Small Cell Lung CancerPhase 3RESILIENTNCT03088813
Study of Irinotecan Liposome Injection (ONIVYDE®) in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing Irinotecan liposome injection and Topotecan in people with Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Ipsen at 118 sites in 18 countries.
Trial summary
A randomized, open label phase 3 study of irinotecan liposome injection (ONIVYDE®) versus topotecan in patients with small cell lung cancer who have progressed on or after platinum-based first-line therapy The study was conducted in two parts: 1. Dose determination of irinotecan liposome injection 2. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Small Cell Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Irinotecan liposome injection and Topotecan
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 491 participants
- Where
- 118 sitesin 18 countries
- Study dates
- 25 Apr 2018to 27 Jul 2023
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- At least 18 years of age.
- Able to understand and provide an informed consent
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
- Life expectancy >12 weeks
- Histopathologically or cytologically confirmed small cell lung cancer
- Evaluable disease as defined by RECIST Version 1.1 guidelines (patients with non measurable lesions only are eligible).
Show all 17Show fewer
- Radiologically confirmed progression on or after first-line platinum based chemotherapy (carboplatin or cisplatin), or chemo-radiation including platinum-based chemotherapy for treatment of limited or extensive stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC). In addition to platinum-based regimen, one line of immunotherapy as monotherapy or in combination, in first or in second line setting is allowed.
- Recovered from the effects of any prior chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy or other anti-neoplastic therapy (recovered to Grade 1 or better, with the exception of alopecia, peripheral neuropathy, or ototoxicity).
- Adequate bone marrow reserves
- Adequate hepatic function
- Adequate renal function
- Electrocardiogram during the Screening period without any clinically significant findings, per investigator's assessment
- Patients with certain types of asymptomatic CNS metastases that meet ALL the following criteria are eligible.
- Patients with asymptomatic CNS metastases prior to enrollment
- Prior radiation for CNS metastatic disease is completed ≥4 weeks prior to enrollment
- CNS metastases that are stable or have decreased according to the post radiation follow-up scan that is conducted at least 4 weeks after completion of radiation treatment for CNS lesion.
- Patients have discontinued corticosteroids or are on stable low-dose steroids (prednisone or equivalent 10 mg daily or less) for at least 1 week after completion of radiation for CNS lesion prior to enrollment.
Who cannot join
- Any medical or social condition deemed by the Investigator to be likely to interfere with a patient's ability to sign informed consent, cooperate and participate in the study, or interfere with the interpretation of the results
- Pregnant or breast feeding;
- Patients with large cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma.
- Patients who have received prior topoisomerase I inhibitor treatment, retreatment with platinum-based regimen, antibody-drug conjugates or molecular targeted agents, more than one line of immunotherapy, or any other additional regimen of prior cytotoxic chemotherapy.
- Patients with the symptomatic Central Nervous System (CNS) metastasis and/or who have developed new or progressive brain metastasis within 3 months following prophylactic and/or therapeutic cranial radiation (whole brain stereotactic radiation).
- Patients with carcinomatous meningitis.
Show all 14Show fewer
- Unable to discontinue the use of strong CYP3A4 or UGT1A1 inhibitors at least 1 week or strong CYP3A4 inducers at least 2 weeks prior to receiving the first dose of irinotecan liposome injection.
- Have a previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary (non-pulmonary) site or SCLC histology
- Investigational therapy administered within 4 weeks, or within a time interval less than at least 5 half-lives of the investigational agent, whichever is less, prior to the first scheduled day of dosing in this study.
- Severe cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases
- New York Heart Association Class III or IV congestive heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias, or uncontrolled blood pressure.
- Active infection
- Known hypersensitivity to any of the components of irinotecan liposome injection, other liposomal products, or topotecan.
- Clinically significant gastrointestinal disorder including hepatic disorders, bleeding, inflammation, occlusion, or diarrhea > grade 1.
Trial locations and contacts
118 sites in 18 countries.
