Forearm FractureNCT03097757
Trial of Ultrasound Guidance for Reduction of Pediatric Forearm Fractures
A study testing Ultrasound - guided fracture reduction in people with Forearm Fracture and Ultrasound, run by Montefiore Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to assess the utility of ultrasound guidance in the closed reduction of pediatric forearm fractures in the pediatric emergency department. The investigators will compare post-reduction radiologic outcomes between the experimental group (ultrasound guided closed forearm fracture… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 21 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Forearm Fracture, Ultrasound
- What is being tested?
- Ultrasound - guided fracture reduction
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 4 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 24 Jan 2017to 31 Jul 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 21 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients who present to the Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) with a confirmed displaced forearm fracture that will require reduction by orthopedic surgery in the PED will be eligible for inclusion in this study.
Who cannot join
- Patients with open fractures.
- Patients with neurovascular compromise.
- Unstable patients with life-threatening injuries who require ongoing resuscitation.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10467
About this study
Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound Guidance for Reduction of Pediatric Forearm Fractures
The primary objective of this study is to assess the utility of ultrasound guidance in the closed reduction of pediatric forearm fractures in the pediatric emergency department. The investigators will compare post-reduction radiologic outcomes between the experimental group (ultrasound guided closed forearm fracture reduction) and control group (standard of care blinded closed forearm fracture reduction) to determine if there is a difference in the number of adequate reductions between groups.
Secondary objectives include comparing provider satisfaction with the reduction procedure, number of patients requiring repeat reductions, time for reduction, number of patients requiring operative repair after reduction, with the reduction procedure and comparison between post-reduction ultrasound and x-ray interpretation.
Read the detailed description
This will be a prospective randomized, controlled, single blinded study that will take place at the Children's Hospital at Montefiore (CHAM) in the Pediatric Emergency Department (PED). Patients who present to the PED, are confirmed to have a forearm fracture requiring closed reduction in the PED and meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be eligible for the study. The decision to perform a closed reduction procedure in the PED will be made by the consulting orthopedic surgeon who will perform the procedure. All eligible patients' pain will be reassessed and managed as necessary as per standard of care The eligible patient or parent/guardian will be approached by the treating physician or consulting orthopedic resident for written consent. Written assent will be obtained from minors older than 7 years of age. After enrollment into the study, patients will be randomized to either the experimental group (ultrasound guided fracture reduction) or control group (standard of care forearm fracture reduction without real-time imaging). Allocation of patients to intervention and control arms will be accomplished by a computer-generated permuted block randomization scheme.
Consulting orthopedic residents will be trained to perform musculoskeletal sonography for this study and will be considered study-trained physicians. All patients will undergo procedural sedation and/or pain management for closed reduction as per standard of care in the PED. The medication used for sedation and/or pain will be determined by the treating Pediatric Emergency Medicine (PEM) physician. Study patients that are randomized to the ultrasound guided group will undergo a point-of-care ultrasound, performed by a study trained physician using a Sonosite Edge ultrasound machine with an L38 linear 10-5 Megahertz (MHz) transducer probe.
Prior to the reduction procedure in patients randomized to the experimental group, ultrasound images of the fracture site will be obtained and the maximum degree of displacement will be measured. Both longitudinal and transverse views of the injured area will be obtained. The trained physician will then perform real-time ultrasound imaging as needed during the closed reduction procedure. Once the orthopedic resident obtains optimal alignment, and prior to casting, a post-reduction ultrasound image will be obtained and the angle of displacement will again be measured. All ultrasounds performed prior to and after the reduction will be recorded, and the images obtained will include video clips of the ultrasound as well as a saved still picture of the best image of the suspected fracture site. The study-trained physician who performed the ultrasound will then record his/her findings on the data collection form immediately after the procedure and prior to reviewing plain radiographs.
In general, the majority of reduction procedures performed in the PED are done without the use of any real time imaging, some orthopedic surgery residents employ the use of the c-arm (fluoroscopy) and/or a portable x-ray machine during the reduction procedure. At his/her discretion, the orthopedic resident may use either of these modalities in both the ultrasound and control group as per standard of care in the PED. The use of these modalities will be recorded.
