Transfusion-associated Circulatory OverloadNCT03135457
TACO Crossover TRIAL
A study testing Autologous RBC transfusion and Saline transfusion in people with Transfusion-associated Circulatory Overload and Blood Transfusion Reaction, run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
This is an open-label, prospective crossover randomized controlled trial to investigate wether TACO is solely hydrostatic pressure overload or arises from a combination of hydrostatic pressure overload and capillary leakage, by investigating the difference in change in static pressure parameters (PCWP), dynamic volume… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Transfusion-associated Circulatory Overload, Blood Transfusion Reaction
- What is being tested?
- Autologous RBC transfusion and Saline transfusion
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 16 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 16 Aug 2017to 1 Apr 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age >18 years
- Elective (non-redo) coronary arterial bypass grafting surgery
- Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (<55%)
- Transfusion of autologous blood (cell saver blood, 300ml, HCT60%, 30min)
- Informed consent
Who cannot join
- Patients with no indication for autologous RBC transfusion
- Patients with pulmonary hypertension, congenital heart disease, mitral or tricuspid valve disease.
- Contraindications for PAC placement; coagulopathy, bundle branch block, defibrillator or pacemaker (risk of displacement). External pacemaker placed during surgery is no exclusion criterium.
- Patients for acute, non-elective surgery
- Chronic kidney disease stage 4 or higher (eGFR < 30)
- Massive transfusion
Show all 15Show fewer
- Previous randomization in the current trial
- Postoperative ongoing bleeding
- Bypass duration > 2 hours
- Infusion of high dose corticosteroids
- Hemodynamic instability with a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 60 mmHg, central venous pressure > 20 mmHg or dependence on high dosages of inotropic drugs after admittance to the ICU
- Severe arrhythmias
- Development of severe pulmonary edema during infusion of autologous blood or saline.
- Elevated liver enzymes
- Iodine allergy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Netherlands1 site
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam
Amsterdam
About this study
Official title: A Cross-over Randomized Controlled Trial; Pulmonary Edema Detection After Fluid Loading With Blood Versus Saline in Patients After CABG
This is an open-label, prospective crossover randomized controlled trial to investigate wether TACO is solely hydrostatic pressure overload or arises from a combination of hydrostatic pressure overload and capillary leakage, by investigating the difference in change in static pressure parameters (PCWP), dynamic volume parameters (PICCO) as indirect measurements of volume status and capillary leakage after autologous transfusion or saline infusion. The investigators will estimate effective circulating volume following autologous transfusion or saline infusion. Furthermore, the investigators will investigate the effect of fluid loading on the microcirculation.
Read the detailed description
Coronary arterial bypass grafting surgery patients with reduced left ventricular function will be allocated to either infusion of 300mL saline with a subsequent autologous RBC (cell saver) transfusion of 300 mL at a rate of 10mL/min, or the same in the reversed order. Prior to start of the intervention, 15 minutes following start of infusion and a the end of infusion, the investigators will measure right-ventricular pressure and wedge pressure (PCWP), as well as extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) and CO estimation through PICCO® and Pulmonary Artery Catheter. The investigators will identify fluid responsiveness by performing a passive leg raise test (PLR). The investigators aim to measure total vessel density (TVD), perfused vessel density (PVD), proportion of perfused vessels (PPV), microvascular flow index (MFI), and blood vessel diameters (Øbv) from the oral microcirculation by CytoCam microscope system. The investigators will estimate the effective circulating blood and plasma volume through dilutional infusion of indocyanine green prior to initial infusion, between and at the end of subsequent infusion.