118 sites in 18 countries
United States22 sites
University of Maryland Medical Group
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Southern Maine Health Care
Biddeford, Maine, 04005
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263
Charleston Hematology Oncology Associates, PA
Charleston, South Carolina, 29414
Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
National Jewish Health
Denver, Colorado, 80206
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers
Denver, Colorado, 80218
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
North Shore Hematology Oncology Associates, PC
East Setauket, New York, 11733
Florida Cancer Specialists (South Region)
Fort Myers, Florida, 33916
Cancer & Hematology Centers of Western Michigan
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503
Greenville Hospital System University Medical Center
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605
Sparrow Regional Cancer Center
Lansing, Michigan, 48219
Northwest Georgia Oncology Centers
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Tri County Hematology & Oncology Associates, Inc
Massillon, Ohio, 44646
Tennessee Oncology
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Cancer Treatment Centers of America-Georgia
Newnan, Georgia, 30265
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Illinois Cancer Care, PC
Peoria, Illinois, 61615
MultiCare Health System Institute for Research and Innovation
Spokane, Washington, 99204
Summit Cancer Treatment Center
Spokane, Washington, 99208
Florida Cancer Specialists
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33705
Ukraine10 sites
CI Chernivtsi RC Oncological Dispensary
Chernivtsi
CI Dnipropetrovsk CMCH #4 of Dnipropetrovsk RC Dept of Chemotherapy SI Dnipropetrovsk MA of MOHU
Dnipro
Communal Non-profit Enterprise Regional Center of Oncology
Kharkiv, 61070
Communal Enterprise Kremenchuk Regional Oncology Dispensary of Poltava Regional Council
Kremenchuk, 39617
CI Kryvyi Rih Oncological Dispensary of DRC
Kryvyi Rih
Treatment-Prevention Institution Volyn Regional Oncological Dispensary
Lutsk
Odesa Regional Oncologic Dispensary
Odesa
RCI Sumy Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary
Sumy
CCCH City Oncological Center SHEI Uzhgorod NU
Uzhhorod, 88000
Medical Clinic Innovacia, LLC
Vyshhorod, 07352
China9 sites
Beijing Cancer Hospital
Beijing, 100142
The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College
Bengbu, 233004
The First Hospital of Jilin University
Changchun, 450008
West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Chengdu, 610041
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
Guangzhou, 510080
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
Hangzhou, 310022
Tongji Hospital
Hubei, 430030
Linyi Cancer Hospital
Linyi
Henan Cancer Hospital
Zhengzhou
Brazil8 sites
Hospital de Cancer de Barretos, Fundacoa Pio X II
Barretos
Hospital de Caridade de Ijuí
Ijuí
Oncobio Servicos de Saude
Nova Lima
HGB - Hospital Giovanni Battista - Mãe de Deus Center
Porto Alegre
Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição
Porto Alegre
INCA - Instituto Nacional de Câncer
Rio de Janeiro
CEPHO - Centro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Hematologia e Oncologia
Santo André
Fundação Faculdade Regional de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto
São José do Rio Preto
Spain8 sites
Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
Alicante
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, 08035
ICO l'Hospitalet - Hospital Duran i Reynals
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08908
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, 28041
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
Madrid
Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga
Málaga, 29010
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
Seville, 41013
Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe
Valencia, 46026
Romania6 sites
S.C Gral Medical S.R.L
Bucharest
Institutul Oncologic "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta" Cluj-Napoca
Cluj-Napoca
S.C Medisprof S.R.L
Cluj-Napoca
S.C Centrul de Oncologie Sf. Nectarie S.R.L
Craiova
S.C Radiotherapy Center Cluj S.R.L
Floreşti
Oncomed SRL
Timișoara
Russia6 sites
SBIH of Arkhangelsk region "Arkhangelsk Clinical Oncological Dispensary"
Arkhangelsk
"VitaMed" LLC
Moscow
BHI of Omsk region "Clinical Oncology Dispensary"
Omsk
SBHI of Kaluga Region "Kaluga regional clinical oncology dispensary"
Saint Petersburg, 197022
SPb SBIH "City Clinical Oncological Dispensary"
Saint Petersburg
SBIH of Yaroslavl region "Regional Clinical Oncological Hospital"
Yaroslavl
Turkey (Türkiye)6 sites
Baskent University Adana Application and Research Center
Adana
Trakya University Medical Faculty
Edirne
Istanbul Medeniyet Uni Goztepe Training&Res Hosp
Istanbul
Istanbul University Cerrahpasa - Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty
Istanbul
Inonu Uni. Med. Fac.
