Pain, ChronicNCT03032497
Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)-Based Feedback for Chronic Pain Management
A study testing EEG-based BCI analysis of fear avoidance in people with Pain, Chronic, run by Tan Tock Seng Hospital at 1 site in Singapore.
Trial summary
The feasibility study proposed here will primarily examine the sensitivity of an electroencephalogram (EEG)-based Brain Computer Interface (BCI) in detecting significant differences in brain signals in patients with chronic low back pain (N=10), lower limb pain (N=10) and healthy controls (N=10) through perceived… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain, Chronic
- What is being tested?
- EEG-based BCI analysis of fear avoidance
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSingapore
- Study dates
- 5 Jun 2017to 31 Mar 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Only English speaking participants are recruited.
- Participants who are healthy controls need to meet the following inclusion criteria:
- Not suffering from any active pain condition
- Without any known disease
- Not on any long- term medication or health supplements AND
- Able to complete a digital self-report questionnaire in English without need for translation.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Participants who have either low back pain or lower limb pain need to meet the following inclusion criteria:
- Diagnosed to have musculoskeletal low back pain OR lower limb pain lasting for > 3 months.
- Not currently on any active therapy (Example: physiotherapy, stabilisation exercise therapy) or medication EXCEPT simple analgesics (Paracetamol, Paracetamol/Orphenadrine, Non-steriodal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), Tramadol).
- Able to complete a digital self-report questionnaire without need for translation.
Who cannot join
- Participants are excluded from the study if they meet any of the following criteria:
- Pregnant or lactating.
- History of drug or alcohol abuse
- History of significant moderate to severe systemic disease including a confirmed diagnosis or current investigation for neoplasm, immunological condition involving musculo-skeletal system; active liver, heart and or renal failure; respiratory diseases needing supplementary oxygen or Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) machine and any other conditions that make it improbable to engage in physical movements.
- History of psychiatric condition- in particular a psychiatric diagnosis meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-V (DSM-V) criteria for major depression, anxiety, phobias or any other conditions that make it improbable to engage in physical movements.
- History of back surgery and surgery involving the joints and bones of the lower limbs, such as knee and hip replacement surgery.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Spine or lower limb pain that has not been medically stabilised.
- History of previous injuries to the head and/or brain, including but not limited to epilepsy, skull defects or cranioplasty
- Ongoing compensation claims or litigation.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Singapore1 site
Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Pain Management Clinic
Singapore, 308433
About this study
Official title: Feasibility of a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)-Based Adaptive Sensing and Feedback for Chronic Pain Management
The feasibility study proposed here will primarily examine the sensitivity of an electroencephalogram (EEG)-based Brain Computer Interface (BCI) in detecting significant differences in brain signals in patients with chronic low back pain (N=10), lower limb pain (N=10) and healthy controls (N=10) through perceived movements via a video and during actual movements. The BCI device has been approved for use in previous trials (e.g. NNI-IRB/07/001, DSRB Domain D/09/608, DSRB Domain D/10/072) and the safety and effectiveness of this non-invasive EEG-based BCI device validated through these trials. However, the validation has not been specific to its use in pain. Related to the primary objective of the study, we will develop and validate an adaptive and participant-specific pain detection and analysis program by exploring and identifying discriminative and robust patterns in spontaneous EEG from our study sample.
For the secondary objective, we will develop and validate a BCI and computer based pain and attention diversion training system with interactive audio-visual feedbacks for Phase 2 of the study. These feedbacks will inform the user about the current brain activation level and attention level, and guide the user in learning to modulate the EEG characteristics and develop skills to manage attention to alleviate perceived fear-related pains. The BCI system captures EEG signals and decodes the underlying brain states in relation to cognition and fear-related pain perception. Such decoded brain states are then presented to the participant in visual or other form to guide the participant to learn to regulate the brain states towards better pain management. For example, the participant may over a few sessions learn to focus on the visual feedback while inhibiting the brain function activity in relation to fear-related pain perception. With practice, the user is encouraged to achieve brain activity modulation without external feedback so fear-related pain can be reduced in realistic situations.
