AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Coronary SyndromeNCT03118752

Pragmatic Collaborative Care for Cardiac Inpatients With Depression or Anxiety

A study testing Collaborative Care in people with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Heart Failure, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 3 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators will complete a pragmatic randomized trial (N=260 randomized participants) of the 26-week blended collaborative care (CC) intervention compared to enhanced usual care (eUC) in patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or heart failure (HF) found to have current depression, generalized… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Heart Failure, Depression
What is being tested?
Collaborative Care
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
290 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
16 Oct 2017to 8 Mar 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults with a primary medical provider in the Partners Healthcare System admitted to Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) or Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH).
  • Admission for acute coronary syndrome (myocardial infarction or unstable angina) or acute heart failure.
  • Clinical depression, GAD, or PD, identified using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for depression and the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD) anxiety modules.

Who cannot join

  • Medical conditions precluding interviews or likely to lead to death within 6 months (per clinical team).
  • Inability to participate in study procedures: cognitive deficits (via 6-item cognitive screen designed for research) or non-fluency in English.
  • Complex psychiatric conditions. The investigators will exclude patients with bipolar disorder, psychosis, or an active substance use disorder, as well as those with active suicidal ideation.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Brigham and Women's Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • Salem Hospital

    Salem, Massachusetts, 01970

Other trials in United States

About this study

The investigators will complete a pragmatic randomized trial (N=260 randomized participants) of the 26-week blended collaborative care (CC) intervention compared to enhanced usual care (eUC) in patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or heart failure (HF) found to have current depression, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), or panic disorder (PD). The CC intervention will use a novel three-pronged approach to these high-risk patients. Care managers will provide centralized care coordination and specific interventions targeting: (1) the psychiatric disorders, (2) cardiac health behaviors, and (3) the cardiac illness. The primary study outcome will be physical function at 26 weeks, measured by the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), given links between function and new cardiac events. The investigators will also examine effects on numerous other outcomes important to patients and healthcare systems.

Specific Aim 1 [patient-centered outcomes-primary aim]: To compare between-group differences in the CC and eUC conditions on improvements in physical function, health-related quality of life, mental health, patient satisfaction, and other key patient-reported outcomes at 26 and 52 weeks.

Read more

Specific Aim 2 [adherence and medical outcomes]: To compare between-group differences on health behaviors (physical activity, diet, smoking, medication adherence) and major adverse cardiac events.

Specific Aim 3 [cost]: To compare healthcare costs between groups and assess the cost-effectiveness of CC.

Hypotheses: The investigators expect this bolstered CC program to be associated with superior improvements in physical function, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, and adherence at 26 weeks, with promising effects on major adverse cardiac events. The investigators likewise expect the intervention to be cost-effective (<$10,000/quality-adjusted life year) over the study period.

Read the detailed description

Study Visits/Contacts/Interventions

Procedures for Participants in the Collaborative Care Intervention

In the hospital, participants randomized to CC will work with the care manager to: (a) define specific goals related to their psychiatric condition, health behaviors, and self-care, (b) initiate care for their psychiatric condition, and (c) make a plan for a health goal, using a structured tool based on prior work, with a specific and systematic focus on social, functional, financial, and other barriers to behavior change.

Following discharge, all contact will be via phone, with the same care manager completing phone sessions to enhance alliance and care continuity. Contacts will last typically 30-45 minutes using a structured but highly flexible approach designed to manage acute issues and cover some aspect of all three care targets based on patient needs/preferences, without requiring care managers to complete all possible interventions at each call. Care managers will prioritize topics to be addressed at each contact, responding first to urgent concerns (e.g., chest pain, suicidal ideation). Next, the care manager will touch on all three aspects of the intervention, with the depth of focus for each component based on prior sessions and current issues. He/she will review psychiatric symptoms and treatment. The care manager will gauge progress on health behavior goals, review motivation/barriers to goal completion, and make an action plan for the next week. Finally, he/she will compare cardiac medication lists to guidelines and review weight/blood pressure self-monitoring. Calls will occur weekly for the first 6 weeks, then may be spaced out in subsequent weeks based on the patient's psychiatric symptoms, progress toward health behavior goals, and cardiovascular status. Both the participant and care manager will agree upon the amount of time between calls after the first 6 weeks, though participants will be encouraged to contact the care manager sooner if needed.

