AzTrials
AzTrials

DiabetesPhase 3PIONEER 10NCT03015220

Safety and Efficacy of Oral Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide Both in Combination With One OAD (Oral Antidiabetic Drug) in Japanese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

A Phase 3 study testing Semaglutide and Dulaglutide in people with Diabetes and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Novo Nordisk A/S at 34 sites in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This trial is conducted in Asia. The aim of this trial is to investigate Safety and efficacy of oral semaglutide versus dulaglutide both in combination with one OAD (oral antidiabetic drug) in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What is being tested?
Semaglutide and Dulaglutide
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
458 participants
Where
34 sitesJapan
Study dates
10 Jan 2017to 12 Jul 2018
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Informed consent obtained before any trial-related activities. Trial-related activities are any procedures that are carried out as part of the trial, including activities to determine suitability for the trial
  • Japanese male or female, age above or equal to 20 years at the time of signing informed consent
  • Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus for at least 60 days prior to day of screening
  • HbA1c (glycosylated haemoglobin) between 7.0%-10.5% (53-91 mmol/mol) (both inclusive)
  • OAD (oral antidiabetic drug) monotherapy with stable daily dose for at least 60 days prior to the day of screening of one of SU (sulphonylurea) glinide , TZD (thiazolidinedione), α-GI (alpha-glucosidase inhibitor) or SGLT-2 (sodium-glucose cotransporter-2) inhibitor according to Japanese labelling

Who cannot join

  • Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant or is of child-bearing potential and not using an adequate contraceptive method. Adequate contraceptive measures are abstinence (not having sex), diaphragm, condom (by the partner), intrauterine device, sponge, spermicide or oral contraceptives
  • Any disorder, which in the investigator's opinion might jeopardise subject's safety or compliance with the protocol
  • Family or personal history of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN 2) or medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC)
  • History of pancreatitis (acute or chronic)
  • History of major surgical procedures involving the stomach potentially affecting absorption of trial product (e.g. subtotal and total gastrectomy, sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass surgery)
  • Any of the following: myocardial infarction, stroke or hospitalisation for unstable angina or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) within the past 180 days prior to the day of screening and randomisation
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Subjects presently classified as being in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV
  • Planned coronary, carotid or peripheral artery revascularisation known on the day of screening
  • Subjects with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) above 2.5 x upper normal limit (UNL)
  • Renal impairment defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 30 mL/min/1.73 m^2 as per Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula (CKD-EPI)
  • Treatment with once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) or once weekly dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor in a period of 90 days before the day of screening
  • For subjects treated with an OAD other than TZD at screening: Treatment with TZD in a period of 90 days before the day of screening
  • Treatment with any medication for the indication of diabetes or obesity in addition to background OAD medication (SU, glinide, TZD, α-GI or SGLT-2 inhibitor) in a period of 60 days before the day of screening with the exception of short-term insulin treatment for acute illness for a total of at least 14 days
  • Proliferative retinopathy or maculopathy requiring acute treatment. Verified by fundus photography or dilated fundoscopy performed within 90 days prior to randomisation
  • History or presence of malignant neoplasms within the last 5 years (except basal and squamous cell skin cancer and in situ carcinomas)
  • History of diabetic ketoacidosis

Trial locations and contacts

34 sites in 1 country.

34 sites in 1 country

Japan34 sites
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Adachi-ku, Tokyo, 123-0845

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Annaka-shi, Gunma, 379-0116

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Arakawa-ku, Tokyo, 116-0012

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Chiba-shi, Chiba, 260-0804

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0061

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Fukushima, 963-8851

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Gunma, 373-0036

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Ibaraki, 311-0113

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Iruma-shi, Saitama, 358-0011

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Kanagawa, 232-0064

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Kashiwara-shi, Osaka, 582-0005

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Kawagoe-shi, Saitama, 350-0851

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Kawaguchi-shi, Saitama, 332-8558

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Kumamoto, 862-0976

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Kurashiki-shi, Okayama, 701-0192

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, 601-1495

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Mitaka-shi, Tokyo, 181-0013

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Mito-shi, Ibaraki, 310-0826

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Miyazaki, 880-0034

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Osaka, 569-1045

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Ota-ku, Tokyo, 144-0051

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Sapporo, 062 0007

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido, 004-0004

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Sendai-shi, Miyagi, 980-0021