After the reduction procedure in the ultrasound group and prior to reviewing the post reduction x-ray, the orthopedic resident will complete a brief questionnaire. Patients in both groups will then undergo a post-reduction x-ray. Based on the degree of displacement on the x-ray, the orthopedic surgeon will determine whether the patient needs a repeat reduction, as per routine standard of care. If a repeat reduction is required, the treating physician can choose to use ultrasound at his/her discretion. The angle of displacement will be measured on the post-reduction x-ray by an orthopedic surgeon. Additionally, the angle of displacement measured on the post-reduction ultrasound will be measured and compared to the angle of displacement on the post-reduction x-ray. An expert sonographer will review cases where the ultrasound and x-ray results do not correlate.
- Conditions
- Forearm Fracture, Ultrasound
- Being tested
- Ultrasound - guided fracture reduction, Standard of care fracture reduction
- Keywords
- Ultrasound, Forearm Fracture Reduction, Pediatric Emergency Department
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ultrasound - guided fracture reductionRadiation
Ultrasound will be used as a real-time imaging modality to guide forearm fracture reduction.
Standard of care fracture reductionProcedure or surgery
Closed reduction of a fractured bone.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Fracture reduction without ultrasound | Active comparator | Fracture reduction as per standard of care involves closed fracture reduction without real-time imaging, or with c-arm or portable x-ray. Closed reduction of a fractured bone. Closed reduction is a procedure to set (reduce) a broken bone without surgery. This allows the bone to grow back together. It works best when it is done as soon as possible after the bone breaks. Receives: Procedure: Standard of care fracture reduction |
| Fracture reduction with ultrasound | Experimental | Ultrasound guided Fracture reduction involves closed fracture reduction with the use of real-time ultrasound imaging, prior to, during and after the reduction procedure. C-arm or portable x-ray may also be used as an adjunct. Receives: Radiation: Ultrasound - guided fracture reduction; Procedure: Standard of care fracture reduction |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Comparing Rate of Reduction Between the Experimental and Control Arm/Group
To compare the number of patients requiring repeat reduction procedure between the experimental group (ultrasound guided fracture reduction) and control group (standard of care forearm fracture reduction).
Measured: From initiation of bone setting procedure, an average of 10-20 minutes
Secondary outcomes (6)
Compare Provider Satisfaction With the Reduction Procedure Between the Experimental and Control Arm/Group
Based on a questionnaire asking:
For the experimental Arm/Group (fracture reduction with ultrasound):
- Ease of fracture reduction on 5-point scale (ranging from 1 = easy to 5 = very difficult)
- Ease of using ultrasonography on 5-point scale (ranging from 1=easy to 5 = very difficult)
- Was ultrasound helpful in completing fracture reduction? Assessed on a trinary option of a) yes, b) no, c) uncertain
For the Control Arm/Group (fracture reduction without ultrasound):
- Ease of fracture reduction on 5-point scale (ranging from 1 = easy to 5 = very difficult)
- Do you think real-time imaging would have been helpful for this reduction? Assessed based on a trinary option of a) yes, b) no, c) uncertain
Measured: After completing the bone setting procedure and validation via ultrasound, an average of 2 minutes
Adequacy of Reduction Based on a Composite Assessment of Degree of Angulation and Displacement
To compare the adequacy of reduction between the experimental and control Arm/Group by a composite assessment of the degree of angulation and displacement on post reduction x-rays. The acceptable degree of angulation will be the same in both Arms/Groups. The acceptable degree of angulation based on age is less than 20 degrees' angulation for patients younger than 10 years of age and less than 10 degrees' angulation for patients older than 10 years of age.
To compare the adequacy of reduction between the experimental and control Arm/Group by measuring and comparing the degree of displacement on the post reduction x-rays.
Measured: From initiation of bone setting procedure, an average of 10-20 minutes
Duration of Reduction
To compare the time for the fracture reduction procedure between the experimental and control Arm/Group.
Measured: From initiation of bone setting procedure, an average of 10-20 minutes
Operative Repair
To compare the number of patients requiring operative repair after reduction between the experimental and control Arm/Group.
Measured: From initiation of bone setting procedure, an average of 10-20 minutes
Post-Reduction Ultrasound Comparison
To compare the post-reduction ultrasound, including measurement of degree of angulation and displacement, for each patient.
