Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP)Phase 3APEKS-NPNCT03032380
Clinical Study of Cefiderocol (S-649266) for the Treatment of Nosocomial Pneumonia Caused by Gram-negative Pathogens
A Phase 3 study testing Cefiderocol, Meropenem and Linezolid in people with Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP) and Hospital Acquired Pneumonia (HAP), run by Shionogi at 119 sites in 19 countries.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to compare all-cause mortality at Day 14 in participants receiving cefiderocol with participants receiving the comparator, meropenem, in adults with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP), ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), or healthcare-associated bacterial… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP), Hospital Acquired Pneumonia (HAP), Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP)
- What is being tested?
- Cefiderocol, Meropenem and Linezolid
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 119 sitesin 19 countries
- Study dates
- 24 Oct 2017to 1 Apr 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects 18 years or older at the time of signing informed consent
- Subjects who have provided written informed consent or their informed consent has been provided by a legally authorized representative
- Subjects who meet the clinical diagnosis criteria for hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP), ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), or healthcare-associated bacterial pneumonia (HCABP)
- All subjects must fulfill at least 1 of the following clinical criteria at screening:
- New onset or worsening of pulmonary symptoms or signs, such as cough, dyspnea, tachypnea (eg, respiratory rate > 25 breaths/minute), expectorated sputum production, or requirement for mechanical ventilation
- Hypoxemia (eg, a partial pressure of oxygen [PaO2] < 60 mm Hg while the subject is breathing room air, as determined by arterial blood gas [ABG], or worsening of the ratio of the PaO2 to the fraction of inspired oxygen [PaO2/FiO2])
Show all 16Show fewer
- Need for acute changes in the ventilator support system to enhance oxygenation, as determined by worsening oxygenation (ABG or PaO2/FiO2) or needed changes in the amount of positive end-expiratory pressure
- New onset of or increase in (quantity or characteristics) suctioned respiratory secretions, demonstrating evidence of inflammation and absence of contamination
- All subjects must have at least 1 of the following signs:
- Documented fever (ie, core body temperature [tympanic, rectal, esophageal] ≥ 38°C [100.4°F], oral temperature ≥ 37.5°C, or axillary temperature ≥ 37°C)
- Hypothermia (ie, core body temperature [tympanic, rectal, esophageal] ≤ 35°C [95.0°F], oral temperature ≤ 35.5°C and axillary temperature ≤ 36°C)
- Leukocytosis with a total peripheral white blood cell (WBC) count ≥ 10,000 cells/mm³
- Leukopenia with total peripheral WBC count ≤ 4500 cells/mm³
- Greater than 15% immature neutrophils (bands) noted on peripheral blood smear
- All subjects must have a chest radiograph during screening showing the presence of new or progressive infiltrate(s) suggestive of bacterial pneumonia. A computed tomography (CT) scan in the same time window showing the same findings could also be acceptable
- All subjects must have a suspected Gram-negative infection involving the lower respiratory tract
Who cannot join
- Subjects who have known or suspected community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), atypical pneumonia, viral pneumonia, or chemical pneumonia (including aspiration of gastric contents, inhalation injury)
- Other exclusions based on the prescribing information of meropenem or linezolid, prior antibiotic usage, age, and pregnancy.
Trial locations and contacts
119 sites in 19 countries.