Malatya
Namik Kemal University
Tekirdağ
Hungary5 sites
Semmelweis Egyetem
Budapest
Bekes Megyei Kozponti Korhaz Pandy Kalman Tagkorhaza
Gyula
Jasz-Nagykun-Szolnok Megyei Hetenyi Geza Korhaz-Rendelointezet
Szolnok
Tudogyogyintezet Torokbalint
Törökbálint
Zala Megyei Szent Rafael Korhaz
Zalaegerszeg
Poland5 sites
KO-MED Centra Kliniczne Biala Podlaska
Biała Podlaska
Szpitale Pomorskie spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością
Gdynia
SP Zespol Gruzlicy i Chorob Pluc w Olsztynie
Olsztyn
Przychodnia Med-Polonia Sp. z o.o.
Poznan
Szpital Kliniczny Przemienienia Panskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego im. Karola Marcinkowskiego
Poznan
Serbia5 sites
Clinical Center "Bezanijska kosa"
Belgrade
Clinical Center Kragujevac
Belgrade
Oncomed System
Belgrade
Institute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina
Kamenitz
General Hospital Uzice
Užice, 31000
Taiwan5 sites
Changhua Christian Hospital
Changhua
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, 100
Tri-Service General Hospital
Taipei
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou
Taoyuan, 333
Australia4 sites
Border Medical Oncology Research Unit
Albury, New South Wales, 2640
South West Healthcare
Warrnambool, Victoria, 3280
Southern Medical Day Care Centre
Wollongong
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Woolloongabba
Belgium4 sites
AZ Klina
Brasschaat
UZ Leuven
Leuven
Centre Hospitalier de l'Ardenne
Libramont
AZ Sint-Maarten
Mechelen
France4 sites
CHU Brest - Hôpital Morvan
Brest
Hôpital Nord - CHU Marseille
Marseille
Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez
Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Quentin
Saint-Quentin, 02321
Germany4 sites
Universitaetsklinikum Freiburg
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Hamm GmbH
Hamm, 50063
Universitaetsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg, 69126
Pius-Hospital Oldenburg
Oldenburg, 26121
South Korea4 sites
Chungbuk National University Hospital
Cheongju-si
Asan Medical Center
Seoul
The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
Seoul
The Catholic University of Korea, St. Vincent's Hospital
Suwon
Italy3 sites
Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo Per Lo Studio e La Cura Dei Tumori
Meldola
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori
Milan
Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine
Udine
About this study
Official title: RESILIENT: A Randomized, Open Label Phase 3 Study of Irinotecan Liposome Injection (ONIVYDE®) Versus Topotecan in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Progressed on or After Platinum-based First-Line Therapy
A randomized, open label phase 3 study of irinotecan liposome injection (ONIVYDE®) versus topotecan in patients with small cell lung cancer who have progressed on or after platinum-based first-line therapy
The study was conducted in two parts:
- Dose determination of irinotecan liposome injection
- A randomized, efficacy study of irinotecan liposome injection versus topotecan
Read the detailed description
The study was conducted in two parts:
Part 1: Open-label dose-finding study of irinotecan liposome injection. 30 patients were planned to be enrolled.
Part 1 Primary Objectives:
- Describe the safety and tolerability of irinotecan liposome injection monotherapy administered every 2 weeks
- Determine the optimal irinotecan liposome injection monotherapy dose for Part 2 of this study
Part 2: A randomized, efficacy study of irinotecan liposome injection versus intravenous (IV) topotecan.
Approximately 450 patients were planned to be enrolled in part 2.
Part 2 objectives: To compare overall survival following treatment with irinotecan liposome injection with overall survival following treatment with IV topotecan.
