AzTrials
AzTrials

Renal ColicPhase 4NCT03137498

Lidocaine vs Ketorolac for Management of Renal Colic in the Emergency Department

A Phase 4 study testing Lidocaine and Ketorolac in people with Renal Colic, run by The Brooklyn Hospital Center at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The hypothesis of the study is that lidocaine will be as effective as ketorolac in decreasing patient's perception of pain as measured by the 10 point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Renal Colic
What is being tested?
Lidocaine and Ketorolac
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
6 Mar 2017to 6 Mar 2019
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients 18 years old and older
  • Presenting with acute generalized pain secondary to suspected or confirmed renal colic
  • Describes pain to be greater than or equal to 3 out of 10 on the numeric rating scale (NRS)
  • Provides informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Reported/documented allergy to lidocaine OR ketorolac (Toradol) OR morphine, corn, aspirin, ibuprofen
  • Patients who are hemodynamically unstable as dictated by the medical resident or attending [(Heart rate not within 60-110bpm); (Respiratory rate not within 12-20 bpm); (Blood pressure not within 90/50 to 180/100); (Oxygen saturation not within 94-100%)]
  • Patient with unwillingness to provide informed consent
  • Patients with past medical history of cardiovascular disorders (examples include but are not limited to: myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart blocks, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, slow heart rate, bradycardia, coronary artery disease, QT prolongation)
  • Past medical history of: liver dysfunction (ie: cirrhosis), chronic alcohol abuse, gastrointestinal bleed or recent gastrointestinal bleed (within past 5 days), renal dysfunction or disease, seizures (or currently actively receiving treatment for seizures), inflammatory bowel disease (or currently actively receiving treatment for inflammatory bowel disease), hepatitis (or currently actively receiving treatment for hepatitis).
  • History of liver transplant
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Currently on dialysis
  • Has acute heart, kidney, liver, respiratory failure or trauma
  • In altered mental status
  • In significant trauma, actively breastfeeding or pregnant
  • Has language barriers who are unable to describe pain,
  • Weighing at or over 130kg
  • Has a blood pressure reading greater than 180/120 mmHg at triage,
  • Previously enrolled to the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Billy Sin, PharmD contact

718-250-6250

bsin@tbh.org

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • The Brooklyn Hospital Center

    Brooklyn, New York, 11201

    Billy W Sin, Pharm.D., 718-250-6250

    Michael Hochberg, MD, 718-250-6202

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Lidocaine Versus Ketorolac for the Management of Renal Colic

The hypothesis of the study is that lidocaine will be as effective as ketorolac in decreasing patient's perception of pain as measured by the 10 point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The aim of the study is to compare the safety \& efficacy of lidocaine versus ketorolac for acute pain secondary to renal colic in the Emergency Department (ED).

Read the detailed description

The hypothesis of the study is that lidocaine will be as effective as ketorolac in decreasing patient's perception of pain as measured by the 10 point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The aim of the study is to compare the safety \& efficacy of lidocaine versus ketorolac for acute pain secondary to renal colic in the Emergency Department (ED). The primary endpoint is patient's perception of pain as described by the use of numeric rating scale (NRS) at 15 minutes after initial study interventions. The secondary endpoints are incidence of adverse events during the study period, patient perception of pain as described by the use of NRS at 0, 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90 minutes after initial administration of study interventions, frequency and mean dose of rescue analgesic therapy needed at 0, 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90 minutes, incidence of adverse events such as but would not be limited to: dizziness, perioral numbness, nausea, vomiting, arrhythmia [examples could be but are not limited to: atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation), hypotension (≤90/60 mmHg), flushing, headache, tremors, ear pain, injection site reactions, disorientation, respiratory depression (respiratory rate less than 12bpm), oxygen saturation less than 90%)], the number of bedside ultrasounds for diagnosis conducted, the number of CT scans for diagnosis conducted, result of radiologic imaging (Ultrasound / Computerized Tomography), time to patient discharge from the initiation of study medication/placebo, patient satisfaction of pain control based on a Likert Scale, the number of patients who consumed an adjuvant pain medication for analgesia.

Conditions
Renal Colic
Being tested
Lidocaine, Ketorolac
Keywords
renal colic, lidocaine, ketorolac, acute pain
Medical subject headings
Renal Colic, Acute Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LidocaineDrug

    Also called Prilocaine

    Lidocaine 1.5mg/kg IVPB in 50ml normal saline over 10 minutes x 1dose

  • KetorolacDrug

    Also called Toradol

    Ketorolac 30mg (1ml) intravenous push injection x 1dose

Study groups in NCT03137498
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
LidocaineExperimentalLidocaine 1.5mg/kg IVPB in 50ml normal saline over 10 minutes (active experimental) and normal saline 1ml intravenous push injection (placebo)
Receives: Drug: Lidocaine
KetorolacActive comparatorKetorolac 30mg (1ml) intravenous push injection (active intervention) and Normal saline 50ml IVPB over 10 minutes (placebo)
Receives: Drug: Ketorolac

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain score at 15 minutes

    Patient's perception of pain as described by the use of numeric rating scale (NRS) at 15 minutes after initial study interventions

    Measured: at 15 minutes after initial study interventions

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Adverse event-dizziness

    incidence of dizziness throughout

    Measured: throughout study period (90 minutes)

  2. Adverse event-perioral numbness

    incidence of perioral numbness

    Measured: throughout study period (90 minutes)

  3. Adverse event-nausea

    incidence of nausea

    Measured: throughout study period (90 minutes)

  4. Adverse event-vomiting

    incidence of vomiting

    Measured: throughout study period (90 minutes)

  5. Adverse event-arrhythmia

    incidence of arrhythmia (atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation)

    Measured: throughout study period (90 minutes)

  6. Adverse event-hypotension

    incidence of hypotension (≤90/60 mmHg)

    Measured: throughout study period (90 minutes)

  7. Adverse event-flushing

    incidence of flushing

    Measured: throughout study period (90 minutes)

  8. Adverse event-headache

    incidence of headache

    Measured: throughout study period (90 minutes)

  9. Adverse event-tremors

    incidence of tremors

    Measured: throughout study period (90 minutes)

  10. Adverse event-ear pain

    incidence of ear pain

    Measured: throughout study period (90 minutes)

  11. Adverse event-injection site reactions

    incidence of injection site reactions

    Measured: throughout study period (90 minutes)

  12. Adverse event-disorientation

    incidence of disorientation

    Measured: throughout study period (90 minutes)

  13. Adverse event-respiratory depression

    incidence of respiratory depression (respiratory rate less than 12bpm)

    Measured: throughout study period (90 minutes)

  14. Adverse event-oxygen saturation less than 90%

    incidence of oxygen saturation less than 90%

    Measured: throughout study period (90 minutes)

  15. patient satisfaction of pain control based on a Likert Scale

    based on a Likert Scale

    Measured: throughout study period (90 minutes)

  16. the number of patients who consumed an adjuvant pain medication for analgesia.

    the number of patients who consumed an adjuvant pain medication for analgesia.

    Measured: throughout study period (90 minutes)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 May 2017
  2. Study start6 Mar 2017
  3. Primary completion6 Mar 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completion6 Mar 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03137498
Sponsor's protocol ID
902683
Status last verified
Jul 2018
First submitted
6 Mar 2017
Last updated
11 Jul 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Lidocaine and Ketorolac in people with Renal Colic, run by The Brooklyn Hospital Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Billy Sin, PharmD (718-250-6250, bsin@tbh.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain score at 15 minutes (time frame: at 15 minutes after initial study interventions). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jul 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in