AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseasePhase 4INCOGNITONCT03152149

INvestigating COPD Outcomes, Genomics and Neutrophilic Inflammation With Tiotropium and Olodaterol

A Phase 4 study testing Tiotropium & olodaterol and fluticasone furoate & vilanterol in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by University of Dundee at 4 sites in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This protocol describes a randomised controlled trial to test the hypothesis that 6 months of treatment with tiotropium and olodaterol will result in a reduction in bacterial load, an improvement in neutrophilic inflammation and clinical benefits compared with treatment with inhaled fluticasone furoate and vilanterol… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
What is being tested?
Tiotropium & olodaterol and fluticasone furoate & vilanterol
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
4 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
1 Jun 2017to 26 Nov 2019
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male and female patients aged > 40 years
  • Current or ex-smokers having at least a 10 pack year smoking history
  • A clinical diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) made by a physician
  • Post-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume 1 (FEV1)/Forced Vital Capacity ratio at screening of <70%
  • Moderate to Very Severe COPD (GOLD II-IV) according to consensus guidelines consisting of a post-bronchodilator FEV1 <80% predicted at screening.
  • Currently treated with inhaled corticosteroids (with or without long acting bronchodilators) for at least 12 months prior to screening.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Able to perform all study procedures including spirometry and questionnaires with minimal assistance
  • Blood eosinophil count less than 300 eosinophil cells per microlitre on bloods taken at screening.
  • Able to produce a sputum sample at the baseline visit (either spontaneously or with nebulised saline induction)

Who cannot join

  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Asthma
  • Acute Antibiotics within 28 days prior to screening
  • Long term macrolide therapy if newly commenced in the past 3 months
  • Current use of the following: roflumilast, ritonavir, itraconazole, telithromycin, or ketoconazole (or other strong CYP3A4 inhibitors).
  • Systemic Immunosuppressive medication including current oral corticosteroids at a dose >5mg for >28 days.
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 30ml/min/1.73m2 or requiring dialysis. This will be determined at screening.
  • Use of any investigational drugs within five times of the elimination half-life after the last study dose or within 30 days, whichever is longer.
  • Known allergy, intolerance or contraindication to any of the study drugs
  • Unstable co-morbidities (cardiovascular disease, active malignancy) which in the opinion of the investigator would make the patient unsuitable to be enrolled in the study
  • An exacerbation of COPD occurring during the 28 days prior to screening requiring treatment with either oral corticosteroids or antibiotics.
  • An exacerbation requiring treatment with antibiotics or corticosteroids between the screening and randomization visit
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Women of child bearing potential who are not practicing an acceptable method of contraception
  • Long term oxygen therapy
  • Lapp lactase deficiency, glucose-galactose malabsorption or another inherited disorder of galactose metabolism.

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country.

United Kingdom4 sites
  • NHS Tayside

    Dundee, DD1 9SY

  • NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

    Glasgow

  • Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust

    North Shields, NE29 8NH

  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

    Nottingham, NG7 2UH

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

This protocol describes a randomised controlled trial to test the hypothesis that 6 months of treatment with tiotropium and olodaterol will result in a reduction in bacterial load, an improvement in neutrophilic inflammation and clinical benefits compared with treatment with inhaled fluticasone furoate and vilanterol in patients with neutrophilic Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

COPD is the third leading cause of death worldwide and a major cause of morbidity in the UK. Exacerbations drive disease progression and worsening quality of life and therefore prevention of exacerbations has been a major goal of treatment.

Read more

In recent years, attempts have been made to phenotype COPD patients in order to target therapies to the correct groups of patients that will benefit. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are primarily effective for patients with eosinophilic inflammation, while there are few established therapies for patients with neutrophilic disease. In recent years, all ICS preparations have been associated with a significant increased risk of pneumonia and this risk appears to be greatest in patients with non-eosinophilic inflammation. Combined treatment with long acting beta-agonists (LABA) and long acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) combinations appears to be a safer and more effective alternative for patients with non-eosinophilic disease. The combination of tiotropium and olodaterol in particular, has strong preclinical data supporting beneficial effects on neutrophilic inflammation.