  • 1 Targeting multiple psychiatric conditions. First, the care manager will assist in the assessment and management of depression, GAD, and/or PD using standardized scales. At weekly team meetings, care managers and supervising clinicians will review participants' scores to allow iterative recommendations for treatment, and supervision will be provided to care managers about psychotherapeutic content. A treat-to-target approach will be used for psychiatric disorders, with a goal of remission. Treatments for mood/anxiety disorders may include medications (with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs] typically recommended), psychotherapy (telephone-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy [CBT] sessions, supplemented by CBT workbooks), or relaxation response (RR) training.
  • 2 Targeting cardiac health behaviors. The investigators will systematically target health behaviors, primarily via motivational interviewing given its efficacy for a wide variety of behaviors in medical patients. The investigators will focus on four specific health behaviors (diet, exercise, smoking, and medication adherence). During admission, care managers and participants will identify one behavior to target and set a specific goal aligned with ACS/HF guidelines and the medical team's recommendations. Care managers will utilize motivational interviewing techniques to assist participants in considering, making, and maintaining change toward that goal. A focus on health behaviors will then continue throughout the 26 weeks.
  • 3 Targeting the cardiac condition. First, care managers will review the participant's medication regimen and compare it to published guidelines for ACS and HF. The care manager will discuss this with the study cardiologist and, if the regimen appears suboptimal, they will suggest to the patient's physician(s) possible adjustments. Second, care managers will encourage participants to check blood pressure and weight daily and will review data at study calls; if the readings deviate from targets (e.g., HF patient gaining weight), the care manager will review with the cardiologist and contact patients' medical providers as indicated. The investigators will provide (commercially-available) digital scales or automated blood pressure cuffs to participants (in either group) who need them.

Procedures for Participants in Enhanced Usual Care.

For participants randomized to eUC, baseline psychiatric and medical assessments will be transmitted to the patient's electronic health record. During the enrollment admission, the care manager will also inform the participant and treatment team about the specific symptoms on the study instruments and their clinical relevance (and will alert teams to the data transmitted to the electronic health record). eUC participants also will be free to receive any treatment for mental health or cardiac conditions throughout the study.

At follow-up study assessments for eUC (and CC) participants at 26 and 52 weeks, psychiatric symptom data will be transmitted to the electronic health record, and providers will be alerted if psychiatric symptoms persist. If acute safety concerns are identified at follow-ups or other contacts, the study team will also arrange as-needed urgent care). Finally, the investigators will provide eUC participants with blood pressure cuffs and/or scales if needed, to ensure that outcome improvements in CC are not simply due to their provision.

Study Endpoints.

Functional, HRQoL, psychological, and care process outcomes (Specific Aim 1) The investigators will assess the intervention's impact on multiple functional and psychological outcomes, including physical function (using the Duke Activity Status Index (primary study outcome), generic HRQoL (Medical Outcomes Study SF-12), disease-specific HRQoL (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, Seattle Angina Questionnaire), depression (SCL-20), anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - anxiety subscale), optimism (Life Orientation Test - Revised), and participant satisfaction.

Behavioral and medical outcomes (Specific Aim 2) The investigators will assess the intervention's impact on adherence to medications (using the self-report medication adherence tool from the NHLBI Heart and Soul study), diet (using the MEDFICTS (meats, eggs, dairy, fried foods, fat in baked goods, convenience foods, fats added at the table, and snacks) scale for saturated fat intake and the Scored Sodium Questionnaire for sodium intake), physical activity (using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire), and smoking (7-day point prevalence smoking assessment). The investigators also will monitor for major adverse cardiac events (defined as admission for an ACS, percutaneous intervention, or acute HF, or mortality).

Cost and related outcomes (Specific Aim 3) Finally, the investigators will monitor medical utilization using Partners Healthcare records ahd the Massachusetts All Payer Claims Database. For cost effectiveness, the investigators will use the EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D) health utilities scale, which allows direct assessment of cost per quality-adjusted life year.

Being tested
Collaborative Care
Medical subject headings
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Heart Failure, Depression, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Panic Disorder

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Collaborative CareBehavioural

    The CC intervention will use a novel three-pronged approach to these high-risk patients. Care managers will provide centralized care coordination and specific interventions targeting: (1) the psychiatric disorders, (2) cardiac health behaviors, and (3) the cardiac illness.

