AzTrials
AzTrials

Cancer ColorectalEDUCANCOLAGENCT03084133

Impact of EDUcation Strategy on Patients With COLorectal CANCER or Advanced Adenoma in the Detection of Colorectal Cancer of Their First-degree Relatives

A study testing Therapeutic Education Strategy in people with Cancer Colorectal, run by University Hospital, Tours at 8 sites in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The relative risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increased in first-degree relatives of patients with CRC or advanced adenoma. In the high-risk CCR population defined by a family history at the first stage of CRC or advanced adenoma before age 60, total colonoscopy is the recommended screening test. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Cancer Colorectal
What is being tested?
Therapeutic Education Strategy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
68 participants
Where
8 sitesFrance
Study dates
10 Apr 2017to 19 Jan 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

List of inclusion criteria

Index case:

  • Patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma or advanced adenoma diagnosed (definition of advanced adenoma (Winawer, 2006): adenoma of diameter ≥ 10 mm and / or severe dysplasia and / or with a villous contingent).
  • Patients with at least one relative of the first degree belonging to the target population of the screening strategy evaluated (between 40 and 75 years of age and less than 10 years of age of the case-index) and residing in France.
  • Affiliation of the patient to a social security scheme (including CMU).
  • Understanding of the French language.

Related:

  • They correspond to the target population at high risk of colorectal cancer targeted by this program of promotion of colonoscopy screening:
  • Subjects related to 1st degree to the index case and in contact with it.
  • Age between 40 and 75 years of age or less than 10 years of age of the index case.
  • Resides in France

List of exclusion Criteria :

Index case :

  • Chronic inflammatory bowel disease.
  • Genetic predisposition syndrome identified with colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome, familial polyposis linked to the APC and MYH genes).
  • Patient's knowledge of a first-degree relative with colorectal adenocarcinoma or advanced adenoma.
  • Isolated patient of his / her first-degree relatives and not wishing to re-establish contact with them.
  • Advanced colorectal cancer with a life expectancy <6 months and / or a WHO ≥ 2 general condition.
  • Transmission of information to the family already carried out.

Related :

  • Not applicable

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 1 country.

8 sites in 1 country

France8 sites
  • Service d'Hépatogastro-entérologie CHU ANGERS

    Angers

  • Service d'Hépatogastro-entérologie CHG BLOIS

    Blois, 41 000

  • Service d'Hépatogastro-entérologie CHG de DREUX

    Dreux

  • Service de Médecine CHG de Loches

    Loches

  • Service d'Hépatogastro-entérologie CHU de NANTES

    Nantes

  • Service d'Hépatogastro-entérologie CHR d'Orléans

    Orléans, 45067

  • Service d'Hépatogastro-entérologie CHU POITIERS

    Poitiers, 86 000

  • Service d'Hépatogastro-entérologie CHRU de TOURS

    Tours, 37044

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Impact of EDUcation Strategy on Patients With COLorectal CANCER or Advanced Adenoma in the Detection of Colorectal Cancer of Their First-degree Relatives - Randomized, Multicenter Cluster Test

The relative risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increased in first-degree relatives of patients with CRC or advanced adenoma. In the high-risk CCR population defined by a family history at the first stage of CRC or advanced adenoma before age 60, total colonoscopy is the recommended screening test. In France, the rate of screening colonoscopy in this population at high risk of CRC is insufficient, which limits the effectiveness of this targeted screening.

The main reason for this low participation rate is that most patients undergoing RCC or advanced adenoma are unaware of the family implications of their diagnosis and therefore reluctant to disseminate this information to their patients Related matters. The need for a better perception of the personal risk of CRC in first-degree relatives of patients with CRC or advanced adenoma, with the expected coronary adherence to increasing screening, requires a good understanding of risk through Clear, adapted and comprehensible information that can be relayed personally by the case-index.

Read more

The objective of this project is to develop a personalized prevention and screening program for the JRC in order to meet the needs of the relatives of the sick. The means of intervention that will be implemented respond to the need to better take into account the level of CRC risk in a family-based CRC screening and prevention approach adapted to a high-risk CRC group characterized by Family history at the first stage of CRC or advanced adenoma and, consequently, to improve the information of the subjects concerned by screening and prevention of CRC.

The aim of the case-index education is to induce its intervention with its relatives to promote CCR screening. The use of the index case, as a means of providing information to relatives, implies an educational and psychological approach, based on evidence, but adapted and personalized.

Read the detailed description

The relative risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increased in first-degree relatives of patients with CRC or advanced adenoma. In the high-risk CCR population defined by a family history at the first stage of CRC or advanced adenoma before age 60, total colonoscopy is the recommended screening test. In France, the rate of screening colonoscopy in this population at high risk of CRC is insufficient, which limits the effectiveness of this targeted screening.