- Conditions
- Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- Irinotecan liposome injection, Topotecan
- Medical subject headings
- Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Irinotecan liposome injectionDrug
Also called ONIVYDE®
IV
TopotecanDrug
IV
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1: Experimental Arm, dose level 1 | Experimental | Irinotecan liposome injection Receives: Drug: Irinotecan liposome injection |
| Part 1: Experimental Arm, dose level 2 | Experimental | Irinotecan liposome injection Receives: Drug: Irinotecan liposome injection |
| Part 2: Experimental Arm | Experimental | Irinotecan liposome injection Receives: Drug: Irinotecan liposome injection |
| Part 2: Control Arm | Active comparator | Topotecan Receives: Drug: Topotecan |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Part 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant following or during exposure to a study treatment, whether or not causally related to the study treatment. An undesirable medical condition could be symptoms, signs or abnormal results of an investigation. An SAE was any AE that: resulted in death; was life-threatening; required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly or birth defect; or was medically important. A TEAE was any AE that occurred or worsened on or after the day of first dose of study treatment and within 30 days after discontinuation of study treatment.
Measured: The TEAEs were reported from the time of first study treatment administration (Day 1) up to 30 days after the date of last study treatment administration, approximately 680 days
Part 1: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLT)
A TEAE was considered as DLT if it occurred during the safety evaluation period (i.e. first 28 days of treatment or 14 days after the second dose of study treatment if there was a treatment delay due to non-DLT related reasons) and were deemed related to the study treatment by the investigator. The determination of whether an Adverse Event was considered a Dose Limiting Toxicity was made by the Safety Review Committee (SRC) comprising the Part 1 Investigators and the Medical Monitor(s) of the Sponsor.
Measured: From the start of the first study treatment administration (Day 1) up to 14 days after the second dose of study treatment administration, a maximum of 42 days
Part 2: Overall Survival (OS)
The OS was defined as the time from randomization date to the date of death from any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive. The OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier technique. Following end of treatment participant and/or family was contacted by telephone every month to assess vital status.
Measured: From date of randomization (within 7 days before start of study treatment) until death. Assessed up to Part 2 primary analysis DCO date of 08 February 2022 (approximately 900 days)
Secondary outcomes (9)
Part 1: Objective Response Rate (ORR)
The ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response (BOR) characterized as either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) recorded from date of first dose of study treatment until documented PD or death. ORR analysis was based on BOR using RECIST v1.1 per investigator assessment. Per RECIST v1.1, CR is disappearance of all target lesions; PR is >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; and overall response = CR + PR. Per protocol, participants had computed tomography (CT)-scans and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) every 6 weeks to measure tumor lesion size. This was continued throughout treatment until PD or commencement of new anti-neoplastic therapy.
Measured: RECIST assessments performed at Baseline (within 28 days before start of study treatment), every 6 weeks post first dose and treatment pause, 30 days after discontinuation of study treatment, then every month thereafter, approximately maximum of 1177 days
Part 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
The PFS was defined as time from first dose of study treatment to the first documented objective PD using RECIST v1.1 or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, progression is defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. The PFS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier technique. Per protocol, participants had CT-scans and brain MRI every 6 weeks to measure tumor lesion size. This was continued throughout treatment until PD or commencement of new anti-neoplastic therapy.
Measured: RECIST assessments performed at Baseline (within 28 days before start of study treatment), every 6 weeks post first dose and treatment pause, 30 days after discontinuation of study treatment, then every month thereafter, approximately maximum of 1177 days
Part 1: OS
The OS was defined as the time from first dose of study treatment to the date of death from any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive. The OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier technique. Following end of treatment participant and/or family was contacted by telephone every month to assess vital status.
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) until death. Assessed up to Part 1 DCO date of 11 August 2021 (approximately 1177 days)
Part 2: PFS
The PFS was defined as time from randomization to first documented objective PD using RECIST 1.1 (or response assessment in neuro-oncology brain metastases [RANO-BM] criteria for central nervous system [CNS] lesions) as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, progression is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. The PFS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier technique. Per protocol, participants had CT-scans and brain MRI every 6 weeks to measure tumor lesion size. This was continued throughout treatment until PD or commencement of new anti-neoplastic therapy.