119 sites in 19 countries
Russia16 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Barnaul, 656024
Shionogi Research Site
Barnaul, 656045
Shionogi Research Site
Chelyabinsk, 454000
Shionogi Research Site
Krasnodar, 350012
Shionogi Research Site
Moscow, 105203
Shionogi Research Site
Moscow, 115280
Shionogi Research Site
Moscow, 127015
Shionogi Research Site
Novosibirsk, 630051
Shionogi Research Site
Novosibirsk, 630075
Shionogi Research Site
Saint Petersburg, 192242
Shionogi Research Site
Saint Petersburg, 196247
Shionogi Research Site
Saint Petersburg, 197706
Shionogi Research Site
Saint Petersburg, 454091
Shionogi Research Site
Sait-Petersburg, 194354
Shionogi Research Site
Smolensk, 214019
Shionogi Research Site
Tomsk, 634063
United States15 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Annapolis, Maryland, 21404
Shionogi Research Site
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808
Shionogi Research Site
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18105
Shionogi Research Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Shionogi Research Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Shionogi Research Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43210-1267
Shionogi Research Site
Council Bluffs, Iowa, 51503
Shionogi Research Site
DeLand, Florida, 32720
Shionogi Research Site
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Shionogi Research Site
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Shionogi Research Site
New Haven, Connecticut, 06511
Shionogi Research Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19141
Shionogi Research Site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132
Shionogi Research Site
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71103
Shionogi Research Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63110-0250
Ukraine13 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Chernivtsi, 58001
Shionogi Research Site
Dnipropetrovsk, 49000
Shionogi Research Site
Ivano-Frankivsk, 76008
Shionogi Research Site
Kharkiv, 61037
Shionogi Research Site
Kharkiv, 61103
Shionogi Research Site
Kherson, 73000
Shionogi Research Site
Kiev, 01133
Shionogi Research Site
Kiev, 041112
Shionogi Research Site
Kremenchuk, 39617
Shionogi Research Site
Poltava, 36038
Shionogi Research Site
Sumy, 40031
Shionogi Research Site
Vinnitsya, 21029
Shionogi Research Site
Zaporizhzhya, 69035
Spain9 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Alicante, 03010
Shionogi Research Site
Barcelona, 08003
Shionogi Research Site
Barcelona, 08026
Shionogi Research Site
Barcelona, 8036
Shionogi Research Site
Madrid, 28007
Shionogi Research Site
Madrid, 28922
Shionogi Research Site
Torrejón de Ardoz, 28850
Shionogi Research Site
Torrevieja, 03186
Shionogi Research Site
Valencia, 46010
Philippines8 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Caloocan, National Capital Region, 1400
Shionogi Research Site
Caloocan, 1427
Shionogi Research Site
Iloilo City, 5000
Shionogi Research Site
Jaro, Iloilo City, 5000
Shionogi Research Site
Manila, 1000
Shionogi Research Site
Quezon City, National Capital Region, 1104
Shionogi Research Site
Quezon City, National Capital Region, 1109
Shionogi Research Site
Tondo, Manila, 1012
Czechia7 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Brno, 65693
Shionogi Research Site
Hradec Králové, 50005
Shionogi Research Site
Kolín, 28000
Shionogi Research Site
Kyjov, 69701
Shionogi Research Site
Ostrava-Poruba, 708 52
Shionogi Research Site
Prague, 15006
Shionogi Research Site
Příbram, 26101
France7 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Angers, 49933
Shionogi Research Site
Argenteuil, 95100
Shionogi Research Site
Bron, 69677
Shionogi Research Site
LaRoche-sur-Yon, 85925
Shionogi Research Site
Lyon, 69437
Shionogi Research Site
Nice, 06202
Shionogi Research Site
Paris, 75018
Japan6 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Kumamoto, 860-0008
Shionogi Research Site
Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511
Shionogi Research Site
Shimajiri-gun, Okinawa, 901-1193
Shionogi Research Site
tabashi City, Tokyo, 173-8610
Shionogi Research Site
Tsu, Mie-ken, 514-8507
Shionogi Research Site
Tsuchiura, Ibaraki, 300-8585
Hungary5 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Budapest, 1121
Shionogi Research Site
Budapest, 1125
Shionogi Research Site
Debrecen, H-4031
Shionogi Research Site
Fehérgyarmat, 4900
Shionogi Research Site
Székesfehérvár, 8000
Israel5 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Holon, 58100
Shionogi Research Site
Jerusalem, 9103102
Shionogi Research Site
Tel Aviv, 64239
Shionogi Research Site
Tel HaShomer, 52621
Shionogi Research Site
Tikva, 49100
Estonia4 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Kohtla-Järve, 31025
