AzTrials
AzTrials

Hodgkin's DiseasePhase 3CheckMate 812NCT03138499

A Study of Nivolumab Plus Brentuximab Vedotin Versus Brentuximab Vedotin Alone in Patients With Advanced Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma, Who Are Relapsed/ Refractory or Who Are Not Eligible for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant,

A Phase 3 study testing Nivolumab and Brentuximab vedotin in people with Hodgkin's Disease, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 22 sites in 3 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether an investigational immuno-therapy combination, nivolumab with Brentuximab vedotin compared to Brentuximab vedotin alone is safe and effective in the treatment of relapsed and refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hodgkin's Disease
What is being tested?
Nivolumab and Brentuximab vedotin
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
23 participants
Where
22 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
26 Jun 2017to 22 Feb 2021
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0 or 1.
  • Participants must have a pathologic diagnosis of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) who are relapsed or refractory with one of the following:.
  • Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) ineligible patients.
  • Patients after failure of ASCT.
  • Must have at least one lesion that is > 15 mm (1.5 cm) in the longest diameter and avid by Fluoro Deoxy Glucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan.

Who cannot join

  • Known central nervous system lymphoma.
  • Participants with nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).
  • Participants with known history of pancreatitis or progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML).
  • Other protocol-defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria apply.

Trial locations and contacts

22 sites in 3 countries.

22 sites in 3 countries

United States20 sites
  • Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75390

  • Karmanos Cancer Institute

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201

  • City of Hope National Medical Center

    Duarte, California, 91010

  • Parkview Cancer Center

    Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46845

  • Bon Secours Saint Francis Cancer Center

    Greenville, South Carolina, 29607

  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center-merge

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Pacific Shores Medical Group

    Long Beach, California, 90813

  • University of Southern California

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

  • UCLA Clinical and Translational Research Center (CTRC)

    Los Angeles, California, 90095-1678

  • Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37213

  • Tulane University Health Sciences Center

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112

  • Orlando Health, Inc

    Orlando, Florida, 32806

  • Local Institution

    Palo Alto, California, 94304

  • University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • Hartford Healthcare Cancer Institute at the Hospital of Central Connecticut

    Plainville, Connecticut, 06062

  • UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Sacramento, California, 95817

  • University of California San Diego

    San Diego, California, 92122

  • University of Kansas Cancer Center

    Westwood, Kansas, 66205

  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157

Other trials in United States

Japan1 site
  • Local Institution

    Sendai, Miyagi, 9808574

Other trials in Japan

Puerto Rico1 site
  • Local Institution

    San Juan, 00918

Other trials in Puerto Rico

About this study

Official title: Randomized, Open-label, Phase 3 Trial of Nivolumab Plus Brentuximab Vedotin Versus Brentuximab Vedotin Alone in Participants With Relapsed Refractory or Ineligible for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) Advanced Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (CheckMate 812: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 812)

The purpose of this study is to determine whether an investigational immuno-therapy combination, nivolumab with Brentuximab vedotin compared to Brentuximab vedotin alone is safe and effective in the treatment of relapsed and refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma. The participants of this trial will comprise of patients who have relapsed or did not respond to treatment and are not eligible for stem cell transplant

Being tested
Nivolumab, Brentuximab vedotin
Medical subject headings
Hodgkin Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NivolumabBiological

    Also called Opdivo

    Specified dose on specified days

  • Brentuximab vedotinBiological

    Also called Adcetris

    Specified dose on specified days

Study groups in NCT03138499
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Module AExperimentalNivolumab combined with Brentuximab
Receives: Biological: Nivolumab; Biological: Brentuximab vedotin
Module BExperimentalBrentuximab alone
Receives: Biological: Brentuximab vedotin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as time from date of randomization to death, or disease progression per investigator assessment estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) product-limit method.

    Measured: From randomization to date of death, or disease progression (up to approximately 45 months)

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Complete Response Rate (CRR):

    Complete Response Rate (CRR) is defined as the number of participants who have achieved complete response (Lugano 2014 classification) per investigator assessment. Complete response is considered a score of 1, 2, or 3.