- Being tested
- Autologous RBC transfusion, Saline transfusion
- Medical subject headings
- Transfusion Reaction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Autologous RBC transfusionProcedure or surgery
Autologous RBC transfusion 300ml 10 ml/min
Saline transfusionProcedure or surgery
Saline transfusion 300ml 10ml/min
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Other | Patients will receive infusion of 300mL saline with a subsequent autologous Red Blood Cells (RBC) transfusion of 300 mL at a rate of 10mL/min Receives: Procedure: Autologous RBC transfusion; Procedure: Saline transfusion |
| Group B | Other | Patients will receive infusion of 300mL autologous RBC with a subsequent saline transfusion of 300 mL at a rate of 10mL/min Receives: Procedure: Autologous RBC transfusion; Procedure: Saline transfusion |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hydrostatic pressure overload
Hydrostatic pressure overload defined as delta pulmonary capillary wedge pressure
Measured: 1 hour
Secondary outcomes (17)
Capillary leakage
Capillary leakage defined as delta extra vascular lung water index
Measured: 1 hour
Cardiac output
Volume overload measured by cardiac output
Measured: 1 hour
Mean arterial pressure
Volume overload measured by mean arterial pressure
Measured: 1 hour
Pulse pressure variation
Volume overload measured by pulse pressure variation
Measured: 1 hour
Stroke volume variation
Volume overload measured by stroke volume variation
Measured: 1 hour
Extra vascular lung water index
Volume overload measured by extra vascular lung water index
Measured: 1 hour
Systemic vascular resistance
Volume overload measured by systemic vascular resistance
Measured: 1 hour
Colloid osmotic pressure
Colloid osmotic pressure measured by membrane colloid osmometer
Measured: 1 hour
Estimated circulating volume
Estimated circulating blood volume measured by indocyanine green
Measured: 1 hour
Estimated circulating volume
Estimated circulating plasma volume measured by indocyanine green
Measured: 1 hour
Microcirculation
Total vessel density in the sublingual microcirculation measured by Cytocam
Measured: 1 hour
Microcirculation
Perfused vessel density in the sublingual microcirculation measured by Cytocam
Measured: 1 hour
Microcirculation
Proportion of perfused vessels in the sublingual microcirculation measured by Cytocam
Measured: 1 hour
Microcirculation
Microvascular flow index in the sublingual microcirculation measured by Cytocam
Measured: 1 hour
Microcirculation
Blood vessel diameters in the sublingual microcirculation measured by Cytocam
Measured: 1 hour
Fluid responsiveness
Fluid responsiveness defined by Passive Leg Raise test (increase in cardiac output > 10%)
Measured: 1 hour
TACO
Transfusion associated circulatory overload criteria 6 hours after infusion of autologous blood transfusion
Measured: 6 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 May 2017
- Study start16 Aug 2017
- Primary completion13 Mar 2020
- Study completion1 Apr 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Transfusion-associated Circulatory OverloadStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Open-label, prospective cross-over randomized controlled trial.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, A.P.J. Vlaar, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
- Investigators
- Alexander Vlaar, MD PhD MBA, Principal investigator, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03135457
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL59191.018.16
- Status last verified
- Aug 2020
- First submitted
- 26 Apr 2017
- Last updated
- 4 Aug 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Delaney M, Wendel S, Bercovitz RS, Cid J, Cohn C, Dunbar NM, Apelseth TO, Popovsky M, Stanworth SJ, Tinmouth A, Van De Watering L, Waters JH, Yazer M, Ziman A; Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) Collaborative. Transfusion reactions: prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Lancet. 2016 Dec 3;388(10061):2825-2836. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01313-6. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
PubMed 27083327Radford M, Estcourt LJ, Sirotich E, Pitre T, Britto J, Watson M, Brunskill SJ, Fergusson DA, Doree C, Arnold DM. Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies for people with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without haematopoietic stem cell support. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 23;5(5):CD011305. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011305.pub3.
PubMed 38780066
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Aug 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Cross-over Randomized Controlled Trial; Pulmonary Edema Detection After Fluid Loading With Blood Versus Saline in Patients After CABG
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03135457
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NL59191.018.16
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)University, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 May 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is an open-label, prospective crossover randomized controlled trial to investigate wether TACO is solely hydrostatic pressure overload or arises from a combination of hydrostatic pressure overload and capillary leakage, by investigating the difference in change in static pressure parameters (PCWP), dynamic volume parameters (PICCO) as indirect measurements of volume status and capillary leakage after autologous transfusion or saline infusion. The investigators will estimate effective circulating volume following autologous transfusion or saline infusion. Furthermore, the investigators will investigate the effect of fluid loading on the microcirculation.
