AzTrials
AzTrials

Low Back Pain, MechanicalNCT03062293

Newcastle Low Back Pain Intervention Study

A study testing Functional Re-adaptive Exercise Device in people with Low Back Pain, Mechanical, run by Northumbria University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to investigate if six-weeks of exercise intervention, 3 times per week on the Functional Re-adaptive Exercise Device (FRED) reduces non-specific mechanical low back pain in adults ages 18-60. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Low Back Pain, Mechanical
What is being tested?
Functional Re-adaptive Exercise Device
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
14 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Sep 2016to Mar 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Mechanical LBP for 8 weeks or longer
  • Score of < 15 on FABQ
  • Age 18-60
  • Commitment to taking part in the study for its full duration

Who cannot join

  • Presence of "red flags" - indicative of non-mechanical LBP
  • Score of > 15 on FABQ or other indicators of a likely poor response to a solely physical approach to treatment incl. seeking compensation for LBP
  • Exercise contraindicated as per Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire
  • Inability to exercise safely on the FRED
  • Pregnancy
  • Surgery within the previous nine months
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Difficulty to exercise safely in standing for 30 mins 3x/week
  • Cardio/respiratory disease
  • Neurological disorders
  • BMI > 28 where adipose tissue infringes on ultrasound imaging and intramuscular electrode placement

About this study

The aim of this study is to investigate if six-weeks of exercise intervention, 3 times per week on the Functional Re-adaptive Exercise Device (FRED) reduces non-specific mechanical low back pain in adults ages 18-60.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this study is to investigate whether an six-week FRED exercise intervention reduces low back pain (LBP) and improves a range of related outcomes.

The objectives of this study are to examine

  1. whether FRED exercise reduces mechanical LBP ( low back pain);
  2. whether FRED exercise improves functional and static balance in people with LBP;
  3. whether FRED exercise has an effect on cross-sectional area (CSA) of relevant lumbo-pelvic muscles;
  4. whether FRED exercise has an effect on TrA (Transversus Abdominis), LM ( Lumbar Multifidus), lumbar Erector Spinae, External and Internal Oblique muscle activity and function in individuals with LBP;
  5. whether FRED exercise has an effect on TrA and internal oblique muscle thickness;
  6. the rate of muscle physiology change in response to FRED exercise in people with LBP;
  7. whether FRED exercise affects the analgesic intake, need for intervention and physical activity level of individuals with LBP;
  8. whether FRED exercise affects wellbeing and every-day function in people with LBP;
  9. the rate of change of level of pain, wellbeing and of function (incl. balance) in response to FRED exercise in people with LBP.
Being tested
Functional Re-adaptive Exercise Device
Keywords
Lumbo-pelvic muscles, Rehabilitation, Exercise, Low back pain, Functional Re-adaptive Exercise Device
Medical subject headings
Low Back Pain, Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Functional Re-adaptive Exercise DeviceDevice

    Also called FRED

    Exercise intervention 3 times per week for up to 30min. Difficulty and time will be progressed as indicated by clinical presentation, assessed by the Physiotherapist team.

Study groups in NCT03062293
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Functional Re-adaptive Exercise DeviceExperimentalSingle arm for within subject repeated measures design.
Receives: Device: Functional Re-adaptive Exercise Device

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Intramuscular EMG of Lumbo-pelvic muscles

    iEMG of Lumbar Multifudus (LM), Transversus Abdominus (TrA), External Obliques and Internal obliques during exercise and balance tasks

    Measured: within 1 week prior to intervention, and within 1 week post intervention (2 data collection

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Change in muscular arcitecture via Ultrasound imaging

    USI of cross sectional area and thickness of Lumbar Multifudus (LM),and thickness of Transversus Abdominus (TrA)

    Measured: At baseline (intervention -6 weeks) within 1 week prior to intervention, within 1 week post intervention, 1 x week during intervention, and at intervention +12 weeks (10 data collections)

  2. VICON/ force plate kinematic data

    Measuring postural sway changes in center of pressure during the balance and rapid arm movement tasks, repeated measure throughout study

    Measured: within 1 week prior to intervention and and within 1 week post intervention (2 data collections)

  3. Participant Activity Log

    Measured: Daily from baseline data collection to intervention +16 weeks follow-up (total 203 days)

  4. SF-36 II .

    Version 2, UK, acute recall

    Measured: At baseline (intervention -6 weeks) within 1 week prior to intervention, within 1 week post intervention, at intervention +6 week, +12 weeks and +16 weeks follow up (5 data collections)

  5. Patient Specific Functional Scale

    repeated measure throughout study

    Measured: At baseline (intervention -6 weeks) within 1 week prior to intervention, within 1 week post intervention, at intervention +6 week, +12 weeks and +16 weeks follow up (5 data collections)

  6. Numeric Rating Scale for Pain

    Measured: At baseline (intervention -6 weeks) within 1 week prior to intervention, within 1 week post intervention, at intervention +6 week, +12 weeks and +16 weeks follow up (5 data collections)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Feb 2017
  2. Study startSep 2016
  3. Primary completionMar 2017 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMar 2017 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Repeat measures within subject design
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
14 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03062293
Sponsor's protocol ID
FRED2016
Status last verified
Feb 2017
First submitted
11 Oct 2016
Last updated
23 Feb 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No: NO IPD will be available to researchers outside of the research team.

Publications

  • Caplan, N, Gibbon, KC, Hibbs, A & Debuse, D 2014, 'Phasic-to-tonic shift in tunk muscle activity during low-impact weight bearing exercise', Acta Astronautica, vol 104, pp. 388-395.

  • Debuse D, Birch O, St Clair Gibson A, Caplan N. Low impact weight-bearing exercise in an upright posture increases the activation of two key local muscles of the lumbo-pelvic region. Physiother Theory Pract. 2013 Jan;29(1):51-60. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2012.698718. Epub 2012 Jul 12.

    PubMed 22789062
  • Gibbon KC, Debuse D, Caplan N. Low impact weight-bearing exercise in an upright posture achieves greater lumbopelvic stability than overground walking. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2013 Oct;17(4):462-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Apr 22.

    PubMed 24139004
  • Evetts SN, Caplan N, Debuse D, Lambrecht G, Damann V, Petersen N, Hides J. Post space mission lumbo-pelvic neuromuscular reconditioning: a European perspective. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2014 Jul;85(7):764-5. doi: 10.3357/asem.3943.2014.

    PubMed 25022167

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Functional Re-adaptive Exercise Device in people with Low Back Pain, Mechanical, run by Northumbria University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Intramuscular EMG of Lumbo-pelvic muscles (time frame: within 1 week prior to intervention, and within 1 week post intervention (2 data collection). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03062293, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in