AzTrials
AzTrials

HivAQNCT03090958

AllyQuest: Engaging HIV+ YMSM in Care Through Social Networking and Gamification

A study testing AllyQuest in people with Hiv and HIV/AIDS, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

AllyQuest is a novel, high impact secondary prevention intervention delivered via mobile phones to improve linkage and engagement in care among newly diagnosed HIV+ young men who have sex with men (YMSM). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 24 years, men only
Conditions the study is for
Hiv, HIV/AIDS
What is being tested?
AllyQuest
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Aug 2015to 3 Jan 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 24 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • HIV positive
  • Diagnosed in the last 12 months
  • Assigned male at birth and self identify as male
  • Have had sex with another man in the last twelve months
  • Own a smart phone
  • Between the ages of 16-24

Who cannot join

  • Assigned female at birth
  • Non-English speaker
  • HIV negative

About this study

AllyQuest is a novel, high impact secondary prevention intervention delivered via mobile phones to improve linkage and engagement in care among newly diagnosed HIV+ young men who have sex with men (YMSM). The features of the intervention aim to target previously identified barriers to care among newly diagnosed youth, namely, low HIV health literacy, lack of social support, and internalized stigma related to their diagnosis. AllyQuest will be an interactive mobile phone intervention for HIV+ YMSM that utilizes social networking, game-based mechanics and a story-based framework to guide behavior change. Grounded in Social Cognitive Theory, narrative communication and the principles of persuasive technology, the intervention is designed to capitalize on social involvement as a means through which HIV+ YMSM can receive information and social support, experience social norms and reflective appraisals, and feel a sense of connectedness to peers.

Read the detailed description

Specific Aim 1 Design and develop AllyQuest a novel theory-based mobile health (mHealth) intervention for newly diagnosed HIV+ YMSM. Using an iterative research design the investigators will work with our YABs and Ayogo, a global leader in the application of game psychology and health behavior change, to develop and tailor the intervention content for maximal relevance and usability for newly diagnosed HIV+ YMSM. The investigators will use content within existing evidence based interventions(EBIs) developed for persons living with HIV, including MSM and youth to develop the informational content to be delivered in AllyQuest. Activities from the EBIs will be translated into the daily activities that participants within AllyQuest receive. To maximize intervention appeal and appropriateness for our target population, the investigators will convene two youth advisory boards (YABs) to provide insight and feedback during the intervention development process. The investigators will recruit 4-5 HIV+ YMSM from each site (Chicago and North Carolina) to serve as YAB members over the first year of the study. The investigators will ensure that YAB members are representative of the target population in terms of age, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation/identity, and length of time since diagnosis. At monthly in-person meetings, our two Youth Advisory Boards (YAB) - each consisting of 4 to 5 HIV+ MSM-will evaluate intervention content as it is developed (including imagery and messaging) for acceptability and relevance. Specifically, the investigators will ask YAB members to react to the written tailored content in terms of the content's readability, comprehension, and relevance. The investigators will also elicit the YABs' views on the following areas of intervention design: (a) intervention structure and format [e.g., organization of the intervention, appropriateness and appeal of language/images, ease of navigating the web-based content]; (b) intervention content [e.g., relevance/applicability of intervention content to the population, comprehension of content, interest in the content]; (c) intervention activities [e.g., comprehension of activity instructions, acceptability/relevance of activities, desire to engage in activities]; and (d) overall impressions of the intervention [e.g., overall utility, overall interest, overall enjoyment]. Two YABs are being utilized to ensure maximal diversity of viewpoints and developmental stages during intervention development. During the first six months of year one, YAB members will meet with the research team monthly, as this will be a critical time to develop intervention materials. In addition, web-based meetings and email communication will be used to review materials in between in-person sessions.

Intervention Development and Usability Testing Prototype ideas will be developed in an iterative fashion with Ayogo to develop low-fidelity clickable prototypes that demonstrate the information architecture and high-level features of the application. Members of the research and app development team will conduct internal usability "beta testing" to ensure functionality. After any discovered problems are fixed, 4-5 members of the target population recruited as described above from the North Carolina site and 4-5 members of the target population from the Chicago site will participate in usability testing. Usability testing will assess users comprehension of the educational content, understanding and use of intervention features, and overall impressions of app relevance and appeal. Testing will be conducted in accordance with NIH usability guidelines. Each participant will be asked to meet with a research team member and a member of the development team for a guided, interactive tour through the app. Participants will be asked to share their thoughts and impressions aloud as they move through the different components and features of the app. Audiotapes of the testing sessions along with video tapes of the app screen and participants' hands will be analyzed for patterns of use or usability problems, and results will be compiled into a report for the developers and research team, including any recommendations to address problems identified. Ongoing adjustments require an agile, iterative approach throughout usability testing with members of the target population.

