Adnexal DiseasesNCT03093675
Robotic Assisted Surgery for Treatment of Gynecological Diseases: Pilot Study
A study testing TELELAP ALF-X Robotic Surgical System in people with Adnexal Diseases and Uterine Diseases, run by SOFAR S.p.A. at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
This is a prospective, single-center clinical trial. One hundred and fifty patients affected by adnexal and uterine diseases will be recruited to undergo treatment with robotic assisted laparoscopic procedures using the innovative TELELAP ALF-X Endoscopic Robotic Surgical System with the primary objective of assessing… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Adnexal Diseases, Uterine Diseases
- What is being tested?
- TELELAP ALF-X Robotic Surgical System
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 23 Oct 2013to 9 Dec 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Patient Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years old
- Sign the informed consent form
- BMI ≤ 40
- A.S.A. Class < III or IV
Disease Inclusion Criteria:
- Ovarian cyst (enucleation/oophorectomy)
- Prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy
- Ectopic pregnancy (salpingotomy/salpingectomy)
- Tubal inflammatory disease (salpingotomy/salpingectomy)
- Infertility and sterility (treatment of endometriosis, chromo-salpingography, etc.)
- Benign uterine disease (Fibromatosis, Adenomyosis)
- Endometrial hyperplasia
- Stage Ia G1-2 Endometrial tumors
- Precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix
- Stage Ia uterine cervical tumors
- Pelvic endometriosis
Patient Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy
- Liver disease
- Coagulation disorders
- Patient internal or anatomical criteria that preclude a laparoscopic approach
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site
Department for the Protection of Health of Women, Newborns, Children and Adolescents A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Rome, 00168
About this study
This is a prospective, single-center clinical trial. One hundred and fifty patients affected by adnexal and uterine diseases will be recruited to undergo treatment with robotic assisted laparoscopic procedures using the innovative TELELAP ALF-X Endoscopic Robotic Surgical System with the primary objective of assessing the feasibility, efficacy and safety of this approach.
Read the detailed description
The study proposed comprises a prospective, single-center clinical trial (Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome, A. Gemelli University Polyclinic).
One hundred and fifty patients affected by adnexal and uterine diseases will be recruited to undergo treatment with robotic assisted laparoscopic procedures using the innovative TELELAP ALF-X Endoscopic Robotic Surgical System with the primary objective of assessing the feasibility, efficacy and safety of this approach.
Post-operative pain will be reported by the patients through a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). It will be assessed at 2, 4 and 12 and 24 hours after the procedure.
At the end of patient recruitment, surgical procedure times, the technical limits encountered, estimated blood loss, intra- and post-operative complications and the percentage of conversions from the standard laparoscopic approach to multiple access and/or to a laparotomic approach will be analyzed in order to arrive at the feasibility and efficacy of robotic assisted treatment.
- Conditions
- Adnexal Diseases, Uterine Diseases
- Being tested
- TELELAP ALF-X Robotic Surgical System
- Medical subject headings
- Adnexal Diseases, Uterine Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TELELAP ALF-X Robotic Surgical SystemDevice
The surgical procedures will be performed using the innovative TELELAP ALF-X robotic system, equipped with multiple independent arms. Initial entry will be through a classic open in which the arm with the video camera will be inserted. The device has four independent arms (one for the video camera and three for surgical instruments). Patients will be in the lithotomy position, supported by Allen stirrups and under general anesthesia. The uterus will be manipulated with a multi-use uterine manipulator. After having induced a pneumoperitoneum, high-definition 3D-technology optics will be inserted. Three laparoscopic instruments will be used to complete the procedure. Standard techniques will be used.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TELELAP ALF-X Robotic Surgical System | Experimental | The patients will undergo surgical procedures using the innovative TELELAP ALF-X robotic system. Receives: Device: TELELAP ALF-X Robotic Surgical System |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility and complications of robotic assisted surgery in the treatment of gynecological diseases
The rate of complications and conversions to laparoscopic/laparotomic surgery will be collected and calculated. As this is a pilot study, no pre-determined success criteria has been set. The number of complications observed during robotic assisted surgery in the treatment of gynecological diseases will be registered.
