Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS)Phase 4NCT03053427
A Study of Oral Dosing of Gabapentin Enacarbil in Japanese Restless Legs Syndrome Patients
A Phase 4 study testing Gabapentin enacarbil in people with Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS), run by Astellas Pharma Inc at 46 sites in Japan.
Trial summary
The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of once-daily oral administration of gabapentin enacarbil versus placebo, based on the change in International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) score in participants with moderate-to-severe idiopathic restless legs syndrome. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS)
- What is being tested?
- Gabapentin enacarbil
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 375 participants
- Where
- 46 sitesJapan
- Study dates
- 30 Mar 2017to 25 Jun 2018
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject has Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS), based on the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) Diagnostic Criteria.
- Subject has reported history of RLS symptoms for at least 15 days in the month prior to the first dosing; if on treatment, this frequency of symptoms was started before treatment.
- Subject with International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) score ≥ 15.
- Subject has discontinued dopamine agonists, and/or gabapentin at least 1 week prior to the first dosing.
- Subject has discontinued other treatments for RLS at least 2 weeks prior to the first dosing.
- Female subject must either:
Show all 18Show fewer
- Be of non-childbearing potential:
- Post-menopausal (defined as at least 1 year without any menses) prior to Screening, or
- documented surgically sterile
- Or, if of childbearing potential:
- Agree not to try to become pregnant during the study and for 28 days after the final study drug administration
- And have a negative urine pregnancy test at Screening
- And, if heterosexually active, agree to consistently use two forms of highly effective birth control starting at Screening and throughout the study period and for 28 days after the final study drug administration.
- Female subject must agree not to breastfeed starting at Screening and throughout the study period, and for 28 days after the final study drug administration.
- Female subject must not donate ova starting at Screening and throughout the study period, and for 28 days after the final study drug administration.
- Subject agrees not to participate in another interventional study while on treatment.
- Subject with a Body Mass Index of ≥ 18.5 and < 30.
- Subject with estimated creatinine clearance of ≥ 60 mL/min.
Who cannot join
- Subject has a sleep disorder that may significantly affect the assessment of RLS.
- Subject has a history of RLS symptom augmentation or end-of-dose rebound with previous dopamine agonist treatment.
- Subject has neurologic disease or movement disorder.
- Subject has poorly controlled diabetes, iron deficiency anemia, or are currently taking any sedative/hypnotic.
- Subject has a history of suicide attempt within 6 months prior to informed consent.
- Subject has a high level of Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST).
Show all 13Show fewer
- Subject is currently suffering from moderate or severe depression.
- Subject has a history of alcohol dependence or drug abuse, or subject had alcohol or drug abuse or dependence in the last 1 year.
- Subject is a shift worker, professional driver, or operator of dangerous machinery.
- Subject has clinically significant or unstable medical conditions.
- Subject has a history of hypersensitivity reaction to gabapentin.
- Subject has previously taken pregabalin, gabapentin enacarbil, or the study drug of Gabapentin enacarbil.
- Subject has participated in a clinical study for another investigational drug or medical device or post-marketing clinical study within 12 weeks (84 days) prior to the first dosing, or is currently participating in any of these studies.
Trial locations and contacts
46 sites in 1 country.
46 sites in 1 country
Japan46 sites
Site JP00012
Arakawa City, Tokyo
Site JP00031
Chiba
Site JP00001
Chōfu, Tokyo
Site JP00028
Chōfu, Tokyo
Site JP00018
Chūō, Tokyo
Site JP00024
Chūō, Tokyo
Site JP00036
Fukuoka
Site JP00041
Kawanishi, Hyōgo
Site JP00038
Kawasaki, Kanagawa
Site JP00006
Kitakyushu, Fukuoka
Site JP00022
Kitakyushu, Fukuoka
Site JP00005
Kobe, Hyōgo
Site JP00020
Kyoto
Site JP00035
Kyoto
Site JP00048
Meguro City, Tokyo
Site JP00034
Musashino, Tokyo
Site JP00025
Nagoya, Aichi-ken
Site JP00029
Nagoya, Aichi-ken
Site JP00040
Nagoya, Aichi-ken
Site JP00046
Nakano City, Tokyo
Site JP00010
Osaka
Site JP00026
Osaka
Site JP00037
Osaka
Site JP00039
Osaka
Site JP00047
Osaka
Site JP00019
Ōta-ku, Tokyo
Site JP00030
Saitama
Site JP00044
Saitama
Site JP00032
Sakai, Osaka
Site JP00002
Sapporo, Hokkaido
Site JP00003
Sapporo, Hokkaido
Site JP00004
Sapporo, Hokkaido
Site JP00023
Sapporo, Hokkaido
Site JP00011
Shibuya City, Tokyo
Site JP00013
Shinagawa, Tokyo
Site JP00015
Shinagawa, Tokyo
Site JP00016
Shinagawa, Tokyo
Site JP00008
Shinjuku, Tokyo
Site JP00014
Shinjuku, Tokyo
Site JP00021
Shinjuku, Tokyo
Site JP00043
Tokorozawa, Saitama
Site JP00007
Yokohama, Kanagawa
Site JP00017
Yokohama, Kanagawa
Site JP00049
Yokohama, Kanagawa
Site JP00050
Yokohama, Kanagawa
Site JP00009
Yokosuka, Kanagawa
About this study
Official title: Gabapentin Enacarbil Post-marketing Clinical Study A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study in Subjects With Restless Legs Syndrome.
