AzTrials
AzTrials

Inguinal HerniaNCT03128216

Local Anesthetic Infiltration VS Trasversalis Fascia Block VS Spinal Anesthesia

A study testing Blind Local Anesthetic infiltration, Transversals Fascia Block and Spinal Anesthesia in people with Inguinal Hernia, run by Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona at 1 site in Italy.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Propose to comparison effectiveness of blind local anesthetic infiltration with ultrasound guided Transversals Fascia Block and Spinal Anesthesia in patients undergoing to inguinal hernia repair surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Inguinal Hernia
What is being tested?
Blind Local Anesthetic infiltration, Transversals Fascia Block and Spinal Anesthesia
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
48 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
Apr 2017to Sep 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • age> 18 years;
  • ASA score I - II - III;
  • patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair;
  • signed informed consent;

Who cannot join

  • chronic therapy with opioids/ antidepressants;
  • urgent/emergent surgery;
  • postoperative transfer to the intensive care unit;
  • known allergy to any drug medication;
  • local skin infection;
  • epilepsy;
  • alcohol or drug abuse;

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Erika Basso Ricci, M.D. contact

+3903724050

e.bassoricci@asst-cremona.it

Italy1 site
  • ASST Cremona

    Creom, Cremona, 26100

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Local Anesthetic Infiltration, Trasversalis Fascia Block or Spinal Anesthesia for Inguinal Hernia Repair

Propose to comparison effectiveness of blind local anesthetic infiltration with ultrasound guided Transversals Fascia Block and Spinal Anesthesia in patients undergoing to inguinal hernia repair surgery. The effectiveness is defined as pain control during intraoperative and time need to reach hospital discharge criteria in the post-operative period.

Conditions
Inguinal Hernia
Being tested
Blind Local Anesthetic infiltration, Transversals Fascia Block, Spinal Anesthesia, Ropivacaine, Bupivacaine
Medical subject headings
Hernia, Inguinal

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Blind Local Anesthetic infiltrationProcedure or surgery

    Patients of this group received blind local anesthetic infiltration on surgical site. Local anesthetic infiltration are performed by surgeon.

  • Transversals Fascia BlockProcedure or surgery

    Patients of this group received ultrasound guided omolateral Transversals Fascia Block.

  • Spinal AnesthesiaProcedure or surgery

    Patients of this group received Spinal Anesthesia

  • RopivacaineDrug

    Local anesthetic used for local infiltration and Transversals fascia block

  • BupivacaineDrug

    Local anesthetic used for Spinal Anesthesia

Study groups in NCT03128216
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Blind Local Anesthetic InfiltrationActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Blind Local Anesthetic infiltration; Drug: Ropivacaine
Transversals Fascia BlockActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Transversals Fascia Block; Drug: Ropivacaine
Spinal AnesthesiaActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Spinal Anesthesia; Drug: Bupivacaine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Hospital discharge

    Time need to reach hospital discharge criteria in post-operative period

    Measured: First 6 post-operative hours

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Intraoperative Pain Control

    Need of addiction local anesthetic or endovascular anesthetic to performed surgery

    Measured: Intraoperative period

  2. Post-operative Pain

    NRS score in post-operative period

    Measured: Post-operative period for 6 hours, every 30 min

  3. Side effects

    Incidence of side effects

    Measured: intra-operative and post-operative period (6 hours)

  4. Chronic Pain

    Incidence of chronic post-operative pain

    Measured: at 1 week and 3 months in post-operative period

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Apr 2017
  2. Study startApr 2017 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionJul 2017 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2017 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
48 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03128216
Sponsor's protocol ID
ANECR_02_17
Status last verified
Apr 2017
First submitted
12 Apr 2017
Last updated
25 Apr 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Blind Local Anesthetic infiltration, Transversals Fascia Block and Spinal Anesthesia in people with Inguinal Hernia, run by Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Erika Basso Ricci, M.D. (+3903724050, e.bassoricci@asst-cremona.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Hospital discharge (time frame: First 6 post-operative hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Apr 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in