Implant TherapyPhase 1/2Implant_boneNCT03070275
Dental Implant Placement in Adjunction With Autologous Alveolar Bone-Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (aBM-MSCs)
A Phase 1/2 study testing Biocomplex: aBM-MSCs/fibrin glue/collagen fleece and Two-stage surgical implant placement in people with Implant Therapy, run by Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki.
Trial summary
Systemically healthy volunteers with no active periodontal disease are recruited from referrals to the Dept. of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Biology of Implants, Aristotle Univ of Thessaloniki for implant therapy. After signing a consent form, participants will be randomized into two treatment groups. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Implant Therapy
- What is being tested?
- Biocomplex: aBM-MSCs/fibrin glue/collagen fleece and Two-stage surgical implant placement
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Feb 2015to Dec 2017
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 60 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- systemically healthy volunteers
Who cannot join
- poorly controlled systemic disease
- heavy smoking (>20cigs/day)
- bisphosphonate medication
- anti-inflammatory drugs
- bone metabolic diseases or disorders that compromise wound healing
- immunosuppressive therapy or radiation
Show all 11Show fewer
- alcohol intake
- drug abuse over the past year
- significant concurrent illness
- pregnancy/lactation
- active periodontal disease and compromised oral hygiene (PI ≥25%)
About this study
Official title: Preservation of Alveolar Crestal Bone From Implant Placement to Implant Exposure Using Autologous Alveolar Bone-Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (aBM-MSCs)
Systemically healthy volunteers with no active periodontal disease are recruited from referrals to the Dept. of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Biology of Implants, Aristotle Univ of Thessaloniki for implant therapy. After signing a consent form, participants will be randomized into two treatment groups. Group-A (NA=10) will receive crestal placement of implants following a two-stage protocol in combination with a biocomplex comprising autologous alveolar bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells free of animal derived reagents, produced in clean room facilities and seeded into collagen scaffolds enriched with autologous fibrin glue. In Group-B (NB=10) implants are placed on the alveolar crest following a two-stage protocol and the manufacturer's guidelines. Intra-surgical clinical and radiographic assessments are performed at the time of implant placement (T0) and at the two-stage surgery (T1). Changes in mucosa thickness, width of keratinized tissues, marginal bone and bone thickness at the surgical site will be determined at T0-T1. Groups will be further divided into two subgroups based on mucosal thickness of the surgical site at T0 [thin mucosa (≤2.5mm) for Groups-AI/-BI; thick mucosa (>2.5mm) for Groups-AII/-BII]. A linear mixed model for repeated measures will be used for data analyses to determine changes in the dimensions of the peri-implant soft and hard tissues, around two stage-implants placed either conventionally, or in combination with the biocomplex.
Read the detailed description
Aims \& Objectives:
The present study describes a novel method to preserve the crestal bone at two-stage dental implants using autologous aBMMSCs, free of animal derived reagents, produced in clean room facilities enriched with autologous fibrin glue and seeded into commercially available collagen scaffolds (collagen fleece) that are stabilized over the implant platform upon surgical implant placement.
Primary objective:
This study aims to assess the efficacy of a novel method based on histotechnology in crestal bone preservation at two-stage dental implants, as compared to conventional surgical implant placement following the manufacturer's guidelines with no adjunctive use of grafting materials.
Secondary, changes in the peri-implant soft tissues will be also determined between implant placement and exposure and will be compared between the experimental and the conventional surgical treatment approaches.