Specific Aim 2 Conduct a one-month pilot trial of AllyQuest with 20 newly diagnosed HIV+ YMSM. To ensure that the features, platform and content of AllyQuest are acceptable to the target population and that there are no technical challenges or user concerns, the investigators will conduct a one-month pilot trial of use. The research assistant (RA) will meet with participants in person to explain the study in detail, facilitate app download and login onto participants' phones, and provide an app site tour to highlight features. Participants will complete a baseline demographic and risk assessment administered via a computer assisted survey instrument (CASI). At the end of the one-month field trial, participants will undergo a debriefing session to evaluate their experience using the app, overall satisfaction and any problems they encountered. Individuals will be instructed to contact the research coordinator immediately to report difficulties with any app components or to report any problems with their phone or phone service. A help link will be embedded within the app that directly links to study staff if assistance is needed. Strategies used in prior team research studies such as employing research staff with training in cultural sensitivity and experience working with HIV+YMSM, providing appropriate monetary incentives for participation in study evaluations, and using available resources to maintain contact will be employed. The investigators will evaluate participant experience with AllyQuest to understand their technology utilization with a specific focus on usability and mechanisms of action that might underlie the potential effectiveness of the intervention (quality/timing of messages, privacy concerns) and quality of the patient-technology relationship (trust, communication, intrusiveness, health promotion). The investigators will also examine barriers and facilitators for implementation. At the end of the one-month pilot trial, participants will complete a quantitative survey administered via a computer assisted survey instrument (CASI). Qualitative exit interviews will allow for a more in-depth and nuanced understanding of intervention acceptability. Interviews will be semistructured and focus on how participants used AllyQuest over the one-month pilot trial and how they perceive that use of the intervention could translate into behavior change.

Conditions
Hiv, HIV/AIDS
Being tested
AllyQuest
Keywords
technology, app, YMSM, HIV
Medical subject headings
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Alzheimer Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AllyQuestBehavioural

    AllyQuest is a novel, high impact secondary prevention intervention delivered via mobile phones to improve linkage and engagement in care among newly diagnosed HIV+ YMSM. The development of this intervention is both timely and vital given the urgency of the ongoing HIV epidemic among YMSM. The features of the intervention aim to target previously identified barriers to care among newly diagnosed youth, namely, low HIV health literacy, lack of social support, and internalized stigma related to their diagnosis.

Study groups in NCT03090958
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AllyQuest PilotExperimentalThe research assistant (RA) will meet with participants in person to explain the study in detail, facilitate app download and login onto participants' phones, and provide an app site tour to highlight features. Participants will complete a baseline demographic and risk assessment administered via a computer assisted survey instrument (CASI). At the end of the one-month field trial, participants will undergo a debriefing session to evaluate their experience using the app, overall satisfaction and any problems they encountered.
Receives: Behavioral: AllyQuest

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants That Were Enrolled of Those Screened

    Feasibility of AllyQuest will be based on recruitment success as measured by the total number of individuals who are screened vs. the total number of individuals who are recruited and subsequently enrolled.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  2. Number of Participants That Missed Follow up Interviews

    Feasibility of AllyQuest will be based retention as measured by the number of missed follow up interviews. Follow up attempts will be documented.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  3. Average Number of Days Participants Logged in.

    Feasibility of AllyQuest will be based on usage as measured by the average number days participants access the app.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  4. Number of Individuals Who Enroll But do Not Participate

    Feasibility of AllyQuest will be based on the number of individuals who enroll and do not participate.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  5. Average Total Time in Minutes Participants Spent Using App.

    Feasibility of AllyQuest will be based on usage as measured by the average time spent using app.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  6. Average Number of App Actions by Participants

    Feasibility of AllyQuest will be based on usage as measured by the average number of activities completed (daily quests), articles read, and social posts made.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  7. Average Days Participants Logged Medications.

    Feasibility of AllyQuest will be based on usage as measured by the average number of days participants logged their medications in the app.

    Measured: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. System Usability Scale Scores

    Acceptability of AllyQuest will be measured by the System Usability Scale (SUS). An 11-item, 7-point Likert scale of subjective assessments of usability (1=strongly agree; 7=strongly disagree). The SUS is technology independent and provides a global measure of system satisfaction and sub-scales of usability and learnability.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  2. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire Score

    Acceptability of AllyQuest will be assessed using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). The CSQ-8 was used to assess global intervention satisfaction. The CSQ-8 has eight items (quality of app, kind of service received from app, app met needs, recommend app to a friend, amount of help received from app, effectiveness of app for dealing with health problem, overall satisfaction, and willingness to use the app again). These domains are assessed on a 4-point response scale with individually specified anchors. Participant responses are scored from 1 to 4, and thus the possible total scores range from 8 to 32. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. The CSQ-8 has demonstrated high internal consistency across a large number of studies and has been used to evaluate technology-based interventions

    Measured: 4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Mar 2017
  2. Study start1 Aug 2015
  3. Primary completion3 Jan 2017
  4. Study completion3 Jan 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
In order to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the app. 20 participants will be enrolled in a one month pilot trial. After being screened for eligibility, the research assistant (RA) will meet with participants in person to explain the study in detail, facilitate app download and login onto participants' phones, and provide an app site tour to highlight features. Participants will complete a baseline demographic and risk assessment administered via a computer assisted survey instrument (CASI). At the end of the one-month field trial, participants will undergo a debriefing session to evaluate their experience using the app, overall satisfaction and any problems they encountered.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03090958
Sponsor's protocol ID
15-0948
Other IDs
5R21MH107266-02
Acronym
AQ
Status last verified
Mar 2017
First submitted
13 Mar 2017
Last updated
11 Jul 2018
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing AllyQuest in people with Hiv and HIV/AIDS, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Jun 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants That Were Enrolled of Those Screened (time frame: 4 weeks). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jul 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in