Shionogi Research Site
Pärnu, 80010
Shionogi Research Site
Tallinn, 13419
Shionogi Research Site
Tartu, 51014
Georgia4 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Batumi, 6010
Shionogi Research Site
Kutaisi, 4600
Shionogi Research Site
Kutaisi, 4601
Shionogi Research Site
Tbilisi, 0160
Germany4 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Bonn, 53127
Shionogi Research Site
Hamburg, 20246
Shionogi Research Site
Heidelberg, 69120
Shionogi Research Site
Leipzig, 04103
Latvia4 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Daugavpils, LV-5417
Shionogi Research Site
Liepāja, LV-3414
Shionogi Research Site
Riga, LV-1006
Shionogi Research Site
Saldus Novads, LV-1002
Taiwan4 sites
Shionogi Research Site
New Taipei City, 235
Shionogi Research Site
Taichung, 40705
Shionogi Research Site
Taipei, 10002
Shionogi Research Site
Taipei, 11696
Serbia3 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Belgrade, 11000
Shionogi Research Site
Kamenitz, 21204
Shionogi Research Site
Kragujevac, 34000
Belgium2 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Brussels, 1020
Shionogi Research Site
Brussels, 1070
Canada2 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H3A7
Shionogi Research Site
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Clinical Study of S-649266 Compared With Meropenem for the Treatment of Hospital-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia, Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia, or Healthcare-associated Bacterial Pneumonia Caused by Gram-negative Pathogens
The primary objective of this study is to compare all-cause mortality at Day 14 in participants receiving cefiderocol with participants receiving the comparator, meropenem, in adults with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP), ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), or healthcare-associated bacterial pneumonia (HCABP) caused by Gram-negative pathogens.
- Conditions
- Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP), Hospital Acquired Pneumonia (HAP), Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP)
- Being tested
- Cefiderocol, Meropenem, Linezolid
- Keywords
- Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), S-649266, linezolid, meropenem, Healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP), nosocomial pneumonia, Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), Gram-negative pathogens, pneumonia, cefiderocol
- Medical subject headings
- Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia, Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated, Pneumonia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CefiderocolDrug
Also called S-649266
2000 mg intravenously every 8 hours for a period of 7 to14 days (dosage adjustment is necessary based on renal function)
MeropenemDrug
Also called Merrem®
2000 mg intravenously every 8 hours for a period of 7 to 14 days (dosage adjustment is necessary based on renal function)
LinezolidDrug
Also called Zyvox®
600 mg of linezolid administered intravenously over 30 minutes to 2 hours, every 12 hours.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cefiderocol | Experimental | Participants will receive 2 g cefiderocol administered intravenously every 8 hours for 7 to 14 days and 600 mg linezolid administered intravenously every 12 hours for at least 5 days. Receives: Drug: Cefiderocol; Drug: Linezolid |
| Meropenem | Active comparator | Participants will receive 2 g meropenem administered intravenously every 8 hours for 7 to 14 days and 600 mg linezolid administered intravenously every 12 hours for at least 5 days. Receives: Drug: Meropenem; Drug: Linezolid |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
All-cause Mortality Rate at Day 14
The all-cause mortality (ACM) rate at Day 14 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from the first infusion of study drug up to Day 14.
The Modified Intent-to-Treat Population included all randomized participants who met either of the following criteria:
- Evidence of Gram-negative infection of the lower respiratory tract based on a culture, Gram-stain, or other diagnostic test
- Evidence of a lower respiratory tract infection but culture or other diagnostic tests did not provide a microbiologic diagnosis
Measured: From first dose of study drug to Day 14
Secondary outcomes (12)
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at Test of Cure (TOC)
Lower respiratory tract specimens (eg, sputum, endotracheal aspiration [ETA], endobronchial culture specimens collected by bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL], or protected specimen brush [PSB], lung biopsy tissue, pleural effusions, etc) were sent to the local microbiology laboratory for isolation and identification of pathogens.