Read the detailed description
We hypothesize that, using appropriately designed system learning and computing techniques, a brain-computer interface (BCI) technology can detect specific brain wave patterns in patients with chronic low back pain or lower limb pain compared to healthy controls. Also, that BCI technology can detect specific brain wave patterns for fear avoidance behaviours in motor activities known to trigger pain in such chronic pain patients.
This is a validation and feasibility study. We calculated sufficient funding to cover 10 participants each with low back pain, lower limb pain, healthy controls and BCI training respectively. Participants will be screened and undergo a comprehensive assessment by the Rehabilitation Physician (RP) on the study team. The aim of the comprehensive assessment is to establish the safety and suitability of participants to be study subjects according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.To ensure a high level of compliance given the high frequency of visits of the subject during the study, it is important that motivated volunteers are chosen.
Consent will be taken in an outpatient consultation room at the pain management clinic(PMC) at Tan Tock Seng Hospital, with full provision for privacy. PMC is where the study will be conducted. Informed consent will be taken at the convenience of the potential participant. A full explanation of the participant information sheet will be given and any questions answered.
The study is conducted over 3 phases. Total span of study participation: 11-months.
Phase 1: A total of 2 visits to the study site over 2 consecutive weeks is required. Each visit will take approximately 1 hour 15 minutes. The 1st session involves a visit to the doctor's office for a screening assessment-history taking, physical examination, and electronic notes review no different from the current standard pain consultation. Those found to be suitable and decide to take part, will be asked at the 2nd session to:
- Complete a digital set of self-report measures and a 6-minute walking test. These measures are completed at the start and end of the second session. The walking test will be conducted by a trained physiotherapist familiar with this measure.
- Participants then participate in two sets of non-invasive experiments one after another. The BCI system set-up comprising of a laptop connected to a brain signal recorder and a headset to record brain signals will be used. Sensors to measure sweat and pulse rate will also be used in the experiments. The brain signal recorder together with the sensors will be secured in a backpack and worn by participants during the experiments.
Exp 1-participants watch 15 videos of people doing daily activities. Each video frame is approximately 1 min long. EEG signal patterns are recorded for each video frame.
Exp 2-participants go through a series of 15 physical movements as guided by the physiotherapist. Participants are required to complete 15 repetitions each, within 1 min. EEG signal patterns are recorded for each movement. Two buzzers (labelled "lesser pain" and "more pain") are available for participants to press accordingly should they experience 'lesser' or 'more' pain at any point during the experiment. If 'more' pain is experienced, the physiotherapist will assess the participant's condition and the participant will have a choice to either (1) continue the experiment at a lower intensity or (2) stop the experiment.
Phase 2: Approximately 6 months after participants' participation in Phase 1 and span a period of 7 weeks. If selected to complete Phase 2, participants will undergo 18 sessions (3 sessions/week) of brain training over a period of 6 consecutive weeks. Sessions are conducted on alternate days in the week with each session lasting approximately 1 hour. The same system set-up used in Phase 1 is used in each training session.
At the start of the first session in week 1, and immediately after completing the last training session in Week 6 participants will also complete the same set of self-report questionnaires and the 6-minute walking test (as assessed in Phase 1). At week 7 (1 week post training) participants will complete the same full set of measures as set out in the second session of Phase 1.
Phase 3: A total of 2 visits to the study site is required. Each visit will take approximately 1 hour 15 minutes. These 2 visits will be scheduled approximately 8.5 mths and 10.5 mths after completing Phase 1. Both visit sessions involve a repeat of the full set of measures that participants completed at the 2nd session in Phase 1.
Potential Risks
- The potential risks to participants are minimal as none of the measures and components of the system are invasive. There are currently no known safety issues with the headset and sensors. However participants will be kept informed of any new findings.
- Participants may experience temporary exertion related discomfort in the main muscle groups that are used in the physiotherapy guided movement experiment (Experiment 2) although the were designed to fit within participants' abilities. Participants will be advised to contact the Principal Investigator (PI) should the muscular discomfort persist for more than 24 hours.
- If participants are screened positive for depression at any point on the study, the PI who is a trained psychologist will screen them for active depression and where appropriate refer to the RP for further treatment recommendations. In this case, the participant will be excluded or withdrawn from the study.
