Dentine HypersensitivityPhase 3NCT03072719
The Efficacy of a Dentifrice in Providing Relief From Immediate and Short Term Relief From Dentinal Hypersensitivity
A Phase 3 study testing Stannous Fluoride and Sodium Monofluorophosphate in people with Dentine Hypersensitivity, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 1 site in Ireland.
Trial summary
A randomised, examiner blind, two treatment arm, stratified, parallel design, single-site study in subjects with at least two sensitive teeth to compare the efficacy of a test dentifrice against that of a control dentifrice in reducing dentinal hypersensitivity. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Dentine Hypersensitivity
- What is being tested?
- Stannous Fluoride and Sodium Monofluorophosphate
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIreland
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2012to 12 Jun 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Demonstrates understanding of the study and willingness to participate
- Aged at least 18 to 65 years
- Understands and is willing, able and likely to comply with all study procedures and restrictions
- Good general health with (in the opinion of the investigator) no clinically significant and relevant abnormalities of medical history or oral examination.
- Self-reported history of dentinal hypersensitivity lasting more than 6 months but not more than 10 years
- Minimum of 20 natural teeth at screening, a minimum of two accessible teeth (incisors, canines, pre-molars)
- At baseline, participant has two non-adjacent sensitive teeth from those meeting the EAR, GI and mobility criteria at screening, with sensitivity measured by tactile stimulus (Yeaple ≤ 20g) and evaporative (air) assessment (Schiff Sensitivity Score ≥ 2) at baseline
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women
- Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients.
- Participation in another clinical study or receipt of an investigational drug within 30 days of the screening visit
- Recent history (within the last year) of alcohol or other substance abuse
- An employee of the sponsor or the study site or members of their immediate family
- Presence of chronic debilitating disease which, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect study outcomes.
Show all 21Show fewer
- Any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, causes xerostomia
- Dental prophylaxis within 4 weeks of screening
- Tongue or lip piercing or presence of dental implants
- Professional desensitising treatment within 12 weeks of screening
- Gross periodontal disease, treatment of periodontal disease (including surgery) within 12 months of screening, scaling or root planning within 3 months of screening.
- Teeth bleaching within 12 weeks of screening
- Tooth with evidence of current or recent caries, or reported treatment of decay in 12 months of screening
- Tooth with exposed dentine but with deep, defective or facial restorations, teeth used as abutments for fixed or removable partial dentures, teeth with full crowns or veneers, orthodontic bands or cracked enamel. Sensitive teeth with contributing aetiologies other than erosion, abrasion or recession of exposed dentine
- Sensitive tooth not expected to respond to treatment with an over-the counter dentifrice in the opinion of the investigator.
- Use of a desensitising dentifrice within six weeks of screening (participant will be required to bring their current dentifrice to the site in order to verify the lack of known anti-sensitivity ingredients)
- Daily doses of a medication which, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with the perception of pain
- Currently taking antibiotics or have taken antibiotics within 2 weeks of baseline.
- Daily doses of a medication which, in the opinion of the investigator, causes xerostomia
- Individuals who require antibiotic prophylaxis for dental procedures
- Any participant who, in the judgment of the investigator, should not participate in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Clinical Study Investigating the Efficacy of a Dentifrice in Providing Immediate and Short Term Relief From Dentinal Hypersensitivity
A randomised, examiner blind, two treatment arm, stratified, parallel design, single-site study in subjects with at least two sensitive teeth to compare the efficacy of a test dentifrice against that of a control dentifrice in reducing dentinal hypersensitivity.
- Conditions
- Dentine Hypersensitivity
- Being tested
- Stannous Fluoride, Sodium Monofluorophosphate
- Medical subject headings
- Dentin Sensitivity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Stannous FluorideDrug
Test dentifrice, participants will brush each of the 2 selected sensitive teeth each for 30 seconds followed by the whole mouth thoroughly for at least one minute.
Sodium MonofluorophosphateDrug
Control dentifrice, participants will brush the whole mouth thoroughly for at least 1 minute.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dentifrice containing stannous fluoride | Experimental | Toothpaste Receives: Drug: Stannous Fluoride |
| Dentifrice containing Sodium Monofluorophosphate | Active comparator | Toothpaste Receives: Drug: Sodium Monofluorophosphate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score on Day 14
Schiff sensitivity score was assessed by examiner as participant's response to an evaporative (air) stimulus after the stimulation of each individual tooth. Response of participant was scored using Schiff sensitivity scale range of 0-3; 0=Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1=Participant responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2=Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3= Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score indicates improvement in sensitivity.
Measured: Baseline, Day 14
Secondary outcomes (2)
Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score on Post First Brushing (After 5 Minutes) and Day 3
Schiff sensitivity score was assessed by examiner as participant's response to an evaporative (air) stimulus after the stimulation of each individual tooth. Response of participant was scored using Schiff sensitivity scale range of 0-3; 0=Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1=Participant responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2=Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3= Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score indicate improvement in sensitivity.