Microbiological outcome by Baseline pathogen at TOC was determined by the sponsor as either Eradication, Persistence, or Indeterminate. Overall per-participant microbiological outcome was determined based on the individual microbiological outcomes for each Baseline pathogen.
Eradication: Absence of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy). If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed as eradication.
Measured: Test of cure (7 days after end of treatment; equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure
Clinical outcome was assessed by the investigator as either Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate.
Clinical Cure: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, including a reduction in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no additional antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.
Measured: Test of cure (7 days after the end of treatment; equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Early Assessment (EA)
Clinical outcome was assessed by the investigator as either Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate.
Clinical Cure: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, including a reduction in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no additional antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.
Measured: Early assessment (Day 3-4 after the start of treatment)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT)
Clinical outcome was assessed by the investigator as either Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate.
Clinical Cure: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, including a reduction in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no additional antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.
Measured: End of treatment (Day 7 to 14)
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up (FU)
Clinical outcome was assessed by the investigator at follow-up as either Sustained Clinical Cure, Relapse, or Indeterminate.
Sustained Clinical Cure: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of pneumonia in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.
Measured: Follow-up (14 days after the end of treatment; Day 21 to 28)
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at Early Assessment
Microbiological outcome by Baseline pathogen at Early Assessment was determined by the sponsor as either Eradication, Persistence, or Indeterminate. Overall per-participant microbiological outcome was determined based on the individual microbiological outcomes for each Baseline pathogen.
Eradication: Absence of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, BAL fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy). If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed as eradication.
Measured: Early Assessment, Days 3 to 4
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at End of Treatment
Microbiological outcome by Baseline pathogen at End of Treatment was determined by the sponsor as either: Eradication, Persistence, or Indeterminate. Overall per-participant microbiological outcome was determined based on the individual microbiological outcomes for each Baseline pathogen.
Eradication: Absence of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, BAL fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy). If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed as eradication.
Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up
Microbiological outcome by Baseline pathogen at Follow-up was determined by the sponsor as either Sustained Eradication, Persistence, Recurrence, or Indeterminate. Overall per-participant microbiological outcome was determined based on the individual microbiological outcomes for each Baseline pathogen.
Sustained eradication: Absence of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, BAL fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy) after TOC. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical response after TOC, the response was presumed to be eradication.
Measured: Follow-up (14 days after the end of treatment, Days 21 to 28)
All-cause Mortality Rate at Day 28
The all-cause mortality (ACM) rate at Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from the first dose of study drug up to Day 28.
Measured: From first dose of study drug to Day 28
All-cause Mortality Rate at the End of Study
The all-cause mortality rate during both the treatment and follow-up period (up to the end of study [EOS] visit) was calculated as the percentage of participants who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from the first infusion of study drug up to EOS. If a participant discontinued from the study before EOS and survival information was not available, then the survival status for this endpoint for the participant was considered unknown.
Measured: From first dose of study drug through end of study (28 days after end of treatment, up to 42 days)
Total Hospitalization Time
The length of hospital stay attributable to the study-qualifying infection.
Measured: From first dose of study drug to test of cure (7 days after end of treatment; equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21) and to follow-up (14 days after the end of treatment; Day 21 to 28)
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
The severity of each adverse event (AE) was graded by the investigator according to the following definitions:
- Mild: A finding or symptom is minor and does not interfere with usual daily activities.
- Moderate: The event causes discomfort and interferes with usual daily activity or affects clinical status.
- Severe: The event causes an interruption of the participant's usual daily activities or has a clinically significant effect.
The relationship of each AE to the study treatment was determined by the investigator based on whether the AE could be reasonably explained as having been caused by the study drug (treatment related AE [TRAE]).