Measured: From initiation of bone setting procedure, an average of 10-20 minutes
Post-Reduction X-ray Interpretation
To compare the post-reduction x-ray interpretation, including measurement of degree of angulation and displacement on the x-raym for each patient.
Measured: From initiation of bone setting procedure, an average of 10-20 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Mar 2017
- Study start24 Jan 2017
- Primary completion31 Jul 2017
- Study completion31 Jul 2017
Why it stopped: Unable to recruit patients for this study due to time constraints and personnel limitations.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Forearm FractureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Montefiore Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Prospective randomized, controlled, single blinded study
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 4 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Montefiore Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Joni Rabiner, MD, Principal investigator, Columbia University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03097757
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2016-6637
- Status last verified
- Dec 2022
- First submitted
- 25 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 9 Jan 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jan 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound Guidance for Reduction of Pediatric Forearm Fractures
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03097757
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2016-6637
- Conditions
- Forearm Fracture, Ultrasound
- Keywords
- Ultrasound, Forearm Fracture Reduction, Pediatric Emergency Department
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Unable to recruit patients for this study due to time constraints and personnel limitations.
- Enrolment
- 4 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Montefiore Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 24 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 9 Jan 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the utility of ultrasound guidance in the closed reduction of pediatric forearm fractures in the pediatric emergency department. The investigators will compare post-reduction radiologic outcomes between the experimental group (ultrasound guided closed forearm fracture reduction) and control group (standard of care blinded closed forearm fracture reduction) to determine if there is a difference in the number of adequate reductions between groups.
Secondary objectives include comparing provider satisfaction with the reduction procedure, number of patients requiring repeat reductions, time for reduction, number of patients requiring operative repair after reduction, with the reduction procedure and comparison between post-reduction ultrasound and x-ray interpretation.
Detailed description
This will be a prospective randomized, controlled, single blinded study that will take place at the Children's Hospital at Montefiore (CHAM) in the Pediatric Emergency Department (PED). Patients who present to the PED, are confirmed to have a forearm fracture requiring closed reduction in the PED and meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be eligible for the study. The decision to perform a closed reduction procedure in the PED will be made by the consulting orthopedic surgeon who will perform the procedure. All eligible patients' pain will be reassessed and managed as necessary as per standard of care The eligible patient or parent/guardian will be approached by the treating physician or consulting orthopedic resident for written consent. Written assent will be obtained from minors older than 7 years of age. After enrollment into the study, patients will be randomized to either the experimental group (ultrasound guided fracture reduction) or control group (standard of care forearm fracture reduction without real-time imaging). Allocation of patients to intervention and control arms will be accomplished by a computer-generated permuted block randomization scheme.
Consulting orthopedic residents will be trained to perform musculoskeletal sonography for this study and will be considered study-trained physicians. All patients will undergo procedural sedation and/or pain management for closed reduction as per standard of care in the PED. The medication used for sedation and/or pain will be determined by the treating Pediatric Emergency Medicine (PEM) physician. Study patients that are randomized to the ultrasound guided group will undergo a point-of-care ultrasound, performed by a study trained physician using a Sonosite Edge ultrasound machine with an L38 linear 10-5 Megahertz (MHz) transducer probe.
Prior to the reduction procedure in patients randomized to the experimental group, ultrasound images of the fracture site will be obtained and the maximum degree of displacement will be measured. Both longitudinal and transverse views of the injured area will be obtained. The trained physician will then perform real-time ultrasound imaging as needed during the closed reduction procedure. Once the orthopedic resident obtains optimal alignment, and prior to casting, a post-reduction ultrasound image will be obtained and the angle of displacement will again be measured. All ultrasounds performed prior to and after the reduction will be recorded, and the images obtained will include video clips of the ultrasound as well as a saved still picture of the best image of the suspected fracture site. The study-trained physician who performed the ultrasound will then record his/her findings on the data collection form immediately after the procedure and prior to reviewing plain radiographs.
In general, the majority of reduction procedures performed in the PED are done without the use of any real time imaging, some orthopedic surgery residents employ the use of the c-arm (fluoroscopy) and/or a portable x-ray machine during the reduction procedure. At his/her discretion, the orthopedic resident may use either of these modalities in both the ultrasound and control group as per standard of care in the PED. The use of these modalities will be recorded.
