ImmunityPhase 3TEMPONCT03067714
A Clinical Study to Investigate the Effect of a Partially Hydrolysed Infant Formula With Added Synbiotics on Gut Microbiota Composition and Clinical Effectiveness in Infants at High Risk of Developing Allergy
A Phase 3 study testing Infant formula with added synbiotics and Standard infant formula in people with Immunity, run by Nutricia Research at 59 sites in 13 countries.
Trial summary
With the rising prevalence of allergic diseases and the subsequent risk of developing other immune-related disorders, primary prevention of allergy has become a major priority. It is generally acknowledged that breastfeeding is one of the main pillars in allergy prevention. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 16 weeksHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Immunity
- What is being tested?
- Infant formula with added synbiotics and Standard infant formula
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 855 participants
- Where
- 59 sitesin 13 countries
- Study dates
- 30 Mar 2017to 25 Mar 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 16 weeks
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Healthy term infants (gestational age ≥ 37 and ≤ 42 weeks) at high risk of developing allergy based on family history of allergy (*1).
- Infants aged ≤ 16 weeks (max. 16 weeks + 0 days), preferably as soon as possible after birth.
- Infants who start formula feeding within 16 weeks of age (infants of mothers who have chosen not to breastfeed or mothers who completely/partially cease breastfeeding before the subject's age of 16 weeks) (*2) OR Infants who are exclusively breastfed and whose mothers have the intention to exclusively breastfeed at least until their infant is 16 weeks of age (*2,3).
- Written informed consent from one or both parents (according to local laws) and/or legal guardian.
- 1 Family history of allergy is defined as at least one first-degree relative (parent or full sibling) with self-reported historically doctor confirmed allergic disease (allergic rhinitis, asthma, food allergy, allergic eczema). In case of a self-reported historically non-doctor confirmed allergic disease, doctor confirmation must be done as part of the screening procedure according to local practice (e.g. skin prick test, IgE measurement).
- 2 Subjects whose mother intents to switch to formula feeding before the subject's age of 16 weeks but in the end still exclusively breastfeed, will be included in the breastfed reference group. The other way around, subjects whose mother intents to exclusively breastfeed for at least 16 weeks, but in the end decides to switch to formula earlier, will be included in the randomised groups. All these subjects should meet all other in-/exclusion criteria.
- 3 Exclusive breast feeding. WHO definition: only breast milk and no other liquids or solids except for drops or syrups consisting of vitamins, mineral supplements or medicines [2]. In addition to the WHO definition, in this study water is allowed as well as formula feeding during the first 72 hours of life.
Who cannot join
- Consumption of any amount of infant formula based on intact protein before randomisation, except from consumption during the first 72 hours of life.
- Consumption of any amount of infant formula with added probiotics and/or probiotic supplement before randomisation.
- Existing allergic manifestations (e.g. allergic skin disorders, food allergy) before randomisation according to investigator's clinical assessment.
- Established or suspected cows' milk allergy, lactose intolerance, galactosaemia, or in infants on a fibre-free diet.
- Severe congenital abnormalities which could influence the subjects' growth (e.g. cystic fibrosis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, tracheomalacia, tracheoesophageal fistula, major congenital heart disease, or any other condition according to investigator's clinical judgement).
- Severe neonatal illnesses (e.g. respiratory distress syndrome, severe sepsis intraventricular hemorrhage, severe neonatal jaundice, necrotizing enterocolitis, persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn, or any other condition which required to be treated with intravenous and/or intramuscular antibiotics).
Show all 10Show fewer
- Known underlying disease predisposing to infection (e.g. HIV, viral hepatitis B, and C, auto-immune diabetes, immune deficiency).
- Severe renal failure and hepatic failure according to investigator's clinical judgement.
- Incapability of the parents to comply with study protocol or investigator's uncertainty about the willingness or ability of the subject to comply with the protocol requirements
- Participation in other studies involving investigational or marketed products concomitantly or within two weeks prior to screening visit.
Trial locations and contacts
59 sites in 13 countries.
59 sites in 13 countries
Slovakia9 sites
PEGYS s.r.o.
Dolný Kubín
Juvenalia, s.r.o.
Dunajská Streda
GASTREN, spol. s.r.o.
Košice
PEDMAN s.r.o.
Martin
Univerzitna nemocnica Martin
Martin
Fakultna nemocnica Nitra
Nitra
GASTOL s.r.o.
Prešov
Fakultna nemocnica Trencin
Trenčín
Ambulancia vseobecneho lekara pre deti a dorast
Zlaté Moravce
Hungary8 sites
Dr. Kenessey Albert Korhaz-Rendelointezet
Balassagyarmat
Pestszentimrei Gyermekrendelő / Elitance Duo Kft.
Budapest
Rózsavölgyi Gyermekháziorvosi Rendelő / CEBA Egészségügyi Bt.
Budapest
Gyermekorvosi Rendelő
Debrecen
Futurenest Kft.
Miskolc
Prehospital Med Kft
Miskolc
Kanizsai Dorottya Korhaz
Nagykanizsa
Házi Gyermekorvosi Rendelő /Babadoki Kft.