An SAE is defined as any AE occurring at any dose that resulted in any of the following outcomes:
- Death
- Life-threatening condition
- Hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization for treatment
- Persistent or significant disability/incapacity
- Congenital anomaly/birth defect
- Other medically important condition
Measured: From first dose of study drug through the end of study, up to 42 days.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study start24 Oct 2017
- Primary completion26 Feb 2019
- Study completion1 Apr 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by ShionogiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shionogi
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Shionogi Clinical Trials Administrator Clinical Support Help Line, Study director, Shionogi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03032380
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1615R2132
- Other IDs
- 2016-003020-23, 2016
- Acronym
- APEKS-NP
- Status last verified
- Oct 2020
- First submitted
- 17 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 13 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
- Expanded access
- Available
Publications
Nordmann P, Shields RK, Doi Y, Takemura M, Echols R, Matsunaga Y, Yamano Y. Mechanisms of Reduced Susceptibility to Cefiderocol Among Isolates from the CREDIBLE-CR and APEKS-NP Clinical Trials. Microb Drug Resist. 2022 Apr;28(4):398-407. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2021.0180. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
PubMed 35076335Skaar EP, Echols R, Matsunaga Y, Menon A, Portsmouth S. Iron serum levels and iron homeostasis parameters in patients with nosocomial pneumonia treated with cefiderocol: post hoc analysis of the APEKS-NP study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Mar;41(3):467-476. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04399-9. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
PubMed 35025025Wenzler E, Butler D, Tan X, Katsube T, Wajima T. Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Dose Optimization of Cefiderocol during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2022 Apr;61(4):539-552. doi: 10.1007/s40262-021-01086-y. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
PubMed 34792787Wunderink RG, Matsunaga Y, Ariyasu M, Clevenbergh P, Echols R, Kaye KS, Kollef M, Menon A, Pogue JM, Shorr AF, Timsit JF, Zeitlinger M, Nagata TD. Cefiderocol versus high-dose, extended-infusion meropenem for the treatment of Gram-negative nosocomial pneumonia (APEKS-NP): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):213-225. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30731-3. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
PubMed 33058798
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Clinical Study of S-649266 Compared With Meropenem for the Treatment of Hospital-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia, Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia, or Healthcare-associated Bacterial Pneumonia Caused by Gram-negative Pathogens
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03032380
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- APEKS-NP / 1615R2132
- Conditions
- Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP), Hospital Acquired Pneumonia (HAP), Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP)
- Keywords
- Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), S-649266, linezolid, meropenem, Healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP), nosocomial pneumonia, Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), Gram-negative pathogens
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- ShionogiIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 24 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Nov 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to compare all-cause mortality at Day 14 in participants receiving cefiderocol with participants receiving the comparator, meropenem, in adults with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP), ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), or healthcare-associated bacterial pneumonia (HCABP) caused by Gram-negative pathogens.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cefiderocol | Experimental | Drug: Cefiderocol, Drug: LinezolidParticipants will receive 2 g cefiderocol administered intravenously every 8 hours for 7 to 14 days and 600 mg linezolid administered intravenously every 12 hours for at least 5 days. |
| Meropenem | Active comparator | Drug: Meropenem, Drug: LinezolidParticipants will receive 2 g meropenem administered intravenously every 8 hours for 7 to 14 days and 600 mg linezolid administered intravenously every 12 hours for at least 5 days. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Subjects 18 years or older at the time of signing informed consent
- Subjects who have provided written informed consent or their informed consent has been provided by a legally authorized representative
- Subjects who meet the clinical diagnosis criteria for hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP), ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), or healthcare-associated bacterial pneumonia (HCABP)
- All subjects must fulfill at least 1 of the following clinical criteria at screening:
- All subjects must have at least 1 of the following signs:
