Metabolic SyndromeIntraining-METNCT03087721
High-intensity Interval, Low Volume Training in Metabolic Syndrome
A study testing HIIT-LV and CAE in people with Metabolic Syndrome and Insulin Resistance, run by Universidad de Antioquia at 1 site in Colombia.
Trial summary
The primary objective of the study is to compare the efficacy of an intervention with high-intensity interval, low volume training (HIIT-LV) or continuous aerobic exercise (CAE) on insulin resistance, insulin sensitivity and percentage of pancreatic β-cell function in adults with metabolic syndrome (MS). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Metabolic Syndrome, Insulin Resistance
- What is being tested?
- HIIT-LV and CAE
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteColombia
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2017to 31 Jul 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 60 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Metabolic syndrome defined according to the International Diabetes Federation-criteria.
- Insulin resistance defined according to the HOMA greater than 2.25
- Sedentary lifestyle (less than 60 min of physical activity per week)
Who cannot join
- Vegetarian diet
- Vitamin D3 supplementation
- Oral contraceptives
- Musculoskeletal diseases or injuries
- Physical, sensory or cognitive impairment
- History of cardiovascular disease (coronary, cerebrovascular, peripheral arterial disease, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias).
Show all 13Show fewer
- Pulmonary diseases
- Acute or chronic inflammatory conditions
- Cancer
- Human immunodeficiency virus infection
- Diabetes mellitus
- Hyperthyroidism
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of High-intensity Interval, Low-volume Training Compared to Continuous Aerobic Exercise on Insulin Resistance, Skeletal Muscle Composition and Endocrine Function in Adults With Metabolic Syndrome: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial (Intraining-MET)
The primary objective of the study is to compare the efficacy of an intervention with high-intensity interval, low volume training (HIIT-LV) or continuous aerobic exercise (CAE) on insulin resistance, insulin sensitivity and percentage of pancreatic β-cell function in adults with metabolic syndrome (MS).
The secondary objective is to compare the efficacy of an intervention with HIIT-LV or CAE on glycosylated hemoglobin, mass and muscle fibre type composition of right thigh and plasma levels of musclin and apelin in adults with MS.
The investigators hypothesized that HIIT-LV is more effective in decreasing insulin resistance and glycosylated hemoglobin and plasma concentrations of musclin and increasing plasma concentrations of apelin, and both mass and muscle fibre type I percentage in thigh, than CAE.
Read the detailed description
This study is a randomized, controlled, masked (single blind, outcomes assessor) clinical trial, with allocation by the minimization method, with two parallel groups and intention of superiority. It was designed to test the hypothesis that a 12-week program of HIIT-LV, yields larger beneficial effects on insulin resistance, skeletal muscle composition and endocrine function than CAE.
Although aerobic exercise increases cardio-respiratory capacity, modifies risk factors and decreases mortality risk, there is currently controversy and gaps in knowledge over the efficacy of more intense and low-volume physical activities on muscle metabolism in patients with metabolic disorders.
The primary outcome will be the insulin resistance, insulin sensitivity and percentage of pancreatic β-cell function. The secondary outcomes will be the glycosylated hemoglobin, mass and muscle fibre type composition of thigh and plasma levels of musclin and apelin. Assessments will be made before and after the 12-week program. Calculations based on previously results (difference mean 10% and SD 15%) suggest that a total number of 60 patients randomized 1:1 (30 in each group) to the two intervention groups is sufficient to detect larger beneficial effects with HIIT-LV with a p-value of 0.05 (two-sided test) and statistical power of 0.80 (primary endpoint is insulin sensitivity).
- Conditions
- Metabolic Syndrome, Insulin Resistance
- Being tested
- HIIT-LV, CAE
- Keywords
- Metabolic Syndrome, Exercise Training, Interval Training, Skeletal Muscle, Risk Factors, Insulin Resistance
- Medical subject headings
- Metabolic Syndrome, Insulin Resistance
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HIIT-LVBehavioural
Supervised endurance treadmill training as walking/running "uphill", 3 times/week during 12 weeks starting at 85-90% of previously determined maximum oxygen consumption (VO2 max). Warm-up 3 min at 30% of VO2 max, 3 min cool-down. Progression in intensity every 3erd week.