Measured: Pre-operative to 30 days follow-up
Secondary outcomes (4)
Robotic assisted surgery learning curve assessed through the reduction of procedure times
Assessment of the Robotic assisted surgery learning curve through an assessment of procedure times
Measured: Through study completion, on average 1 year
Procedure times
The duration of each procedure will be registered. Mean duration will be estimated
Measured: Day of surgical intervention
Intra- and post-operative complications
The number of intra- and post-operative complications complications will be registered and described
Measured: Day of surgical intervention, 24h post-surgery and after 30-day follow-up
Post-operative pain
Post-operative pain will be reported by the patients through a 10-points VAS scale (1-10)
Measured: End of surgery to 24 hours post-op
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Mar 2017
- Study start23 Oct 2013
- Primary completion9 Dec 2014
- Study completion9 Dec 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Adnexal DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- SOFAR S.p.A.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Giovanni Scambia, Professor, Principal investigator, Department for the Protection of Health of Women, Newborns, Children and Adolescents A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03093675
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TELELAP-ALF-X
- Status last verified
- Mar 2017
- First submitted
- 16 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 28 Mar 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Schreuder HW, Verheijen RH. Robotic surgery. BJOG. 2009 Jan;116(2):198-213. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02038.x.
PubMed 19076952Murphy DG, Hall R, Tong R, Goel R, Costello AJ. Robotic technology in surgery: current status in 2008. ANZ J Surg. 2008 Dec;78(12):1076-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04754.x.
PubMed 19087046Heemskerk J, van Gemert WG, de Vries J, Greve J, Bouvy ND. Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007 Jun;17(3):171-4. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31805b8346.
PubMed 17581459Nezhat C, Saberi NS, Shahmohamady B, Nezhat F. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgery. JSLS. 2006 Jul-Sep;10(3):317-20.
PubMed 17212887Advincula AP, Song A. The role of robotic surgery in gynecology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;19(4):331-6. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328216f90b.
PubMed 17625414Marchal F, Rauch P, Verhaeghe JL, Guillemin F. [Laparoscopic surgery and robot]. Bull Cancer. 2007 Dec;94(12):1075-80. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2007.0524. French.
PubMed 18156116De Ugarte DA, Etzioni DA, Gracia C, Atkinson JB. Robotic surgery and resident training. Surg Endosc. 2003 Jun;17(6):960-3. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8745-6. Epub 2003 Mar 28.
PubMed 12658424Weinberg L, Rao S, Escobar PF. Robotic surgery in gynecology: an updated systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2011;2011:852061. doi: 10.1155/2011/852061. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
PubMed 22190948Ercoli A, D'asta M, Fagotti A, Fanfani F, Romano F, Baldazzi G, Salerno MG, Scambia G. Robotic treatment of colorectal endometriosis: technique, feasibility and short-term results. Hum Reprod. 2012 Mar;27(3):722-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der444. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
PubMed 22238113Carvalho L, Abrao MS, Deshpande A, Falcone T. Robotics as a new surgical minimally invasive approach to treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review. Int J Med Robot. 2012 Jun;8(2):160-5. doi: 10.1002/rcs.451. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
PubMed 22162096Yim GW, Kim YT. Robotic surgery in gynecologic cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;24(1):14-23. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32834daebc.
PubMed 22123220Fagotti A, Gagliardi ML, Fanfani F, Salerno MG, Ercoli A, D'Asta M, Tortorella L, Turco LC, Escobar P, Scambia G. Perioperative outcomes of total laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy versus total robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients: a multicentre study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jun;125(3):552-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.02.035. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
PubMed 22391483
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Mar 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Robotic Assisted Surgery for Treatment of Gynecological Diseases: Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03093675
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TELELAP-ALF-X
- Conditions
- Adnexal Diseases, Uterine Diseases
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SOFAR S.p.A.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 23 Oct 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 Dec 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 Dec 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective, single-center clinical trial. One hundred and fifty patients affected by adnexal and uterine diseases will be recruited to undergo treatment with robotic assisted laparoscopic procedures using the innovative TELELAP ALF-X Endoscopic Robotic Surgical System with the primary objective of assessing the feasibility, efficacy and safety of this approach.
Detailed description
The study proposed comprises a prospective, single-center clinical trial (Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome, A. Gemelli University Polyclinic).
One hundred and fifty patients affected by adnexal and uterine diseases will be recruited to undergo treatment with robotic assisted laparoscopic procedures using the innovative TELELAP ALF-X Endoscopic Robotic Surgical System with the primary objective of assessing the feasibility, efficacy and safety of this approach.
Post-operative pain will be reported by the patients through a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). It will be assessed at 2, 4 and 12 and 24 hours after the procedure.