Being tested
Therapeutic Education Strategy
Keywords
Therapeutic education strategy
Medical subject headings
Colonic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Therapeutic Education StrategyBehavioural

    In the experimental arm of the study ("intervention group"), a screening information and education system will be implemented. The particularities of the index cases likely to require an adaptation of the device will be collected, analyzed and taken into account (level of health literacy, socio-economic status, level of education, professional activity ...). The analysis and intervention frameworks derived from theories on health behaviors will be mobilized (theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behaviors) and applied in order to reinforce the "intention" of the target audience. The analysis and intervention frameworks resulting from the educational sciences will be integrated with a "competence" approach (Aizen, 1991, Denovel, Dufour, Prochaska, 1983, Le Boterf, 2002).

Study groups in NCT03084133
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Therapeutic Education StrategyExperimentalMeans a screening information and education system in which the particularities of the index cases likely to require adaptation of the device will be collected, analyzed and taken into account. Intervention 'Therapeutic Education Strategy'
Receives: Behavioral: Therapeutic Education Strategy
Control groupNo interventionProvision of information on the need for screening colonoscopy in first-degree relatives of case-index patients by the practitioner taking charge of the index case according to its usual practice

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Participation rate in screening colonoscopy for first-degree relatives of patients with RCC or advanced adenoma.

    Participation rate in screening colonoscopy for first-degree relatives of patients with RCC or advanced adenoma.

    Measured: 12 MONTHS

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Psychological determinants (quality of relationship with relatives, motivation to inform relatives) that can condition the enrollment in the education program.

    Psychological determinants (quality of relationship with relatives, motivation to inform relatives) that can condition the enrollment in the education program.

    Measured: 12 MONTHS

  2. Social and demographic factors in index cases associated with screening colonoscopy in related subjects: age, sex, educational level, socio-professional category.

    Social and demographic factors in index cases associated with screening colonoscopy in related subjects: age, sex, educational level, socio-professional category.

    Measured: 12 MONTHS

  3. Social and demographic factors associated with screening colonoscopy in related subjects: age, sex, educational level, socio-professional category.

    Social and demographic factors associated with screening colonoscopy in related subjects: age, sex, educational level, socio-professional category.

    Measured: 12 MONTHS

  4. How to access screening colonoscopy: pathway (public or private), direct access to the gastroenterologist or through the attending physician.

    How to access screening colonoscopy: pathway (public or private), direct access to the gastroenterologist or through the attending physician.

    Measured: 12 MONTHS

  5. Time to access the colonoscopy (time between the procedure and the completion of the screening colonoscopy).

    Time to access the colonoscopy (time between the procedure and the completion of the screening colonoscopy).

    Measured: 2 MONTHS

  6. Rate of colorectal cancer.

    Rate of colorectal cancer.

    Measured: 12 MONTHS

  7. Rate of advanced adenomas.

    Rate of advanced adenomas.

    Measured: 12 MONTHS

  8. Detection rate of scallop lesions.

    Detection rate of scallop lesions.

    Measured: 12 MONTHS

  9. Rate of complications in screening colonoscopies.

    Rate of complications in screening colonoscopies.

    Measured: 12 MONTHS

  10. Quality criteria for screening colonoscopy using the following parameters: visualization rate of the bottom of the colon, the withdrawal time of the colonoscope (Withdrawal time), quality of the colic preparation using the Boston scale.

    Quality criteria for screening colonoscopy using the following parameters: visualization rate of the bottom of the colon, the withdrawal time of the colonoscope (Withdrawal time), quality of the colic preparation using the Boston scale.

    Measured: 12 MONTHS

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Mar 2017
  2. Study start10 Apr 2017
  3. Primary completion19 Jan 2019
  4. Study completion19 Jan 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
"Intervention group" means a screening information and education system in which the particularities of the index cases likely to require adaptation of the device will be collected, analyzed and taken into account. "Control group": provision of information on the need for screening colonoscopy in first-degree relatives of case-index patients by the practitioner taking charge of the case-index according to its usual practice and adapted to the level of understanding of Case-index.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
68 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03084133
Sponsor's protocol ID
INCA14-TL/EDUCANCOLAGE
Other IDs
2015-A01514-45
Acronym
EDUCANCOLAGE
Status last verified
Sep 2019
First submitted
28 Feb 2017
Last updated
26 Sep 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Therapeutic Education Strategy in people with Cancer Colorectal, run by University Hospital, Tours at 8 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Participation rate in screening colonoscopy for first-degree relatives of patients with RCC or advanced adenoma. (time frame: 12 MONTHS). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in