Study design:
Biopsies will be derived from alveolar bone marrow of the alveolar bone under local anaesthesia in each patient belonging to the Experimental Group (Group-A). Briefly, after a thorough oral rinse with chlorhexidine 0.12% for 1min, an osteotomy using a trephine drill will be performed in the alveolar bone of an intraoral edentulous site other than the implant site and a 2x8 mm or 3cc approximately of an osseous core will be harvested. The area and the biopsy will be copiously irrigated with saline solution and then flaps will be sutured to achieve primary closure at the donor site. The bone sample will be then immediately placed in sterile tubes and will be transported to Biohellenika, Thessaloniki, Greece (http://www.biohellenika.gr) for stem cell isolation and expansion according to a strict clinical grade expansion protocol (Bakopoulou et al. 2013; Bakopoulou et al. in preparation). Since MSCs will be isolated and expanded in vitro in Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)-compliant clean rooms (Biohellenika facilities) meeting the quality guidelines set by the European Union and no animal derived reagents will be used throughout the experiments for autologous transplantation, the cells are considered safe for human clinical cell therapy applications. In Biohellenika facilities, 40ml of venous blood will be collected from each subject in Group-A shortly after the biopsy harvest, so that autologous serum is used for the isolation and culture expansion of the autologous stem cells. In addition, autologous fibrin glue will be used to load the BM-MSCs onto a commercially available collagen fleece. At the day of the surgical placement of the implants and chairside, the grafting material (BM-MSCs enriched with fibrin glue) will be delivered in an insulin syringe containing 10x10E6 cells/200μl fibrin and will be gently loaded onto the collagen fleece and activated with the addition of CaCl2. Subsequently, the biocomplex will be sutured onto the lingual flap using bioresorbable sutures (5-0 Coated VicrylTM (polyglactin 910), reverse cutting 3/8 circle - 16mm, Ethicon, Johnson \& Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA) and will be thus gently stabilized over the implant platform head partially covering the buccal bone. Handling of the scaffold will be done with care to avoid doing any harm to the viable cells.
In the Control Group (Group-B), the implants will be placed crestally following the manufacturer's guidelines with no adjunctive use of grafting materials. One system of implants will be consistently used throughout the study in both groups (Osseotite, Certain, parallel wall, Biomet 3i, Palm Beach Gardens, USA).
Post-operative care Post-operative pain will be controlled with Ibuprofen (600mg) at the end of the surgical procedure and 12h later if in pain. Amoxicillin (500mg / 8 hours for 5 days) will be prescribed to both Groups. All patients will be instructed to use 0.12% chlorhexidine twice daily and avoid brushing and chewing hard in the treated area for two weeks. During this 2-week period, patients will be followed on a weekly basis to record uneventful healing, and after that patients will discontinue rinsing with chlorhexidine solution and resume oral hygiene. Thereafter, subjects will be seen at three to four months to have their implants exposed.
Subjects will be assessed at baseline (T0: surgical implant placement) and T1 (implant exposure at 3-4 months). Clinical recordings will be determined by a single calibrated examiner using a manual periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy XP-23/QW, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) with an endo-stop attached on it and all measurements will be digitalised using an electronic caliper. A customised metallic caliper will measure the thickness of the bone at the buccal/lingual aspects of the implant. At T0 and T1, clinical recordings will assess:
- Thickness of mucosa at the top of the alveolar ridge and 2- and 4mm apically, on the buccal and the lingual aspects of the ridge.
- Width of keratinized mucosa buccally and lingually of the implantation site.
- Thickness of buccal and lingual bone at 0, 3- and 6mm from the implant shoulder.
- Level of of the buccal and lingual marginal bone, in relation to the implant shoulder.
Standardised digital radiographs will be collected at T0 and T1 to linearly determine changes (in mm) in the height of the alveolar bone between the implant shoulder and teh alveolar crest using the VixWin™ Platinum|Gendex software.
Groups will be further divided into two subgroups based on mucosal thickness of the surgical site at T0 [thin mucosa (≤2.5mm) for Groups-AI/-BI; thick mucosa (>2.5mm) for Groups-AII/-BII] and all the parameters will be determined and compared on the basis of the surgical approach and mucosa thickness at the surgical site.
A linear mixed model for repeated measures will be used for data analyses to determine changes in the dimensions of the peri-implant soft and hard tissues, around two stage-implants placed either conventionally, or in combination with the biocomplex.
- Conditions
- Implant Therapy
- Being tested
- Biocomplex: aBM-MSCs/fibrin glue/collagen fleece, Two-stage surgical implant placement
- Keywords
- surgical implant placement, crestal bone, mucosa thickness, stem cells, fibrin glue, collagen fleece
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Biocomplex: aBM-MSCs/fibrin glue/collagen fleeceBiological
Xeno-free, clinical-grade, autologous alveolar bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells enriched with autologous fibrin glue and loaded into a commercially available collagen fleece.