The trial is a multi-centre randomised open label controlled parallel group study with two treatment arms in 80 participants. Moderate to very severe COPD patients and currently treated with inhaled corticosteroid therapy will be randomised to treatment with either the combination of tiotropium and olodaterol (LABA/LAMA) or fluticasone furoate and vilanterol (ICS/LABA). Participants will return at 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months for sampling of the lower airway by sputum samples and the upper airway using oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs. Sputum will be used to test for airway neutrophilic inflammation.

This study will make an important contribution to understanding "phenotyping" in COPD by identifying whether the combination of tiotropium and olodaterol improves airway bacterial load and restores neutrophil function in patients with neutrophilic COPD.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are commonly prescribed for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but their role in the management of COPD is currently being re-evaluated in light of new evidence and the emergence of alternative treatments. Recent concerns have been expressed about the safety of ICS in COPD following several randomized controlled trials of fluticasone propionate and fluticasone furoate demonstrating an increase in rates of pneumonia as an adverse event. Several systematic reviews and observational studies confirm an association between ICS use and risk of pneumonia.

A series of post-hoc analyses of large randomized controlled trials of ICS/ long acting beta-agonists (LABA) or ICS alone have suggested that benefits of ICS in terms of exacerbation reduction and preventing lung function decline are limited to a subgroup of patients with eosinophilic airway inflammation. Eosinophils are highly sensitive to ICS, and so there is a compelling rationale for this association, and therefore an emerging consensus that ICS should be reserved for those patients with eosinophilic disease. This can be identified on the basis of blood eosinophil count although the precise cut-off is yet to be determined. This is strongly supported by a post-hoc analysis of the WISDOM randomized controlled trial of ICS withdrawal in which ICS withdrawal was only associated with an increase in exacerbations above blood eosinophil counts of 300 cells per ul. Furthermore in the FLAME study which excluded patients with very high eosinophils counts, LABA/long acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) was superior to ICS/LABA in terms of reducing exacerbations.

If there is an emerging consensus regarding the treatment of "eosinophilic COPD", then the unmet need in the management of COPD is for the majority of patients that have neutrophilic airway inflammation. Neutrophilic inflammation does not respond to inhaled corticosteroids and indeed there is in-vitro evidence that inhaled corticosteroids may exacerbate neutrophilic inflammation by delaying neutrophil apoptosis. Neutrophilic inflammation is associated with disordering of the lung microbiome with overgrowth of Proteobacteria, a process that may be exacerbated by ICS. Release of proteolytic enzymes such as elastase and matrix metalloproteinase from neutrophils are associated with disease progression and lung function decline in COPD.

RATIONALE FOR STUDY It is hypothesised that the combination of tiotropium and olodaterol may be an ideal treatment option for patients with neutrophilic COPD because

  • Tiotropium and olodaterol have both been shown to have potentially beneficial effects in suppressing neutrophilic inflammation without impairing bacterial killing
  • These effects may reverse the detrimental impact of inhaled corticosteroids on airway neutrophil function and the microbiome.

In particular olodaterol was evaluated in cigarette smoke- and Lipolpolysaccharide - induced- models of neutrophil lung inflammation in mice and guinea pigs. The results showed Olodaterol to suppress neutrophil recruitment to the lung (by up to 90%) while preserving chemotactic function (which is required for effective phagocytosis of pathogens). Tiotropium has also been extensively investigated and is known to suppress neutrophil recruitment and neutrophil dependent remodelling in a number of in-vivo models and may work synergistically with olodaterol in reducing neutrophil retention in the lung.

This extensive preclinical work justifies a study of olodaterol/tiotropium in human subjects evaluating its impact on neutrophilic inflammation. This could establish the combination of olodaterol/tiotropium as the first line therapy for patients with neutrophilic COPD.