- Due to the potential of the videos and the guided movements to elicit fear of pain, participants may experience some increase in anxiety and slight worsening of usual pains. Experiment 2 is performed under close supervision of the physiotherapist to prevent any possible strain caused by incorrect movements. If participants experience 'more' pain, the physiotherapist will assess their condition and participants will have a choice to either (1) continue the experiment at a lower intensity or (2) stop the experiment. In the event that participants experience anxiety from participating on any of the experiments, the PI will assess their symptoms of anxiety and be able to administer appropriate intervention onsite as necessary at no cost. If further treatment is required, participants stop the experiment, get re-assessed by the RP and appropriate referrals will be made for treatment follow-up.
- As no other medication except simple analgesics such as Paracetamol, Paracetamol/Orphenadrine, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or Tramadol to treat pain can be taken while participating on the study, there is a possibility pain may be exacerbated and their condition may worsen. If this occurs, the RP will re-assess their condition and make appropriate treatment recommendations.
- If participants pain condition is exacerbated at any point during the course of the study for reasons not indicated in points 1-4 above, they will be referred to the RP on the study team for an assessment who will then make appropriate treatment recommendations.
- if participants develop significant symptoms because of study participation which warrants medical intervention, a subsidized medical consult and follow-up treatment will be at their own costs. The RP on the study team will facilitate a fast tracked appointment at PMC within 2 weeks. Study Withdrawal: (a) Participants may withdraw voluntarily from participation in the study at any time. Participants may also withdraw voluntarily from receiving the study intervention for any reason. If voluntary withdrawal occurs, the participant will not be asked to continue scheduled evaluations and their involvement in the study will cease. (b) Any participant will be withdrawn from further participation on the study if a serious adverse event classified as having a reasonable causal relationship to the study occurs. In this case the participant will be given appropriate medical care until the symptoms resolve or the condition becomes stable. The participant will not be asked to continue scheduled evaluations and their involvement in the study will cease. (c) All participants will be withdrawn if there is study closure due to Domain Specific Review Board (DSRB) review. Participants who drop out of the study will not be replaced. (d) Any participant can be withdrawn from further participation on the study if the study team deem it is the best interest of the participant. This can also happen when the participant does not follow instructions required to complete the study adequately, or develops other medical problems during the study period. Specific Restrictions / Requirements: (a) Standard over the counter pregnancy testing kits will be used for the purposes of determining if a female of childbearing age is pregnant. (b) All forms of contraception are allowed during the entire duration of the study (c) Participants are limited to only taking simple analgesics such as Paracetamol, Paracetamol/Orphenadrine, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or Tramadol while participating in the study (d) All medications (prescription and over the counter), vitamin and mineral supplements, and / or herbs taken by the participant will be documented. Data analysis: Self-report outcome measures and data from the walking test will be analysed via the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) package utilizing t-tests to measure group differences and pearson bivariate correlations to measure potential relationships between outcome measures and responses made on Exp 1 (video condition) and Exp 2 (physiotherapy guided movement condition). EEG patterns will be analysed via feature analysis in association with clinical signals and user states/condition including physiological measures of skin conductance and pulse rate. Data Storage: 1. All hardcopy data, will be stored in designated locked cabinet(s) that are accessible to authorized study personnel only. 2. All electronic data, they will be stored on in a secured computer that is password-protected. The databases will not contain participant identifiers and the data linking participant identifiers and the participant identification codes will be stored separately including those using portable media (e.g. CD, USB drives etc.). Data Access: 1. All study team members will have access to the research data which has password protection. 2. Data will not be released and shared with individuals or entities outside the institution. 3. Data will be destroyed after it has been stored for 6 years or minimum duration of retention period as specific by our institutional policy, whichever that is longer. Data Monitoring: 1. Safety data will be monitored at every visit with participants asked to report adverse events since the last visit. 2.There are no anticipated adverse events or complications expected. However reported adverse events if any, will be fully recorded, graded in terms of severity, and classified as either not related to the study, or having a reasonable causal relationship to the study. 3. The PI will be responsible for reporting all adverse events to DSRB. If excess risk to the participant/s is observed, or a statistically significant benefit is observed, the study is stopped early and the patient informed of the results. Futility is not used as a stopping criteria as this is a feasibility trial design of which there is limited data, and of a small sample size. The final study results are needed to proof the study concept here. 4. The PI will be responsible for the dissemination of any data and safety information to the study site. Communication will be conducted weekly via secure e-mail to the study team during active phase of the study in Phase 1, 2 and 3. A monthly face-to-face meetings and where necessary ad hoc meetings during the period of the study.