Detailed description
Coronary arterial bypass grafting surgery patients with reduced left ventricular function will be allocated to either infusion of 300mL saline with a subsequent autologous RBC (cell saver) transfusion of 300 mL at a rate of 10mL/min, or the same in the reversed order. Prior to start of the intervention, 15 minutes following start of infusion and a the end of infusion, the investigators will measure right-ventricular pressure and wedge pressure (PCWP), as well as extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) and CO estimation through PICCO® and Pulmonary Artery Catheter. The investigators will identify fluid responsiveness by performing a passive leg raise test (PLR). The investigators aim to measure total vessel density (TVD), perfused vessel density (PVD), proportion of perfused vessels (PPV), microvascular flow index (MFI), and blood vessel diameters (Øbv) from the oral microcirculation by CytoCam microscope system. The investigators will estimate the effective circulating blood and plasma volume through dilutional infusion of indocyanine green prior to initial infusion, between and at the end of subsequent infusion.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Open-label, prospective cross-over randomized controlled trial.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Other | Procedure: Autologous RBC transfusion, Procedure: Saline transfusionPatients will receive infusion of 300mL saline with a subsequent autologous Red Blood Cells (RBC) transfusion of 300 mL at a rate of 10mL/min |
| Group B | Other | Procedure: Autologous RBC transfusion, Procedure: Saline transfusionPatients will receive infusion of 300mL autologous RBC with a subsequent saline transfusion of 300 mL at a rate of 10mL/min |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age >18 years
- Elective (non-redo) coronary arterial bypass grafting surgery
- Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (<55%)
- Transfusion of autologous blood (cell saver blood, 300ml, HCT60%, 30min)
- Informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Patients with no indication for autologous RBC transfusion
- Patients with pulmonary hypertension, congenital heart disease, mitral or tricuspid valve disease.
- Contraindications for PAC placement; coagulopathy, bundle branch block, defibrillator or pacemaker (risk of displacement). External pacemaker placed during surgery is no exclusion criterium.
- Patients for acute, non-elective surgery
- Chronic kidney disease stage 4 or higher (eGFR < 30)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Autologous RBC transfusionAutologous RBC transfusion 300ml 10 ml/min | Procedure or surgery | Group A, Group B |
| Saline transfusionSaline transfusion 300ml 10ml/min | Procedure or surgery | Group A, Group B |
Primary outcome
Hydrostatic pressure overload
Time frame: 1 hour
Hydrostatic pressure overload defined as delta pulmonary capillary wedge pressure
17 secondary outcomes
Capillary leakage
Time frame: 1 hour
Cardiac output
Time frame: 1 hour
Mean arterial pressure
Time frame: 1 hour
Pulse pressure variation
Time frame: 1 hour
Stroke volume variation
Time frame: 1 hour
Extra vascular lung water index
Time frame: 1 hour
Systemic vascular resistance
Time frame: 1 hour
Colloid osmotic pressure
Time frame: 1 hour
Estimated circulating volume
Time frame: 1 hour
Estimated circulating volume
Time frame: 1 hour
Microcirculation
Time frame: 1 hour
Microcirculation
Time frame: 1 hour
Microcirculation
Time frame: 1 hour
Microcirculation
Time frame: 1 hour
Microcirculation
Time frame: 1 hour
Fluid responsiveness
Time frame: 1 hour
TACO
Time frame: 6 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Aug 2020.
- Background: PubMed 27083327Delaney M, Wendel S, Bercovitz RS, Cid J, Cohn C, Dunbar NM, Apelseth TO, Popovsky M, Stanworth SJ, Tinmouth A, Van De Watering L, Waters JH, Yazer M, Ziman A; Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) Collaborative. Transfusion reactions: prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Lancet. 2016 Dec 3;388(10061):2825-2836. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01313-6. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38780066Radford M, Estcourt LJ, Sirotich E, Pitre T, Britto J, Watson M, Brunskill SJ, Fergusson DA, Doree C, Arnold DM. Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies for people with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without haematopoietic stem cell support. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 23;5(5):CD011305. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011305.pub3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alexander Vlaar, MD PhD MBA principal investigator
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Autologous RBC transfusion and Saline transfusion in people with Transfusion-associated Circulatory Overload and Blood Transfusion Reaction, run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hydrostatic pressure overload (time frame: 1 hour). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03135457, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Aug 2020.