CAEBehavioural
Supervised moderate intensity treadmill training, 3 times/week for 12 weeks starting at 70% of VO2 max. Warm-up 3 min at 30% of VO2 max, 3 min cool-down. Progression in intensity every 3erd week.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1x2 HIIT-LV, 3 times a week, 24 min | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: HIIT-LV |
| CAE, moderate intensity, 3 times a week, 36 min | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Behavioral: CAE |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Insulin sensitivity
Using HOMA model (units as percentages of a normal reference population)
Measured: 12-week
Insulin resistance
Using HOMA model (arbitrary units)
Measured: 12-week
Pancreatic β-cell function
Using HOMA model (units as percentages of a normal reference population)
Measured: 12-week
Secondary outcomes (5)
Glycosylated hemoglobin
Using blood tests (%)
Measured: 12-week
Mass muscle of right thigh
Using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) (kg/m2)
Measured: 12-week
Muscle fibre type composition of right thigh
Using carnosine quantification by hydrogen magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) (% fibre type I)
Measured: 12-week
Musclin
Using plasma levels of musclin (pg/mL)
Measured: 12-week
Apelin
Using plasma levels of apelin (pg/mL)
Measured: 12-week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Mar 2017
- Study start1 Mar 2017
- Primary completion31 Jul 2019
- Study completion31 Jul 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Metabolic SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad de Antioquia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Instituto Colombiano para el Desarrollo de la Ciencia y la Tecnología (COLCIENCIAS)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jaime Gallo, Universidad de Antioquia
- Investigators
- Juan Calderón, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, ProfessorDaniel Aguirre, PhD, Study director, Professor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03087721
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 54-2016
- Acronym
- Intraining-MET
- Status last verified
- Jul 2019
- First submitted
- 6 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 1 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Gallo-Villegas J, Restrepo D, Perez L, Castro-Valencia LA, Narvaez-Sanchez R, Osorio J, Aguirre-Acevedo DC, Calderon JC. Safety of High-Intensity, Low-Volume Interval Training or Continuous Aerobic Training in Adults With Metabolic Syndrome. J Patient Saf. 2022 Jun 1;18(4):295-301. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000922. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
PubMed 34870388Aristizabal JC, Montoya E, Sanchez YL, Yepes-Calderon M, Narvaez-Sanchez R, Gallo-Villegas JA, Calderon JC. Effects of Low-Volume, High-Intensity Interval Training Compared with Continuous Training on Regional and Global Body Composition in Adults with Metabolic Syndrome: A post hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Nutr Metab. 2021;77(5):279-288. doi: 10.1159/000518909. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
PubMed 34763335Gallo-Villegas J, Castro-Valencia LA, Perez L, Restrepo D, Guerrero O, Cardona S, Sanchez YL, Yepes-Calderon M, Valbuena LH, Pena M, Milan AF, Trillos-Almanza MC, Granados S, Aristizabal JC, Estrada-Castrillon M, Narvaez-Sanchez R, Osorio J, Aguirre-Acevedo DC, Calderon JC. Efficacy of high-intensity interval- or continuous aerobic-training on insulin resistance and muscle function in adults with metabolic syndrome: a clinical trial. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022 Feb;122(2):331-344. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04835-w. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
PubMed 34687360Gallo-Villegas J, Aristizabal JC, Estrada M, Valbuena LH, Narvaez-Sanchez R, Osorio J, Aguirre-Acevedo DC, Calderon JC. Efficacy of high-intensity, low-volume interval training compared to continuous aerobic training on insulin resistance, skeletal muscle structure and function in adults with metabolic syndrome: study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial (Intraining-MET). Trials. 2018 Feb 27;19(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2541-7.
PubMed 29482601
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of High-intensity Interval, Low-volume Training Compared to Continuous Aerobic Exercise on Insulin Resistance, Skeletal Muscle Composition and Endocrine Function in Adults With Metabolic Syndrome: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial (Intraining-MET)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03087721
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Intraining-MET / 54-2016
- Conditions
- Metabolic Syndrome, Insulin Resistance
- Keywords
- Metabolic Syndrome, Exercise Training, Interval Training, Skeletal Muscle, Risk Factors, Insulin Resistance
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad de AntioquiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Instituto Colombiano para el Desarrollo de la Ciencia y la Tecnología (COLCIENCIAS)
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of the study is to compare the efficacy of an intervention with high-intensity interval, low volume training (HIIT-LV) or continuous aerobic exercise (CAE) on insulin resistance, insulin sensitivity and percentage of pancreatic β-cell function in adults with metabolic syndrome (MS).
The secondary objective is to compare the efficacy of an intervention with HIIT-LV or CAE on glycosylated hemoglobin, mass and muscle fibre type composition of right thigh and plasma levels of musclin and apelin in adults with MS.
The investigators hypothesized that HIIT-LV is more effective in decreasing insulin resistance and glycosylated hemoglobin and plasma concentrations of musclin and increasing plasma concentrations of apelin, and both mass and muscle fibre type I percentage in thigh, than CAE.
Detailed description
This study is a randomized, controlled, masked (single blind, outcomes assessor) clinical trial, with allocation by the minimization method, with two parallel groups and intention of superiority. It was designed to test the hypothesis that a 12-week program of HIIT-LV, yields larger beneficial effects on insulin resistance, skeletal muscle composition and endocrine function than CAE.
Although aerobic exercise increases cardio-respiratory capacity, modifies risk factors and decreases mortality risk, there is currently controversy and gaps in knowledge over the efficacy of more intense and low-volume physical activities on muscle metabolism in patients with metabolic disorders.
