AzTrials
AzTrials

Vaccine ComplianceNCT03039725

Vaccination Compliance

An observational study of Vaccine Compliance, run by Jaye Shyken, MD at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Retrospective study to assess a single Clinic on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendations for hepatitis A, hepatitis B, influenza, tetanus/diphtheria/pertussis, HPV and pneumococcal disease Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 14 to 55 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Vaccine Compliance
What is being tested?
Observational
Type of treatment
Vaccines
How many people
99 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 May 2017to 28 Aug 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 14 to 55 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Study population: * Female * All ethnic backgrounds

Who may be able to join

  • Patients addicted to opioids during pregnancy

Who cannot join

  • must meet inclusion criteria

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • St. Mary's Health Center

    St Louis, Missouri, 63117

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Vaccination Rates in Obstetric Opioid-Addicted Patients

Retrospective study to assess a single Clinic on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendations for hepatitis A, hepatitis B, influenza, tetanus/diphtheria/pertussis, HPV and pneumococcal disease

Read the detailed description

Vaccines are known as one of the greatest public health achievements of the twentieth century. Due to the successful implementation of childhood immunization programs in the United States (US), once common disease states such as polio, smallpox, and measles are no longer a natural part of childhood. Unfortunately, these successes have not been replicated in the adult population despite the availability of vaccines and published recommendations guiding appropriate screening for and administration of vaccines. On average, 42,000 adults compared to 300 children die in the US of vaccine-preventable infections every year. In fact, results of the National Health Interview Survey from 2012 demonstrated low immunization rates for adults 19 years of age and older leaving a significant portion of eligible patients susceptible to disease.

Vaccine administration rates are often lower in the obstetric population likely due to fear of administration during pregnancy and lack of recommendations and education to patients about vaccines. The influenza and Tdap vaccines are recommended for every pregnant patient. However, in 2015-16 influenza season only 49.9% of pregnant patients received the influenza vaccine. Additionally, only 30-53.% have receive the Tdap vaccine. Besides these needed vaccines, patients are often indicated for additional vaccines including hepatitis A, hepatitis B, pneumococcal-23, and human papillomavirus. Additionally, patients who have unequivocal or negative rubella titers during pregnancy should receive the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine when post-partum. Because of the lack of vaccination, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) has recommended that vaccines become part of the routine obstetric care.

According to American Society of Healthcare Pharmacists (ASHP) Guidelines on the pharmacist's role in immunizations, all pharmacists can contribute to the effort by promoting proper immunizations in various ways. One way is by helping to identify patients in need of immunizations by gathering immunization histories, identifying patient specific indication, issuing immunization records to patients, and educating patients on their specific indications, and the risk of the immunizations.

The investigator's team includes a maternal fetal medicine specialist, nurse practitioners, clinical pharmacist, social workers, and registered nurses. The pharmacist meets with all patients to perform medication reconciliation, vaccine history, social history, allergy history, disease specific review of systems, pregnancy related review of systems, and preventative health review; assess medical and preventative health problems; recommend appropriate management of medical problems and preventative health; and provide extensive education including information on all indicated vaccines. The indicated vaccines are recommended to either the physician or nurse practitioner provider for that visit as well as documented in the medical record. Additionally, prior to each office visit, the pharmacist reviews each patient's chart to determine what vaccines are indicated for this visit. This list of indicated vaccines is provided to the nurse who asks the patients about receiving the vaccine at that day's visit. If the patient is willing to receive the vaccine, the nurse has the provider order the indicated vaccines. All the vaccines are kept as floor stock in the clinic to minimize wait time for the patient.

Although there have been recent efforts to increase immunization rates throughout the health care system, there is little evidence about the impact of pharmacists' involvement on immunization rates in outpatient obstetric clinic setting. The goal of this study is to evaluate immunization administration compliance with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2016 immunization recommendations for influenza, pneumococcal 23 polyvalent, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap), human papillomavirus (HPV), and measles-mumps-rubella (MMR).

Being tested
Observational

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ObservationalOther

    Retrospective chart review on vaccine compliance

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. compliance with the 2016 ACIP recommendations

    Chart review

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Feb 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 May 2017
  3. Primary completion28 Aug 2017
  4. Study completion28 Aug 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
99 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03039725
Sponsor's protocol ID
27919
Status last verified
Nov 2017
First submitted
31 Jan 2017
Last updated
21 Nov 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Vaccine Compliance, run by Jaye Shyken, MD at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

compliance with the 2016 ACIP recommendations (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Nov 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 28 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in