This trial will compare treatment of patients with COPD previously treated with ICS randomized to either tiotropium/olodaterol combination or fluticasone furoate/vilanterol combination. The objective of the trial is to evaluate in-vivo effects of these drugs on the lung microbiota and airway neutrophil function. In particular, we expect that 6 months treatment with olodaterol/tiotropium will result in a reduced airway bacterial load (through restored neutrophil function allowing neutrophils to kill airway bacteria), an increase in microbiota diversity, an enhanced ex-vivo killing of Haemophilus influenzae and reduced markers of neutrophilic airway inflammation.

HYPOTHESIS Tiotropium and olodaterol combination treatment will result in a reduced airway bacterial load at 6 months compared to fluticasone furoate and vilanterol. The reduced bacterial load will be associated with improvements in the airway microbiota and reduced markers of neutrophilic inflammation and restored neutrophil function.

Being tested
Tiotropium & olodaterol, fluticasone furoate & vilanterol
Keywords
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Tiotropium & olodaterolDrug

    Also called Spiolto Respimat

    Spiolto Respimat (Tiotropium 2.5 micrograms,olodaterol 2.5 micrograms) 2 puffs once daily for 6 months

  • fluticasone furoate & vilanterolDrug

    Also called Relvar Ellipta

    Relvar Ellipta (fluticasone furoate 92 micrograms, vilanterol 22 micrograms) 1 puff once per day for 6 months

Study groups in NCT03152149
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1. Spiolto RespimatActive comparatorSpiolto Respimat (Tiotropium 2.5 micrograms,olodaterol 2.5 micrograms) 2 puffs once daily for 6 months
Receives: Drug: Tiotropium & olodaterol
2. Relvar ElliptaActive comparatorRelvar Ellipta (fluticasone furoate 92 micrograms, vilanterol 22 micrograms) 1 puff once per day for 6 months
Receives: Drug: fluticasone furoate & vilanterol

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in bacterial load of total bacteria determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction

    To determine the effects of the Tiotropium and olodaterol combination vs fluticasone furoate and vilanterol on airway bacterial load from sputum

    Measured: From baseline to 1, 2, 3 and 6 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Change in bacterial community composition determined by 16S microbiome sequencing as measured by the Shannon Diversity index.

    To determine the effects of the Tiotropium and olodaterol combination vs fluticasone furoate and vilanterol on the airway microbiota. Microbiota will be characterised in sputum, oropharyngeal swabs and nasopharyngeal swabs

    Measured: From baseline to 1, 2, 3 and 6 months

  2. Sputum neutrophil elastase activity determined using an activity based immunoassay

    To determine the effects of the Tiotropium and olodaterol combination vs fluticasone furoate and vilanterol on sputum neutrophil elastase activity

    Measured: From baseline to 1, 2, 3 and 6 months

  3. Change in sputum neutrophil extracellular traps determined using a validated ELISA

    To determine the effects of the Tiotropium and olodaterol combination vs fluticasone furoate and vilanterol on concentration sputum neutrophil extracellular traps

    Measured: From baseline to 1, 2, 3 and 6 months

  4. Change in sputum cytokines and inflammatory markers including but not limited to CXCL-8, IL17, IL-1beta, resistin, IL13

    To determine the effects of the Tiotropium and olodaterol combination vs fluticasone furoate and vilanterol on sputum cytokines and inflammatory markers

    Measured: From baseline to 1, 2, 3 and 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 May 2017
  2. Study start1 Jun 2017
  3. Primary completion26 Nov 2019
  4. Study completion26 Nov 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03152149
Sponsor's protocol ID
2016RC22
Other IDs
2016-004473-41, 2016
Acronym
INCOGNITO
Status last verified
Jul 2020
First submitted
1 May 2017
Last updated
20 Jul 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Tiotropium & olodaterol and fluticasone furoate & vilanterol in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by University of Dundee at 4 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in bacterial load of total bacteria determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (time frame: From baseline to 1, 2, 3 and 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in