Measured: RECIST assessments performed at Baseline (within 28 days before start of study treatment), every 6 weeks post first dose and treatment pause, 30 days after discontinuation of study treatment, then every month thereafter, approximately maximum of 900 days
Part 2: ORR
The ORR was defined as percentage of participants with a BOR characterized as either a CR or PR, recorded from randomization until documented PD or death relative to the total number of participants. ORR analysis was based on BOR assessed by BICR using RECIST v1.1. Per RECIST v1.1, CR is disappearance of all target lesions; PR is >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; and overall response = CR + PR. Per protocol, participants had CT-scans and brain MRI every 6 weeks to measure tumor lesion size. This was continued throughout treatment until PD or commencement of new anti-neoplastic therapy.
Measured: RECIST assessments performed at Baseline (within 28 days before start of study treatment), every 6 weeks post first dose and treatment pause, 30 days after discontinuation of study treatment, then every month thereafter, approximately maximum of 900 days
Part 2: Median Duration of Response (DoR)
The DoR was defined as time from the first documented objective response (CR or PR, whichever was earlier) to the date of first documented PD or death due to any cause. The DoR analysis was based on BOR assessed by BICR using RECIST v1.1. Per RECIST v1.1, CR is disappearance of all target lesions and PR is >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. The DoR was calculated using Kaplan-Meier technique. Per protocol, participants had CT-scans and brain MRI every 6 weeks to measure tumor lesion size. This was continued throughout treatment until PD or commencement of new anti-neoplastic therapy.
Measured: RECIST assessments performed at Baseline (within 28 days before start of study treatment), every 6 weeks post first dose and treatment pause, 30 days after discontinuation of study treatment, then every month thereafter, approximately maximum of 900 days
Part 2: Median Time to Objective Response (OR)
Time to OR as per RECIST v1.1 criteria according to BICR was defined as time from the date of randomization to the date of first documented objective tumor response (CR or PR, whichever was first). Per RECIST v1.1, CR is disappearance of all target lesions; PR is >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesion. Participants with a new anti-cancer therapy prior to OR were censored at the last tumor assessment prior to new anti-cancer therapy. Per protocol, participants had CT-scans and brain MRI every 6 weeks to measure tumor lesion size. This was continued throughout treatment until PD or commencement of new anti-neoplastic therapy.
Measured: RECIST assessments performed at Baseline (within 28 days before start of study treatment), every 6 weeks post first dose and treatment pause, 30 days after discontinuation of study treatment, then every month thereafter, approximately maximum of 900 days
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)/Lung Cancer Supplement (LC13) Dyspnea Scale at Week 12
The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific module used in conjunction with EORTC QLQ-C30 and covers typical symptoms of lung cancer (cough, pain, dyspnea, sore mouth, peripheral neuropathy, hair loss). Scores range from 0-100 and a high score represents a high level of symptomatology/problems/worse QoL. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to reference start date. Change from baseline in dyspnea scale was calculated regardless of premature study treatment discontinuation. Participants completed these questionnaires on an electronic tablet every 6 weeks during treatment and it was continued until PD or commencement of new anti-neoplastic therapy.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-LC13 Cough Scale at Week 12
The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific module used in conjunction with EORTC QLQ-C30 and covers typical symptoms of lung cancer (cough, pain, dyspnea, sore mouth, peripheral neuropathy, hair loss). Score ranges from 0-100 scale and a high score represents a high level of symptomatology/problems/worse QoL. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to reference start date. Change from baseline in cough scale was calculated regardless of premature study treatment discontinuation. Participants completed these questionnaires on an electronic tablet every 6 weeks during treatment and it was continued until PD or commencement of new anti-neoplastic therapy.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Mar 2017
- Study start25 Apr 2018
- Primary completion8 Feb 2022
- Study completion27 Jul 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Small Cell Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by IpsenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 491 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ipsen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ipsen Medical Director, Study director, Ipsen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03088813
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MM-398-01-03-04
- Other IDs
- 2017-004261-26, 2017
- Acronym
- RESILIENT