- Conditions
- Pain, Chronic
- Being tested
- EEG-based BCI analysis of fear avoidance
- Keywords
- Brain Computer Interface, Electroencephalogram (EEG), Chronic Pain
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EEG-based BCI analysis of fear avoidanceDevice
Scalp EEG signals that are acquired and recorded from experiment 1 and 2 are analysed for healthy controls, participants with low back pain and participants with lower limb pain. Comparisons of signal patterns are made between groups. Assuming unique signal patterns are obtained for each groups, these signals are further analysed and used to develop a feedback brain training system to better manage pain and ideally reduce fear-avoidant behaviors towards pain.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| EEG-based BCI analysis of fear avoidance | Experimental | All participants complete two experiments one after another-EEG patterns, skin conductance and pulse rate are recorded. The EEG cap is mounted on the participant's head, the GSR sensor secured on the fingers and the PPG sensor secured on the wrist using a Velcro strap. Exp 1-participants watch a series of 15, 1 min videos of people doing daily activities. Exp 2-participants do 15 movements (15 reps each in 1 min) as guided by a physiotherapist. 2 identical buzzers (labelled "lesser pain" and "more pain") are available to press accordingly should participants experience 'lesser' or 'more' pain any time during the experiment. If 'more' pain experienced, participants' condition will be assessed and they can choose to continue the experiment at a lower intensity or stop. Receives: Device: EEG-based BCI analysis of fear avoidance |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Assessing change in Numerical pain rating scale
Measure of pain intensity
Measured: Phase 1: week 1; Phase 2: Week 1, Week 6 and Week 7; Phase 3: Week 1 and week 9
Assessing change in Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (Miller et al., 1991)
Measure of fear-avoidance
Measured: Phase 1: week 1; Phase 2: Week 1, Week 6 and Week 7; Phase 3: Week 1 and week 9
Secondary outcomes (6)
Assessing change in Photograph series of daily activities (PHODA-SeV) scale (Leeuw et al., 2007)
Measure of patients' perceptions about the consequences of harmful situations based on a series of photographs
Measured: Phase 1: week 1; Phase 2: Week 1, Week 6 and Week 7; Phase 3: Week 1 and week 9
Assessing change in Pain Interference Scale on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) (Cleeland & Ryan, 1994)
Measure of pain interference on daily activities
Measured: Phase 1: week 1; Phase 2: Week 1, Week 6 and Week 7; Phase 3: Week 1 and week 9
Assessing change in Short-form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) (Ware & Sherbourne, 1992)
Measure of quality of life
Measured: Phase 1: week 1; Phase 2: Week 1, Week 6 and Week 7; Phase 3: Week 1 and week 9
Assessing change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (Spitzer et al., 1999)
Measure of Depressive Symptoms
Measured: Phase 1: week 1; Phase 2: Week 1, Week 6 and Week 7; Phase 3: Week 1 and week 9
Assessing change in Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) (Sullivan et al., 1995)
Measure of pain related catastrophizing
Measured: Phase 1: week 1; Phase 2: Week 1, Week 6 and Week 7; Phase 3: Week 1 and week 9
Assessing change in 6 minute Shuttle Walk Test
Objective measure of disability
Measured: Phase 1: week 1; Phase 2: Week 1, Week 6 and Week 7; Phase 3: Week 1 and week 9
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study start5 Jun 2017
- Primary completion31 Mar 2019
- Study completion31 Mar 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pain, ChronicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tan Tock Seng Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institute for Infocomm Research
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Su-Yin Yang, PhD, Principal investigator, Tan Tock Seng Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03032497
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2016/00516
- Other IDs
- RRG1/16013, 2016
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 19 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 13 Sep 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: There is no plan to make IPD available to other researchers.
