AzTrials
AzTrials

Scapholunate Ligament TearNCT03017040

In Vivo Kinematics of Scapolunate Interosseous Ligament Injuries

A study testing CT scan and Fluoroscopy Scan in people with Scapholunate Ligament Tear, run by Massachusetts General Hospital.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators hypothesize that there is no relationship between in vivo kinematic abnormalities and patient-rated outcomes for scapholunate interosseous ligament injuries (SLIL) The secondary null hypotheses are that: There are no kinematic differences between subjects with unilateral, symptomatic, full thickness… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Scapholunate Ligament Tear
What is being tested?
CT scan and Fluoroscopy Scan
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Sep 2015to 27 Apr 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All patients with a unilateral full thickness scapholunate ligament tear diagnosed by radiographs or advanced imaging

Who cannot join

  • Patients with a partial thickness scapholunate ligament tear
  • Patients with radiographic arthrosis
  • Patients with prior wrist injury
  • Pregnant women

About this study

The investigators hypothesize that there is no relationship between in vivo kinematic abnormalities and patient-rated outcomes for scapholunate interosseous ligament injuries (SLIL)

The secondary null hypotheses are that: There are no kinematic differences between subjects with unilateral, symptomatic, full thickness scapholunate ligament tears in comparison to the contralateral wrist without scapholunate ligament injury.

The investigators aim to answer to the below questions:

  • What are baseline validated outcomes for subjects with SLIL injury?
  • What are baseline physical measures (range of motion, Jamar Dynamometry)?
Read the detailed description

In vivo kinematics of the normal wrist has been studied previously, but few studies have characterized the wrist with a SLIL injury. There are few studies evaluating validated patient-rated outcomes for patients with SLIL injury. The goal of this study would be to evaluate to what degree kinematic abnormalities affect patient-rated outcomes.

Being tested
CT scan, Fluoroscopy Scan

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CT scanDevice

    A CT scan of the wrist

  • Fluoroscopy ScanDevice

    A fluoroscopy scan of the wrist.

Study groups in NCT03017040
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Scapholunate tearExperimentalSubjects with a full scapholunate tear will have a CT scan and fluoroscopy images taken
Receives: Device: CT scan; Device: Fluoroscopy Scan
Control WristActive comparatorSubjects will have a CT scan and fluoroscopy image taken of the contralateral wrist serve as the control.
Receives: Device: CT scan; Device: Fluoroscopy Scan

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)

    The questionnaire will help the investigators determine how much difficulty the subject has had with the injured wrist in the past week.

    Measured: at enrollment

  2. SF-12 Patient Questionnaire

    The SF-12 questionnaire will help the investigators determine how well subjects are able to do usual activities

    Measured: at enrollment

  3. DASH Questionnaire

    The DASH questionnaire will help the investigators determine the level of disability subjects face from the wrist injury.

    Measured: at enrollment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jan 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2015
  3. Primary completion27 Apr 2018
  4. Study completion27 Apr 2018

Why it stopped: Not enough research staff

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03017040
Sponsor's protocol ID
2015P001271
Status last verified
Aug 2019
First submitted
7 Dec 2016
Last updated
14 Aug 2019
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing CT scan and Fluoroscopy Scan in people with Scapholunate Ligament Tear, run by Massachusetts General Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Sep 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) (time frame: at enrollment). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Aug 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in