The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of once-daily oral administration of gabapentin enacarbil versus placebo, based on the change in International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) score in participants with moderate-to-severe idiopathic restless legs syndrome. This study also assessed the safety of Gabapentin enacarbil.
Read the detailed description
After 1 week run in period with single-blind placebo, participants meeting the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were randomized to receive double-blind treatment with either gabapentin enacarbil 600 mg or placebo for 12 weeks treatment period. After then, single-blind placebo was given for 1 week for follow-up observation.
- Conditions
- Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS)
- Being tested
- Placebo, Gabapentin enacarbil
- Keywords
- Restless Legs Syndrome, ASP8825, Gabapentin enacarbil
- Medical subject headings
- Restless Legs Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PlaceboDrug
Oral administration
Gabapentin enacarbilDrug
Also called Regnite
Oral administration
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo was administered orally once daily after the evening meal. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Gabapentin enacarbil | Experimental | Gabapentin enacarbil was administered orally once daily after the evening meal. Participants with an estimated creatinine clearance of ≥ 60 mL/min to < 90 mL/min at the start of the run-in period were administrated gabapentin enacarbil 300 mg for 1 week followed by gabapentin enacarbil 600 mg for 11 weeks. Receives: Drug: Gabapentin enacarbil |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) Score at Week 12
The IRLS consisted of 10-item scale for assessing severity of restless legs syndrome (RLS) with each item ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (very severe symptoms). The total IRLS score ranges from 0 to 40. Higher IRLS score indicated greater disease activity. Mixed Model of Repeated Measurements (MMRM) model with compound symmetry as a covariance structure was used. The explanatory variables of the model included treatment group, IRLS score at baseline, age category, estimated creatinine clearance category, time point, and interaction of treatment group and time point.
Measured: Baseline and week 12
Secondary outcomes (8)
Change From Baseline in IRLS Score at Each Time Point
ANCOVA model with the baseline value as a covariate was used.
Measured: Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and EoT (week 12)
Percentage of Participants With an Investigator-rated Clinical Global Impression (ICGI) Response
ICGI was assessed by 7-point ordinate scale. Participants who were "Very much improved" or "Much improved" were defined as responders.
Measured: EoT (week 12)
Percentage of Participants With a Patient-rated Clinical Global Impression (PCGI) Response
PCGI was assessed by 7-point ordinate scale. Participants who were "Very much improved" or "Much improved" were defined as responders.
Measured: EoT (week 12)
Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Total Score (PSQI)
The self-rated items of the PSQI generate seven component scores (range of subscale scores, 0-3). The sum of these seven component scores yielded one global score of subjective sleep quality (range, 0-21). Higher scores represent poorer subjective sleep. ANCOVA model with the baseline value as a covariate was used.
Measured: Baseline and EoT (week 12)
Change From Baseline in Athens Insomnia Scale
Athens Insomnia Scale consisted of 8-item scale (range of subscale scores, 0-3). The scale range of Athens Insomnia was 0-24. Higher scores represent poorer sleep quality. ANCOVA model with the baseline value as a covariate was used.
Measured: Baseline and EoT (week 12)
Change From Baseline in Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) Pain Score
The scale range of RLS pain score was 0-10. Higher scores represent greater RLS pain intensity. ANCOVA model with the baseline value as a covariate was used.
Measured: Baseline and EoT (week 12)
Change From Baseline in Health Status Score of EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L)
Health status was assessed by general visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS ranges from 0 (worst health status) and 100 (best health status).
Measured: Baseline and EoT (week 12)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event (AE) with onset after the start of the run-in period. A drug-related TEAE was a TEAE with at least a possible relationship to the study drug as assessed by the investigator. Serious TEAE was an AE considered serious.