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi, 329-0433

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 141-0032

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Shizuoka-shi, Shizuoka, 424-0853

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Suita-shi, Osaka, 565-0853

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Tokyo, 103-0027

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Tokyo, 104-0031

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Tokyo, 125-0054

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Tokyo, 160-0008

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Toshima-ku, Tokyo, 171-0021

  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

    Yamato-shi, Kanagawa, 242-0004

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: Safety and Efficacy of Oral Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide Both in Combination With One OAD in Japanese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

This trial is conducted in Asia. The aim of this trial is to investigate Safety and efficacy of oral semaglutide versus dulaglutide both in combination with one OAD (oral antidiabetic drug) in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes.

Being tested
Semaglutide, Dulaglutide
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SemaglutideDrug

    Oral administration once-daily, as add-on to pre-trial oral antidiabetic drug (OAD).

  • DulaglutideDrug

    Subcutaneously administration (s.c., under the skin) once-weekly, as add-on to pre-trial oral antidiabetic drug (OAD).

Study groups in NCT03015220
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Oral semaglutide 3 mgExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Semaglutide
Oral semaglutide 7 mgExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Semaglutide
Oral semaglutide 14 mgExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Semaglutide
Dulaglutide 0.75 mgActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Dulaglutide

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded from week 0 to week 57 (52-week treatment period plus the 5-week follow-up period). Adverse events (AEs) with onset during the on-treatment observation period were considered treatment-emergent. On-treatment observation period: Time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

    Measured: Weeks 0-57

Secondary outcomes (32)
  1. Change in HbA1c

    Change from baseline (week 0) in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was evaluated at weeks 26 and 52. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

    Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 52

  2. Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose

    Change from baseline (week 0) in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was evaluated at weeks 26 and 52. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

    Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 52

  3. Change in Self-measured Plasma Glucose 7-point Profile (SMPG) - Mean 7-point Profile

    Change from baseline (week 0) in mean 7-point SMPG profile was evaluated at weeks 26 and 52. SMPG was recorded at the following 7 time points: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after dinner and at bedtime. Mean 7-point profile was defined as the area under the profile, calculated using the trapezoidal method, divided by the measurement time. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

    Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 52

  4. Change in Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) - Mean Postprandial Increment Over All Meals

    Change from baseline (week 0) in the average of the post-prandial increments over all meals was evaluated at weeks 26 and 52. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

    Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 52

  5. Change in Body Weight (kg)

    Change from baseline (week 0) in body weight was evaluated at weeks 26 and 52. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

    Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 52

  6. Change in Body Weight (%)

    Relative change from baseline (week 0) in body weight (kg) was evaluated at weeks 26 and 52. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

    Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 52

  7. Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)

    Change from baseline (week 0) in BMI was evaluated at weeks 26 and 52. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

    Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 52

  8. Change in Waist Circumference

    Change from baseline (week 0) in waist circumference was evaluated at weeks 26 and 52. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

    Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 52

  9. Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)

    Change from baseline (week 0) in fasting total cholesterol (mmol/L) at weeks 26 and 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

    Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 52

  10. Change in Fasting Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) - Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)

    Change from baseline (week 0) in fasting low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (mmol/L) at weeks 26 and 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

    Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 52

  11. Change in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) - Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)

    Change from baseline (week 0) in fasting high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (mmol/L) at weeks 26 and 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

    Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 52

  12. Change in Fasting Very-low Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) - Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)

    Change from baseline (week 0) in fasting very-low density lipoprotein (VLDL) (mmol/L) at weeks 26 and 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

    Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 52

  13. Change in Fasting Triglyceride (Ratio to Baseline)

    Change from baseline (week 0) in fasting triglycerides (mmol/L) at weeks 26 and 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

    Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 52

  14. Participants Who Achieve HbA1c Below 7% (53 mmol/Mol), American Diabetes Association Target (Yes/No)

    Participants who achieved HbA1c below 7.0% (53 millimoles per mole [mmol/mol]) according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) target (yes/no) at weeks 26 and 52 are presented. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

    Measured: Week 26, week 52

  15. Participants Who Achieve HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Target (Yes/No)

    Participants who achieved HbA1c below or equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/mol), American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) target (yes/no) at weeks 26 and 52 are presented. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