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Subjects who have known or suspected community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), atypical pneumonia, viral pneumonia, or chemical pneumonia (including aspiration of gastric contents, inhalation injury)
- Other exclusions based on the prescribing information of meropenem or linezolid, prior antibiotic usage, age, and pregnancy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CefiderocolAlso: S-6492662000 mg intravenously every 8 hours for a period of 7 to14 days (dosage adjustment is necessary based on renal function) | Drug | Cefiderocol |
| MeropenemAlso: Merrem®2000 mg intravenously every 8 hours for a period of 7 to 14 days (dosage adjustment is necessary based on renal function) | Drug | Meropenem |
| LinezolidAlso: Zyvox®600 mg of linezolid administered intravenously over 30 minutes to 2 hours, every 12 hours. | Drug | Cefiderocol, Meropenem |
Primary outcome
All-cause Mortality Rate at Day 14
Time frame: From first dose of study drug to Day 14
The all-cause mortality (ACM) rate at Day 14 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from the first infusion of study drug up to Day 14. The Modified Intent-to-Treat Population included all randomized participants who met either of the following criteria: * Evidence of Gram-negative infection of the lower respiratory tract based on a culture, Gram-stain, or other diagnostic test * Evidence of a lower respiratory tract infection but culture or other diagnostic tests did not provide a microbiologic diagnosis
12 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at Test of Cure (TOC)
Time frame: Test of cure (7 days after end of treatment; equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure
Time frame: Test of cure (7 days after the end of treatment; equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Early Assessment (EA)
Time frame: Early assessment (Day 3-4 after the start of treatment)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT)
Time frame: End of treatment (Day 7 to 14)
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up (FU)
Time frame: Follow-up (14 days after the end of treatment; Day 21 to 28)
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at Early Assessment
Time frame: Early Assessment, Days 3 to 4
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at End of Treatment
Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up
Time frame: Follow-up (14 days after the end of treatment, Days 21 to 28)
All-cause Mortality Rate at Day 28
Time frame: From first dose of study drug to Day 28
All-cause Mortality Rate at the End of Study
Time frame: From first dose of study drug through end of study (28 days after end of treatment, up to 42 days)
Total Hospitalization Time
Time frame: From first dose of study drug to test of cure (7 days after end of treatment; equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21) and to follow-up (14 days after the end of treatment; Day 21 to 28)
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
Time frame: From first dose of study drug through the end of study, up to 42 days.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Nov 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35076335Nordmann P, Shields RK, Doi Y, Takemura M, Echols R, Matsunaga Y, Yamano Y. Mechanisms of Reduced Susceptibility to Cefiderocol Among Isolates from the CREDIBLE-CR and APEKS-NP Clinical Trials. Microb Drug Resist. 2022 Apr;28(4):398-407. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2021.0180. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35025025Skaar EP, Echols R, Matsunaga Y, Menon A, Portsmouth S. Iron serum levels and iron homeostasis parameters in patients with nosocomial pneumonia treated with cefiderocol: post hoc analysis of the APEKS-NP study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Mar;41(3):467-476. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04399-9. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34792787Wenzler E, Butler D, Tan X, Katsube T, Wajima T. Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Dose Optimization of Cefiderocol during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2022 Apr;61(4):539-552. doi: 10.1007/s40262-021-01086-y. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33058798Wunderink RG, Matsunaga Y, Ariyasu M, Clevenbergh P, Echols R, Kaye KS, Kollef M, Menon A, Pogue JM, Shorr AF, Timsit JF, Zeitlinger M, Nagata TD. Cefiderocol versus high-dose, extended-infusion meropenem for the treatment of Gram-negative nosocomial pneumonia (APEKS-NP): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):213-225. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30731-3. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Shionogi Clinical Trials Administrator Clinical Support Help Line study director
Shionogi
119 sites in 19 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Cefiderocol, Meropenem and Linezolid in people with Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP) and Hospital Acquired Pneumonia (HAP), run by Shionogi at 119 sites in 19 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 119 sites in Russia, United States, Ukraine, Spain, Philippines and 14 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Nov 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
All-cause Mortality Rate at Day 14 (time frame: From first dose of study drug to Day 14). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03032380, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Nov 2020.