CHD - Coronary Heart DiseaseEMPIRE-BVSNCT03076476
Coronary Microcirculatory and Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds
A study testing Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds (BVS), Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) - slow and Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) - standard(std) in people with CHD - Coronary Heart Disease and Angina, Stable, run by Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Angina and heart attacks are caused by narrowings in the coronary arteries (blood vessels) supplying the heart. These narrowings can be opened using a balloon and stent (angioplasty). Traditionally, stents are constructed from metal and are permanent. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- CHD - Coronary Heart Disease, Angina, Stable, Myocardial Ischemia
- What is being tested?
- Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds (BVS), Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) - slow and Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) - standard(std)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2017to 10 Mar 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient age >18 years, <75 years.
- Lesion suitability for BVS deployment: target vessel calibre >2.3mm and <3.8mm reference diameter, without significant tortuosity or calcification.
- Listed for single-vessel PCI procedure.
- Lesion length≤28mm (to accommodate single BVS/DES)
- Preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (EF≥50%).
Who cannot join
- Patients with confirmed myocardial infarction within the preceding 2 months.
- Allergy or intolerance to aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor or contraindication to 12 months' dual antiplatelet therapy.
- Contraindication to use of adenosine (asthma/chronic lung disease with documented bronchoreactivity).
- Significant known comorbidity or terminal condition with life expectancy <6 months.
- Pregnancy.
- Coagulopathy or warfarin treatment.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Significant renal impairment (baseline creatinine>130 mmol/l).
- Other comorbid condition that may affect microcirculatory function or troponin release (eg. Seropositive inflammatory conditions).
- Inability to comply with follow-up requirements.
- Target lesion in left mainstem, saphenous vein or arterial grafts.
- Chronic total occlusion.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB23 3RE
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Microcirculatory Protection In Percutaneous REvascularisation With Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Metallic Drug-eluting Stents: a Device- and Implant Technique-based Comparison
Angina and heart attacks are caused by narrowings in the coronary arteries (blood vessels) supplying the heart. These narrowings can be opened using a balloon and stent (angioplasty). Traditionally, stents are constructed from metal and are permanent. However, newer stents are being constructed from carbohydrate polymers (scaffolds), which allow them to reabsorb over time leaving no permanent implant. New data has suggested that these scaffolds appear to reduce recurrent angina and may alter the blood flow down the artery. However, it is not known whether this is due to the scaffolds themselves or the way the scaffolds are inserted. In this study we hope to measure the blood flow to the heart and assess changes in that flow during stent and scaffold insertion. It is also important to know whether these effects are durable and thus, a cohort of patients will return at 3-months to be restudied. These data are important to help us understand why blood flow is affected by stent/scaffold selection or device implantation technique and whether this results in better long-term outcomes.
- Being tested
- Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds (BVS), Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) - slow, Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) - standard(std)
- Keywords
- Coronary Stent, PCI, BVS, Index of microcirculatory resistance
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease, Angina, Stable, Myocardial Ischemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds (BVS)Device
Also called ABSORB
Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold. Introduced after the interim analysis (phase 2) for comparison with DES-slow.
Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) - slowDevice
Also called Xience
Slow device inflation (mandated in the BVS IFU). To be compared with the DES-std group at interim analysis at the end of phase 1 stage.
After the interim analysis DES-slow to be compared with BVS.
Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) - standard(std)Device
Also called Xience
Metallic DES implanted in standard fashion. To be compared with the DES-slow group at interim analysis at the end of phase 1 stage.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| DES-std group | Active comparator | (DES: drug-eluting stent). Metallic DES implanted in standard fashion. To be compared with the DES-slow group at interim analysis at the end of phase 1 stage. Receives: Device: Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) - standard(std) |
| DES-slow group | Experimental | (DES: drug-eluting stent). Slow device inflation (mandated in the BVS IFU). To be compared with the DES-std group at interim analysis at the end of phase 1 stage.
After the interim analysis DES-slow to be compared with BVS. Receives: Device: Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) - slow |
| BVS group | Experimental | (Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold) Introduced after the interim analysis (phase 2) for comparison with DES-slow. Receives: Device: Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds (BVS) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in IMR between baseline and post-stent/scaffold implantation.
IMR: index of microvascular resistance
Measured: During procedure
Change in CFR between baseline and post-stent/scaffold implantation.