    Per the Lugano criteria:

    Positron emission tomography (PET) negative scans are defined on the 5-point scale as scores of 1, 2, or 3 (where 1 = no uptake above background; 2 = uptake </= mediastinum; and 3 = uptake > mediastinum but </= liver) and PET-positive scans, as scores of 4 or 5 (where 4 = uptake moderately higher than liver; 5 = uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions). Response on PET scans should be reported as complete metabolic response (CMR) partial metabolic response (PMR), SMD (stable metabolic disease), or PMD (progressive metabolic disease).

    Measured: From randomization up to approximately 45 months

  2. Objective Response Rate (ORR)

    Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as the number of participants with a Best Overall Response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (Lugano 2014 classification) per investigator assessment. Complete response is considered a score of 1, 2, or 3. Partial response is considered a score of 4 or 5.

    Per the Lugano criteria:

    Positron emission tomography (PET) negative scans are defined on the 5-point scale as scores of 1, 2, or 3 (where 1 = no uptake above background; 2 = uptake </= mediastinum; and 3 = uptake > mediastinum but </= liver) and PET-positive scans, as scores of 4 or 5 (where 4 = uptake moderately higher than liver; 5 = uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions). Response on PET scans should be reported as complete metabolic response (CMR) partial metabolic response (PMR), SMD (stable metabolic disease), or PMD (progressive metabolic disease).

    Measured: From randomization up to approximately 45 months

  3. Duration of Response (DOR)

    The time from first response (Complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)) to the date of initial objectively documented progression (2014 Lugano classification) or death due to any cause per investigator assessment estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) product-limit method. Complete response is considered a score of 1, 2, or 3. Partial response is considered a score of 4 or 5.

    Per the Lugano criteria:

    Positron emission tomography (PET) negative scans are defined on the 5-point scale as scores of 1, 2, or 3 (where 1 = no uptake above background; 2 = uptake </= mediastinum; and 3 = uptake > mediastinum but </= liver) and PET-positive scans, as scores of 4 or 5 (where 4 = uptake moderately higher than liver; 5 = uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions). Response on PET scans should be reported as complete metabolic response (CMR) partial metabolic response (PMR), SMD (stable metabolic disease), or PMD (progressive metabolic disease).

    Measured: From randomization to date of documented progression or death (up to approximately 45 months)

  4. Duration of Complete Response (DOCR)

    Duration of complete response (DOR) is defined as the time from first complete response to the date of initial objectively documented progression (2014 Lugano classification) or death due to any cause per investigator assessment estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) product-limit method. Complete response is considered a score of 1, 2, or 3.

    Per the Lugano criteria:

    Positron emission tomography (PET) negative scans are defined on the 5-point scale as scores of 1, 2, or 3 (where 1 = no uptake above background; 2 = uptake </= mediastinum; and 3 = uptake > mediastinum but </= liver) and PET-positive scans, as scores of 4 or 5 (where 4 = uptake moderately higher than liver; 5 = uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions). Response on PET scans should be reported as complete metabolic response (CMR) partial metabolic response (PMR), SMD (stable metabolic disease), or PMD (progressive metabolic disease).

    Measured: From randomization to date of documented progression or death (up to approximately 45 months)

  5. Overall Survival (OS)

    Overall Survival (OS) is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) product-limit method

    Measured: From randomization to the date of death (up to approximately 3 years 7 months)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 May 2017
  2. Study start26 Jun 2017
  3. Primary completion22 Feb 2021
  4. Study completion22 Feb 2021

Why it stopped: Insufficient enrollment.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
23 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03138499
Sponsor's protocol ID
CA209-812
Other IDs
2017-000847-41, 2017
Acronym
CheckMate 812
Status last verified
Jan 2024
First submitted
1 May 2017
Last updated
10 Jan 2024
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Nivolumab and Brentuximab vedotin in people with Hodgkin's Disease, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 22 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 22 sites in United States, Japan, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Apr 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progression Free Survival (PFS) (time frame: From randomization to date of death, or disease progression (up to approximately 45 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jan 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in