Szeged
Spain7 sites
Hospital HLA Inmaculada Servicio de Pediatría
Granada
Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
Granada
Hospital Materno Infantil La Paz
Madrid
Hospital Sant Joan de Deu
Manresa
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago
Santiago de Compostela
Instituto Hispalense de Pediatría
Seville
Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe
Valencia
Israel6 sites
Hillel Yaffe Medical center
Hadera
Rambam Health Care Campus
Haifa
Meir Medical Center
Kfar Saba
Schneider Children's Medical
Petah Tikva
Kaplan Medical Center
Rehovot
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Tel Aviv
Czechia5 sites
MUDr. Daniel Drazan, prakticky lekar pro deti a dorost
Prague
MUDr. Jitka Fabianova
Prague
Prakticky lekar pro deti a dorost
Prague
Ustav pro peci o matku a dite
Prague
Nemocnice Strakonice, a.s.
Strakonice
Netherlands5 sites
VU University Medical Center
Amsterdam
PT&R
Beek
Amphia Ziekenhuis
Breda, North Brabant, 4819 EV
Deventer Ziekenhuis
Deventer
EB UtrechtResearch BV
Utrecht
United Kingdom5 sites
Royal London Hospital
London
University College Hospital
London
Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Manchester
The Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Newcastle
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Southampton
Belgium4 sites
Algemeen Stedelijk Ziekenhuis
Aalst
Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc
Brussels
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
Brussels
Centre Hospitalier Régional de Namur
Namur
Italy3 sites
Ospdale Maggiore Policlinico, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda
Milan
IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Università degli studi di Pavi
Pavia
UOC Allergologia, Osp. Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, IRCCS;
Roma
Hong Kong2 sites
Queen Mary Hospital
Hong Kong
Prince of Wales Hospital
Shatin
Singapore2 sites
Kandang Kerbau Women's and Children's Hospital
Singapore
National University Hospital
Singapore
Taiwan2 sites
China Medical University Hospital
Taichung
LinKou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Taoyuan
About this study
Official title: A Randomised, Double-blind, Controlled, Parallel-group, Multi-country Study to Investigate the Effect of a Partially Hydrolysed Infant Formula With Added Synbiotics on Gut Microbiota Composition and Clinical Effectiveness in Infants at High Risk of Developing Allergy
With the rising prevalence of allergic diseases and the subsequent risk of developing other immune-related disorders, primary prevention of allergy has become a major priority. It is generally acknowledged that breastfeeding is one of the main pillars in allergy prevention. Infant formulas based on hydrolysed proteins have been developed to be used by infants at increased risk of developing allergy in case a mother is unable or chooses not to breastfeed her infant. It has recently been demonstrated that the gut microbiota composition and microbiota activity of infants receiving an infant formula based on partially hydrolysed proteins, supplemented with oligosaccharides, is more similar to breastfed infants than to infants receiving standard cow's milk formula, demonstrated by increased levels of bifidobacteria. However the interaction between microbial changes impacted by an hypoallergenic concept and its influence on early life immune development should be further explored. The aim of the present study is therefore to investigate the bifidogenic effect of a hypoallergenic formula supplemented with prebiotics and probiotics compared to standard infant formula in infants at increased risk of developing allergic disease. This study will secondary assess the effects of this concept on the development of allergic manifestations up to the age of 12 months, which will be verified in a separate clinical study MAESTRO as primary outcome. Furthermore, the effects on growth and safety will be studied.
- Conditions
- Immunity
- Being tested
- Infant formula with added synbiotics, Standard infant formula
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Infant formula with added synbioticsOther
Intervention group: Infant Formula / Follow-On formula with partially hydrolysed cow's milk protein supplemented with prebiotics and probiotics.
Standard infant formulaOther
Control group: Standard Infant Formula / Follow-On formula with intact cow's milk protein (only standard ingredients, without addition of pre- and probiotics).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active product: partially hydrolysed formula + synbiotics | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Infant formula with added synbiotics |
| Control product: standard formula (intact protein) | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Standard infant formula |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Faecel levels of Bifidobacteria
Levels of Bifidobacteria at 17 weeks of age - stool sample
Measured: 17 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
Faecal levels of Bifidobacteria and adult-like bacterial cluster
Levels of Bifidobacteria and adult-like bacterial cluster up to 52 weeks of age - stool sample
Measured: 52 weeks
IgE-mediated allergic manifestations
IgE-mediated allergic manifestations up to 52 weeks of age - blood sample
Measured: 52 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Mar 2017
- Study start30 Mar 2017
- Primary completion25 Mar 2020
- Study completion25 Mar 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ImmunityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Nutricia ResearchThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 855 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nutricia Research
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03067714
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EBB15BL89847
- Acronym
- TEMPO
- Status last verified
- Dec 2021
- First submitted
- 1 Feb 2017
- Last updated
- 8 Dec 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Savova MV, Zhu P, Kindt A; TEMPO study team; Wopereis H, Belzer C, Harms AC, Hankemeier T. Fecal metabolome alterations in infants at risk of developing allergies during the first year of life. Metabolomics. 2026 Jul 1;22(4):112. doi: 10.1007/s11306-026-02478-6.