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 9 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 19 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Spigel DR, Dowlati A, Chen Y, Navarro A, Yang JC, Stojanovic G, Jove M, Rich P, Andric ZG, Wu YL, Rudin CM, Chen H, Zhang L, Yeung S, Benzaghou F, Paz-Ares L, Bunn PA; RESILIENT Trial Investigators. RESILIENT Part 2: A Randomized, Open-Label Phase III Study of Liposomal Irinotecan Versus Topotecan in Adults With Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jul 1;42(19):2317-2326. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.02110. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
PubMed 38648575Paz-Ares L, Spigel DR, Chen Y, Jove M, Juan-Vidal O, Rich P, Hayes T, Calderon VG, Caro RB, Navarro A, Dowlati A, Zhang B, Moore Y, Yao X, Kokhreidze J, Ponce S, Bunn PA. RESILIENT part 1: a phase 2 dose-exploration and dose-expansion study of second-line liposomal irinotecan in adults with small cell lung cancer. Cancer. 2022 May 1;128(9):1801-1811. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34123. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
PubMed 35195913
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- RESILIENT: A Randomized, Open Label Phase 3 Study of Irinotecan Liposome Injection (ONIVYDE®) Versus Topotecan in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Progressed on or After Platinum-based First-Line Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03088813
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RESILIENT / MM-398-01-03-04
- Conditions
- Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 491 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- IpsenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 25 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Jul 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 17 Oct 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A randomized, open label phase 3 study of irinotecan liposome injection (ONIVYDE®) versus topotecan in patients with small cell lung cancer who have progressed on or after platinum-based first-line therapy
The study was conducted in two parts:
- Dose determination of irinotecan liposome injection
- A randomized, efficacy study of irinotecan liposome injection versus topotecan
Detailed description
The study was conducted in two parts:
Part 1: Open-label dose-finding study of irinotecan liposome injection. 30 patients were planned to be enrolled.
Part 1 Primary Objectives:
- Describe the safety and tolerability of irinotecan liposome injection monotherapy administered every 2 weeks
- Determine the optimal irinotecan liposome injection monotherapy dose for Part 2 of this study
Part 2: A randomized, efficacy study of irinotecan liposome injection versus intravenous (IV) topotecan.
Approximately 450 patients were planned to be enrolled in part 2.
Part 2 objectives: To compare overall survival following treatment with irinotecan liposome injection with overall survival following treatment with IV topotecan.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1: Experimental Arm, dose level 1 | Experimental | Drug: Irinotecan liposome injectionIrinotecan liposome injection |
| Part 1: Experimental Arm, dose level 2 | Experimental | Drug: Irinotecan liposome injectionIrinotecan liposome injection |
| Part 2: Experimental Arm | Experimental | Drug: Irinotecan liposome injectionIrinotecan liposome injection |
| Part 2: Control Arm | Active comparator | Drug: TopotecanTopotecan |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (17 listed)
- At least 18 years of age.
- Able to understand and provide an informed consent
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
- Life expectancy >12 weeks
- Histopathologically or cytologically confirmed small cell lung cancer
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Any medical or social condition deemed by the Investigator to be likely to interfere with a patient's ability to sign informed consent, cooperate and participate in the study, or interfere with the interpretation of the results
- Pregnant or breast feeding;
- Patients with large cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma.
- Patients who have received prior topoisomerase I inhibitor treatment, retreatment with platinum-based regimen, antibody-drug conjugates or molecular targeted agents, more than one line of immunotherapy, or any other additional regimen of prior cytotoxic chemotherapy.
- Patients with the symptomatic Central Nervous System (CNS) metastasis and/or who have developed new or progressive brain metastasis within 3 months following prophylactic and/or therapeutic cranial radiation (whole brain stereotactic radiation).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Irinotecan liposome injectionAlso: ONIVYDE®IV | Drug | Part 1: Experimental Arm, dose level 1, Part 1: Experimental Arm, dose level 2, Part 2: Experimental Arm |
| TopotecanIV | Drug | Part 2: Control Arm |
Primary outcome
Part 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: The TEAEs were reported from the time of first study treatment administration (Day 1) up to 30 days after the date of last study treatment administration, approximately 680 days
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant following or during exposure to a study treatment, whether or not causally related to the study treatment. An undesirable medical condition could be symptoms, signs or abnormal results of an investigation. An SAE was any AE that: resulted in death; was life-threatening; required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly or birth defect; or was medically important. A TEAE was any AE that occurred or worsened on or after the day of first dose of study treatment and within 30 days after discontinuation of study treatment.