Publications
Jensen MP, Sherlin LH, Fregni F, Gianas A, Howe JD, Hakimian S. Baseline brain activity predicts response to neuromodulatory pain treatment. Pain Med. 2014 Dec;15(12):2055-63. doi: 10.1111/pme.12546. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
PubMed 25287554Jensen MP, Hakimian S, Sherlin LH, Fregni F. New insights into neuromodulatory approaches for the treatment of pain. J Pain. 2008 Mar;9(3):193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.11.003. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
PubMed 18096437Pinheiro ES, de Queiros FC, Montoya P, Santos CL, do Nascimento MA, Ito CH, Silva M, Nunes Santos DB, Benevides S, Miranda JG, Sa KN, Baptista AF. Electroencephalographic Patterns in Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review of the Literature. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 25;11(2):e0149085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149085. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 26914356
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Sep 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Feasibility of a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)-Based Adaptive Sensing and Feedback for Chronic Pain Management
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03032497
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2016/00516
- Conditions
- Pain, Chronic
- Keywords
- Brain Computer Interface, Electroencephalogram (EEG), Chronic Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Tan Tock Seng HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institute for Infocomm Research
- Study start
- 5 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The feasibility study proposed here will primarily examine the sensitivity of an electroencephalogram (EEG)-based Brain Computer Interface (BCI) in detecting significant differences in brain signals in patients with chronic low back pain (N=10), lower limb pain (N=10) and healthy controls (N=10) through perceived movements via a video and during actual movements. The BCI device has been approved for use in previous trials (e.g. NNI-IRB/07/001, DSRB Domain D/09/608, DSRB Domain D/10/072) and the safety and effectiveness of this non-invasive EEG-based BCI device validated through these trials. However, the validation has not been specific to its use in pain. Related to the primary objective of the study, we will develop and validate an adaptive and participant-specific pain detection and analysis program by exploring and identifying discriminative and robust patterns in spontaneous EEG from our study sample.
For the secondary objective, we will develop and validate a BCI and computer based pain and attention diversion training system with interactive audio-visual feedbacks for Phase 2 of the study. These feedbacks will inform the user about the current brain activation level and attention level, and guide the user in learning to modulate the EEG characteristics and develop skills to manage attention to alleviate perceived fear-related pains. The BCI system captures EEG signals and decodes the underlying brain states in relation to cognition and fear-related pain perception. Such decoded brain states are then presented to the participant in visual or other form to guide the participant to learn to regulate the brain states towards better pain management. For example, the participant may over a few sessions learn to focus on the visual feedback while inhibiting the brain function activity in relation to fear-related pain perception. With practice, the user is encouraged to achieve brain activity modulation without external feedback so fear-related pain can be reduced in realistic situations.
Detailed description
We hypothesize that, using appropriately designed system learning and computing techniques, a brain-computer interface (BCI) technology can detect specific brain wave patterns in patients with chronic low back pain or lower limb pain compared to healthy controls. Also, that BCI technology can detect specific brain wave patterns for fear avoidance behaviours in motor activities known to trigger pain in such chronic pain patients.
This is a validation and feasibility study. We calculated sufficient funding to cover 10 participants each with low back pain, lower limb pain, healthy controls and BCI training respectively. Participants will be screened and undergo a comprehensive assessment by the Rehabilitation Physician (RP) on the study team. The aim of the comprehensive assessment is to establish the safety and suitability of participants to be study subjects according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.To ensure a high level of compliance given the high frequency of visits of the subject during the study, it is important that motivated volunteers are chosen.
Consent will be taken in an outpatient consultation room at the pain management clinic(PMC) at Tan Tock Seng Hospital, with full provision for privacy. PMC is where the study will be conducted. Informed consent will be taken at the convenience of the potential participant. A full explanation of the participant information sheet will be given and any questions answered.
The study is conducted over 3 phases. Total span of study participation: 11-months.
Phase 1: A total of 2 visits to the study site over 2 consecutive weeks is required. Each visit will take approximately 1 hour 15 minutes. The 1st session involves a visit to the doctor's office for a screening assessment-history taking, physical examination, and electronic notes review no different from the current standard pain consultation. Those found to be suitable and decide to take part, will be asked at the 2nd session to:
- Complete a digital set of self-report measures and a 6-minute walking test. These measures are completed at the start and end of the second session. The walking test will be conducted by a trained physiotherapist familiar with this measure.