Two-stage surgical implant placementProcedure or surgery
Implants are surgically placed on the alveolar crest following a two-stage protocol and the manufacture's guidelines with no adjunctives.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group-A | Experimental | In the experimental Group (Group-A), a two-stage implant will be placed in parallel with an overlying biocomplex (aBM-MSCs/fibrin glue/collagen fleece) that comprises autologous alveolar bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells free of animal derived reagents, produced in clean room facilities and seeded into collagen scaffolds enriched with autologous fibrin glue. Receives: Biological: Biocomplex: aBM-MSCs/fibrin glue/collagen fleece |
| Control Group-B | Active comparator | In Group-B, a two-stage surgical implant placement on the alveolar crest is followed based on the manufacturer's guidelines with no use of adjunctive grafting materials. Receives: Procedure: Two-stage surgical implant placement |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
A reduction in the marginal bone levels
Intra-surgical clinical data: Changes in the vertical distance from the implant shoulder to the alveolar crest in mm
Measured: baseline (implant placement) to 4 months (implant exposure)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Radiographic changes in the marginal bone levels
Radiographic data: linear measurements (mm) on standardised x-rays regarding vertical changes in the marginal bone levels from implant shoulder to the alveolar crest
Measured: baseline (implant placement) to 4 months (implant exposure)
Reduction in the thickness of the buccal/lingual bone
Clinical data: Changes in the thickness of the bone plates in the buccal/lingual aspects of the implant
Measured: baseline (implant placement) to 4 months (implant exposure)
Changes in the alveolar mucosa
Changes in the thickness of mucosa at the top of the alveolar ridge and at 2- and 4mm apically of the implant shoulder
Measured: baseline (implant placement) to 4 months (implant exposure)
Changes in the width of keratised mucosa
Changes in the width of keratinised mucosa in mm at the surgical site
Measured: baseline (implant placement) to 4 months (implant exposure)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Mar 2017
- Study startFeb 2015
- Primary completionJun 2017
- Study completionDec 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Implant TherapyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Aristotle University Of ThessalonikiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Prospective, randomised, single blind, control clinical trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Danae A. Apatzidou, Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
- Investigators
- Antonis Konstantinidis, Professor, Study chair, Retired, Dept. of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Implant Biology, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03070275
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ELKE_91480
- Acronym
- Implant_bone
- Status last verified
- Oct 2018
- First submitted
- 25 Feb 2017
- Last updated
- 1 Nov 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bakopoulou A, Leyhausen G, Volk J, Koidis P, Geurtsen W. Comparative characterization of STRO-1(neg)/CD146(pos) and STRO-1(pos)/CD146(pos) apical papilla stem cells enriched with flow cytometry. Arch Oral Biol. 2013 Oct;58(10):1556-68. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.06.018. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
PubMed 23871383
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Nov 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Preservation of Alveolar Crestal Bone From Implant Placement to Implant Exposure Using Autologous Alveolar Bone-Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (aBM-MSCs)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03070275
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Implant_bone / ELKE_91480
- Conditions
- Implant Therapy
- Keywords
- surgical implant placement, crestal bone, mucosa thickness, stem cells, fibrin glue, collagen fleece
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Aristotle University Of ThessalonikiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Systemically healthy volunteers with no active periodontal disease are recruited from referrals to the Dept. of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Biology of Implants, Aristotle Univ of Thessaloniki for implant therapy. After signing a consent form, participants will be randomized into two treatment groups. Group-A (NA=10) will receive crestal placement of implants following a two-stage protocol in combination with a biocomplex comprising autologous alveolar bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells free of animal derived reagents, produced in clean room facilities and seeded into collagen scaffolds enriched with autologous fibrin glue. In Group-B (NB=10) implants are placed on the alveolar crest following a two-stage protocol and the manufacturer's guidelines. Intra-surgical clinical and radiographic assessments are performed at the time of implant placement (T0) and at the two-stage surgery (T1). Changes in mucosa thickness, width of keratinized tissues, marginal bone and bone thickness at the surgical site will be determined at T0-T1. Groups will be further divided into two subgroups based on mucosal thickness of the surgical site at T0 [thin mucosa (≤2.5mm) for Groups-AI/-BI; thick mucosa (>2.5mm) for Groups-AII/-BII]. A linear mixed model for repeated measures will be used for data analyses to determine changes in the dimensions of the peri-implant soft and hard tissues, around two stage-implants placed either conventionally, or in combination with the biocomplex.