Part 1: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLT)
Time frame: From the start of the first study treatment administration (Day 1) up to 14 days after the second dose of study treatment administration, a maximum of 42 days
A TEAE was considered as DLT if it occurred during the safety evaluation period (i.e. first 28 days of treatment or 14 days after the second dose of study treatment if there was a treatment delay due to non-DLT related reasons) and were deemed related to the study treatment by the investigator. The determination of whether an Adverse Event was considered a Dose Limiting Toxicity was made by the Safety Review Committee (SRC) comprising the Part 1 Investigators and the Medical Monitor(s) of the Sponsor.
Part 2: Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: From date of randomization (within 7 days before start of study treatment) until death. Assessed up to Part 2 primary analysis DCO date of 08 February 2022 (approximately 900 days)
The OS was defined as the time from randomization date to the date of death from any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive. The OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier technique. Following end of treatment participant and/or family was contacted by telephone every month to assess vital status.
9 secondary outcomes
Part 1: Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time frame: RECIST assessments performed at Baseline (within 28 days before start of study treatment), every 6 weeks post first dose and treatment pause, 30 days after discontinuation of study treatment, then every month thereafter, approximately maximum of 1177 days
Part 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: RECIST assessments performed at Baseline (within 28 days before start of study treatment), every 6 weeks post first dose and treatment pause, 30 days after discontinuation of study treatment, then every month thereafter, approximately maximum of 1177 days
Part 1: OS
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) until death. Assessed up to Part 1 DCO date of 11 August 2021 (approximately 1177 days)
Part 2: PFS
Time frame: RECIST assessments performed at Baseline (within 28 days before start of study treatment), every 6 weeks post first dose and treatment pause, 30 days after discontinuation of study treatment, then every month thereafter, approximately maximum of 900 days
Part 2: ORR
Time frame: RECIST assessments performed at Baseline (within 28 days before start of study treatment), every 6 weeks post first dose and treatment pause, 30 days after discontinuation of study treatment, then every month thereafter, approximately maximum of 900 days
Part 2: Median Duration of Response (DoR)
Time frame: RECIST assessments performed at Baseline (within 28 days before start of study treatment), every 6 weeks post first dose and treatment pause, 30 days after discontinuation of study treatment, then every month thereafter, approximately maximum of 900 days
Part 2: Median Time to Objective Response (OR)
Time frame: RECIST assessments performed at Baseline (within 28 days before start of study treatment), every 6 weeks post first dose and treatment pause, 30 days after discontinuation of study treatment, then every month thereafter, approximately maximum of 900 days
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)/Lung Cancer Supplement (LC13) Dyspnea Scale at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-LC13 Cough Scale at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Feb 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38648575Spigel DR, Dowlati A, Chen Y, Navarro A, Yang JC, Stojanovic G, Jove M, Rich P, Andric ZG, Wu YL, Rudin CM, Chen H, Zhang L, Yeung S, Benzaghou F, Paz-Ares L, Bunn PA; RESILIENT Trial Investigators. RESILIENT Part 2: A Randomized, Open-Label Phase III Study of Liposomal Irinotecan Versus Topotecan in Adults With Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jul 1;42(19):2317-2326. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.02110. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35195913Paz-Ares L, Spigel DR, Chen Y, Jove M, Juan-Vidal O, Rich P, Hayes T, Calderon VG, Caro RB, Navarro A, Dowlati A, Zhang B, Moore Y, Yao X, Kokhreidze J, Ponce S, Bunn PA. RESILIENT part 1: a phase 2 dose-exploration and dose-expansion study of second-line liposomal irinotecan in adults with small cell lung cancer. Cancer. 2022 May 1;128(9):1801-1811. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34123. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
Related trials for Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
RecruitingPhase 2
A UGT1A1 Genotype-Directed Study of Belinostat Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity
Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine, Tumor, Neuroendocrine
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ipsen Medical Director study director
Ipsen
118 sites in 18 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Irinotecan liposome injection and Topotecan in people with Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Ipsen at 118 sites in 18 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 118 sites in United States, Ukraine, China, Brazil, Spain and 13 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Oct 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Part 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (time frame: The TEAEs were reported from the time of first study treatment administration (Day 1) up to 30 days after the date of last study treatment administration, approximately 680 days). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03088813, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Feb 2025.