Measured: From first dose of study drug up to week 13
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Feb 2017
- Study start30 Mar 2017
- Primary completion25 Jun 2018
- Study completion25 Jun 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 375 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Astellas Pharma Inc
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Director, Study director, Astellas Pharma Inc
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03053427
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 8825-CL-0101
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 12 Feb 2017
- Last updated
- 12 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Access to anonymized individual participant level data will not be provided for this trial. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Gabapentin Enacarbil Post-marketing Clinical Study A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study in Subjects With Restless Legs Syndrome.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03053427
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 8825-CL-0101
- Conditions
- Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS)
- Keywords
- Restless Legs Syndrome, ASP8825, Gabapentin enacarbil
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 375 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Astellas Pharma IncIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 30 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Jun 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 10 Jul 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of once-daily oral administration of gabapentin enacarbil versus placebo, based on the change in International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) score in participants with moderate-to-severe idiopathic restless legs syndrome. This study also assessed the safety of Gabapentin enacarbil.
Detailed description
After 1 week run in period with single-blind placebo, participants meeting the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were randomized to receive double-blind treatment with either gabapentin enacarbil 600 mg or placebo for 12 weeks treatment period. After then, single-blind placebo was given for 1 week for follow-up observation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo was administered orally once daily after the evening meal. |
| Gabapentin enacarbil | Experimental | Drug: Gabapentin enacarbilGabapentin enacarbil was administered orally once daily after the evening meal. Participants with an estimated creatinine clearance of ≥ 60 mL/min to < 90 mL/min at the start of the run-in period were administrated gabapentin enacarbil 300 mg for 1 week followed by gabapentin enacarbil 600 mg for 11 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Subject has Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS), based on the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) Diagnostic Criteria.
- Subject has reported history of RLS symptoms for at least 15 days in the month prior to the first dosing; if on treatment, this frequency of symptoms was started before treatment.
- Subject with International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) score ≥ 15.
- Subject has discontinued dopamine agonists, and/or gabapentin at least 1 week prior to the first dosing.
- Subject has discontinued other treatments for RLS at least 2 weeks prior to the first dosing.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Subject has a sleep disorder that may significantly affect the assessment of RLS.
- Subject has a history of RLS symptom augmentation or end-of-dose rebound with previous dopamine agonist treatment.
- Subject has neurologic disease or movement disorder.
- Subject has poorly controlled diabetes, iron deficiency anemia, or are currently taking any sedative/hypnotic.
- Subject has a history of suicide attempt within 6 months prior to informed consent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PlaceboOral administration | Drug | Placebo |
| Gabapentin enacarbilAlso: RegniteOral administration | Drug | Gabapentin enacarbil |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) Score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
The IRLS consisted of 10-item scale for assessing severity of restless legs syndrome (RLS) with each item ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (very severe symptoms). The total IRLS score ranges from 0 to 40. Higher IRLS score indicated greater disease activity. Mixed Model of Repeated Measurements (MMRM) model with compound symmetry as a covariance structure was used. The explanatory variables of the model included treatment group, IRLS score at baseline, age category, estimated creatinine clearance category, time point, and interaction of treatment group and time point.
8 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in IRLS Score at Each Time Point
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and EoT (week 12)
Percentage of Participants With an Investigator-rated Clinical Global Impression (ICGI) Response
Time frame: EoT (week 12)
Percentage of Participants With a Patient-rated Clinical Global Impression (PCGI) Response
Time frame: EoT (week 12)
Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Total Score (PSQI)
Time frame: Baseline and EoT (week 12)
Change From Baseline in Athens Insomnia Scale
Time frame: Baseline and EoT (week 12)
Change From Baseline in Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) Pain Score
Time frame: Baseline and EoT (week 12)
Change From Baseline in Health Status Score of EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L)
Time frame: Baseline and EoT (week 12)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to week 13
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Dec 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Access to anonymized individual participant level data will not be provided for this trial. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.
Related trials for Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS)
RecruitingObservational study
Lemborexant vs Clonidine vs Sedatives to Treat Insomnia in Chronic Pain Patients
Chronic Insomnia, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Neuromodulation to Overcome Severe Restless Legs Syndrome
Restless Leg Syndrome (RLS), Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Intravenous Iron in the Management of Drug-resistant Restless Legs syndromeI
Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS)
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Acupressure on Restless Legs Syndrome and Pruritus in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis
Restless Leg Syndrome (RLS)
Not yet recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Super High-Flux Hemodialysis in Maintenance Dialysis Patients. SHINE-RLS (Super High-flux Dialysis Improves Neuro-symptoms and Efficacy in Restless Legs Syndrome)
End Stage Renal Failure, Hemodialysis, Restless Leg Syndrome (RLS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Director study director
Astellas Pharma Inc
46 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Gabapentin enacarbil in people with Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS), run by Astellas Pharma Inc at 46 sites in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 18 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 46 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Jul 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) Score at Week 12 (time frame: Baseline and week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Dec 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.