    Measured: Week 26, week 52

  16. Participants Who Achieve HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/No)

    Participants who achieved HbA1c below 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without severe or blood glucose (BG) confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia episodes and without weight gain (yes/no) at weeks 26 and 52 are presented. Severe hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate or glucagon, or take other corrective actions. BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode with plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

    Measured: Week 26, week 52

  17. Participants Who Achieve HbA1c Reduction More Than or Equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss More Than or Equal to 3% (Yes/No)

    Participants who achieved HbA1c reduction more than or equal to 1% (10.9 mmol/mol) and weight loss more than or equal to 3% (yes/no) at weeks 26 and 52 are presented. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

    Measured: Week 26, week 52

  18. Participants Who Achieve Weight Loss More Than or Equal to 5% (Yes/No).

    Participants who achieved weight loss more than or equal to 5% (yes/no) at weeks 26 and 52 are presented. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

    Measured: Week 26, week 52

  19. Participants Who Achieve Weight Loss More Than or Equal to 10% (Yes/No)

    Participants who achieved weight loss more than or equal to 10% (yes/no) at weeks 26 and 52 are presented. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

    Measured: Week 26, week 52

  20. Time to Additional Anti-diabetic Medication

    Presented results are the number of participants who had taken additional anti-diabetic medication anytime during the periods, from week 0 to week 26 and week 0 to week 52. Additional anti-diabetic medication was defined as any new anti-diabetic medication used for more than 21 days with the initiation at or after randomisation (week 0) and before (planned) end-of-treatment, and/or intensification of anti-diabetic medication (a more than 20% increase in dose relative to baseline) for more than 21 days with the intensification at or after randomisation and before (planned) end-of-treatment. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

    Measured: Weeks 0-52

  21. Time to Rescue Medication

    Presented results are the number of participants who had taken rescue medication anytime during the periods, from week 0 to week 26 and week 0 to week 52. Rescue medication was defined as any new anti-diabetic medication used as add-on to trial product and used for more than 21 days with the initiation at or after randomisation (week 0) and before last day on trial product, and/or intensification of anti-diabetic medication (a more than 20% increase in dose relative to baseline) for more than 21 days with the intensification at or after randomisation and before last day on trial product. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period, which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation.

    Measured: Weeks 0-52

  22. Change in Amylase (Ratio to Baseline)

    Change from baseline (week 0) in amylase (measured as units per liter [U/L]) at weeks 26 and 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

    Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 52

  23. Change in Lipase (Ratio to Baseline)

    Change from baseline (week 0) in lipase (measured as U/L) at weeks 26 and 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

    Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 52

  24. Change in Pulse Rate

    Change from baseline (week 0) in pulse rate was evaluated at weeks 26 and 52. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

    Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 52

  25. Change in Blood Pressure

    Change from baseline (week 0) in blood pressure (systolic blood pressure [SBP] and diastolic blood pressure [DBP]) was evaluated at weeks 26 and 52. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

    Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 52

  26. Change in ECG Evaluation

    Change from baseline (week 0) in electrocardiogram (ECG) was evaluated at weeks 26 and 52. Change from baseline results are presented as shift in findings (normal, abnormal and not clinically significant (NCS) and abnormal and clinically significant (CS)) from week 0 to week 26 and 52. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

    Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 52

  27. Change in Physical Examination

    Participants with physical examination findings, normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS at baseline (weeks -2), week 26 and weeks 52 are presented. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Results are presented for the following examinations: 1) Cardiovascular system; 2) Central and peripheral nervous system; 3) Gastrointestinal system, incl. mouth; 4) General appearance; 5) Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck; 6) Lymph node palpation; 7) Musculoskeletal system; 8) Respiratory system; 9) Skin; 10) Thyroid gland.

    Measured: Week -2, week 26, week 52

  28. Change in Eye Examination Category

    Participants with eye examination (fundoscopy) findings, normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS at baseline (week -2) and week 52 are presented. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product.

    Measured: Week -2, week 52

  29. Number of Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes

    Treatment emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were recorded during weeks 0-57 (52-week treatment period plus the 5-week follow-up period). Hypoglycaemic episodes with onset during the on-treatment observation period were considered treatment-emergent. On-treatment observation period was defined as the time period when a subject was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Severe hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate or glucagon, or take other corrective actions. BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia: Confirmed by a glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia.