PubMed 42384241
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Dec 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised, Double-blind, Controlled, Parallel-group, Multi-country Study to Investigate the Effect of a Partially Hydrolysed Infant Formula With Added Synbiotics on Gut Microbiota Composition and Clinical Effectiveness in Infants at High Risk of Developing Allergy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03067714
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TEMPO / EBB15BL89847
- Conditions
- Immunity
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 855 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nutricia ResearchIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 30 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Mar 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
With the rising prevalence of allergic diseases and the subsequent risk of developing other immune-related disorders, primary prevention of allergy has become a major priority. It is generally acknowledged that breastfeeding is one of the main pillars in allergy prevention. Infant formulas based on hydrolysed proteins have been developed to be used by infants at increased risk of developing allergy in case a mother is unable or chooses not to breastfeed her infant. It has recently been demonstrated that the gut microbiota composition and microbiota activity of infants receiving an infant formula based on partially hydrolysed proteins, supplemented with oligosaccharides, is more similar to breastfed infants than to infants receiving standard cow's milk formula, demonstrated by increased levels of bifidobacteria. However the interaction between microbial changes impacted by an hypoallergenic concept and its influence on early life immune development should be further explored. The aim of the present study is therefore to investigate the bifidogenic effect of a hypoallergenic formula supplemented with prebiotics and probiotics compared to standard infant formula in infants at increased risk of developing allergic disease. This study will secondary assess the effects of this concept on the development of allergic manifestations up to the age of 12 months, which will be verified in a separate clinical study MAESTRO as primary outcome. Furthermore, the effects on growth and safety will be studied.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active product: partially hydrolysed formula + synbiotics | Experimental | Other: Infant formula with added synbiotics |
| Control product: standard formula (intact protein) | Active comparator | Other: Standard infant formula |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 16 weeks
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Healthy term infants (gestational age ≥ 37 and ≤ 42 weeks) at high risk of developing allergy based on family history of allergy (*1).
- Infants aged ≤ 16 weeks (max. 16 weeks + 0 days), preferably as soon as possible after birth.
- Infants who start formula feeding within 16 weeks of age (infants of mothers who have chosen not to breastfeed or mothers who completely/partially cease breastfeeding before the subject's age of 16 weeks) (*2) OR Infants who are exclusively breastfed and whose mothers have the intention to exclusively breastfeed at least until their infant is 16 weeks of age (*2,3).
- Written informed consent from one or both parents (according to local laws) and/or legal guardian.
- 1 Family history of allergy is defined as at least one first-degree relative (parent or full sibling) with self-reported historically doctor confirmed allergic disease (allergic rhinitis, asthma, food allergy, allergic eczema). In case of a self-reported historically non-doctor confirmed allergic disease, doctor confirmation must be done as part of the screening procedure according to local practice (e.g. skin prick test, IgE measurement).
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Infant formula with added synbioticsIntervention group: Infant Formula / Follow-On formula with partially hydrolysed cow's milk protein supplemented with prebiotics and probiotics. | Other | Active product: partially hydrolysed formula + synbiotics |
| Standard infant formulaControl group: Standard Infant Formula / Follow-On formula with intact cow's milk protein (only standard ingredients, without addition of pre- and probiotics). | Other | Control product: standard formula (intact protein) |
Primary outcome
Faecel levels of Bifidobacteria
Time frame: 17 weeks
Levels of Bifidobacteria at 17 weeks of age - stool sample
2 secondary outcomes
Faecal levels of Bifidobacteria and adult-like bacterial cluster
Time frame: 52 weeks
IgE-mediated allergic manifestations
Time frame: 52 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Dec 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42384241Savova MV, Zhu P, Kindt A; TEMPO study team; Wopereis H, Belzer C, Harms AC, Hankemeier T. Fecal metabolome alterations in infants at risk of developing allergies during the first year of life. Metabolomics. 2026 Jul 1;22(4):112. doi: 10.1007/s11306-026-02478-6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Immunity
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Comparing Immune Response of 2 vs 3 HPV Doses (27-45 Years Old)
Immunization, HPV Infection
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Characterization of Adaptive Immune Responses to Oropouche Virus (OROV) Infection
Oropouche Infection
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Thymosin Alpha 1 and IgM Levels in Sepsis
Sepsis, Septic Shock
Recruiting
Effects of Different Activation Techniques on Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy in Apical Periodontitis
Apical Periodontitis, Endodontic Retreatment
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
Vaccine Pandemic Preparedness Through Airway Immunology Characterization
Influenza, Human
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
59 sites in 13 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Infant formula with added synbiotics and Standard infant formula in people with Immunity, run by Nutricia Research at 59 sites in 13 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 59 sites in Slovakia, Hungary, Spain, Israel, Czechia and 8 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Faecel levels of Bifidobacteria (time frame: 17 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03067714, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Dec 2021.