AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseNCT03120169

Effects of Treadmill Versus Cycling Endurance Training in Patients With COPD

A study testing treadmill endurance training and cycling endurance training in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener Land at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Aim of this study is to investigate the effects of treadmill versus cycling endurance training on Balance, gait performance and exercise capacity in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
What is being tested?
treadmill endurance training and cycling endurance training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
30 Mar 2017to 27 Nov 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • COPD Stage III or IV according to the global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease
  • impaired exercise capacity (6 Minute walk distance of less than 70% of the reference values from Troosters et al.)

Who cannot join

  • acute, severe exacerbation of COPD
  • carbon dioxide of more than 45 mmHg at rest
  • any disabilities that prevent patient form walking or cycling
  • Patient is not able to walk 20 meters without any aid (for example rollator)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • Schoen Klinik Berchtesgadener Land

    Schönau am Königssee, 83471

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Effects of a Three Week Treadmill Versus Cycling Endurance Training on Balance, Gait Performance and Exercise Capacity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease - a Pilot Study

Aim of this study is to investigate the effects of treadmill versus cycling endurance training on Balance, gait performance and exercise capacity in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Patients will be recruited during a 3-week inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program and will be randomized into one of two intervention groups. Walking intensity in the treadmill group will be set at 80 percent of the average speed of the 6-minute walking test. The cycling group will exercise at an intensity of 60 percent according to an Initial incremental cycling test.

Patients will perform 5 to 6 training sessions per week. The total exercise duration will be progressively increased from 10 to 30 minutes. Walking or cycling intensity will also be progressively increased if perceived exertion during exercise is rated below 3 on the modified 10-point Borg scale.

Being tested
treadmill endurance training, cycling endurance training
Keywords
COPD, exercise, training, cycling, treadmill, walking, pulmonary rehabilitation
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • treadmill endurance trainingOther

    n = 15 patients with COPD. Walking intensity will be initially set at 80 percent of 6-minute Walking test Speed with progressive increase in Duration and intensity.

  • cycling endurance trainingOther

    n=15 patients with COPD. Cycling intensity will initially be set at 60 percent of Peak work rate with progressive increase in Duration and intensity

Study groups in NCT03120169
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
treadmill endurance trainingActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: treadmill endurance training
cycling endurance trainingActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: cycling endurance training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in step symmetry during 20m walking

    Patients walk 20m while wearing the Mc Roberts move test device (triaxial accelerometer) which performs a gait analysis

    Measured: measurement on day 1 and 21

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Change in balance performance during semi-tandem stance

    patients stand still for 10 seconds on a force platform that measures absolute path length of the center of force.

    Measured: measurement on day 1 and 21

  2. Change in balance performance during Romberg stance

    patients stand still for 10 seconds on a force platform that measures absolute path length of the center of force.

    Measured: measurement on day 1 and 21

  3. Change in balance performance during single leg stance

    patients stand still for 10 seconds on a force platform that measures absolute path length of the center of force.

    Measured: measurement on day 1 and 21

  4. Change in muscle power during counter movement jump

    patients jump on a force platform as high as possible. The Outcome is Watt per Kilogram Body weight

    Measured: measurement on day 1 and 21

  5. Change in 1 Minute sit to stand test

    Patients try to perform as many repetitions as possible of standing up and sitting down from a chair with crossed arms on a force platform during 1 minute

    Measured: measurement on day 1 and 21

  6. Change in 5 Repetition sit to stand test

    Patients try to perform 5 repetitions of standing up and sitting down from a chair with crossed arms on a force platform as quick as possible

    Measured: measurement on day 1 and 21

  7. Change in peak muscle strength

    isometric peak torque of the knee extensor muscles are measured in 90° knee angle

    Measured: measurement on day 1 and 21

  8. Change in 4 meter gait Speed test

    patients have to walk 4 meters at their usual Speed. Outcome is the average Speed during the 4m walk.

    Measured: measurement on day 1 and 21

  9. Change in 6-minute Walk test

    the best out of two 6- Minute Walk Tests will be used for analysis

    Measured: measurement on day 1 and 21

  10. Change in Hospital anxiety and Depression scale

    the Hospital anxiety and Depression scale is a questionnaire that evaluates signs of anxiety or depression

    Measured: measurement on day 1 and 21

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Apr 2017
  2. Study start30 Mar 2017
  3. Primary completion27 Nov 2017
  4. Study completion27 Nov 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03120169
Sponsor's protocol ID
treadmill vs. cycling in COPD
Status last verified
Feb 2018
First submitted
13 Apr 2017
Last updated
15 Feb 2018
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing treadmill endurance training and cycling endurance training in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener Land at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in step symmetry during 20m walking (time frame: measurement on day 1 and 21). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in