- Participants then participate in two sets of non-invasive experiments one after another. The BCI system set-up comprising of a laptop connected to a brain signal recorder and a headset to record brain signals will be used. Sensors to measure sweat and pulse rate will also be used in the experiments. The brain signal recorder together with the sensors will be secured in a backpack and worn by participants during the experiments.
Exp 1-participants watch 15 videos of people doing daily activities. Each video frame is approximately 1 min long. EEG signal patterns are recorded for each video frame.
Exp 2-participants go through a series of 15 physical movements as guided by the physiotherapist. Participants are required to complete 15 repetitions each, within 1 min. EEG signal patterns are recorded for each movement. Two buzzers (labelled "lesser pain" and "more pain") are available for participants to press accordingly should they experience 'lesser' or 'more' pain at any point during the experiment. If 'more' pain is experienced, the physiotherapist will assess the participant's condition and the participant will have a choice to either (1) continue the experiment at a lower intensity or (2) stop the experiment.
Phase 2: Approximately 6 months after participants' participation in Phase 1 and span a period of 7 weeks. If selected to complete Phase 2, participants will undergo 18 sessions (3 sessions/week) of brain training over a period of 6 consecutive weeks. Sessions are conducted on alternate days in the week with each session lasting approximately 1 hour. The same system set-up used in Phase 1 is used in each training session.
At the start of the first session in week 1, and immediately after completing the last training session in Week 6 participants will also complete the same set of self-report questionnaires and the 6-minute walking test (as assessed in Phase 1). At week 7 (1 week post training) participants will complete the same full set of measures as set out in the second session of Phase 1.
Phase 3: A total of 2 visits to the study site is required. Each visit will take approximately 1 hour 15 minutes. These 2 visits will be scheduled approximately 8.5 mths and 10.5 mths after completing Phase 1. Both visit sessions involve a repeat of the full set of measures that participants completed at the 2nd session in Phase 1.
Potential Risks
- The potential risks to participants are minimal as none of the measures and components of the system are invasive. There are currently no known safety issues with the headset and sensors. However participants will be kept informed of any new findings.
- Participants may experience temporary exertion related discomfort in the main muscle groups that are used in the physiotherapy guided movement experiment (Experiment 2) although the were designed to fit within participants' abilities. Participants will be advised to contact the Principal Investigator (PI) should the muscular discomfort persist for more than 24 hours.
- If participants are screened positive for depression at any point on the study, the PI who is a trained psychologist will screen them for active depression and where appropriate refer to the RP for further treatment recommendations. In this case, the participant will be excluded or withdrawn from the study.
- Due to the potential of the videos and the guided movements to elicit fear of pain, participants may experience some increase in anxiety and slight worsening of usual pains. Experiment 2 is performed under close supervision of the physiotherapist to prevent any possible strain caused by incorrect movements. If participants experience 'more' pain, the physiotherapist will assess their condition and participants will have a choice to either (1) continue the experiment at a lower intensity or (2) stop the experiment. In the event that participants experience anxiety from participating on any of the experiments, the PI will assess their symptoms of anxiety and be able to administer appropriate intervention onsite as necessary at no cost. If further treatment is required, participants stop the experiment, get re-assessed by the RP and appropriate referrals will be made for treatment follow-up.
- As no other medication except simple analgesics such as Paracetamol, Paracetamol/Orphenadrine, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or Tramadol to treat pain can be taken while participating on the study, there is a possibility pain may be exacerbated and their condition may worsen. If this occurs, the RP will re-assess their condition and make appropriate treatment recommendations.
- If participants pain condition is exacerbated at any point during the course of the study for reasons not indicated in points 1-4 above, they will be referred to the RP on the study team for an assessment who will then make appropriate treatment recommendations.