Detailed description
Aims \& Objectives:
The present study describes a novel method to preserve the crestal bone at two-stage dental implants using autologous aBMMSCs, free of animal derived reagents, produced in clean room facilities enriched with autologous fibrin glue and seeded into commercially available collagen scaffolds (collagen fleece) that are stabilized over the implant platform upon surgical implant placement.
Primary objective:
This study aims to assess the efficacy of a novel method based on histotechnology in crestal bone preservation at two-stage dental implants, as compared to conventional surgical implant placement following the manufacturer's guidelines with no adjunctive use of grafting materials.
Secondary, changes in the peri-implant soft tissues will be also determined between implant placement and exposure and will be compared between the experimental and the conventional surgical treatment approaches.
Study design:
Biopsies will be derived from alveolar bone marrow of the alveolar bone under local anaesthesia in each patient belonging to the Experimental Group (Group-A). Briefly, after a thorough oral rinse with chlorhexidine 0.12% for 1min, an osteotomy using a trephine drill will be performed in the alveolar bone of an intraoral edentulous site other than the implant site and a 2x8 mm or 3cc approximately of an osseous core will be harvested. The area and the biopsy will be copiously irrigated with saline solution and then flaps will be sutured to achieve primary closure at the donor site. The bone sample will be then immediately placed in sterile tubes and will be transported to Biohellenika, Thessaloniki, Greece (http://www.biohellenika.gr) for stem cell isolation and expansion according to a strict clinical grade expansion protocol (Bakopoulou et al. 2013; Bakopoulou et al. in preparation). Since MSCs will be isolated and expanded in vitro in Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)-compliant clean rooms (Biohellenika facilities) meeting the quality guidelines set by the European Union and no animal derived reagents will be used throughout the experiments for autologous transplantation, the cells are considered safe for human clinical cell therapy applications. In Biohellenika facilities, 40ml of venous blood will be collected from each subject in Group-A shortly after the biopsy harvest, so that autologous serum is used for the isolation and culture expansion of the autologous stem cells. In addition, autologous fibrin glue will be used to load the BM-MSCs onto a commercially available collagen fleece. At the day of the surgical placement of the implants and chairside, the grafting material (BM-MSCs enriched with fibrin glue) will be delivered in an insulin syringe containing 10x10E6 cells/200μl fibrin and will be gently loaded onto the collagen fleece and activated with the addition of CaCl2. Subsequently, the biocomplex will be sutured onto the lingual flap using bioresorbable sutures (5-0 Coated VicrylTM (polyglactin 910), reverse cutting 3/8 circle - 16mm, Ethicon, Johnson \& Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA) and will be thus gently stabilized over the implant platform head partially covering the buccal bone. Handling of the scaffold will be done with care to avoid doing any harm to the viable cells.
In the Control Group (Group-B), the implants will be placed crestally following the manufacturer's guidelines with no adjunctive use of grafting materials. One system of implants will be consistently used throughout the study in both groups (Osseotite, Certain, parallel wall, Biomet 3i, Palm Beach Gardens, USA).
Post-operative care Post-operative pain will be controlled with Ibuprofen (600mg) at the end of the surgical procedure and 12h later if in pain. Amoxicillin (500mg / 8 hours for 5 days) will be prescribed to both Groups. All patients will be instructed to use 0.12% chlorhexidine twice daily and avoid brushing and chewing hard in the treated area for two weeks. During this 2-week period, patients will be followed on a weekly basis to record uneventful healing, and after that patients will discontinue rinsing with chlorhexidine solution and resume oral hygiene. Thereafter, subjects will be seen at three to four months to have their implants exposed.
Subjects will be assessed at baseline (T0: surgical implant placement) and T1 (implant exposure at 3-4 months). Clinical recordings will be determined by a single calibrated examiner using a manual periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy XP-23/QW, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) with an endo-stop attached on it and all measurements will be digitalised using an electronic caliper. A customised metallic caliper will measure the thickness of the bone at the buccal/lingual aspects of the implant. At T0 and T1, clinical recordings will assess:
- Thickness of mucosa at the top of the alveolar ridge and 2- and 4mm apically, on the buccal and the lingual aspects of the ridge.
- Width of keratinized mucosa buccally and lingually of the implantation site.
- Thickness of buccal and lingual bone at 0, 3- and 6mm from the implant shoulder.