Study groups in NCT03118752
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Collaborative CareExperimentalParticipants randomized to collaborative care (CC) will receive a 26-week, telephone based CC intervention. Care managers will monitor participants' psychiatric symptoms, review current treatments for their psychiatric and cardiac illnesses, deliver psychotherapeutic interventions, provide education about self-monitoring for cardiac symptoms, perform motivational interviewing to encourage health behavior adherence, and coordinate care between psychiatric/cardiac specialists and participants' primary care physicians. CC will utilize a treat-to-target approach, with a goal of remission of psychiatric and cardiac symptoms.
Receives: Behavioral: Collaborative Care
Enhanced Usual CareNo interventionParticipants in the enhanced usual care (eUC) arm will not receive any specific intervention, though they will be free to receive any treatment for psychiatric or cardiac illness. Participants' outpatient providers will be informed of their psychiatric diagnosis, which may lead to higher-than-usual treatment for psychiatric illness.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in physical function

    Physical function will be assessed with the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI).

    Measured: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Change in generic health-related quality of life

    Generic HRQoL will be assessed via the Medical Outcomes Study SF-12 (SF-12).

    Measured: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks

  2. Change in disease-specific health-related quality of life

    Disease-specific HRQoL, measured via the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ; for participants with heart failure) or the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ; for participants who experienced an acute coronary syndrome).

    Measured: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks

  3. Change in mental health (depression)

    Depression will be measured by the 20-item Symptom Checklist Depression Scale (SCL-20).

    Measured: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks

  4. Change in mental health (anxiety)

    Anxiety will be measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Anxiety Subscale (HADS-A).

    Measured: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks

  5. Change in optimism

    Optimism will be assessed via the well-validated Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R)

    Measured: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks

  6. Change in patient satisfaction

    Participant satisfaction with mental health care and cardiac care will both be measured using 10-point Likert scales.

    Measured: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks

  7. Change in physical activity adherence

    Physical activity adherence will be measured by a 7-day physical activity recall assessment for physical activity using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).

    Measured: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks

  8. Change in dietary adherence (saturated fat)

    Dietary adherence will be measured by assessing saturated fat using the MEDFICTS scale calibrated to American Heart Association guidelines.

    Measured: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks

  9. Change in dietary adherence (sodium intake)

    Dietary adherence will be assessed by sodium intake measured using the Scored Sodium Questionnaire (SSQ).

    Measured: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks

  10. Change in smoking

    Change in smoking will be measured by a 7-day point prevalence smoking assessment.

    Measured: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks

  11. Change in cardiac medication adherence

    Cardiac medication adherence will be assessed using the self-report medication adherence tool from the NHLBI Heart and Soul study.

    Measured: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks

  12. Major adverse cardiac events

    Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) will be defined as admission for an acute coronary event (ACS or new percutaneous intervention) or acute HF, or mortality.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  13. Healthcare costs

    Direct program costs will be measured by a compiled value from the following parts: (1) patient assessment (including Electronic Health Record [EHR] alerts/PROM); (2) care manager and other team member time (including training); (3) medications for psychiatric and cardiac conditions; (4) care registry development/maintenance; and (5) mental health specialty referrals. Patient costs include both direct costs (e.g., copayments) and indirect costs (patient time, valued via Bureau of Labor Statistics).

    Measured: 52 weeks

  14. Cost-effectiveness

    Cost effectiveness will be measured using the EQ-5D health utilities scale, which allows direct assessment of cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY).

    Measured: 52 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Apr 2017
  2. Study start16 Oct 2017
  3. Primary completion8 Mar 2024
  4. Study completion8 Mar 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This study will be a randomized, controlled, 2-arm, single blinded trial.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
290 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03118752
Sponsor's protocol ID
2016P002870
Other IDs
1R01HL133149-01A1
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
6 Apr 2017
Last updated
13 May 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The investigators will download final research data, from which the investigators will generate deidentified datasets that are free of patient names, medical record numbers, addresses, or other personal identifiers. The investigators will also review the data to ensure that there is not additional information by which patients could be deductively identified. Data will be provided in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet or in a file compatible with specific commonly used statistical packages (Stata, SPSS, and SAS). It will be deposited in the publicly available Dataverse repository used within the Harvard system.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Collaborative Care in people with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Heart Failure, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in physical function (time frame: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 May 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in