Measured: Baseline, post first brushing (after 5 minutes) and Day 3
Change From Baseline in Tactile (Yeaple) Pain Threshold on Post First Brushing (After 5 Minutes), Day 3 and Day 14
Tactile threshold was assessed by examiner using a constant pressure probe (Yeaple probe) which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface from 10 g to an upper threshold of 80g in increments of 10 g. The tactile threshold is the maximum pressure applied at which participant do not report any pain or discomfort. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the participant whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the participant gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth.
Measured: Baseline, post first brushing (after 5 minutes), Day 3 and Day 14
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Mar 2017
- Study start1 Mar 2012
- Primary completion1 Jun 2012
- Study completion12 Jun 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Dentine HypersensitivityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03072719
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 202161
- Other IDs
- RH01327
- Status last verified
- Feb 2018
- First submitted
- 2 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 6 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Parkinson CR, Hughes N, Hall C, Whelton H, Gallob J, Mason S. Three randomized clinical trials to assess the short-term efficacy of anhydrous 0.454% w/w stannous fluoride dentifrices for the relief of dentin hypersensitivity. Am J Dent. 2016 Feb;29(1):25-32.
PubMed 27093773
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Clinical Study Investigating the Efficacy of a Dentifrice in Providing Immediate and Short Term Relief From Dentinal Hypersensitivity
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03072719
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 202161
- Conditions
- Dentine Hypersensitivity
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Jun 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 18 Apr 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A randomised, examiner blind, two treatment arm, stratified, parallel design, single-site study in subjects with at least two sensitive teeth to compare the efficacy of a test dentifrice against that of a control dentifrice in reducing dentinal hypersensitivity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dentifrice containing stannous fluoride | Experimental | Drug: Stannous FluorideToothpaste |
| Dentifrice containing Sodium Monofluorophosphate | Active comparator | Drug: Sodium MonofluorophosphateToothpaste |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Demonstrates understanding of the study and willingness to participate
- Aged at least 18 to 65 years
- Understands and is willing, able and likely to comply with all study procedures and restrictions
- Good general health with (in the opinion of the investigator) no clinically significant and relevant abnormalities of medical history or oral examination.
- Self-reported history of dentinal hypersensitivity lasting more than 6 months but not more than 10 years
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women
- Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients.
- Participation in another clinical study or receipt of an investigational drug within 30 days of the screening visit
- Recent history (within the last year) of alcohol or other substance abuse
- An employee of the sponsor or the study site or members of their immediate family
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Stannous FluorideTest dentifrice, participants will brush each of the 2 selected sensitive teeth each for 30 seconds followed by the whole mouth thoroughly for at least one minute. | Drug | Dentifrice containing stannous fluoride |
| Sodium MonofluorophosphateControl dentifrice, participants will brush the whole mouth thoroughly for at least 1 minute. | Drug | Dentifrice containing Sodium Monofluorophosphate |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score on Day 14
Time frame: Baseline, Day 14
Schiff sensitivity score was assessed by examiner as participant's response to an evaporative (air) stimulus after the stimulation of each individual tooth. Response of participant was scored using Schiff sensitivity scale range of 0-3; 0=Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1=Participant responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2=Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3= Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score indicates improvement in sensitivity.
2 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score on Post First Brushing (After 5 Minutes) and Day 3
Time frame: Baseline, post first brushing (after 5 minutes) and Day 3
Change From Baseline in Tactile (Yeaple) Pain Threshold on Post First Brushing (After 5 Minutes), Day 3 and Day 14
Time frame: Baseline, post first brushing (after 5 minutes), Day 3 and Day 14
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Mar 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27093773Parkinson CR, Hughes N, Hall C, Whelton H, Gallob J, Mason S. Three randomized clinical trials to assess the short-term efficacy of anhydrous 0.454% w/w stannous fluoride dentifrices for the relief of dentin hypersensitivity. Am J Dent. 2016 Feb;29(1):25-32.
Related trials for Dentine Hypersensitivity
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Decoupling With Time Technique on the Clinical Performance of Proximal Posterior Composite Restorations
Dental Restoration Failure, Postoperative Hypersensitivity
Recruiting
A Study to Assess the Efficacy of a Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate Toothpaste for the Relief of Dentine Hypersensitivity
Dentin Sensitivity
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Evaluation of Short Dentin Etching
Hypersensitivity Dentin, Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity
Recruiting
Peroxide Versus Non-Peroxide In-Office Tooth Bleaching
Tooth Discoloration, Tooth Staining
Recruiting
Dentine Hypersensitivity Using Dentine Adhesive With Strontium-doped Bioactive Glass-Ceramic
Dentine Hypersensitivity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Stannous Fluoride and Sodium Monofluorophosphate in people with Dentine Hypersensitivity, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 1 site in Ireland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Ireland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Apr 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score on Day 14 (time frame: Baseline, Day 14). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03072719, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Mar 2018.