be photographically and videotape recorded. All polyps will be resected or biopsied for histopathological examination used as the criterion standard for the analysis.

Study groups in NCT03155308
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Polyp groupConsecutive adult patients between 18 and 80 years of age, referred for elective outpatient colonoscopy and in whom polypectomy or biopsy is perform will be enrolled to be evaluated using Pentax chromoendoscopy (i-scan and Optical Enhancement)
Receives: Device: Pentax chromoendoscopy (i-scan and Optical Enhancement)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of Pentax chromoendoscopy (i-scan and Optical Enhancement system) for differentiating between the three types of NICE classification.

    colorectal polypoid lesions will be evaluated using Pentax chromoendoscopy (i-scan and OE system) in order to classified the lesions by NICE classification. The histopathology will be evaluated from all lesions as Gold Standard and finally accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value will be calculated.

    Measured: 4 month

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. assessment of inter- and intra-observer agreement

    A data set containing 30 random-selected videos will be presented after 2 months to the three main investigators (C.R.M, M.V, M.S.A.) in order to assess intra and inter-observer reproducibility. The endoscopists will have classified again the polyps according to the three types on the NICE classification. To examine inter and intra observer agreement, kappa values will be calculated. Kappa coefficients below 0.4 indicate "poor agreement," values between 0.4 and 0.8 represent "moderate to good agreement," and values greater than 0.8 indicate "excellent agreement."

    Measured: 4 month

  2. Diagnostic accuracy of the individual criteria of NICE classification using i-scan and OE system.

    It will be calculated the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values with the 95% of Confidence Interval (95% CI), for each component of the classification and for the overall prediction by using the classification. Using multilevel logistic regression, the sensitivity and specificity of the different criteria, will be compared. Diagnostic values of the criteria used in combination (combination of "at least 1 criterion being positive" versus "all combined criteria being positive") will be assessed and compared. The criterion standard for validation of predictions will be the lesions histology. Presence of adenomatous feature at each criterion will be defined as a positive result.

    Measured: 4 month

  3. Diagnostic accuracy according to the level of confidence.

    A level of confidence (high or low) will be assign in each stage. A high confidence prediction will be considered when the endoscopist is 90% certain of the diagnosis and this condition will be consider when polyps have ≥1 features associated with one NICE type and no features associated to the others NICE type. If there are uncertainty regarding the features or if there are features from different NICE types the prediction will have low confidence.

    Measured: 4 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 May 2017
  2. Study start1 Apr 2017
  3. Primary completion1 May 2018
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case crossover
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
95 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03155308
Sponsor's protocol ID
MAY 2-2017
Status last verified
Feb 2019
First submitted
14 May 2017
Last updated
26 Feb 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • US Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999 - 2005 Incidence and Mortality Web-Based Report. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute: Atlanta, 2009

  • Gono K, Yamazaki K, Doguchi N et al. Endoscopic observation of tissue by narrow band illumination. Opt. Rev. 2003; 10: 211-5.

  • Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC, Schoenfeld PS, Burke CA, Inadomi JM; American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected]. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104(3):739-50. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.104. Epub 2009 Feb 24.

    PubMed 19240699
  • Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, Andrews KS, Brooks D, Bond J, Dash C, Giardiello FM, Glick S, Johnson D, Johnson CD, Levin TR, Pickhardt PJ, Rex DK, Smith RA, Thorson A, Winawer SJ; American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory Group; US Multi-Society Task Force; American College of Radiology Colon Cancer Committee. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008 May;134(5):1570-95. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Feb 8.

    PubMed 18384785
  • Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O'Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Waye JD, Schapiro M, Bond JH, Panish JF, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 30;329(27):1977-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199312303292701.

    PubMed 8247072
  • De Palma GD, Rega M, Masone S, Persico M, Siciliano S, Addeo P, Persico G. Conventional colonoscopy and magnified chromoendoscopy for the endoscopic histological prediction of diminutive colorectal polyps: a single operator study. World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Apr 21;12(15):2402-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i15.2402.

    PubMed 16688833
  • Fu KI, Sano Y, Kato S, Fujii T, Nagashima F, Yoshino T, Okuno T, Yoshida S, Fujimori T. Chromoendoscopy using indigo carmine dye spraying with magnifying observation is the most reliable method for differential diagnosis between non-neoplastic and neoplastic colorectal lesions: a prospective study. Endoscopy. 2004 Dec;36(12):1089-93. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-826039.

    PubMed 15578300
  • Su MY, Hsu CM, Ho YP, Chen PC, Lin CJ, Chiu CT. Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and narrow-band imaging systems in differential diagnosis of neoplastic and nonneoplastic colonic polyps. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Dec;101(12):2711-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00932.x.

    PubMed 17227517
  • Kudo S, Tamura S, Nakajima T, Yamano H, Kusaka H, Watanabe H. Diagnosis of colorectal tumorous lesions by magnifying endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996 Jul;44(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70222-5.

    PubMed 8836710
  • Kato S, Fujii T, Koba I, Sano Y, Fu KI, Parra-Blanco A, Tajiri H, Yoshida S, Rembacken B. Assessment of colorectal lesions using magnifying colonoscopy and mucosal dye spraying: can significant lesions be distinguished? Endoscopy. 2001 Apr;33(4):306-10. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-13700.

    PubMed 11315890
  • Rex DK. Narrow-band imaging without optical magnification for histologic analysis of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology. 2009 Apr;136(4):1174-81. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.009. Epub 2008 Dec 10.

    PubMed 19187781
  • Machida H, Sano Y, Hamamoto Y, Muto M, Kozu T, Tajiri H, Yoshida S. Narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of colorectal mucosal lesions: a pilot study. Endoscopy. 2004 Dec;36(12):1094-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-826040.

    PubMed 15578301
  • Apel D, Jakobs R, Schilling D, Weickert U, Teichmann J, Bohrer MH, Riemann JF. Accuracy of high-resolution chromoendoscopy in prediction of histologic findings in diminutive lesions of the rectosigmoid. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 May;63(6):824-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.09.013.

    PubMed 16650546
  • Tischendorf JJ, Wasmuth HE, Koch A, Hecker H, Trautwein C, Winograd R. Value of magnifying chromoendoscopy and narrow band imaging (NBI) in classifying colorectal polyps: a prospective controlled study. Endoscopy. 2007 Dec;39(12):1092-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966781.

    PubMed 18072061
  • Hewett DG, Kaltenbach T, Sano Y, Tanaka S, Saunders BP, Ponchon T, Soetikno R, Rex DK. Validation of a simple classification system for endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging. Gastroenterology. 2012 Sep;143(3):599-607.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.006. Epub 2012 May 15.

    PubMed 22609383

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Colorectal Polyp, run by Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas at 1 site in Ecuador.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Ecuador. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic accuracy of Pentax chromoendoscopy (i-scan and Optical Enhancement system) for differentiating between the three types of NICE classification. (time frame: 4 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03155308, which also lists 25 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Feb 2019.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in