The primary outcome will be the insulin resistance, insulin sensitivity and percentage of pancreatic β-cell function. The secondary outcomes will be the glycosylated hemoglobin, mass and muscle fibre type composition of thigh and plasma levels of musclin and apelin. Assessments will be made before and after the 12-week program. Calculations based on previously results (difference mean 10% and SD 15%) suggest that a total number of 60 patients randomized 1:1 (30 in each group) to the two intervention groups is sufficient to detect larger beneficial effects with HIIT-LV with a p-value of 0.05 (two-sided test) and statistical power of 0.80 (primary endpoint is insulin sensitivity).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1x2 HIIT-LV, 3 times a week, 24 min | Experimental | Behavioral: HIIT-LV |
| CAE, moderate intensity, 3 times a week, 36 min | Active comparator | Behavioral: CAE |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Metabolic syndrome defined according to the International Diabetes Federation-criteria.
- Insulin resistance defined according to the HOMA greater than 2.25
- Sedentary lifestyle (less than 60 min of physical activity per week)
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Vegetarian diet
- Vitamin D3 supplementation
- Oral contraceptives
- Musculoskeletal diseases or injuries
- Physical, sensory or cognitive impairment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HIIT-LVSupervised endurance treadmill training as walking/running "uphill", 3 times/week during 12 weeks starting at 85-90% of previously determined maximum oxygen consumption (VO2 max). Warm-up 3 min at 30% of VO2 max, 3 min cool-down. Progression in intensity every 3erd week. | Behavioural | 1x2 HIIT-LV, 3 times a week, 24 min |
| CAESupervised moderate intensity treadmill training, 3 times/week for 12 weeks starting at 70% of VO2 max. Warm-up 3 min at 30% of VO2 max, 3 min cool-down. Progression in intensity every 3erd week. | Behavioural | CAE, moderate intensity, 3 times a week, 36 min |
Primary outcome
Insulin sensitivity
Time frame: 12-week
Using HOMA model (units as percentages of a normal reference population)
Insulin resistance
Time frame: 12-week
Using HOMA model (arbitrary units)
Pancreatic β-cell function
Time frame: 12-week
Using HOMA model (units as percentages of a normal reference population)
5 secondary outcomes
Glycosylated hemoglobin
Time frame: 12-week
Mass muscle of right thigh
Time frame: 12-week
Muscle fibre type composition of right thigh
Time frame: 12-week
Musclin
Time frame: 12-week
Apelin
Time frame: 12-week
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Aug 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34870388Gallo-Villegas J, Restrepo D, Perez L, Castro-Valencia LA, Narvaez-Sanchez R, Osorio J, Aguirre-Acevedo DC, Calderon JC. Safety of High-Intensity, Low-Volume Interval Training or Continuous Aerobic Training in Adults With Metabolic Syndrome. J Patient Saf. 2022 Jun 1;18(4):295-301. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000922. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34763335Aristizabal JC, Montoya E, Sanchez YL, Yepes-Calderon M, Narvaez-Sanchez R, Gallo-Villegas JA, Calderon JC. Effects of Low-Volume, High-Intensity Interval Training Compared with Continuous Training on Regional and Global Body Composition in Adults with Metabolic Syndrome: A post hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Nutr Metab. 2021;77(5):279-288. doi: 10.1159/000518909. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34687360Gallo-Villegas J, Castro-Valencia LA, Perez L, Restrepo D, Guerrero O, Cardona S, Sanchez YL, Yepes-Calderon M, Valbuena LH, Pena M, Milan AF, Trillos-Almanza MC, Granados S, Aristizabal JC, Estrada-Castrillon M, Narvaez-Sanchez R, Osorio J, Aguirre-Acevedo DC, Calderon JC. Efficacy of high-intensity interval- or continuous aerobic-training on insulin resistance and muscle function in adults with metabolic syndrome: a clinical trial. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022 Feb;122(2):331-344. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04835-w. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29482601Gallo-Villegas J, Aristizabal JC, Estrada M, Valbuena LH, Narvaez-Sanchez R, Osorio J, Aguirre-Acevedo DC, Calderon JC. Efficacy of high-intensity, low-volume interval training compared to continuous aerobic training on insulin resistance, skeletal muscle structure and function in adults with metabolic syndrome: study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial (Intraining-MET). Trials. 2018 Feb 27;19(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2541-7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Metabolic Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Defining the Natural History of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Fanconi Anemia
Fanconi Anemia, Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Osilodrostat for Glycemic Control in Mild Autonomous Cortisol Secretion (MACS) With Difficult-To-Control Type 2 Diabetes - A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Study
Mild Autonomous Cortisol Secretion (MACS), Diabetes Mellitus (Type 2)
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Whole-body Electrical Muscle Stimulation Exercise on Adults With Neuromuscular Disease
Neuromuscular Diseases (NMD), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Genetics Branch Eligibility Screening Survey
Melanoma, Li-Fraumeni Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Effects of Meal Macronutrients on Postprandial Lipids
Nephrotic Syndrome, Lipodystrophy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Juan Calderón, MD, PhD principal investigator
Professor
Daniel Aguirre, PhD study director
Professor
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing HIIT-LV and CAE in people with Metabolic Syndrome and Insulin Resistance, run by Universidad de Antioquia at 1 site in Colombia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Colombia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Insulin sensitivity (time frame: 12-week). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03087721, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2019.