CFR: coronary flow reserve
Measured: During procedure
Secondary outcomes (8)
Incidence of troponin elevation post-PCI (MI4a).
Measuring serum troponin I levels by blood test
Measured: Measured 6 hours after stent insertion
Changes in IMR between baseline, post-implant and subsequent timepoints in subrandomized group.
IMR: index of microvascular resistance
Measured: 3 months follow up
Incidence of post-PCI angina and quality of life by standardized Seattle angina questionnaire at telephone follow-up.
Description: The Seattle Angina Questionnaire is a points based question and answer system where a overall score can be assessed and compared
Measured: Up to 12 months
Incidence of stent & scaffold expansion & malapposition adjudged by strut-level OCT analysis.
OCT analysis of stent struts done quantitatively
Measured: During index procedure and at 3 month follow up
Incidence of stent/scaffold strut coverage/endothelialisation adjudged by strut-level OCT analysis.
OCT analysis of stent struts done quantitatively
Measured: During index procedure and at 3 month follow up
Nature/phenotype of underlying target lesion plaque by OCT analysis.
OCT analysis of lesion characteristics done quantitatively
Measured: During index procedure and at 3 month follow up
Adverse events
Adverse event assessed by clinical history and medical notes
Measured: At time points 1, 3, 6 & 12 months post-PCI
Serious adverse events
Serious adverse event assessed by clinical history and medical notes
Measured: At time points 1, 3, 6 & 12 months post-PCI
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Mar 2017
- Study start1 Feb 2017
- Primary completion10 Mar 2021
- Study completion10 Mar 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CHD - Coronary Heart DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Melissa Duckworth, Study director, Papworth NHS Foundation Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03076476
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P02135
- Acronym
- EMPIRE-BVS
- Status last verified
- Apr 2022
- First submitted
- 26 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 22 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Aetesam-Ur-Rahman M, Zhao TX, Paques K, Oliveira J, Chiu YD, Duckworth M, Khialani B, Kyranis S, Bennett MR, West NEJ, Hoole SP. Evaluation of microcirculatory protection in percutaneous revascularisation: A stent implantation technique and device comparison. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Sep;104(3):462-471. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31155. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
PubMed 39044651Aetesam-Ur-Rahman M, Zhao TX, Paques K, Oliveira J, Khialani B, Kyranis S, Braganza DM, Clarke SC, Bennett MR, West NEJ, Hoole SP. Coronary Flow Variations Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Affect Diastolic Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios More Than the Whole Cycle Ratios. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 May 3;11(9):e023554. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023554. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
PubMed 35470686
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Microcirculatory Protection In Percutaneous REvascularisation With Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Metallic Drug-eluting Stents: a Device- and Implant Technique-based Comparison
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03076476
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EMPIRE-BVS / P02135
- Keywords
- Coronary Stent, PCI, BVS, Index of microcirculatory resistance
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation TrustOther government
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Mar 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Angina and heart attacks are caused by narrowings in the coronary arteries (blood vessels) supplying the heart. These narrowings can be opened using a balloon and stent (angioplasty). Traditionally, stents are constructed from metal and are permanent. However, newer stents are being constructed from carbohydrate polymers (scaffolds), which allow them to reabsorb over time leaving no permanent implant. New data has suggested that these scaffolds appear to reduce recurrent angina and may alter the blood flow down the artery. However, it is not known whether this is due to the scaffolds themselves or the way the scaffolds are inserted. In this study we hope to measure the blood flow to the heart and assess changes in that flow during stent and scaffold insertion. It is also important to know whether these effects are durable and thus, a cohort of patients will return at 3-months to be restudied. These data are important to help us understand why blood flow is affected by stent/scaffold selection or device implantation technique and whether this results in better long-term outcomes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| DES-std group | Active comparator | Device: Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) - standard(std)(DES: drug-eluting stent). Metallic DES implanted in standard fashion. To be compared with the DES-slow group at interim analysis at the end of phase 1 stage. |
| DES-slow group | Experimental | Device: Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) - slow(DES: drug-eluting stent). Slow device inflation (mandated in the BVS IFU). To be compared with the DES-std group at interim analysis at the end of phase 1 stage. After the interim analysis DES-slow to be compared with BVS. |
| BVS group | Experimental | Device: Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds (BVS)(Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold) Introduced after the interim analysis (phase 2) for comparison with DES-slow. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patient age >18 years, <75 years.