- Level of of the buccal and lingual marginal bone, in relation to the implant shoulder.
Standardised digital radiographs will be collected at T0 and T1 to linearly determine changes (in mm) in the height of the alveolar bone between the implant shoulder and teh alveolar crest using the VixWin™ Platinum|Gendex software.
Groups will be further divided into two subgroups based on mucosal thickness of the surgical site at T0 [thin mucosa (≤2.5mm) for Groups-AI/-BI; thick mucosa (>2.5mm) for Groups-AII/-BII] and all the parameters will be determined and compared on the basis of the surgical approach and mucosa thickness at the surgical site.
A linear mixed model for repeated measures will be used for data analyses to determine changes in the dimensions of the peri-implant soft and hard tissues, around two stage-implants placed either conventionally, or in combination with the biocomplex.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Prospective, randomised, single blind, control clinical trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group-A | Experimental | Biological: Biocomplex: aBM-MSCs/fibrin glue/collagen fleeceIn the experimental Group (Group-A), a two-stage implant will be placed in parallel with an overlying biocomplex (aBM-MSCs/fibrin glue/collagen fleece) that comprises autologous alveolar bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells free of animal derived reagents, produced in clean room facilities and seeded into collagen scaffolds enriched with autologous fibrin glue. |
| Control Group-B | Active comparator | Procedure: Two-stage surgical implant placementIn Group-B, a two-stage surgical implant placement on the alveolar crest is followed based on the manufacturer's guidelines with no use of adjunctive grafting materials. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- systemically healthy volunteers
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- poorly controlled systemic disease
- heavy smoking (>20cigs/day)
- bisphosphonate medication
- anti-inflammatory drugs
- bone metabolic diseases or disorders that compromise wound healing
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Biocomplex: aBM-MSCs/fibrin glue/collagen fleeceXeno-free, clinical-grade, autologous alveolar bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells enriched with autologous fibrin glue and loaded into a commercially available collagen fleece. | Biological | Group-A |
| Two-stage surgical implant placementImplants are surgically placed on the alveolar crest following a two-stage protocol and the manufacture's guidelines with no adjunctives. | Procedure or surgery | Control Group-B |
Primary outcome
A reduction in the marginal bone levels
Time frame: baseline (implant placement) to 4 months (implant exposure)
Intra-surgical clinical data: Changes in the vertical distance from the implant shoulder to the alveolar crest in mm
4 secondary outcomes
Radiographic changes in the marginal bone levels
Time frame: baseline (implant placement) to 4 months (implant exposure)
Reduction in the thickness of the buccal/lingual bone
Time frame: baseline (implant placement) to 4 months (implant exposure)
Changes in the alveolar mucosa
Time frame: baseline (implant placement) to 4 months (implant exposure)
Changes in the width of keratised mucosa
Time frame: baseline (implant placement) to 4 months (implant exposure)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Nov 2018.
- Background: PubMed 23871383Bakopoulou A, Leyhausen G, Volk J, Koidis P, Geurtsen W. Comparative characterization of STRO-1(neg)/CD146(pos) and STRO-1(pos)/CD146(pos) apical papilla stem cells enriched with flow cytometry. Arch Oral Biol. 2013 Oct;58(10):1556-68. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.06.018. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Implant Therapy
Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
RecruitingObservational study
Post Market Evaluation of Real World Outcomes and Durability to Support Implantable Inceptiv™ Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy
Chronic Pain, Intractable Pain
Recruiting
BioPoly® Partial Resurfacing Knee Implant IDE
Knee Pain Chronic, Knee Osteoarthritis
RecruitingObservational study
A Clinical Study to Collect Real-wordt Data on Safety and Clinical Performance of the VCFix Spinal System for Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures of (Suspected) Osteoporotic Origin.
Vertebra Compression Fracture
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Standardized Management of Esophageal Fistula in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC), Esophageal Fistula
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Antonis Konstantinidis, Professor study chair
Retired, Dept. of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Implant Biology, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Biocomplex: aBM-MSCs/fibrin glue/collagen fleece and Two-stage surgical implant placement in people with Implant Therapy, run by Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
A reduction in the marginal bone levels (time frame: baseline (implant placement) to 4 months (implant exposure)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03070275, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Nov 2018.