    Measured: Weeks 0-57

  30. Participants With Treatment-emergent Severe or BG-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes

    Participants with treatment emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were recorded from week 0 to week 83 (78-week treatment period plus the 5-week follow-up period). Hypoglycaemic episodes with onset during the on-treatment observation period were considered treatment-emergent. On-treatment observation period was defined as the time period when a subject was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Severe hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate or glucagon, or take other corrective actions. BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia: Confirmed by a glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia.

    Measured: Weeks 0-57

  31. Change in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey Scores: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)

    SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the participant's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SF-36v2™ (acute version) questionnaire measured eight domains of functional health and well-being as well as two component summary scores (physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS)). The 0-100 scale scores (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. In the metric of norm-based scores, 50 and 10 corresponds to the mean and standard deviation respectively of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline (week 0) in the domain scores and component summary (PCS and MCS) scores were evaluated at weeks 26 and 52. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period.

    Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 52

  32. Diabetes Therapy-Related Quality of Life (DTR-QoL): Total Score and Scores for the 4 Domains

    DTR-QoL questionnaire is a 29-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the influence of diabetes treatment on health related-QoL on 4 domains on individual scale ranges: "Burden on social activities and daily activities", "Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment", "Hypoglycemia" and "Satisfaction with treatment" on a 7-point graded response scale. The domain score is calculated from the mean score of the attribute items, and the scoring range is converted to 0 - 100 (best-case response = 100; worst case response = 0). The total score, after simple addition of the item scores, is converted to 0 - 100 (best-case response = 100; worst case response = 0). Change from baseline (week 0) in the scores were evaluated at week 26, week 52. Data based on in-trial observation period is presented. W26 and W52 refer to week 26 and week 52 respectively.

    Measured: week 0, week 26, week 52

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jan 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study start10 Jan 2017
  3. Primary completion12 Jul 2018
  4. Study completion12 Jul 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
458 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03015220
Sponsor's protocol ID
NN9924-4282
Other IDs
U1111-1181-4133, JapicCTI-173485
Acronym
PIONEER 10
Status last verified
Feb 2021
First submitted
6 Jan 2017
Last updated
2 Mar 2021
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: According to the Novo Nordisk disclosure commitent on novonordisk-trials.com

Publications

  • Ishii H, Hansen BB, Langer J, Horio H. Effect of Orally Administered Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide on Diabetes-Related Quality of Life in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: The PIONEER 10 Randomized, Active-Controlled Trial. Diabetes Ther. 2021 Feb;12(2):613-623. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00985-w. Epub 2021 Jan 18.

    PubMed 33460016
  • Yabe D, Nakamura J, Kaneto H, Deenadayalan S, Navarria A, Gislum M, Inagaki N; PIONEER 10 Investigators. Safety and efficacy of oral semaglutide versus dulaglutide in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (PIONEER 10): an open-label, randomised, active-controlled, phase 3a trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020 May;8(5):392-406. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30074-7.

    PubMed 32333876
  • Husain M, Bain SC, Holst AG, Mark T, Rasmussen S, Lingvay I. Effects of semaglutide on risk of cardiovascular events across a continuum of cardiovascular risk: combined post hoc analysis of the SUSTAIN and PIONEER trials. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Sep 30;19(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01106-4.

    PubMed 32998732
  • Thethi TK, Pratley R, Meier JJ. Efficacy, safety and cardiovascular outcomes of once-daily oral semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: The PIONEER programme. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Aug;22(8):1263-1277. doi: 10.1111/dom.14054. Epub 2020 May 13.

    PubMed 32267058
  • Husain M, Bain SC, Jeppesen OK, Lingvay I, Sorrig R, Treppendahl MB, Vilsboll T. Semaglutide (SUSTAIN and PIONEER) reduces cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes across varying cardiovascular risk. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Mar;22(3):442-451. doi: 10.1111/dom.13955. Epub 2020 Feb 5.

    PubMed 31903692

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Semaglutide and Dulaglutide in people with Diabetes and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Novo Nordisk A/S at 34 sites in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 34 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Dec 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (time frame: Weeks 0-57). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03015220, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Mar 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in