- if participants develop significant symptoms because of study participation which warrants medical intervention, a subsidized medical consult and follow-up treatment will be at their own costs. The RP on the study team will facilitate a fast tracked appointment at PMC within 2 weeks. Study Withdrawal: (a) Participants may withdraw voluntarily from participation in the study at any time. Participants may also withdraw voluntarily from receiving the study intervention for any reason. If voluntary withdrawal occurs, the participant will not be asked to continue scheduled evaluations and their involvement in the study will cease. (b) Any participant will be withdrawn from further participation on the study if a serious adverse event classified as having a reasonable causal relationship to the study occurs. In this case the participant will be given appropriate medical care until the symptoms resolve or the condition becomes stable. The participant will not be asked to continue scheduled evaluations and their involvement in the study will cease. (c) All participants will be withdrawn if there is study closure due to Domain Specific Review Board (DSRB) review. Participants who drop out of the study will not be replaced. (d) Any participant can be withdrawn from further participation on the study if the study team deem it is the best interest of the participant. This can also happen when the participant does not follow instructions required to complete the study adequately, or develops other medical problems during the study period. Specific Restrictions / Requirements: (a) Standard over the counter pregnancy testing kits will be used for the purposes of determining if a female of childbearing age is pregnant. (b) All forms of contraception are allowed during the entire duration of the study (c) Participants are limited to only taking simple analgesics such as Paracetamol, Paracetamol/Orphenadrine, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or Tramadol while participating in the study (d) All medications (prescription and over the counter), vitamin and mineral supplements, and / or herbs taken by the participant will be documented. Data analysis: Self-report outcome measures and data from the walking test will be analysed via the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) package utilizing t-tests to measure group differences and pearson bivariate correlations to measure potential relationships between outcome measures and responses made on Exp 1 (video condition) and Exp 2 (physiotherapy guided movement condition). EEG patterns will be analysed via feature analysis in association with clinical signals and user states/condition including physiological measures of skin conductance and pulse rate. Data Storage: 1. All hardcopy data, will be stored in designated locked cabinet(s) that are accessible to authorized study personnel only. 2. All electronic data, they will be stored on in a secured computer that is password-protected. The databases will not contain participant identifiers and the data linking participant identifiers and the participant identification codes will be stored separately including those using portable media (e.g. CD, USB drives etc.). Data Access: 1. All study team members will have access to the research data which has password protection. 2. Data will not be released and shared with individuals or entities outside the institution. 3. Data will be destroyed after it has been stored for 6 years or minimum duration of retention period as specific by our institutional policy, whichever that is longer. Data Monitoring: 1. Safety data will be monitored at every visit with participants asked to report adverse events since the last visit. 2.There are no anticipated adverse events or complications expected. However reported adverse events if any, will be fully recorded, graded in terms of severity, and classified as either not related to the study, or having a reasonable causal relationship to the study. 3. The PI will be responsible for reporting all adverse events to DSRB. If excess risk to the participant/s is observed, or a statistically significant benefit is observed, the study is stopped early and the patient informed of the results. Futility is not used as a stopping criteria as this is a feasibility trial design of which there is limited data, and of a small sample size. The final study results are needed to proof the study concept here. 4. The PI will be responsible for the dissemination of any data and safety information to the study site. Communication will be conducted weekly via secure e-mail to the study team during active phase of the study in Phase 1, 2 and 3. A monthly face-to-face meetings and where necessary ad hoc meetings during the period of the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| EEG-based BCI analysis of fear avoidance | Experimental | Device: EEG-based BCI analysis of fear avoidanceAll participants complete two experiments one after another-EEG patterns, skin conductance and pulse rate are recorded. The EEG cap is mounted on the participant's head, the GSR sensor secured on the fingers and the PPG sensor secured on the wrist using a Velcro strap. Exp 1-participants watch a series of 15, 1 min videos of people doing daily activities. Exp 2-participants do 15 movements (15 reps each in 1 min) as guided by a physiotherapist. 2 identical buzzers (labelled "lesser pain" and "more pain") are available to press accordingly should participants experience 'lesser' or 'more' pain any time during the experiment. If 'more' pain experienced, participants' condition will be assessed and they can choose to continue the experiment at a lower intensity or stop. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Only English speaking participants are recruited.
- Participants who are healthy controls need to meet the following inclusion criteria:
- Participants who have either low back pain or lower limb pain need to meet the following inclusion criteria:
- Diagnosed to have musculoskeletal low back pain OR lower limb pain lasting for > 3 months.
- Not currently on any active therapy (Example: physiotherapy, stabilisation exercise therapy) or medication EXCEPT simple analgesics (Paracetamol, Paracetamol/Orphenadrine, Non-steriodal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), Tramadol).