- Lesion suitability for BVS deployment: target vessel calibre >2.3mm and <3.8mm reference diameter, without significant tortuosity or calcification.
- Listed for single-vessel PCI procedure.
- Lesion length≤28mm (to accommodate single BVS/DES)
- Preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (EF≥50%).
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Patients with confirmed myocardial infarction within the preceding 2 months.
- Allergy or intolerance to aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor or contraindication to 12 months' dual antiplatelet therapy.
- Contraindication to use of adenosine (asthma/chronic lung disease with documented bronchoreactivity).
- Significant known comorbidity or terminal condition with life expectancy <6 months.
- Pregnancy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds (BVS)Also: ABSORBBioresorbable Vascular Scaffold. Introduced after the interim analysis (phase 2) for comparison with DES-slow. | Device | BVS group |
| Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) - slowAlso: XienceSlow device inflation (mandated in the BVS IFU). To be compared with the DES-std group at interim analysis at the end of phase 1 stage. After the interim analysis DES-slow to be compared with BVS. | Device | DES-slow group |
| Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) - standard(std)Also: XienceMetallic DES implanted in standard fashion. To be compared with the DES-slow group at interim analysis at the end of phase 1 stage. | Device | DES-std group |
Primary outcome
Change in IMR between baseline and post-stent/scaffold implantation.
Time frame: During procedure
IMR: index of microvascular resistance
Change in CFR between baseline and post-stent/scaffold implantation.
Time frame: During procedure
CFR: coronary flow reserve
8 secondary outcomes
Incidence of troponin elevation post-PCI (MI4a).
Time frame: Measured 6 hours after stent insertion
Changes in IMR between baseline, post-implant and subsequent timepoints in subrandomized group.
Time frame: 3 months follow up
Incidence of post-PCI angina and quality of life by standardized Seattle angina questionnaire at telephone follow-up.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Incidence of stent & scaffold expansion & malapposition adjudged by strut-level OCT analysis.
Time frame: During index procedure and at 3 month follow up
Incidence of stent/scaffold strut coverage/endothelialisation adjudged by strut-level OCT analysis.
Time frame: During index procedure and at 3 month follow up
Nature/phenotype of underlying target lesion plaque by OCT analysis.
Time frame: During index procedure and at 3 month follow up
Adverse events
Time frame: At time points 1, 3, 6 & 12 months post-PCI
Serious adverse events
Time frame: At time points 1, 3, 6 & 12 months post-PCI
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Apr 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39044651Aetesam-Ur-Rahman M, Zhao TX, Paques K, Oliveira J, Chiu YD, Duckworth M, Khialani B, Kyranis S, Bennett MR, West NEJ, Hoole SP. Evaluation of microcirculatory protection in percutaneous revascularisation: A stent implantation technique and device comparison. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Sep;104(3):462-471. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31155. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35470686Aetesam-Ur-Rahman M, Zhao TX, Paques K, Oliveira J, Khialani B, Kyranis S, Braganza DM, Clarke SC, Bennett MR, West NEJ, Hoole SP. Coronary Flow Variations Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Affect Diastolic Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios More Than the Whole Cycle Ratios. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 May 3;11(9):e023554. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023554. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for CHD - Coronary Heart Disease
Not yet recruiting
Autologous Thymus Transplant in Children With Congenital Heart Disease: A Pilot Study
Congenital Heart Disease (CHD)
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Thiamine Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Coronary Heart Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Not yet recruiting
Hs-CRP-Guided Colchicine Treatment Targets in Very-High-Risk Patients With Coronary Artery Disease After PCI (TARGET-CHD)
Coronary Artery Disease, Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD)
Active, not recruiting
Learning by Heart: The Effectiveness of an EF Training Program for Pre-schoolers With Critical CHD
Congenital Heart Disease, Executive Dysfunction
Not yet recruiting
UltraTrac for Cardiac Output Monitoring in Congenital Heart Disease
Congenital Heart Disease, Cardiac Output
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Melissa Duckworth study director
Papworth NHS Foundation Trust
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds (BVS), Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) - slow and Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) - standard(std) in people with CHD - Coronary Heart Disease and Angina, Stable, run by Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in IMR between baseline and post-stent/scaffold implantation. (time frame: During procedure). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03076476, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Apr 2022.