At the end of patient recruitment, surgical procedure times, the technical limits encountered, estimated blood loss, intra- and post-operative complications and the percentage of conversions from the standard laparoscopic approach to multiple access and/or to a laparotomic approach will be analyzed in order to arrive at the feasibility and efficacy of robotic assisted treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TELELAP ALF-X Robotic Surgical System | Experimental | Device: TELELAP ALF-X Robotic Surgical SystemThe patients will undergo surgical procedures using the innovative TELELAP ALF-X robotic system. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TELELAP ALF-X Robotic Surgical SystemThe surgical procedures will be performed using the innovative TELELAP ALF-X robotic system, equipped with multiple independent arms. Initial entry will be through a classic open in which the arm with the video camera will be inserted. The device has four independent arms (one for the video camera and three for surgical instruments). Patients will be in the lithotomy position, supported by Allen stirrups and under general anesthesia. The uterus will be manipulated with a multi-use uterine manipulator. After having induced a pneumoperitoneum, high-definition 3D-technology optics will be inserted. Three laparoscopic instruments will be used to complete the procedure. Standard techniques will be used. | Device | TELELAP ALF-X Robotic Surgical System |
Primary outcome
Feasibility and complications of robotic assisted surgery in the treatment of gynecological diseases
Time frame: Pre-operative to 30 days follow-up
The rate of complications and conversions to laparoscopic/laparotomic surgery will be collected and calculated. As this is a pilot study, no pre-determined success criteria has been set. The number of complications observed during robotic assisted surgery in the treatment of gynecological diseases will be registered.
4 secondary outcomes
Robotic assisted surgery learning curve assessed through the reduction of procedure times
Time frame: Through study completion, on average 1 year
Procedure times
Time frame: Day of surgical intervention
Intra- and post-operative complications
Time frame: Day of surgical intervention, 24h post-surgery and after 30-day follow-up
Post-operative pain
Time frame: End of surgery to 24 hours post-op
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Mar 2017.
- Background: PubMed 19076952Schreuder HW, Verheijen RH. Robotic surgery. BJOG. 2009 Jan;116(2):198-213. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02038.x.
- Background: PubMed 19087046Murphy DG, Hall R, Tong R, Goel R, Costello AJ. Robotic technology in surgery: current status in 2008. ANZ J Surg. 2008 Dec;78(12):1076-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04754.x.
- Background: PubMed 17581459Heemskerk J, van Gemert WG, de Vries J, Greve J, Bouvy ND. Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007 Jun;17(3):171-4. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31805b8346.
- Background: PubMed 17212887Nezhat C, Saberi NS, Shahmohamady B, Nezhat F. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgery. JSLS. 2006 Jul-Sep;10(3):317-20.
- Background: PubMed 17625414Advincula AP, Song A. The role of robotic surgery in gynecology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;19(4):331-6. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328216f90b.
- Background: PubMed 18156116Marchal F, Rauch P, Verhaeghe JL, Guillemin F. [Laparoscopic surgery and robot]. Bull Cancer. 2007 Dec;94(12):1075-80. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2007.0524. French.
- Background: PubMed 12658424De Ugarte DA, Etzioni DA, Gracia C, Atkinson JB. Robotic surgery and resident training. Surg Endosc. 2003 Jun;17(6):960-3. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8745-6. Epub 2003 Mar 28.
- Background: PubMed 22190948Weinberg L, Rao S, Escobar PF. Robotic surgery in gynecology: an updated systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2011;2011:852061. doi: 10.1155/2011/852061. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
- Background: PubMed 22238113Ercoli A, D'asta M, Fagotti A, Fanfani F, Romano F, Baldazzi G, Salerno MG, Scambia G. Robotic treatment of colorectal endometriosis: technique, feasibility and short-term results. Hum Reprod. 2012 Mar;27(3):722-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der444. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
- Background: PubMed 22162096Carvalho L, Abrao MS, Deshpande A, Falcone T. Robotics as a new surgical minimally invasive approach to treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review. Int J Med Robot. 2012 Jun;8(2):160-5. doi: 10.1002/rcs.451. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
- Background: PubMed 22123220Yim GW, Kim YT. Robotic surgery in gynecologic cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;24(1):14-23. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32834daebc.
- Background: PubMed 22391483Fagotti A, Gagliardi ML, Fanfani F, Salerno MG, Ercoli A, D'Asta M, Tortorella L, Turco LC, Escobar P, Scambia G. Perioperative outcomes of total laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy versus total robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients: a multicentre study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jun;125(3):552-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.02.035. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Adnexal Diseases
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Recruiting
A Study to Compare Two Surgical Procedures in Individuals With BRCA1 Mutations to Assess Reduced Risk of Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Investigation of Ubamatamab Combination Therapy in Adult Participants With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Torvutatug Samrotecan Plus Bevacizumab as First-line Maintenance in Non-Homologous Recombination Deficiency (Non-HRD) Positive Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Giovanni Scambia, Professor principal investigator
Department for the Protection of Health of Women, Newborns, Children and Adolescents A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing TELELAP ALF-X Robotic Surgical System in people with Adnexal Diseases and Uterine Diseases, run by SOFAR S.p.A. at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility and complications of robotic assisted surgery in the treatment of gynecological diseases (time frame: Pre-operative to 30 days follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03093675, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Mar 2017.