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Participants are excluded from the study if they meet any of the following criteria:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EEG-based BCI analysis of fear avoidanceScalp EEG signals that are acquired and recorded from experiment 1 and 2 are analysed for healthy controls, participants with low back pain and participants with lower limb pain. Comparisons of signal patterns are made between groups. Assuming unique signal patterns are obtained for each groups, these signals are further analysed and used to develop a feedback brain training system to better manage pain and ideally reduce fear-avoidant behaviors towards pain. | Device | EEG-based BCI analysis of fear avoidance |
Primary outcome
Assessing change in Numerical pain rating scale
Time frame: Phase 1: week 1; Phase 2: Week 1, Week 6 and Week 7; Phase 3: Week 1 and week 9
Measure of pain intensity
Assessing change in Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (Miller et al., 1991)
Time frame: Phase 1: week 1; Phase 2: Week 1, Week 6 and Week 7; Phase 3: Week 1 and week 9
Measure of fear-avoidance
6 secondary outcomes
Assessing change in Photograph series of daily activities (PHODA-SeV) scale (Leeuw et al., 2007)
Time frame: Phase 1: week 1; Phase 2: Week 1, Week 6 and Week 7; Phase 3: Week 1 and week 9
Assessing change in Pain Interference Scale on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) (Cleeland & Ryan, 1994)
Time frame: Phase 1: week 1; Phase 2: Week 1, Week 6 and Week 7; Phase 3: Week 1 and week 9
Assessing change in Short-form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) (Ware & Sherbourne, 1992)
Time frame: Phase 1: week 1; Phase 2: Week 1, Week 6 and Week 7; Phase 3: Week 1 and week 9
Assessing change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (Spitzer et al., 1999)
Time frame: Phase 1: week 1; Phase 2: Week 1, Week 6 and Week 7; Phase 3: Week 1 and week 9
Assessing change in Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) (Sullivan et al., 1995)
Time frame: Phase 1: week 1; Phase 2: Week 1, Week 6 and Week 7; Phase 3: Week 1 and week 9
Assessing change in 6 minute Shuttle Walk Test
Time frame: Phase 1: week 1; Phase 2: Week 1, Week 6 and Week 7; Phase 3: Week 1 and week 9
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Sep 2019.
- Background: PubMed 25287554Jensen MP, Sherlin LH, Fregni F, Gianas A, Howe JD, Hakimian S. Baseline brain activity predicts response to neuromodulatory pain treatment. Pain Med. 2014 Dec;15(12):2055-63. doi: 10.1111/pme.12546. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
- Background: PubMed 18096437Jensen MP, Hakimian S, Sherlin LH, Fregni F. New insights into neuromodulatory approaches for the treatment of pain. J Pain. 2008 Mar;9(3):193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.11.003. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
- Background: PubMed 26914356Pinheiro ES, de Queiros FC, Montoya P, Santos CL, do Nascimento MA, Ito CH, Silva M, Nunes Santos DB, Benevides S, Miranda JG, Sa KN, Baptista AF. Electroencephalographic Patterns in Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review of the Literature. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 25;11(2):e0149085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149085. eCollection 2016.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. There is no plan to make IPD available to other researchers.
Related trials for Pain, Chronic
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Adding Vagal Neuromodulation to Manual Therapy in Women With Fibromyalgia
Fibromyalgia (FM) OR Fibromyalgia Syndrome, Manuel Therapy
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Veterans' Intervention Blending NeuRomodulation and YogA for Chronic Low BackPaiN Treatment: VIBRANT
Chronic Low Back Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Psilocybin-Assisted Physical Therapy in Chronic Low Back Pain
Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP), Physical Therapy
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Music During Walking on Pain and Muscle Activation in People With Chronic Pain Due to Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
PRP Versus NP Injections for Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain
Discogenic Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Su-Yin Yang, PhD principal investigator
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing EEG-based BCI analysis of fear avoidance in people with Pain, Chronic, run by Tan Tock Seng Hospital at 1 site in Singapore.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Assessing change in Numerical pain rating scale (time frame: Phase 1: week 1; Phase 2: Week 1, Week 6 and Week 7; Phase 3: Week 1 and week 9). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03032497, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Sep 2019.