After the reduction procedure in the ultrasound group and prior to reviewing the post reduction x-ray, the orthopedic resident will complete a brief questionnaire. Patients in both groups will then undergo a post-reduction x-ray. Based on the degree of displacement on the x-ray, the orthopedic surgeon will determine whether the patient needs a repeat reduction, as per routine standard of care. If a repeat reduction is required, the treating physician can choose to use ultrasound at his/her discretion. The angle of displacement will be measured on the post-reduction x-ray by an orthopedic surgeon. Additionally, the angle of displacement measured on the post-reduction ultrasound will be measured and compared to the angle of displacement on the post-reduction x-ray. An expert sonographer will review cases where the ultrasound and x-ray results do not correlate.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Prospective randomized, controlled, single blinded study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Fracture reduction without ultrasound | Active comparator | Procedure: Standard of care fracture reductionFracture reduction as per standard of care involves closed fracture reduction without real-time imaging, or with c-arm or portable x-ray. Closed reduction of a fractured bone. Closed reduction is a procedure to set (reduce) a broken bone without surgery. This allows the bone to grow back together. It works best when it is done as soon as possible after the bone breaks. |
| Fracture reduction with ultrasound | Experimental | Radiation: Ultrasound - guided fracture reduction, Procedure: Standard of care fracture reductionUltrasound guided Fracture reduction involves closed fracture reduction with the use of real-time ultrasound imaging, prior to, during and after the reduction procedure. C-arm or portable x-ray may also be used as an adjunct. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 21 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who present to the Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) with a confirmed displaced forearm fracture that will require reduction by orthopedic surgery in the PED will be eligible for inclusion in this study.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with open fractures.
- Patients with neurovascular compromise.
- Unstable patients with life-threatening injuries who require ongoing resuscitation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound - guided fracture reductionUltrasound will be used as a real-time imaging modality to guide forearm fracture reduction. | Radiation | Fracture reduction with ultrasound |
| Standard of care fracture reductionClosed reduction of a fractured bone. | Procedure or surgery | Fracture reduction with ultrasound, Fracture reduction without ultrasound |
Primary outcome
Comparing Rate of Reduction Between the Experimental and Control Arm/Group
Time frame: From initiation of bone setting procedure, an average of 10-20 minutes
To compare the number of patients requiring repeat reduction procedure between the experimental group (ultrasound guided fracture reduction) and control group (standard of care forearm fracture reduction).
6 secondary outcomes
Compare Provider Satisfaction With the Reduction Procedure Between the Experimental and Control Arm/Group
Time frame: After completing the bone setting procedure and validation via ultrasound, an average of 2 minutes
Adequacy of Reduction Based on a Composite Assessment of Degree of Angulation and Displacement
Time frame: From initiation of bone setting procedure, an average of 10-20 minutes
Duration of Reduction
Time frame: From initiation of bone setting procedure, an average of 10-20 minutes
Operative Repair
Time frame: From initiation of bone setting procedure, an average of 10-20 minutes
Post-Reduction Ultrasound Comparison
Time frame: From initiation of bone setting procedure, an average of 10-20 minutes
Post-Reduction X-ray Interpretation
Time frame: From initiation of bone setting procedure, an average of 10-20 minutes
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jan 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Forearm Fracture
Active, not recruiting
Treatment of Olecranon Fractures in the Elderly
Olecranon Fracture
Recruiting
This is a Study to Find Out Whether Surgery Using a Metal Plate to Fix a Broken Elbow in Older Adults Leads to Better Recovery and Arm Function Compared to Non-surgical Treatment
Olecranon Fracture
Recruiting
The With Or Without Olecranon K-wires Trial
Olecranon Fracture
RecruitingObservational study
Radiological Criteria for Instability in Distal Radius Fractures
Distal Radius Fractures
Recruiting
Evaluation of Diaphragmatic Function After Interscalene Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine
Diaphragmatic Function, Metacarpal Fracture
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Joni Rabiner, MD principal investigator
Columbia University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ultrasound - guided fracture reduction in people with Forearm Fracture and Ultrasound, run by Montefiore Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Jan 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Comparing Rate of Reduction Between the Experimental and Control Arm/Group (time frame: From initiation of bone setting procedure, an average of 10-20 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2023.